Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

EPA faults Mississippi state communications on water risks ahead of Jackson crisis

News Feed
Tuesday, August 13, 2024

Mississippi’s state health department did not adequately enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act in Jackson, contributing to the 2022 crisis that left 150,000 residents without drinking water, according to a report released Tuesday by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Inspector General. The OIG found that annual inspections by the Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH) between 2015 and 2021 did not properly document inadequacies in Jackson’s water system or properly notify the city of those issues. “As a result, the EPA did not have a comprehensive understanding of the extent of the management and operational issues at Jackson’s system,” the report states. “The MSDH oversight failures obscured Jackson’s long-standing challenges, allowed issues to compound over time, and contributed to the system’s eventual failure.” The report also found that the state failed to report two Safe Drinking Water Act violations in 2016 and 2017 in a timely manner and took no formal enforcement actions for more than four years beginning in September 2018. As a result, the city had no violations listed from 2012 to 2017 and could not be flagged as an enforcement priority for the EPA. The report also found that on one occasion, in July 2015, samples collected by the state showed lead levels past the threshold at which action must be taken, but the state did not notify Jackson of the elevated levels until the following January. The OIG report recommends that the agency develop a method to ensure sanitary surveys are adequate, and for the agency’s assistant administrator for water to update EPA guidance. It further recommends developing guidance specific to the Safe Drinking Water Act. The EPA has agreed with all of the recommendations. The August 2022 crisis began after flooding of the Pearl River knocked the city’s biggest water treatment plant out of commission, leaving some residents without clean water for months. The capitol city was once majority-white but after federal desegregation in the 1960s, large portions of its white population left for the suburbs, depleting its tax base. Since then, it has frequently been the site of political standoffs between its predominantly Black and Democratic leadership and the state’s white, Republican leaders. Following the 2022 crisis the EPA referred the city to the Justice Department, leading to the appointment of a third-party manager. The Hill has reached out to the MSDH for comment.

Mississippi’s state health department did not adequately enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act in Jackson, contributing to the 2022 crisis that left 150,000 residents without drinking water, according to a report released Tuesday by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Inspector General. The OIG found that annual inspections by the Mississippi State Department of...

Mississippi’s state health department did not adequately enforce the Safe Drinking Water Act in Jackson, contributing to the 2022 crisis that left 150,000 residents without drinking water, according to a report released Tuesday by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Inspector General.

The OIG found that annual inspections by the Mississippi State Department of Health (MSDH) between 2015 and 2021 did not properly document inadequacies in Jackson’s water system or properly notify the city of those issues.

“As a result, the EPA did not have a comprehensive understanding of the extent of the management and operational issues at Jackson’s system,” the report states. “The MSDH oversight failures obscured Jackson’s long-standing challenges, allowed issues to compound over time, and contributed to the system’s eventual failure.”

The report also found that the state failed to report two Safe Drinking Water Act violations in 2016 and 2017 in a timely manner and took no formal enforcement actions for more than four years beginning in September 2018. As a result, the city had no violations listed from 2012 to 2017 and could not be flagged as an enforcement priority for the EPA.

The report also found that on one occasion, in July 2015, samples collected by the state showed lead levels past the threshold at which action must be taken, but the state did not notify Jackson of the elevated levels until the following January.

The OIG report recommends that the agency develop a method to ensure sanitary surveys are adequate, and for the agency’s assistant administrator for water to update EPA guidance. It further recommends developing guidance specific to the Safe Drinking Water Act. The EPA has agreed with all of the recommendations.

The August 2022 crisis began after flooding of the Pearl River knocked the city’s biggest water treatment plant out of commission, leaving some residents without clean water for months. The capitol city was once majority-white but after federal desegregation in the 1960s, large portions of its white population left for the suburbs, depleting its tax base. Since then, it has frequently been the site of political standoffs between its predominantly Black and Democratic leadership and the state’s white, Republican leaders. Following the 2022 crisis the EPA referred the city to the Justice Department, leading to the appointment of a third-party manager.

The Hill has reached out to the MSDH for comment.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Can renewable energy really fix the global energy crisis?

Rising energy costs, unreliable power grids, and climate change continue to exacerbate the global energy crisis and its impact on both businesses and households. To be sure, electricity access has been improving, the cost of solar energy has dropped by over 80% since 2010, and renewable energy installations have consistently outpaced fossil fuel developments. But even with all that progress, projections signal a rough road ahead for energy usage around the world—one that will continue to impact families struggling to pay bills, industries facing operational disruptions, and economies hindered by resource instability. One major contributor to the calamity: the world’s reliance on centralized energy grids. Although centralized grids are pivotal to the generation and distribution of energy across many major cities of the world, a lot of these grids are getting old and outdated, overburdened, and ill-equipped to handle the demands of modern economies. Fortunately, decentralized grids are emerging to help solve that problem. “The rise of decentralized energy solutions, like microgrids, is a direct response to the limitations of traditional grids,” Gil Kroyzer, CEO of Solargik, tells Fast Company. “Unlike centralized systems, decentralized solutions bring energy production closer to the end consumer, improving reliability and reducing infrastructure stress.” [Source Images: Getty Images] Another major factor contributing to the global energy crisis is the boom in AI, which is driving more energy demands in data centers and straining already aging energy grids. According to Andreas Schierenbeck, CEO at Hitachi Energy, “data center loads are evolving from a few megawatts to capacities exceeding 1 gigawatt due to the rise of energy-intensive AI applications.” For context, the training process for an AI model like GPT-3 consumed roughly the amount of energy consumed by 120 American households over the course of a year, per a report by Harvard Magazine. In fact, one study projects that by 2027, the AI industry could consume as much energy as the Netherlands, a country with a population of almost 20 million people. Then there’s also what’s called the “problem of intermittency” with renewable energy sources. While wind and solar offer clean and somewhat cheap sources of energy, they’re largely dependent on weather conditions. Without sufficient energy storage solutions, excess power cannot be efficiently stored for later use, leading to wasted capacity and gaps in supply during peak demand. The Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (GEAPP) points out that affordable and scalable battery energy storage systems (BESS)—which helps to store energy at scale—are critical to solving this problem. A series of hurdles Companies like EVLO are stepping up to help address this issue with its large scale BESS solutions. “Energy storage solutions are the perfect match to leverage intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind,” says Sonia St-Arnaud, president and CEO at EVLO. Our overdependence on fossil fuels presents an arguably more critical hurdle. Despite increasing investments in renewable and clean energy, fossil fuels still account for over 80% of global energy production, according to the United Nations. Coal, oil, and natural gas remain dominant sources, particularly in developing nations where infrastructure for renewables is still limited. Rising geopolitical tensions—like the Russia-Ukraine war—further reflect why fossil fuel-overdependence is a big problem. Europe, which relied heavily on Russian gas, experienced an energy crisis in 2022, as Russia cut gas supplies to many parts of the region, leading to severe price hikes in some parts of the continent, per Reuters. Such disruptions highlight the fragility of fossil-dependent systems. THE RACE FOR CLEAN ENERGY Amid the energy turmoil and arduous race for net zero by 2050, there are renewable energy solutions offering real value to the everyday person and businesses today. Companies like Solargik, Hitachi Energy, and CheckSammy are all creating scalable and efficient systems that not only provide clean energy but also address challenges of cost and infrastructure. [Source Images: Getty Images] For example, Solargik’s AI-powered solar tracking solution is improving the cost-effectiveness of solar systems. “By integrating real-time weather analytics and 3D shading plans, we optimize solar panel positioning and maximize energy yields even on irregular terrains or in challenging environments,” says Solargik CEO Kroyzer. These innovations ensure solar projects can thrive in irregular terrains or low-resource areas, making renewable energy more viable globally. Hitachi Energy, meanwhile, is advancing grid stability with technologies like BESS and hydrogen-powered backups. Currently, Hitachi Energy is powering the world’s largest data center heat recovery project, recycling excess heat to replace fossil fuels with emission-free energy. “To support the sharp surge in energy demands, power grids with higher capacities are essential, especially if we aim to make renewable energy our main electricity source,” says Schierenbeck. On the waste and sustainability side, CheckSammy—the world’s largest bulk waste and sustainability provider—is leveraging data-driven waste diversion and recycling solutions to help businesses cut costs while reducing environmental footprints. Agrivoltaics—which combines solar energy generation with agricultural land use—is another exciting development. Solargik’s agrivoltaic systems, for example, integrate clean energy production with agriculture, enabling farmers to protect crops from extreme heat, increasing their agricultural yields. This dual-use approach enhances both energy and food security, making it a compelling solution for sustainable land use. CHALLENGES WITH ENERGY TRANSITION While renewable energy offers a promising solution to the energy crisis, many challenges hinder widespread adoption and scalability. One of the most significant hurdles is the high upfront cost of renewable energy systems. For emerging markets, where energy infrastructure is often underdeveloped, the expense of installing solar panels, upgrading grids, and building storage systems can be daunting. It’s almost like these markets exist in a paradoxical world where, even though renewable energy is vital for energy access and sustainability, the costs remain a major barrier to adoption. [Source Images: Getty Images] Another major hurdle is sustainable land use, says Kroyzer. “Across the world, we’re seeing less and less ‘ideal’ land for PV development available. By unlocking land previously thought of as too challenging to build upon and expanding to dual-use applications, we can make the deployment of solar PV systems more cost-effective across all markets; while also minimizing impact on the land itself,” he adds.  Then there is the limitation of traditional power grids. Most centralized grids were built decades ago and are ill-suited to handle intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Upgrades to integrate these sources, decentralize production, and ensure grid resilience require substantial investments in both time and capital. Renewable energy production also fluctuates with weather patterns and daylight hours, making scalable battery storage essential to ensure consistent supply. Furthermore, inconsistent regulatory frameworks often slow down the transition. Renewable energy adoption requires clear policies, strong incentives, and collaboration between public and private sectors. Without these, progress stagnates, especially in countries still heavily reliant on fossil fuels. LOOKING AHEAD The quest for renewable energy, as Schierenbeck notes, isn’t merely a trendy option but a critical necessity to address the energy crisis and global warming effectively. He adds, however, that without significant development of power grids, it will be impossible to ramp up the production of renewable energy. [Source Images: Getty Images] As renewable energy sources continue to grow more popular, there’s the need for greater grid infrastructure enhancements and more advanced energy storage systems. Perhaps if more investments go into building these systems that can actually support energy from renewable sources, global energy prices can truly go low and net zero—which some now say is no longer possible in 2050—can be achieved. Meanwhile, according to EVLO’s St-Arnaud, utilities and independent power producers now recognize battery energy storage as a highly versatile energy asset for enhancing the grid and improving its resiliency, optimizing peak load management to handle increased power demands, while integrating renewable energy sources where needed.  The rise of lithium iron phosphate battery chemistry is also reshaping the economics of energy storage, driven by its safety profile and declining costs, he adds. “With a 20% drop in prices in 2024, following a 30% reduction in 2023, the market is benefiting from improved affordability, which is likely to persist through 2028.”  For Kroyzer, the future of renewable energy isn’t just about cutting emissions; it’s about building systems that are resilient, predictable, and financially viable. ”With the momentum and collaborations we’re seeing today, we’re not just fixing the energy crisis,” he says, “we’re unlocking a massive economic opportunity that is fueled by clean, smart, and future-ready solutions.”

Rising energy costs, unreliable power grids, and climate change continue to exacerbate the global energy crisis and its impact on both businesses and households. To be sure, electricity access has been improving, the cost of solar energy has dropped by over 80% since 2010, and renewable energy installations have consistently outpaced fossil fuel developments. But even with all that progress, projections signal a rough road ahead for energy usage around the world—one that will continue to impact families struggling to pay bills, industries facing operational disruptions, and economies hindered by resource instability. One major contributor to the calamity: the world’s reliance on centralized energy grids. Although centralized grids are pivotal to the generation and distribution of energy across many major cities of the world, a lot of these grids are getting old and outdated, overburdened, and ill-equipped to handle the demands of modern economies. Fortunately, decentralized grids are emerging to help solve that problem. “The rise of decentralized energy solutions, like microgrids, is a direct response to the limitations of traditional grids,” Gil Kroyzer, CEO of Solargik, tells Fast Company. “Unlike centralized systems, decentralized solutions bring energy production closer to the end consumer, improving reliability and reducing infrastructure stress.” [Source Images: Getty Images] Another major factor contributing to the global energy crisis is the boom in AI, which is driving more energy demands in data centers and straining already aging energy grids. According to Andreas Schierenbeck, CEO at Hitachi Energy, “data center loads are evolving from a few megawatts to capacities exceeding 1 gigawatt due to the rise of energy-intensive AI applications.” For context, the training process for an AI model like GPT-3 consumed roughly the amount of energy consumed by 120 American households over the course of a year, per a report by Harvard Magazine. In fact, one study projects that by 2027, the AI industry could consume as much energy as the Netherlands, a country with a population of almost 20 million people. Then there’s also what’s called the “problem of intermittency” with renewable energy sources. While wind and solar offer clean and somewhat cheap sources of energy, they’re largely dependent on weather conditions. Without sufficient energy storage solutions, excess power cannot be efficiently stored for later use, leading to wasted capacity and gaps in supply during peak demand. The Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (GEAPP) points out that affordable and scalable battery energy storage systems (BESS)—which helps to store energy at scale—are critical to solving this problem. A series of hurdles Companies like EVLO are stepping up to help address this issue with its large scale BESS solutions. “Energy storage solutions are the perfect match to leverage intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind,” says Sonia St-Arnaud, president and CEO at EVLO. Our overdependence on fossil fuels presents an arguably more critical hurdle. Despite increasing investments in renewable and clean energy, fossil fuels still account for over 80% of global energy production, according to the United Nations. Coal, oil, and natural gas remain dominant sources, particularly in developing nations where infrastructure for renewables is still limited. Rising geopolitical tensions—like the Russia-Ukraine war—further reflect why fossil fuel-overdependence is a big problem. Europe, which relied heavily on Russian gas, experienced an energy crisis in 2022, as Russia cut gas supplies to many parts of the region, leading to severe price hikes in some parts of the continent, per Reuters. Such disruptions highlight the fragility of fossil-dependent systems. THE RACE FOR CLEAN ENERGY Amid the energy turmoil and arduous race for net zero by 2050, there are renewable energy solutions offering real value to the everyday person and businesses today. Companies like Solargik, Hitachi Energy, and CheckSammy are all creating scalable and efficient systems that not only provide clean energy but also address challenges of cost and infrastructure. [Source Images: Getty Images] For example, Solargik’s AI-powered solar tracking solution is improving the cost-effectiveness of solar systems. “By integrating real-time weather analytics and 3D shading plans, we optimize solar panel positioning and maximize energy yields even on irregular terrains or in challenging environments,” says Solargik CEO Kroyzer. These innovations ensure solar projects can thrive in irregular terrains or low-resource areas, making renewable energy more viable globally. Hitachi Energy, meanwhile, is advancing grid stability with technologies like BESS and hydrogen-powered backups. Currently, Hitachi Energy is powering the world’s largest data center heat recovery project, recycling excess heat to replace fossil fuels with emission-free energy. “To support the sharp surge in energy demands, power grids with higher capacities are essential, especially if we aim to make renewable energy our main electricity source,” says Schierenbeck. On the waste and sustainability side, CheckSammy—the world’s largest bulk waste and sustainability provider—is leveraging data-driven waste diversion and recycling solutions to help businesses cut costs while reducing environmental footprints. Agrivoltaics—which combines solar energy generation with agricultural land use—is another exciting development. Solargik’s agrivoltaic systems, for example, integrate clean energy production with agriculture, enabling farmers to protect crops from extreme heat, increasing their agricultural yields. This dual-use approach enhances both energy and food security, making it a compelling solution for sustainable land use. CHALLENGES WITH ENERGY TRANSITION While renewable energy offers a promising solution to the energy crisis, many challenges hinder widespread adoption and scalability. One of the most significant hurdles is the high upfront cost of renewable energy systems. For emerging markets, where energy infrastructure is often underdeveloped, the expense of installing solar panels, upgrading grids, and building storage systems can be daunting. It’s almost like these markets exist in a paradoxical world where, even though renewable energy is vital for energy access and sustainability, the costs remain a major barrier to adoption. [Source Images: Getty Images] Another major hurdle is sustainable land use, says Kroyzer. “Across the world, we’re seeing less and less ‘ideal’ land for PV development available. By unlocking land previously thought of as too challenging to build upon and expanding to dual-use applications, we can make the deployment of solar PV systems more cost-effective across all markets; while also minimizing impact on the land itself,” he adds.  Then there is the limitation of traditional power grids. Most centralized grids were built decades ago and are ill-suited to handle intermittent renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Upgrades to integrate these sources, decentralize production, and ensure grid resilience require substantial investments in both time and capital. Renewable energy production also fluctuates with weather patterns and daylight hours, making scalable battery storage essential to ensure consistent supply. Furthermore, inconsistent regulatory frameworks often slow down the transition. Renewable energy adoption requires clear policies, strong incentives, and collaboration between public and private sectors. Without these, progress stagnates, especially in countries still heavily reliant on fossil fuels. LOOKING AHEAD The quest for renewable energy, as Schierenbeck notes, isn’t merely a trendy option but a critical necessity to address the energy crisis and global warming effectively. He adds, however, that without significant development of power grids, it will be impossible to ramp up the production of renewable energy. [Source Images: Getty Images] As renewable energy sources continue to grow more popular, there’s the need for greater grid infrastructure enhancements and more advanced energy storage systems. Perhaps if more investments go into building these systems that can actually support energy from renewable sources, global energy prices can truly go low and net zero—which some now say is no longer possible in 2050—can be achieved. Meanwhile, according to EVLO’s St-Arnaud, utilities and independent power producers now recognize battery energy storage as a highly versatile energy asset for enhancing the grid and improving its resiliency, optimizing peak load management to handle increased power demands, while integrating renewable energy sources where needed.  The rise of lithium iron phosphate battery chemistry is also reshaping the economics of energy storage, driven by its safety profile and declining costs, he adds. “With a 20% drop in prices in 2024, following a 30% reduction in 2023, the market is benefiting from improved affordability, which is likely to persist through 2028.”  For Kroyzer, the future of renewable energy isn’t just about cutting emissions; it’s about building systems that are resilient, predictable, and financially viable. ”With the momentum and collaborations we’re seeing today, we’re not just fixing the energy crisis,” he says, “we’re unlocking a massive economic opportunity that is fueled by clean, smart, and future-ready solutions.”

L.A.’s Twin Crises Finally Seem Fixable

The city is gradually revamping America’s most infamous sprawl.

Los Angeles has seen better days. Traffic is terrible, homelessness remains near record highs, and housing costs are among the worst in the country. Several years ago, these factors contributed to an alarming first: L.A.’s population started shrinking.This is no pandemic hangover. With a few exceptions, the local economy has come roaring back. Many of its major industries proved resistant to remote work—you still can’t film a movie over Zoom—and perfect year-round weather continually drew digital nomads. The quick rebound has had the paradoxical effect of kicking L.A.’s pre-pandemic problems into overdrive, by clogging freeways, eating up limited housing supply, and forcing out residents who couldn’t afford to stay.The city’s traffic and housing crises date back a century, when Los Angeles first became dependent on the automobile and exclusionary zoning. Ever since, municipalities across the country—from Las Vegas to Miami, and nearly every suburb in between—have followed L.A.’s example, prioritizing cars over public transit and segregating housing by income. Predictably, Los Angeles’s problems have become urban America’s problems.In recent years, a critical mass of state policy makers, housing reformers, and urban planners understood that L.A.’s problems are reversible, and started to lay out an alternative path for the future. The city has made massive investments in transit and—partly because of pressure from statewide pro-housing laws—experienced a surge of permitting for new homes. Even though rampant NIMBYism remains a barrier, the breadth of the city’s progress is becoming clearer: Los Angeles is gradually revamping America’s most infamous sprawl.L.A.’s quest to reinvent itself holds national implications. Savvy urban planners and policy makers are watching to see how Los Angeles addresses the issues that are intensifying in many of their own cities. They know that a congested, unaffordable future awaits if they don’t intervene.It’s often said that Los Angeles was planned around the car. But it was actually built around what was once the largest transit system in the world. In the early 20th century, the Pacific Electric Railway stitched together hundreds of historic town centers from Riverside to Venice. The rest of L.A. was subdivided into one of the largest street grids in history, marshaling growth along a coherent, interconnected pattern.Only in the 1930s did the city begin to redesign itself for driving. Freeways started carving up the grid, spewing pollution across Los Angeles. The railway closed. Walking and biking became unpleasant and unsafe. This transformation spawned today’s L.A., where car crashes kill more people than violent crime, and the average driver spends 62 hours a year sitting in traffic. It ended up being a model for suburbs across the country; the average American now spends an hour a day driving.The state of housing is equally bleak. By some measures, Los Angeles has arguably the worst housing-affordability crisis in the country. If a middle-class family ever wants to own a home, they’d better go somewhere else. The median home price in L.A. is over 10 times the median household income—more than double a healthy ratio.The many Angelenos who are locked out of homeownership are stuck paying some of America’s steepest rents. Most residents spend more than 30 percent of their income on housing; a quarter of residents spend at least half. To curb costs, many renters double or triple up, resulting in the country’s highest overcrowding rate. About 75,000 residents of Los Angeles County go without housing altogether.The housing shortage is by design: Beginning in the 1960s, policy makers tightened zoning regulations, slashing the city’s capacity by 60 percent. As a matter of law, Los Angeles could not grow. Today, building apartments is still illegal in about three-quarters of residential areas, where most land is effectively reserved for McMansions. The situation is even worse in the suburbs, where zoning allows virtually no new housing at all. The crisis has even spread to once-affordable places like Phoenix, as local growth butts up against restrictive zoning in more and more cities.Until recently, nearly every development in L.A.-adjacent cities such as Pasadena or Culver City entailed a costly environmental review and endless public hearings, both easily hijacked by NIMBYs. Impact fees increase the cost of a new housing unit by tens of thousands of dollars. For a long time, the number of permits issued across Greater Los Angeles looked more like it does in diminished cities like Detroit than in prosperous peers like Seattle.The city’s recent population decline might make you think that nobody wants to live there. But, really, Los Angeles hasn’t let anybody in.After decades of dysfunction, L.A.’s twin crises are starting to look fixable.Take transit: Los Angeles is currently building one of North America’s most ambitious rail expansions, which will rival the top systems in the country. Thanks in part to Measure M, a half-cent sales-tax increase that voters approved in 2016, the city is scheduled to open rail service to Los Angeles International Airport by the end of the decade, as well as new trains extending from West Los Angeles to East Los Angeles. In 2023, L.A. Metro completed the Regional Connector, which linked two light-rail lines, allowing for transfer-free rides across the metropolis.All this new rail will soon be supplemented by an expanded network of bus, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure. In March, a coalition led by the group Streets for All passed Measure HLA, which will add over 200 miles of bus lanes and protected bicycle lanes, and many hundreds of redesigned, pedestrian-friendly streets in the coming decades. If officials can unlock new revenue through congestion pricing—which will nudge some Angelenos out of their cars—the city might finally be able to tame traffic.The housing situation is turning around too, if in fits and starts. Recent experience shows that simply easing overly restrictive rules could unlock a lot of new home building. In 2022, Los Angeles issued more permits than it had in any of the previous 36 years. Although the average home price continues to hover around a million dollars, rents have fallen by about 5 percent compared with late 2023.A range of interventions have made this possible. Since 2017, Los Angeles has permitted nearly 35,000 accessory dwelling units—homes that were largely illegal prior to state intervention in 2017. Thanks to a newly strengthened state “fair share” law, cities across L.A. County will be required to permit thousands of new homes in coming years; Santa Monica, for example, will have to allow some 1,500 new homes over the next few years, more than the city has permitted in decades. A 2022 law green-lighting the construction of affordable housing in commercial zones has prompted Costco to agree to add 800 apartments above a planned storefront in South Los Angeles. Other state laws have eliminated parking mandates, streamlined permitting, and expedited townhouse subdivisions.Still, fixing the crisis will require much more work. By one state estimate, Greater L.A. must permit 168,000 homes each year to end the housing shortage. Even in the historically productive year of 2022, the region permitted fewer than 60,000. And in a major setback, the city council voted in December to preserve single-family zoning, which bans new apartments in nearly three-quarters of Los Angeles. (Never mind that a city-commissioned report admits that the decision will entrench segregation.)But reform continues bubbling up locally thanks to a growing YIMBY movement. Ten years ago, the idea of rolling back apartment prohibitions in Los Angeles was unthinkable; now it seems inevitable. The Transit-Oriented Communities program, part of a ballot measure that Angelenos adopted in 2016, has facilitated the construction of tens of thousands of new apartments near transit. When Mayor Karen Bass took office in 2022, she issued Executive Directive 1, speeding up permitting processes. Combined with a generous state incentive program for projects that agree to keep rents low, the initiative has attracted applications for more than 20,000 new homes and counting. At almost any public hearing, expect to bump into an Abundant Housing LA volunteer eager to share the good news.A century ago, Los Angeles pioneered an urban model that much of America made the mistake of replicating. Now, after many decades of strict zoning and car-centric growth, Los Angeles is figuring out what comes next. The city is starting to treat its dependence on automobiles by reintroducing bus lanes, bike lanes, and rail lines. Neighborhoods that had been locked up for a half century by zoning are finally growing again. Hundreds of urban areas across the country desperately require similar interventions.If history is a guide, L.A.’s ambitions might once again reshape the American city—this time for the better.

Water rates in Northern Ireland suggested to help address wastewater crisis

Manager of Lough Neagh Partnership praises actions so far on lake’s algae crisis but warns of wider problemsThe introduction of water rates in Northern Ireland could address crumbling wastewater infrastructure and the impact on waterways, it has been suggested.It comes as the Stormont executive works to halt an environmental crisis at Lough Neagh, where noxious blooms of blue-green algae have covered the surface of the water across the past two summers. Continue reading...

The introduction of water rates in Northern Ireland could address crumbling wastewater infrastructure and the impact on waterways, it has been suggested.It comes as the Stormont executive works to halt an environmental crisis at Lough Neagh, where noxious blooms of blue-green algae have covered the surface of the water across the past two summers.The lough is the largest freshwater lake by surface area in the UK and Ireland, supplies 40% of Northern Ireland’s drinking water and sustains a major eel-fishing industry.But it is facing a “perfect storm” caused by pollution, nutrients, the climate crisis and invasive species according to Gerry Darby, manager of the Lough Neagh Partnership.He praised the approach and actions taken so far by the agriculture, environment and rural affairs minister, Andrew Muir, but warned of wider problems that need a whole-of-executive approach.In an interview with the PA news agency, Darby said the Lough Neagh action plan, and particularly the setting up of a stakeholder forum led by Muir, was positive and was a first for a minister.He said 10 of the actions have already been implemented, including water inspectors and looking to the private sector for innovation, but it will take decades to start to see improvement.“Is the nutrient level going to come down immediately? No, it’s not. Is the level of phosphorus going to come down? Probably not, but at least you can now begin to look at setting targets,” Darby said.“It’s important to remember it’s not just farmers; there are a lot of nutrients coming in off the waste management processing units within NI Water and septic tanks – we’re all contributing to it and other factors such as topography, there is only one river out of the lough. There is not great flow to flush it out.“There is also climate change as well as invasive species in there. It all came together to create a perfect storm, and at least the minister has engaged with many organisations to try and find solutions.“It will be a long-term solution – nobody has ever suggested that the reduction of nutrients in Lough Neagh is going to happen overnight. It is estimated that it will take somewhere between 10 and 20 years before we’re beginning to see change.”However, Darby said part of the problem is that people assume the blue-green algae is the only problem in the lough, pointing out the absence of a navigation authority as well as the wastewater system that was described by the head of NI Water as being “at breaking point”.He said addressing the wastewater system will require the hard choice between trying to secure more money from the London government, rejigging the strained Stormont budget or considering charging water rates.While non-domestic water charges already apply in Northern Ireland, there has been strong political opposition to introducing domestic water charges.“The other elephant in the room is the money needed for infrastructure for wastewater management. This year the budget of NI Water for capital investment has been cut in half. That is a big, serious issue that politicians need to find an answer to,” Darby said.“There are three choices: you ask Westminster to cough up more, Stormont reprioritises budgets, or else the big, controversial one is that you introduce water rates, which is pretty standard in the rest of the UK.“I couldn’t comment on that personally, but I think it is something that needs to be given serious consideration in the context of the issues also facing Belfast Lough.“The problem, of course, is that it is political dynamite.”

In South Korea, Nations Meet in Final Round to Address Global Plastic Crisis

Negotiators are gathering in South Korea in what’s billed as a final push to address the global crisis of plastic pollution

Negotiators gathered in Busan, South Korea, on Monday in a final push to create a treaty to address the global crisis of plastic pollution.It's the fifth time the world's nations convene to craft a legally binding plastic pollution accord. In addition to the national delegations, representatives from the plastics industry, scientists and environmentalists have come to shape how the world tackles the surging problem. “Don’t kick the can, or the plastic bottle, down the road," U.N. Environment Programme Executive Director Inger Andersen said in a message aimed at negotiators. This “is an issue about the intergenerational justice of those generations that will come after us and be living with all this garbage. We can solve this and we must get it done in Busan,” she said in an interview.The previous four global meetings have revealed sharp differences in goals and interests. This week's talks go through Saturday. Led by Norway and Rwanda, 66 countries plus the European Union say they want to address the total amount of plastic on Earth by controlling design, production, consumption and where plastic ends up. The delegation from the hard-hit island nation of Micronesia helped lead an effort to call more attention to "unsustainable” plastic production, called the Bridge to Busan. Island nations are grappling with vast amounts of other countries’ plastic waste washing up on their shores.“We think it’s the heart of the treaty, to go upstream and to get to the problem at its source,” said Dennis Clare, legal advisor and plastics negotiator for Micronesia. “There’s a tagline, ‘You can’t recycle your way out of this problem.’” Some plastic-producing and oil and gas countries, including Saudi Arabia, disagree. They vigorously oppose any limits on plastic manufacturing. Most plastic is made from fossil fuels. Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest exporter of primary polypropylene, a common type of plastic, accounting for an estimated 17% of exports last year, according to the Plastics Industry Association. China, the United States and Germany led the global plastics trade by exports and imports in 2023, the association said.The plastics industry has been advocating for a treaty focused on redesigning plastic products, recycling and reuse, sometimes referred to as “circularity.” Chris Jahn, International Council of Chemical Associations secretariat, said negotiators should focus on ending plastic waste in the environment, not plastic production, to get a deal. Many countries won’t join a treaty if it includes production caps, he said.To continue to progress and grow as a global economy, there are going to be more plastics, Jahn added.“So we should strive then to keep those plastics in the economy and out of the environment,” Jahn said.The United States delegation at first said countries should develop their own plans to act, a position viewed as favoring industry. It changed its position this summer, saying the U.S. is open to considering global targets for reductions in plastic production.Environmental groups accused the U.S. of backtracking as negotiations approached.Center for Coalfield Justice executive director Sarah Martik said the United States is standing on the sidelines rather than leading, putting “their thumb on the scale throughout the entirety of the negotiations.” She hopes this does not derail other countries’ ambition. Democratic U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, of Oregon, said it's a mistake for the United States to settle for the lowest common denominator proposals, just to get some kind of agreement. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the committee chair from Ecuador, recently proposed text for sections where he thinks the delegations could agree. The production and use of plastics globally is set to reach 736 million tons by 2040, up 70% from 2020, without policy changes, according to the intergovernmental Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Research published in Science this month found it is still possible to nearly end plastic pollution. The policies that make the most difference are: mandating new products be made with 40% post-consumer recycled plastic; limiting new plastic production to 2020 levels; investing significantly in plastic waste management, such as landfills and waste collection services and implementing a small fee on plastic packaging. The treaty is the only way to solve plastic pollution at this scale, said Douglas McCauley, professor at UC Santa Barbara and UC Berkeley. McCauley co-led the research.Margaret Spring, chief conservation and science officer for Monterey Bay Aquarium, said plastic pollution used to be considered largely a waste problem. Now it is widely viewed as an existential crisis that must be addressed, said Spring, who represents the International Science Council at the negotiations.“I’ve never seen people’s understanding of this issue move as fast, given how complex the topic is,” she said. “It gives me hope that we can actually start moving the dial.”The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Sept. 2024

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.