Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

The Mosquito-Borne Disease ‘Triple E’ Is Spreading in the US as Temperatures Rise

News Feed
Saturday, September 7, 2024

This story originally appeared on Grist and is part of the Climate Desk collaboration.A 41-year-old man in New Hampshire died last week after contracting a rare mosquito-borne illness called eastern equine encephalitis virus, also known as EEE or “triple E.” It was New Hampshire’s first human case of the disease in a decade. Four other human EEE infections have been reported this year, in Wisconsin, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont.Though this outbreak is small, and triple E does not pose a risk to most people living in the United States, public health officials and researchers are concerned about the threat the deadly virus poses to the public, both this year and in future summers. There is no known cure for the disease, which can cause severe flu-like symptoms and seizures in humans four to 10 days after exposure and kills between 30 and 40 percent of the people it infects. Half of the people who survive a triple E infection are left with permanent neurological damage. Because of EEE’s high mortality rate, state officials have begun spraying insecticide in Massachusetts, where 10 communities have been designated “critical” or “high risk” for triple E. Towns in the state shuttered their parks from dusk to dawn and warned people to stay inside after 6 pm, when mosquitoes are most active.Like West Nile virus, another mosquito-borne illness that poses a risk to people in the US every summer, triple E is constrained by environmental factors that are changing rapidly as the planet warms. That’s because mosquitoes thrive in the hotter, wetter conditions that climate change is producing.“We have seen a resurgence of activity with eastern equine encephalitis virus over the course of the past 10 or so years,” said Theodore G. Andreadis, a researcher who studied mosquito-borne diseases at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, a state government research and public outreach outfit, for 35 years. “And we’ve seen an advancement into more northern regions where it had previously not been detected.” Researchers don’t know what causes the virus to surge and abate, but Andreadis said it’s clear that climate change is one of the factors spurring its spread, particularly into new regions.The first triple E outbreak on record occurred in Massachusetts in the 1830s in horses—the reason one of the three Es stands for “equine.” It wasn’t until a full century later, in 1934, that mosquitoes were incriminated as potential vectors for the disease. The first recorded human cases of the disease also occurred in Massachusetts four years later, in 1938. There were 38 human cases in the state that year; 25 of them were fatal. Since then, human cases have mostly been registered in Gulf Coast states and, increasingly, the Northeast. From 1964 to 2002, in the Northeast, there was less than one case of the disease per year. From 2003 to 2019, the average in the region increased to between four and five cases per year.

Eastern equine encephalitis, which has a high mortality rate, is becoming more common in North America as climate changes expands the habitats of insects.

This story originally appeared on Grist and is part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

A 41-year-old man in New Hampshire died last week after contracting a rare mosquito-borne illness called eastern equine encephalitis virus, also known as EEE or “triple E.” It was New Hampshire’s first human case of the disease in a decade. Four other human EEE infections have been reported this year, in Wisconsin, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont.

Though this outbreak is small, and triple E does not pose a risk to most people living in the United States, public health officials and researchers are concerned about the threat the deadly virus poses to the public, both this year and in future summers. There is no known cure for the disease, which can cause severe flu-like symptoms and seizures in humans four to 10 days after exposure and kills between 30 and 40 percent of the people it infects. Half of the people who survive a triple E infection are left with permanent neurological damage. Because of EEE’s high mortality rate, state officials have begun spraying insecticide in Massachusetts, where 10 communities have been designated “critical” or “high risk” for triple E. Towns in the state shuttered their parks from dusk to dawn and warned people to stay inside after 6 pm, when mosquitoes are most active.

Like West Nile virus, another mosquito-borne illness that poses a risk to people in the US every summer, triple E is constrained by environmental factors that are changing rapidly as the planet warms. That’s because mosquitoes thrive in the hotter, wetter conditions that climate change is producing.

“We have seen a resurgence of activity with eastern equine encephalitis virus over the course of the past 10 or so years,” said Theodore G. Andreadis, a researcher who studied mosquito-borne diseases at the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, a state government research and public outreach outfit, for 35 years. “And we’ve seen an advancement into more northern regions where it had previously not been detected.” Researchers don’t know what causes the virus to surge and abate, but Andreadis said it’s clear that climate change is one of the factors spurring its spread, particularly into new regions.

The first triple E outbreak on record occurred in Massachusetts in the 1830s in horses—the reason one of the three Es stands for “equine.” It wasn’t until a full century later, in 1934, that mosquitoes were incriminated as potential vectors for the disease. The first recorded human cases of the disease also occurred in Massachusetts four years later, in 1938. There were 38 human cases in the state that year; 25 of them were fatal. Since then, human cases have mostly been registered in Gulf Coast states and, increasingly, the Northeast. From 1964 to 2002, in the Northeast, there was less than one case of the disease per year. From 2003 to 2019, the average in the region increased to between four and five cases per year.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Here’s why Europe’s had disastrous flooding

Read more

An extreme storm named Boris slammed central Europe over the weekend with record rainfall, deadly flooding and up to 10 feet of mountain snow. At least 12 people have died — six in Romania, two in Poland, three in Austria and one in the Czech Republic — since the rains began Friday, according to officials.The storm — which unleashed several months’ worth of rain in just a few days — was spawned by a rare combination of meteorological factors, starting with an unusually powerful outbreak of cold air in western Europe that clashed with exceptionally warm weather to the east. Human-caused climate change probably intensified the ensuing deluge by warming the air and the water that fed into the storm.How did the storm come together?The beginnings of Boris came as a large dip in the jet stream plunged Arctic air southward into Europe. Several stations in Austria saw record cold for the time of year as temperatures remained below 50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius) for three days, while Hochfilzen in western Austria recorded its lowest September high temperature of 33 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius). Switzerland, Italy and Germany also saw historic cold.The cold-air outbreak has a connection to usual warmth and unusually high pressure in the polar stratosphere, according to Judah Cohen, a long-range forecaster at Verisk Atmospheric and Environmental Research.As the Arctic air swept southward through western and Central Europe, it clashed with unusually warm, moist air to the east and south. Numerous heat records were set in Russia, with temperatures soaring into the low 80s (upper 20s Celsius) according to weather historian Maximiliano Herrera. Moscow set a record for its hottest September night when the temperature only dropped to 67 degrees (19.2 Celsius).Follow Climate & environmentLow pressure forming near the intersection of the clashing cold and warm air masses then became cut off from the jet stream and trapped by areas of high pressure to its west and east. That caused the storm to stall over central Europe, allowing it to draw moisture-filled air from a historically warm Mediterranean Sea, which in August recorded its warmest average sea surface temperature for any month on record.The moisture surging north and west from the Mediterranean was — in many cases — forced up mountain slopes. The rising air helped to squeeze out even more rainfall as it cooled and condensed out moisture, intensifying the downpours on the steep terrain and adjacent valleys.Humidity that reached record levels across the planet this summer may have contributed to the heavy rainfall as well. Scientists say that warm air brought about by climate change is prone to holding more moisture and producing more intense rainfall. The nonprofit Climate Central says the atmosphere holds 4 percent more moisture for every one degree Fahrenheit of climate warming, which “supercharges” the water cycle.How much rain and snow fell?The result was repeated rounds of heavy rain over the same locations, triggering catastrophic flooding in the Czech Republic, Austria and Romania. The storm also dumped historic amounts of snow in the Alps. Some rain and snow totals included:Jesenik, Czech Republic, received 14.2 inches (460 millimeters) in four days, as much as would typically fall in about six months. 18.3 inches (464 millimeters) fell in nearby Serak.St. Polten, Austria, received 14.2 inches (361 millimeters) in four days, exceeding the total rainfall for the previous wettest autumn (September through November) on record, and making September the city’s wettest month in 130 years.In Austria, Lilenfeld and Tulin recorded four-day record rainfalls of 14.6 and 14.1 inches (371 and 358 millimeters), respectively.Parts of Poland saw two-thirds of its average annual rainfall in three days.Bratislava, Koliba, Slovakia, recorded 9.9 inches (251 millimeters), making September the wettest month since at least 1961.Up to 10 feet of snow fell in the Austrian Alps, where some locations reported their first September snow on record. Heavy snow also fell in the Swiss Alps.How has the storm impacted central Europe?Six deaths in Romania were in Galati County, Dan Cristian Ionascu, a spokesperson for the Galati Emergency Situations Inspectorate, told The Washington Post in a text message Monday. One person was missing, Ionascu added.After visiting Pechea in Galati County, Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu said that more than 5,000 homes were affected by the floods. “Nothing can ease the suffering of the people of Pechea,” Ciolacu wrote on Facebook.Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, who said Saturday that almost everywhere in the country had been affected by heavy rainfall or snowfall, said Sunday afternoon that the “situation remains serious.”Thousands of firefighters and emergency workers have been deployed to tackle the floods, he said, and schools were closed Monday. Campaigning for the Sept. 29 legislative election was also paused Sunday.“All our energy and attention is focused on disaster management and helping those affected by the storms,” Nehammer wrote on X.Austrian public broadcaster ORF reported Monday that two men age 70 and 80 had died in the floodwaters in their homes in the Lower Austria villages of Untergrafendorf and Höbersdorf, respectively. A firefighter also died over the weekend after “slipping on stairs” while pumping out a flooded basement in the Austrian town of Tulln.Infrastructure Minister Dariusz Klimczak confirmed on Polish broadcaster TVN24 that two people had died in the floods: one in the rural municipality of Kłodzko, southwestern Poland, and a second in the south.Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote on X on Sunday that he had issued a disaster declaration, a step toward requesting European Union aid.On Monday afternoon, the Polish government also announced a state of natural disaster for 30 days across several flood-affected areas.In the Czech Republic, Prime Minister Petr Fiala spoke of a “once-in-a-century flood.” One person drowned in the Krasovka River in the Czech district of Bruntal, police confirmed Monday. At least seven people were missing.What’s happening with the storm now?By Monday, the severe rainfall showed little signs of easing. In the state of Upper Austria, emergency services said that new, intense rainfall was causing water levels to rise again. “We are currently monitoring the situation and waiting for a possible second wave,” Markus Voglhuber, spokesman for the state fire brigade command, told Austria’s ORF. Authorities in the state of Lower Austria warned of a high risk of dams breaking.Flood advisories remained in place across the whole of the Czech Republic and parts of Slovakia as of Monday morning, according to Meteoalarm, a weather tool created by the European Network of National Meteorological Services.Jason Samenow contributed to this report.

Anthrax in Zimbabwe: Caused by Oppression, Worsened by Climate Change

First used as a bioweapon four decades ago, anthrax outbreaks continue to worsen as the country gets warmer and wetter. The post Anthrax in Zimbabwe: Caused by Oppression, Worsened by Climate Change appeared first on The Revelator.

A herd of emaciated cows crowd for water at a small dam in the Zimunya area about 50 kilometres (31 miles) south of Zimbabwe’s eastern border city of Mutare. On the other side of the small dam, a group of children excitedly fetch water, mostly for nondrinking or cooking uses. In this part of the country, water became scarce this year as an El Niño-induced drought — the worst in more than 40 years — ravaged the region. The drought has left nearly 10 million people food insecure. Livestock and people now compete for limited water in many rural areas of Zimbabwe. At the same time, livestock diseases are killing the few cattle that have survived the current and previous droughts. The mix of severe droughts and devastating diseases are making both livestock and rain-fed crop farming in Zimbabwe increasingly untenable. And farmers are worried; summer seasons are becoming shorter — in some cases accompanied by violent storms and heavy flooding. “We don’t even know how to save our cattle,” says Leonard Madanhire, a small-scale livestock and crop farmer in Zimunya. “The cattle might survive the drought, but we are not sure whether they will survive the diseases like anthrax and theileriosis. Most of our livestock are now too frail to fight diseases.” Anthrax, a disease that affects wild animals, livestock, and humans, is caused by spore-forming bacteria called Bacillus anthracis. Theileriosis, also known as January disease, is a cattle disease transmitted by ticks. Anthrax is of particular worry. Early this year several districts in Zimbabwe were hit by an anthrax outbreak that caused a documented 513 human infections, countless livestock infections, and 36 livestock deaths. To contain this year’s outbreak, the Zimbabwe government imported 426,000 anthrax vaccine doses — 25% of what it initially said it needed — from Botswana. The medicines were deployed in hotspots like Chipinge, Gokwe North and South, Mazowe, Makonde, and Hurungwe. The government also said it carried out public-awareness campaigns about anthrax risks “to ensure that people are well-protected,” according to statements in The Herald, a state-owned newspaper. Education on the risks is important: People can be infected by anthrax through breathing in spores, eating food and drinking water contaminated with spores, or getting spores in a cut in the skin. Flu-like symptoms such as sore throat, mild fever, fatigue, and muscle aches are common. Other symptoms include mild chest discomfort, shortness of breath, nausea, coughing up blood, painful swallowing, high fever, and trouble breathing. Animals infected by anthrax may stagger, have difficulty breathing, tremble, and finally collapse and die within a few hours, according to experts. Eddie Cross, a livestock expert in Zimbabwe, says anthrax poses a serious threat to humans and livestock in Africa. Anthrax “can survive in the ground for many years and then be activated by appropriate conditions,” says Cross, who is also a former legislator and advisor to the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. “People eating meat from an infected animal run a risk of catching the infection themselves.” Modern Problems, Historic Cause Though some experts say the current anthrax outbreaks in Zimbabwe have been exacerbated by climate change, outbreaks can be traced back to the time of Zimbabwe’s protracted war of liberation that ended in 1979. At the height of the war, when the country was still known as Rhodesia, the brutal colonial regime of the late Prime Minister Ian Smith reportedly used anthrax as a biological weapon. Experts say this resulted in the largest global human anthrax outbreak, which occurred in Zimbabwe between 1978 and 1980. More than 10,700 cases of human anthrax and 200 deaths were recorded during that time. Since the late 1970s and early 1980s, the disease has become endemic in Zimbabwe. Victor Matemadanda — a veteran of the 1970s liberation war and secretary general of the Zimbabwe National Liberation War Association — confirmed to me that many of his colleagues died from suspected anthrax infections. The association is a grouping of former freedom fighters, also known as guerrillas or comrades, who served during the country’s war of liberation (also known as the Rhodesian Bush War). The war culminated in the end of minority white rule and Zimbabwe attaining independence in 1980. “Many freedom fighters died, I can confirm that,” says Matemadanda, who is also Zimbabwe’s ambassador to Mozambique. “But back then we were not sure whether it was anthrax or not because there was no scientific research to confirm that. But the signs and symptoms showed it was anthrax.” Unfortunately, due to a lack of knowledge back then, many cases could not be confirmed as anthrax infections. Even some medical doctors were not familiar with anthrax symptoms in humans during that time. Little has changed. One 2016 study revealed that grossly unusual epidemiological features of the anthrax outbreaks in the late 1970s and early 1980s still have not been definitively explained. However, the authors, from the University of Nevada–Reno, widely agree with a hypothesis proposed by Meryl Nass, an American physician living in Zimbabwe at the time of the outbreaks who suggested that the anthrax epidemic was propagated intentionally. “Nass emphasized the unusual features of the epidemic: large numbers of cases, geographic extent and involvement of areas that had never reported anthrax before, lack of involvement of neighbouring countries, specific involvement of the Tribal Trust Lands versus European-owned agricultural land, and coincidence with an ongoing civil war,” the study notes. Witness testimony from some people who lived on Tribal Trust Land — areas reserved for Indigenous Black people during the colonial era — revealed a belief that “poisoning” by anthrax occurred during the war, according to the study. The researchers cited other authors who provided testimony of deliberate anthrax releases during the war by Rhodesian soldiers with support from South African forces. And they say that these activities were part of apartheid South Africa’s biological weapons program, code-named Project Coast. During the war Rhodesia was under United Nations economic sanctions and was isolated from the rest of the world, although it maintained a close relationship with apartheid South Africa. Through South Africa, Rhodesia Prime Minister Smith managed to bust the U.N. sanctions to fund the war, which lasted for more than a decade. A New Threat Rises Today experts fear that anthrax outbreaks in Zimbabwe will become worse due to climate change, which is making some parts of the country warmer and wetter. Les Baillie, a professor of microbiology at Cardiff University’s School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences in the United Kingdom, tells me that outbreaks of anthrax regularly occur in Zimbabwe and that there have been several outbreaks across Africa since last year. Baillie shared a report on anthrax he recently wrote with Alexandra Cusmano, another expert from the school, which suggests that climate change may have worsened the anthrax problem in Africa. Oddly enough, the evidence for their hypothesis comes from a 2016 anthrax outbreak in reindeer in northern Russia. There, anthrax killed thousands of animals and affected dozens of humans on the Yamal peninsula, in Northwest Siberia. Experts, the report adds, identified two primary factors as contributing to this outbreak: a summer heat wave that caused the permafrost to melt, releasing “trapped spores,” and the cancellation of the reindeer vaccination program in 2007, which led to an increase in population susceptibility. Baillie and Cusmano conclude that: “Outbreaks of anthrax in endemic regions of the world are not unusual. We are likely to see more cases due to a combination of climate change and socio-economic factors, such as food poverty and lack of access to effective veterinary services.” Another study, published in the journal BMC Public Health this year, modeled the future of anthrax outbreaks in Zimbabwe under climate change. The researchers found that the country’s eastern and western districts will face the greatest threats. These districts are home to thousands of small-scale farmers who depend mostly on livestock and crop farming. The study calls for disease surveillance systems, public-awareness campaigns, and targeted vaccinations, among other control measures. One of several models for anthrax spread in Zimbabwe. Photo: BMC Public Health Cross, the Zimbabwe livestock expert, agrees, and says the government should make sure that farmers are aware of the dangers of coming across the carcass of a cow who has died from unrecognized causes. Anthrax infections in humans are mostly by exposure to contaminated animals or their meat. “[Farmers] should be extremely careful in the way they approach the carcass and, if possible, they should arrange it to be burned, which is the only real way of ending the infections,” Cross says.  Meanwhile, the government says plans are underway to produce enough anthrax vaccines locally starting next year, which could help to eradicate the disease. But the collapse of Zimbabwe’s economy may complicate the fight against livestock and human diseases. Political and economic crises that unfolded following the country’s controversial land-reform program — which started in 2000 — resulted in negative growth rates, skyrocketing inflation, decline in the rule of law, and a disintegration of markets, according to experts. At the same time, the country has become isolated on the international stage due to its frequent human-rights violations. Time will tell whether Zimbabwe can succeed in eradicating anthrax. But for now the legacy of this wartime bioweapon continues to haunt the country, more than four decades after it was unleashed. Scroll down to find our “Republish” button Previously in The Revelator: 5 Ways Environmental Damage Drives Human Diseases Like COVID-19 The post Anthrax in Zimbabwe: Caused by Oppression, Worsened by Climate Change appeared first on The Revelator.

‘Bulldoze your way through’: Anthony Albanese compared to Scott Morrison in climate trigger stoush

Sarah Hanson-Young says PM needs to negotiate with senators after he appeared to rule out adding a climate trigger to proposed environmental lawsFollow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastAnthony Albanese has been rebuked by the Senate crossbench for all but ruling out a climate trigger in environment legislation, with his take-it-or-leave-it stance compared to Scott Morrison’s description of himself as a “bulldozer”.On Monday the independent senator David Pocock labelled the prime minister’s position “really disappointing” while the Greens’ environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, warned the PM it is “not leadership to bulldoze your way through”.Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email Continue reading...

Anthony Albanese has been rebuked by the Senate crossbench for all but ruling out a climate trigger in environment legislation, with his take-it-or-leave-it stance compared to Scott Morrison’s description of himself as a “bulldozer”.On Monday the independent senator David Pocock labelled the prime minister’s position “really disappointing” while the Greens’ environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, warned the PM it is “not leadership to bulldoze your way through”.The environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, has been talking to the Greens, crossbenchers and the Coalition about legislation to establish an environment protection authority, which was a Labor commitment at the 2022 election.On Monday, Albanese was asked about a key Greens demand for a climate trigger, which would add climate to Australia’s list of nine protected matters.Albanese told reporters in Canberra that “the Greens political party have never seen any piece of legislation they’re not confused by, any piece of legislation they don’t bring up things [as] a distraction in order to justify voting against it”.“They should vote for the nature-positive legislation as it stands.“With regard to a climate trigger and other things that they’re raising, I’ve made it clear … just a couple of weeks ago that I don’t support adding a trigger to that legislation.”Albanese said that climate issues “are dealt with through the safeguard mechanism”, a policy to limit emissions of large industrial emitters which passed with Greens support, and the 43% emissions reduction target.“The Greens and the Coalition increasingly are combining to vote against good legislation … they need to get out of the way and stop coming up with excuses and start voting for solutions.”Albanese’s comments appear to contradict suggestions from Plibersek that the government could consider the climate before projects are approved, although some interpreted her remarks to the Minerals Council last week as an attempt to put pressure on the Coalition to cut a deal instead.Last week the Greens wrote to Albanese and Plibersek suggesting the minor party could settle for – if not a climate trigger – then at least climate impacts as criteria to be considered before projects are approved under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.Albanese was less definitive when asked about that option on Monday, although he labelled both Coalition claims and Greens demands “nonsense”.Hanson-Young said it was not good enough to demand the crossbench “get out of the way” because “this parliament doesn’t operate like that”.“We’re a democracy. The government does not have the numbers in the Senate. The government needs to negotiate and to work collaboratively to get outcomes. It is not leadership to bulldoze your way through.”“Our previous prime minister was a bulldozer, let’s not forget, that didn’t end so well,” she said, invoking Morrison’s ill-fated bulldozer metaphor in the dying days of his government promising a different approach if re-elected in May 2022.Crossbenchers including the Greens, Lidia Thorpe and Pocock are seeking amendments to strengthen the EPA’s independence and to protect native forests by ending the exemption from Australia’s environment laws for logging covered by a regional forest agreement.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Breaking News AustraliaGet the most important news as it breaksPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionEarlier, Pocock noted that Albanese in 2005 “moved his own bill to ensure that the EPBC Act considers climate”.“He’s known about this being a huge issue since the year I finished high school. To be in this place in 2024 and see what’s happening when it comes to our climate and biodiversity in Australia, the nature that Australians love and cherish, and have him taking these lines is pretty disappointing.“There’s a lot of people out there who are wondering why there is such a lack of leadership, vision and courage when it comes to protecting the people and places [that we love].”In 2005 Albanese introduced a bill calling for a climate trigger in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, accusing the Howard government of “procrastinating on a climate change trigger since 1999”. Hanson-Young described a climate trigger as “his own policy”.The former Labor senator turned independent Fatima Payman said she has been speaking to stakeholders on both sides and wants to balance more environmental protection with the importance of job creation.Payman said Albanese has “still not given me my full staffing allocation” making it “really difficult” to get on top of critical legislation, implicitly linking her support to granting her more staff.On Wednesday Peter Dutton told the Minerals Council the Coalition is negotiating in good faith on environmental laws.“I don’t believe that the Greens and the government can arrive at a position that wouldn’t destroy the Labor party in Western Australia,” Dutton said. “And I don’t think the prime minister is going to take that risk is my political judgment.”

How Hunting Season Became a European Political Issue

This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. The forest was unnaturally still when Soňa Chovanová Supeková first picked up the bear’s scent. It was roe deer rutting season in southern Slovakia, and the hills below the Carpathian mountains were busy with tourists biking and foraging for mushrooms. Fellow […]

This story was originally published by the Guardian and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. The forest was unnaturally still when Soňa Chovanová Supeková first picked up the bear’s scent. It was roe deer rutting season in southern Slovakia, and the hills below the Carpathian mountains were busy with tourists biking and foraging for mushrooms. Fellow hunters who had come face to face with bears had told Supeková the fear had been so great they could not lift their rifles. Sitting with her father, a hunter in his 80s who had killed a few bears, she found herself in a similar state of dread—she was out on that trip expecting to kill deer, and did not want to come on a bear unexpectedly. “Fear permeated me…the smell penetrated to the tip of my bones,” says Supeková, the founder of the Club of Slovak Lady Hunters. But the bear never appeared. The next morning, the daughter and father hunting duo saw its droppings. “We breathed a sigh of relief only in the car.” Europe’s brown bears are a protected species. But they—alongside wolves and lynxes—are increasingly crossing paths with farmers, forestry officials, and hunters such as Supeková. The appetite for killing big carnivores has shot up as wolf and bear populations have grown, several bear attacks have made headlines, and politicians have taken aim at laws that brought back them back from the brink of extinction. Sweden has issued permits to kill 486 of its brown bears, about 20 percent, this hunting season, which runs until mid-October. In 2023, the country conducted record-breaking culls of lynxes and wolves. Romania’s MPs voted in July to double its hunting quota from 220 brown bears to 481. In Slovakia, where a bear was recently filmed rampaging through a village, lawmakers voted in June to allow hunting near villages under certain conditions. In July, the European court of justice ruled that recent wolf culls in Austria and Spain were unlawful. Earlier in the year, Switzerland also faced legal challenges for its proposal to kill 70 percent of its wolf population. The debate around shooting protected species has provoked such fury among farmers, hunters, and conservationists that it has bubbled up to the highest levels of bureaucrats in Brussels. The European Commission, whose president, Ursula von der Leyen, had a pony killed by a wolf two years ago, is seeking to downgrade the animal’s protection status. “The wolf is no longer an animal with two ears, four legs and one tail; it is a political subject,” says Luigi Boitani, a zoologist at the Sapienza University of Rome and chairman of the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe, a conservation group. “There’s a lot of polarization. When you speak about wolves and bears, the world is not a variety of greys, it’s black or white.” Wolves were killed off across much of Europe in the 19th and 20th century, but began to bounce back in the 1970s as people moved from villages to cities, and governments later protected the animals and their habitats. A similar shift happened with brown bears and lynxes, with conservationists resettling them in regions from which they had been wiped out. “This issue is an incendiary force in the hands of populists.” The continent is now home to six species of large carnivore, and the EU bans killing them, with some exceptions—for example if they pose a danger to the public. Perched at the top of their food chain, the animals help ecosystems thrive by regulating prey populations. There is also some evidence they can limit the spread of disease. But the scale and speed of their return—there are thought to be more than 20,000 wolves and 17,000 bears in Europe—has increasingly led to conflicts with humans. Farmer and hunting lobbies have pushed to reduce the number of hurdles needed to kill them as the animals have expanded their territory and attacked people and livestock. A week after Supeková found the bear’s tracks in the forest, she says: “A farmer’s son met a bear on a forest road when he was mushroom picking in a place only about 2 kilometers away. Luckily, the bear ran away.” Footage of a bear barreling down the streets of a small Slovakian town captured international attention in March, with five injured in the attack. So too did the death of a Belarusian hiker who died when fleeing from a bear the day before. The attacks prompted a change in law to let Slovak security services shoot brown bears that come within half a kilometer of a human settlement. A few months later in Romania, the death of a 19-year-old hiker at the hands of a bear led to the prime minister calling lawmakers back from their summer break for an emergency session in which they voted to cull more bears. People from villages and the countryside want to reduce the numbers of bears because attacks are increasing, says Supeková. “What’s very tragic is that one bear in the town of Liptovský Mikuláš injured five people, running across the town where children were outside playing games.” The issue has become fodder for populist parties courting rural votes, with politicians blasting Brussels for putting their children at risk and abandoning villages out of elitist environmental concerns. Critics say the deaths are tragic but have been blown out of proportion. In Romania, which is home to the most brown bears in Europe, the animals killed 26 people and injured 276 over 20 years, according to the environment ministry. Data from Eurostat shows that motorized vehicles killed 45,000 people in the country in that time. Cultural associations are a problem for the wolf, which has long been portrayed as the villain of fairytales. Helmut Dammann-Tamke, president of the German hunting association and politician with the center-right Christian Democrats, says the threat of wolf attacks on sheep is “like something on a serving platter” for the far right because it reaches people on an emotional level. “This issue is an incendiary force in the hands of populists.” A 2022 study of German municipalities found that wolf attacks on livestock predict far-right support. After controlling for factors such as immigration and jobs, the researchers found wolf attacks were associated with far-right gains in municipal elections of between 1 and 2 percentage points. “The evidence points to wolf attacks as one potential driver of electoral radicalisation,” the authors wrote. Environmental activists question whether blanket policies to cull animals will do much to avoid conflicts with humans and have called for measures to promote peaceful coexistence that range from fences and guard dogs to awareness campaigns for visitors. Scientists are not yet troubled by the wolf’s population across the continent, but have warned that killing wolves in countries with small populations could prove catastrophic. Large-scale culls could put populations of these predators below local survival levels, they warn. Culls can even increase predation of livestock, as packs are disrupted, sending lone, vulnerable wolves venturing on to farms to hunt. The same “backfire” effect has also been documented with cougars and coyotes. Ciprian Gal from the Romanian branch of Greenpeace said the Europe-wide trend of weakening protection for big carnivores was “a step backwards” that echoed times when humans felt a strong sense of competition with wildlife. “European governments, influenced by dominant populist rhetoric and powerful hunting and agricultural lobbies, seem to be choosing solutions based on fear and rapid economic return,” he says. “In a way, this is a backlash against the ambitious green policies of recent years and a valve for those still struggling to cope with the climate reality we’re facing.”

‘There’s something in the air’: UK airport expansion gears up for takeoff

Lobbyists are increasingly confident about expansion plans as concerns for the economy start to deepenThe younger, tormented minister mulling his position before the Labour government granted Heathrow’s third runway in 2009 might have been greatly relieved to know that, 15 years later, not a shovel would have touched the ground.But now, returning to power with a revamped energy and climate brief, Ed Miliband again finds himself in a cabinet which, many in aviation hope, may usher in bigger airports and more flights – as well as enough CO2 emissions to outweigh any new solar farms. Continue reading...

The younger, tormented minister mulling his position before the Labour government granted Heathrow’s third runway in 2009 might have been greatly relieved to know that, 15 years later, not a shovel would have touched the ground.But now, returning to power with a revamped energy and climate brief, Ed Miliband again finds himself in a cabinet which, many in aviation hope, may usher in bigger airports and more flights – as well as enough CO2 emissions to outweigh any new solar farms.Despite emerging victorious in political and legal battles over its plans for a third runway, Heathrow has dropped down the airport expansion queue. Among London airports alone, City has just been granted permission to expand passenger numbers by 40%, while Luton and Gatwick await ministerial decisions on large developments that would add huge numbers of flights.Net zero may still be the government’s stated ambition, but the messages ringing louder in airport executives ears are those from the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, stressing growth and planning reforms to get Britain building infrastructure again – particularly the type not funded by the battered public purse. A pre-election interview in which Reeves underlined she had “nothing against expanding airport capacity … I back our airports” was noted.Planes land, taxi and unload at Heathrow airport. Photograph: Steve Parsons/PAGrowth doesn’t necessarily mean new runways. Airports’ passenger capacities are often limited in original planning conditions, which several hope to amend. Bigger planes and extended flight hours, as well as reconfigured buildings and more efficient operations, can all bring more customers through. Manchester and Birmingham are growing with terminal renovations, while a large extension to Stansted’s terminalfollows the airport’s legal victory in pushing its permitted capacity to 43 million passengers a year.Britain’s operators might not yet have the brass neck of Ireland’s Dublin airport which, its Ryanair-schooled CEO Kenny Jacobs announced last week, would simply be breaking its licensed 32m limit this year, and hadn’t checked the sanctions. “We’re in uncharted territory”, Jacobs said.But the operators would certainly echo his accompanying sentiments: that bigger airports mean trade, jobs and growth. Jacobs claimed that meeting the threshold, by turning away a million passengers in 2025, would lose Ireland €500m (£420m) in visitor spending and cost 1,000 jobs.Similar figures are bandied around in south-east England by Gatwick, which has rebranded an existing taxiway as a standby “northern runway” as it seeks permission for the kind of expansion ruled out last decade by the Airport Commission. Tim Norwood, Gatwick’s chief planning officer, said the runway plans “will be a major contributor to our airport’s long-term growth and will deliver a significant boost to the region, by generating 14,000 new jobs and £1bn for the economy every year”.Luton airport hopes to increase its passenger numbers from 19 million a year to 32 million. Photograph: Dominika Zarzycka/SOPA Images/REX/ShutterstockA planning inspector’s report will land on the transport secretary Louise Haigh’s desk in November, for a decision early in 2025. Before that, Haigh must rule on Luton’s masterplan to fly 32 million passengers a year, up from the current 19 million maximum, by adding a terminal and expanding into a neighbouring park.Paul Kehoe, chair of Luton Rising, the council-owned company that runs the airport, said the proposal would make “best use of the airport’s existing runway and assets and play a crucial role in stimulating regional economic growth by enhancing trade, attracting investment and boosting tourism – generating an additional £1.5bn in economic activity every year by the mid-2040s”. It would bring 11,000 jobs at the airport, he added.Will these applications succeed? According to one industry source, “The mood music is positive … There’s something in the air.” And not just another jet to the Balearics.Labour’s manifesto had none of the measures to curb aviation proposed by the Liberal Democrats or Greens, and decisions on these large privately funded infrastructure projects are expected to be led by the Treasury rather than the DfT.Officially, all expansion has to meet the party’s four tests, three of which are environmental: would a bigger airport harm air quality; increase noise; and still allow Britain to meet its climate change targets. But the fourth, whether it brings countrywide economic benefits, is the one that suddenly seems the most germane to policymakers.skip past newsletter promotionSign up to Business TodayGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe industry insists that the environment will not be simply shunted aside for the economy. AirportsUK, the renamed trade body for the operators, said international flights were “important enablers of economic growth, and will play an important role in delivering the government’s ambition to have the fastest rate of growth in the G7”; and that airport expansion “would directly create jobs, inject investment into all areas of the UK and stimulate trade and investment”. But, it said, “airports can expand while meeting net zero commitments” and should be allowed “to grow sustainably, subject to planning and environmental requirements”.Most environmental groups, of course, disagree. Opposition to expansion has in no way been softened by the greatest current hope of “sustainable aviation”: its eponymous fuels (SAF).Others argue that the economic arguments are fundamentally flawed. Alex Chapman of the thinktank the New Economics Foundation says: “If we are saying airport expansion drives growth, what is the mechanism? Typically most of the modelling suggests it is through business travellers and trade. But the statistics show that there has been no net increase in business travel since 2006, when capacity has grown dramatically. All the growth has come from the leisure market.An aerial image of Gatwick airport. Critics say building Heathrow’s third runway would be like ‘plonking Gatwick next to the existing site’. Photograph: One Plus One Media/Alamy “That poses serious questions for those who argue airports deliver growth. It’s not clear that residents flying overseas for holidays is of any economic benefit to the UK.” Data published by Visit Britain this month showed domestic tourism declining by 5% year on year, with spending down 9%, hitting the regions hardest, as outbound trips boomed.A longstanding campaigner for Labour and on transport issues, who declined to be named, said: “Within a lot of Labour, there’s a reflex belief in the voodoo economics pushed by the airports.”Now though, he said: “There is another group of very senior Labour politicians who do understand the environmental implications, in a way ministers didn’t 20 years ago.”While the Ed Miliband of 2024 has rapidly approved massive renewable energy projects, Chapman warns: “All of that progress in terms of carbon emissions on onshore wind and solar is likely to be immediately wiped out by one or two airport expansions.”And the shadow of the big one, Heathrow, looms again. Heathrow declined to comment for this feature, but its chief executive, Thomas Woldbye, said in July that the airport was hoping to get “more capacity out of the existing infrastructure”, while also working on new runway plans.Paul Beckford, policy director at anti-Heathrow expansion group, Hacan, said: “All of these other southeast airport expansions combined don’t equate to the size of Heathrow’s expansion in its size or climate impact … Building Heathrow’s third runway would be like plonking Gatwick next to the existing site.”A Department for Transport spokesperson said: “We are committed to securing the long-term future of the UK’s aviation sector.“However, all expansion proposals must demonstrate they contribute to economic growth, while remaining in line with existing environmental obligations.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.