Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

GoGreenNation News

Learn more about the issues presented in our films
Show Filters

Monarch Butterfly May Gain Threatened Species Status in US

(Reuters) - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing the monarch butterfly as a threatened species on Tuesday, citing a significant...

(Reuters) - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing the monarch butterfly as a threatened species on Tuesday, citing a significant decline in the iconic black and orange insects that has pushed them toward extinction.Monarch butterflies, known for migrating thousands of miles (km) across North America, have experienced a decades-long U.S. population decline due to habitat loss caused by human activities such as farming and urban development, widespread use of pesticides and climate change.Environmental groups have been pushing for U.S. protection of the winged pollinators for a decade."The iconic monarch butterfly is cherished across North America, captivating children and adults throughout its fascinating lifecycle," U.S. FWS Director Martha Williams said in a statement."Despite its fragility, it is remarkably resilient, like many things in nature when we just give them a chance. Science shows that the monarch needs that chance, and this proposed listing invites and builds on unprecedented public participation in shaping monarch conservation efforts," she addedDespite being recognized as needing federal protection under the Endangered Species Act four years ago, the monarch butterfly waited behind dozens of other species facing more immediate threats.The ESA, signed into law in 1973, is credited with helping to save the bald eagle, California condor and numerous other animals and plants from extinction. ESA protection makes it illegal to kill or harm species classified as threatened or endangered without a special permit.The eastern migratory monarch population has declined by about 80% since the 1980s, while the western migratory population has dropped by more than 95%. The declines put the western populations at greater than 99% chance of extinction by 2080, according to the FWS.The agency is proposing to designate 4,395 acres (1,780 hectares) in California as "critical habitat" for the butterflies. Federal agencies are prohibited from destroying or modifying areas with that designation.The public will have until March 12, 2025 to comment on the proposal to list the monarch butterfly. The service will then evaluate the comments and any additional information on the species to determine whether to list the monarch butterfly.(Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Sandra Maler)Copyright 2024 Thomson Reuters.

Brazilian Beef and Leather Companies Fall Short in Tackling Deforestation, a Study Finds

The next United Nations climate conference will be held in Belem, the capital of an Amazon region where widespread deforestation has turned the surrounding rainforest from a vital carbon sink into a significant carbon source

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — The next United Nations climate conference, COP30, will be held in Belem, the capital of an Amazon region where widespread deforestation mainly driven by cattle farming has turned the surrounding rainforest from a vital carbon sink into a significant carbon source. Now a new report concludes around 80% of Brazil’s leading beef and cow leather companies and their financiers have made no commitments to stop deforestation.The study, released Wednesday by the environmental nonprofit group Global Canopy, highlights the country´s 175 most influential beef and leather companies and financial institutions that have supported them with $100 billion. This amount is one-third of the annual funding that wealthy nations pledged to provide for climate finance in developing countries during COP29 last month in Baku, Azerbaijan.“Although cattle is the single most influential commodity for deforestation and linked greenhouse gas emissions, the report ... reveals a picture of staggering inaction from corporates and financial institutions alike in Brazilian supply chains,” the study said. The record is poor even among companies that commit to halting deforestation, such as JBS, according to the report. The giant meatpacker is one of the few to make such commitments and one of only two to have a system for tracing cattle all the way to the production unit. Yet the report ranks the company as the most likely to be buying cattle and cow leather from recently deforested land.This assessment of deforestation risk is based on the number of cattle bought from ranchers in each Brazilian municipality and its deforestation rate. Meatpackers buying from high-deforestation areas are more likely to source from recently cleared land than those buying from low-deforestation areas. The methodology was created by Do Pasto ao Prato, an independent Brazilian consumer app that aims to increase transparency in the livestock sector."Commitments are critical as one of the first steps a company takes to address deforestation," Emma Thomson, one of the coauthors, told The Associated Press. “But it has to be followed by effective implementation and by monitoring suppliers and indirect suppliers for compliance with those standards. It has to have effective traceability mechanisms and transparent reporting on the progress that is — or isn´t — being made.”Besides JBS, the report lists three processing companies with units based in Para state as likely to be buying cattle and cow leather from recently deforested land: Mercurio, Mafrinorte and Frigol. In a written response, JBS said the study's methodology provides a simplistic and inaccurate assessment of deforestation risk, ignoring factors such as corporate policies, sustainable procurement systems and exclusion of noncompliant suppliers. The company said that since 2009 it has maintained a system to ensure suppliers meet socio-environmental criteria. “The companies that have made significant progress in their controls end up being criticized, and their transparency is used not as an incentive but as a penalty,” it said.Mercurio, Mafrinorte and Frigol didn´t reply to requests for comment.Global Canopy´s report was funded by the Bezos Earth Fund. Do Pasto ao Prato is financed by Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative.The state of Para harbors Brazil´s second largest cattle herd, with 25 million animals — and 35% of its territory is cleared, an area slightly smaller than Syria. As a result, it ranks first in greenhouse gas emissions among Brazilian states. A landmark study published in the journal Nature in 2021 found that the eastern Amazon, where Para is located, has ceased to function as a carbon sink, or absorber, for the Earth, due to widespread deforestation and climate change.Niki Mardas, executive director of Global Canopy, said there will be an update to Wednesday's baseline report in the runup to COP30 next November, when all eyes will be on the Amazon. “This isn't a fixed picture. This is a call to action.”The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Sept. 2024

Biden proposes protections for monarch butterfly

The Biden administration is proposing protections for the monarch butterfly – though the protections face an uncertain future in the incoming Trump administration. The Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to list the orange and black butterfly as threatened, citing steep drops in the insect’s populations. It said that eastern migratory monarchs have declined by about...

The Biden administration is proposing protections for the monarch butterfly – though the protections face an uncertain future in the incoming Trump administration.  The Fish and Wildlife Service proposed to list the orange and black butterfly as threatened, citing steep drops in the insect’s populations.  It said that eastern migratory monarchs have declined by about 80 percent while western monarchs have declined by more than 95 percent – giving the western group a 99 percent chance of going extinct by 2080. Habitat loss, pesticides and climate change are contributing to the issue.  “The iconic monarch butterfly is cherished across North America, captivating children and adults throughout its fascinating lifecycle,” said U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Martha Williams in a statement. “Working together, we can help make this extraordinary species a legacy for our children and generations to come.” In 2020, the Trump administration declined to provide the monarch with protections. It determined at that time that protections were “warranted” but that it was unable to protect the butterfly because it needed to devote its resources to higher-priority species.  At the time, it granted the monarch “warranted-but-precluded” status — meaning that every year it will consider adding the butterfly to the list. Environmental advocates were pleased with the proposed protections, and indicated they would fight to finalize them under President-elect Trump. "We’ve spent 10 years to get to this landmark decision today, and won’t be stopping until the job is done. Science and the law is on the side of the monarchs," George Kimbrell, co-executive director of the Center for Food Safety, told The Hill in an email.  — Updated at 5:59 p.m.

The Mashpee Wampanoag Work With a Cape Cod Town to Restore Their Fishing Grounds

This is the second of two articles about the Mashpee Wampanoag’s efforts to assert their fishing rights on Cape Cod. Read the first story here. Pocknett drove to Fishermen’s Landing at the members-only Popponesset Beach, stopping at a “beach security checkpoint” run by two teenagers who hid from the July sun under an oversized umbrella. One […] The post The Mashpee Wampanoag Work With a Cape Cod Town to Restore Their Fishing Grounds appeared first on Civil Eats.

This is the second of two articles about the Mashpee Wampanoag’s efforts to assert their fishing rights on Cape Cod. Read the first story here. Vernon “Buddy” Pocknett steered his truck through the curving streets of Popponesset Island, Cape Cod, jostling a satchel that hung from the rearview mirror above a trucker hat reading “WTF (Where’s The Fish).” The satchel was made from a seal paw, adorned with long claws that jiggled as Pocknett took the turns, passing Teslas, sailboat-shaped mailboxes, and sunburned cyclists. Pocknett drove to Fishermen’s Landing at the members-only Popponesset Beach, stopping at a “beach security checkpoint” run by two teenagers who hid from the July sun under an oversized umbrella. One asked Pocknett if he was there to fish, and Pocknett said he was doing research. The teen sounded skeptical and asked what kind. Pocknett patted the sticker on his windshield emblazoned with the official Mashpee Wampanoag tribal seal. “Oh!” she said, sounding flustered. “You’re all set.” “You see what I mean?” Pocknett said, with the girl barely out of earshot. “How do they get to say who’s to come down here and who’s not?” Pocknett was at the beach to identify Indigenous water access points, paths used for generations to reach fishing grounds from shores that are now mostly privatized by non-Wampanoags. Public access points along Massachusetts waters have thinned since the mid-20th century, but their disappearance has been especially pronounced here, in and around the town of Mashpee and the Popponessett Bay, in what was once Wampanoag territory. Meanwhile, overdevelopment has destroyed abundant wetland areas that shaped Wampanoag life for thousands of years, and water pollution threatens many aquatic species essential to the tribe’s survival. A lifelong aquaculturist and fisherman, Pocknett has recently begun work to restore access to traditional fishing grounds and the ecosystem that supports them. Fishermen’s Landing at Popponesset Beach, near New Seabury, Cape Cod. (Photo credit: Emma Glassman-Hughes) With help from the tribe’s Natural Resources Department, the town of Mashpee is compiling a harbor management plan, an extensive document that will set guidelines for the construction of marinas and docks. The plan will also address encroaching erosion and sea-level rise throughout this Massachusetts municipality. As part of the project, the town has invited Pocknett and a group of tribal elders to identify Indigenous pathways to the water, with the goal of eventually opening some of them back up for public use. It is a modest effort, a starting point to repair fraught relations, reconcile with the past, and strategize for the future. If the plan succeeds, it will help rebuild wetlands and traditional food sources for the tribe, once largely excluded from environmental decision-making. At Fishermen’s Landing, Pocknett leaned against a freshly painted railing and looked out at Nantucket Sound. Sunbathers floated and dozed below, on a beach where Pocknett grew up fishing, back when it was still a hotspot for striped bass, or stripers. But as in other parts of the bay, the fish have been driven out of these spawning grounds. Since the arrival of European settlers 400 years ago, not a single season has passed without humans harvesting as much as possible from waters that are now increasingly fouled with pollution. “It’s like they don’t see the impact [on] their great-great-grandchildren,” Pocknett said. “What’s going to happen, four generations from us right here? When’s it end?” A Plan for the Harbor The harbor management plan is, among other things, an attempt to ensure generations of sustainable fishing and clean water in Mashpee. The town’s Harbor Management Committee, with support from the Urban Harbors Institute at the University of Massachusetts Boston, is compiling its second draft of hundreds of pages detailing everything from dock compliance to potential new aquaculture sites, which can help improve water quality over time. Once the final plan is approved by the town, it could open the door to state or federal funding to contend with existential threats like sea-level rise and a shifting coastline. But finalizing the plan has been a slow process. Overdevelopment has destroyed abundant wetland areas that shaped Wampanoag life for thousands of years, and water pollution threatens many aquatic species essential to the tribe’s survival. “It’s a pretty encompassing project, hence why it’s going to take a bit of time,” said Christopher Avis, the town’s shellfish constable. (Each Cape Cod town has a shellfish constable, who enforces shellfish bylaws and oversees aquaculture projects.) “We want to say, okay, here we are today. What do we do tomorrow? And in 10 years, as things change, how do we not only change with them but also kind of be ahead of the curve?” Avis and other members of Mashpee’s Natural Resources Department are actively working to mend their relationship with the Wampanoag, acknowledging that the stewardship of local waterways is a joint effort. In the past, the two sides have clashed over the tribe’s fishing practices, but increased advocacy from Wampanoags has helped shift the town’s official stance on the “Aboriginal right to fish” from what are now private access points. The harbor management plan represents a chance for the tribe to continue this advocacy in a more formal capacity. Under the direction of Ashley Fisher—the head of Mashpee Natural Resources until last month, when she was reassigned to the wastewater department—the harbor management plan has served as a sort of olive-branch offering to the tribe, a solicitation for Wampanoag knowledge that can help address the many resource management crises afflicting the town. To underscore their intentions, the Mashpee Natural Resources Department also plans to include a section clearly outlining Aboriginal rights as they pertain to hunting and fishing, rights that give Wampanoags the option to ignore the “private property” signs that decorate the densely populated wetlands of Popponesset Island and New Seabury. Despite this greater institutional recognition of those rights, water access points have become so impractical—overgrown, gated off, or built up—and the fish so few that only a small group of Wampanoags regularly use them today. On Daniels Island, a giant rock obstructs access to the beach (left). At right, an example of a privatized water access point in the resort community of New Seabury. (Photo credit: Emma Glassman-Hughes) The slow-moving harbor plan is just the beginning of a long reconciliation process that may or may not come. During the early stages of the plan, in February 2023, Fisher told Civil Eats she felt strongly that the opening of access points would be a good-faith gesture to restore trust between Wampanoags and the town—though not without significant hurdles. “It’s going to be a tough sell,” she said. “There’s going to be some angry people, because our waterfront is landlocked.” Her ambition to partner with the tribe on the harbor plan has at least materialized, though. Pocknett said he and some other tribal “old-timers” met with Fisher this summer to identify access points on a map from their personal memories of “how it was.” There were maybe three or four existing access points acknowledged by the town, but the group was able to identify close to 100 more along the Popponesset and Waquoit bays. Fisher worried that memories and hearsay wouldn’t be enough to reopen the access points, so she asked the tribe’s natural resource team to search their archives for documentation demonstrating that the areas had been used as “historic passage” for multiple generations. While the team continues its hunt for that documentation, consultants at the Urban Harbors Institute are working to revise the first draft of the plan after an extensive public comment period this past spring and summer. Avis said his team has “sort of formed a partnership” with the tribe and its aquaculturists, including Pocknett. “If they need something, they call us. If we need something, we’ll call them. It’s been a tremendous relationship with those guys as to utilizing their resources and our resources to pool together to get as many animals in the water to help clean the water,” he said. Traditional Knowledge Will Shape the Future Pocknett and his younger cousin, CheeNulKa Pocknett, know about using bivalves to mitigate nitrogen pollution. The two manage First Light Shellfish Farm, the tribe’s aquacultural operation on Popponesset Bay, which the elder Pocknett’s father founded in 1977. Since the 1970s, development on the Cape has exceeded the ecosystem’s capacity to support it, made worse by a lack of central sewage systems and wastewater treatment facilities. From Provincetown to Barnstable, untreated wastewater from homes, hotels, restaurants, and golf courses leaches into bays, lakes, and rivers. Joshua Reitsma, a marine chemist at the nearby Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, says this effluent is responsible for 80 percent of the Cape’s “nutrient pollution,” leading to algal blooms that blanket the surface in summer and fall to the bottom in winter. The algae smothers keystone species like eelgrass, and coats the sand in muck that can’t support the oysters, quahogs, and soft-shelled clams that would naturally grow there. Quahog (littleneck) clams freshly caught off Cape Cod. (Photo credit: John Piekos/Getty Images) The tribe has always protected and cultivated species like oysters and quahogs, in part because of their role in filtering Mashpee’s waterways. By eating nitrogen-rich phytoplankton and incorporating the protein into their tissues, the bivalves maintain the stasis of their aquatic home. First Light farm is the tribe’s attempt to rehabilitate Popponesset Bay in an era of unprecedented wreckage. (The town of Mashpee runs its own separate aquaculture projects, which have anchored its water-quality strategy for decades.) But no amount of shellfish alone can revive waterways strangled by such heavy pollution. At one of the town’s recent Shellfish Commission meetings, aquaculturist and chair Peter Thomas likened the lopsided reliance on shellfish to “putting a Band-Aid on someone who needs to be med-flighted.” For years, tribal leaders and environmental advocates have raised similar warnings about the quality of Mashpee’s watersheds. For the Pocknetts, this pollution is personal. The 16th-century settlers who claimed the shores of present-day New England were met by people with a vibrant social order, language, and trade network, shaped by the surrounding natural world. Clan identities are just one example: CheeNulKa’s family is part of the wolf clan. There are no wild wolves left in Massachusetts. The eel clan, too, got its name in honor of once-thriving animal relatives. “Without the eels, you can’t have the eel clan,” CheeNulKa said. “Without the eel clan, you can’t have an eel dance. That’s how you lose that culture. It’s something as small or as monumental as this, depending on how you look at it.” “Without the eels, you can’t have the eel clan. Without the eel clan, you can’t have an eel dance. That’s how you lose that culture.” As Indigenous concerns are increasingly heeded, change is creeping in. The town recently broke ground on a wastewater treatment plan to introduce centralized sewering for the first time, part of a Cape-wide effort that will take roughly 30 years to fully implement. The first phase, which involved the $54 million construction of a wastewater collection system and treatment facility, is underway. The second phase, which would begin in spring 2025 at the earliest, is earmarked for $96 million, according to Cape News. Over time, the two phases are expected to reduce nitrogen levels in the Popponesset Bay by 42 percent. Indigenous environmental expertise and traditional ecological knowledge are also getting overdue recognition in Mashpee’s Conservation Commission, which oversees wetland building permits and other environmental conservation projects. The commission recently proposed a plan for the town and tribe to co-steward conservation land, a partnership that Wampanoag Chief Earl Mills, Sr., has said would be a “win-win.” These efforts reflect a pattern emerging worldwide. At the 2022 UN Biodiversity Conference in Montreal, Indigenous delegates lobbied successfully for a plan that honors the rights of Indigenous peoples, who make up less than six percent of the world’s population but protect nearly 80 percent of its biodiversity. In an unprecedented expression of partnership, President Joe Biden’s cabinet, including Interior Secretary Deb Haaland (Pueblo of Laguna), proposed that dozens of tribes co-steward ancestral lands from Virginia to Idaho, working alongside the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. And in November this year, in nearby Bristol, Rhode Island, Brown University confirmed the transfer of 255 acres to the Pokanoket tribe to “ensure appropriate stewardship and management of this unique, historical, sacred, and natural resource for generations to come.” Generations of Knowledge  From the rocky shores of the Waquoit to the pale sand of the Popponesset, Mashpee holds generations of Pocknett family memories. But the Pocknetts have watched the town and its shorelines disappear, parcel by parcel, into the lawns and patios of the highest bidders. A private-property sign near Spohr’s Beach on Monomoscoy Island, Cape Cod. (Photo credit: Emma Glassman-Hughes) Each privately developed access point contributes to the water’s decline. Re-opening whatever is outlined in the harbor management plan won’t heal the waters or bring back the fish. But it would send a message from Mashpee—a municipality that proudly proclaims “Wampanoag land” on signs on its town line—that its Indigenous residents are vital to the success of its ecosystems. In July, Buddy Pocknett lumbered down a footpath on Mashpee’s Monomoscoy Island, past a flurry of metal signs that declared, “Spohr’s Private Beach.” His scraggly gray ponytail grazed the neckline of his T-shirt, above the words “Aboriginal Rights” printed in blue script. He shuffled by a big house and a couple of canoes drying in the shade of the leaning pitch pines, toward an old quahog-digging spot that has gone from public to private in his lifetime. He planted his sturdy brown boots on the sand. The new wave of interest in tribal knowledge makes him cautiously optimistic, he said. But the town has just scratched the surface of collaboration. Moving forward, Pocknett wants Wampanoags to be consulted before the approval of any new developments. “For years, the tribe has been kind of sleeping and not going to these meetings,” he said. “[Townspeople] have been kind of pulling the wool over our face for a long time, just doing whatever they want.” With more Indigenous representation at town meetings and in big projects like the harbor plan, Pocknett predicted more checks on overbuilding, more strategic and effective resource management, and better environmental advocacy across the board. With more Indigenous representation at town meetings and in big projects like the harbor plan, Pocknett predicted more checks on overbuilding, more strategic and effective resource management, and better environmental advocacy across the board. After all, non-Indigenous control of Mashpee is very new, compared with the 12,000 years that the Wampanoags managed the land. Within Pocknett’s father’s lifetime, the tribe had much more say in resource management. One particularly prominent steward was Pocknett’s grandfather, Will, who kept a fishing camp on the edge of the scrubby woods near Waquoit Bay. Will was a respected fisherman, whose knowledge of the bay was widely trusted. At that time, in the mid-20th century, Mashpee was still considered a Wampanoag town. Every bay and fishing ground was run by a tribal member, Pocknett said—someone familiar with its particular quirks, like Will was with Waquoit Bay. “If you went fishing in Waquoit Bay when my grandfather was alive, you asked him and he would tell you where to go,” he said. “It wasn’t just ‘go fishing.’ Each tribal member had a bay. And they would say, ‘There’s more over here today, come fish over here.’ It was equally important to Indian people to recognize the areas that had less fish and leave them alone.” But even with his influence, Will never claimed to own the bay or the surrounding area, Pocknett said, eyeing the metal signs that stuck out of the reeds and laid claim to the beach beneath his feet. He smiled and said, “Because no one can own the land.” The post The Mashpee Wampanoag Work With a Cape Cod Town to Restore Their Fishing Grounds appeared first on Civil Eats.

Maps reveal parts of protected Tasmanian native forest that could be open to logging, environmentalists say

Mapping based on documents released under right-to-information laws show proposed areas include habitats for 37 threatened speciesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastEnvironmentalists have released what they say are the first maps of nearly 40,000 hectares of protected Tasmanian native forests that the state government plans to open to logging in what critics have described as “political point scoring”.They suggest significant parts of the state’s north-east around the Ben Lomond national park and near the town of Scottsdale could be made available to the forestry industry if the Liberal government wins support for the changes in parliament. A smaller area of forest could be opened up in the north-west between Smithton and Wynyard.Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email Continue reading...

Environmentalists have released what they say are the first maps of nearly 40,000 hectares of protected Tasmanian native forests that the state government plans to open to logging in what critics have described as “political point scoring”.They suggest significant parts of the state’s north-east around the Ben Lomond national park and near the town of Scottsdale could be made available to the forestry industry if the Liberal government wins support for the changes in parliament. A smaller area of forest could be opened up in the north-west between Smithton and Wynyard.The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, announced in February that a re-elected Liberal government would allow logging in 27 areas that have been protected since a “peace deal” was struck between the timber industry, conservation groups and unions in 2012 in an effort to end the decades-long conflict known as the “Tasmanian forest wars”.The policy to expand logging of native forests puts Tasmania at odds with Victoria and Western Australia, which banned the practice this year. It prompted accusations the Liberals would accelerate environmental damage. A forest lobby group argued Rockliff was treating the industry as a political football.Orange areas of the map are 39,000 hectares of forest that could be opened for logging under changes proposed by the Tasmanian government. Black areas are listed as ‘future potential production forest’ areas that the government says is a ‘wood bank’ and could be logged in future. Illustration: The Wilderness SocietyTen months on, the state government is yet to reveal which forests could be logged. The Wilderness Society mapped the proposed zones based on documents released under right-to-information laws last week that describe what has been included and excluded.The organisation says it includes forests that could be habitat for 37 threatened species, including the masked owl, wedge-tailed eagle and multiple types of quoll. The combined area is about 60 times larger than the Melbourne CBD.Guardian Australia asked the government if the maps were correct. The business, industry and resources minister, Eric Abetz, did not directly answer, but said the government had “clearly communicated” its policy was to open up to 40,000 hectares of forest to industry and it had “received a mandate to deliver on this commitment”.The Liberals won 14 out of 35 lower house seats at the March election and retained power with the support of crossbench MPs, who promised support on confidence and supply bills.Abetz said work was under way to prepare the information needed to win parliamentary approval to convert the protected areas into logging coupes. He said the forestry act required that environmental and heritage values of the land be considered and “balanced against the economic opportunities”.Alice Hardinge, the Wilderness Society’s Tasmanian campaigns manager, said the reserves should be protected from logging as promised. She said Australian taxpayers had already paid $121m in transition packages for workers affected by a reduction in logging in the state.“These forests, which communities fought so hard to protect and which contain such rich ecological and First Nations cultural significance, must be permanently protected, not handed over to loggers for political point scoring,” Hardinge said.The Liberals have promised to open up additional forests to logging since claiming power in 2014, designating 356,000 hectares of protected forest as a “wood bank” or “future potential production forest”. Those areas have not been logged in the decade since, and timber business leaders have warned attempts to fell trees in some areas could reignite protests and market campaigns that would damage the industry.As reported by the ABC, a right-to-information request by BirdLife Australia last week revealed the government had asked the state-owned forestry agency (formerly known as Forestry Tasmania, rebadged as Sustainable Timber Tasmania) in late 2021 if it wanted expanded access to native forests.The agency responded in March 2022 with a list of 27 areas, including more than 6,000 hectares that it acknowledged were “old growth” forest with “negligible” past disturbance. The forests are mostly eucalyptus – stringy bark, gum-top stringy bark and swamp gum. About 88% of trees in a 18,000 hectare area proposed for logging was estimated to be more than 80 years in age, and the agency conceded some of the land was “unsurveyed or poorly surveyed”.The government policy followed projections suggesting a drop in available native forest timber for sawmills after 2027. Nearly 90% of the timber produced in Australia comes from plantations.Abetz said environmentalists had an “ideological opposition to native forestry”, and their lobbying led to Labor governments shutting down native forestry in Victoria and WA. He said if Australians did not produce the hardwood timber it needed it would import more from native forests in the US, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Solomon Islands and South America.“Tasmanians can have confidence that the relevant environmental and cultural values will be identified and carefully managed before any forestry operations occur,” Abetz said.

Whale makes epic migration, astonishing scientists

A humpback whale makes one of the longest and most unusual migrations ever recorded, raising alarm.

Whale makes epic migration, astonishing scientists Natalia Botero-AcostaThis humpback whale, photographed here off the Pacific coast of Colombia, made an epic migration A humpback whale has made one of the longest and most unusual migrations ever recorded, possibly driven by climate change, scientists say.It was seen in the Pacific Ocean off Colombia in 2017, then popped up several years later near Zanzibar in the Indian Ocean - a distance of at least 13,000 km.The experts think this epic journey might be down to climate change depleting food stocks or perhaps an odyssey to find a mate.Ekaterina Kalashnikova of the Tanzania Cetaceans Program said the feat was "truly impressive and unusual even for this highly migratory species".The photograph below shows the same whale photographed in 2022, off the Zanzibar coast.Ekaterina KalashnikovaThe same whale just off Zanzibar, photographed in 2022Dr Kalashnikova said it was very likely the longest distance a humpback whale had ever been recorded travelling.Humpback whales live in all oceans around the world. They travel long distances every year and have one of the longest migrations of any mammal, swimming from tropical breeding grounds to feeding grounds in cooler waters.But this male's journey was even more spectacular, involving two distant breeding grounds.One theory is that climate change is altering the abundance of the tiny shrimplike krill humpback whales feed on, forcing them to travel further in search of food.Alternatively, whales may be exploring new breeding grounds as populations rebound through global conservation efforts."While actual reasons are unknown, amongst the drivers there might be global changes in the climate, extreme environmental events (that are more frequent nowadays), and evolutionary mechanisms of the species," said Dr Kalashnikova.BBC/Victoria GillHumpbacks migrate annually from summer feeding grounds near the poles to warmer winter breeding waters closer to the EquatorThe wandering male was among a group of humpbacks photographed from a research vessel on the Pacific coast of Colombia in 2013. He was then identified in a similar area in 2017 - and off Zanzibar in 2022.The sightings are separated by a 13,046 km great-circle distance - the minimum distance for the route the whale might have taken, the scientists say, though it is likely to be much greater. Since the earth is a sphere, the shortest path between two points is expressed by the great circle distance, which corresponds to an arc linking two points on a sphere.The paperʻs findings are based on hundreds of thousands of photos of whales submitted by researchers, whale watchers and members of the public to the citizen science website, happywhale.com. The database uses artificial intelligence to match the individual shapes and patterns of humpback whale tails, or flukes, thereby mapping their movements around the globe. The research is published in the journal, Royal Society Open Science.Find out more about humpback whales in The Secret's of Antarctica's Giants on BBC iPlayer.

Trawl the sea or mine for metals? Pacific nations wrestle with how to protect oceans - and livelihoods

Palau plans to allow more fishing in its marine sanctuary, as countries across the region seek to balance conservation with economic needsDotted across the north-west of the Pacific Ocean, the limestone islands of Palau rise like forested domes. Beneath the waves, reefs pulse with activity – fish dart through coral gardens, turtles drift nearby, while sharks with black-tipped fins shadow a passing tourist boat.Nearly a decade ago, the country took a bold step to safeguard this vibrant seascape, declaring 80% of its waters a no-fishing sanctuary.Ngerukewid, also known as the ‘Seventy Islands’, is a group of dozens of small, raised coral islands nestled within Palau’s lagoon. Continue reading...

Dotted across the north-west of the Pacific Ocean, the limestone islands of Palau rise like forested domes. Beneath the waves, reefs pulse with activity – fish dart through coral gardens, turtles drift nearby, while sharks with black-tipped fins shadow a passing tourist boat.Nearly a decade ago, the country took a bold step to safeguard this vibrant seascape, declaring 80% of its waters a no-fishing sanctuary. Ngerukewid, also known as the ‘Seventy Islands’, is a group of dozens of small, raised coral islands nestled within Palau’s lagoon. But support for the sanctuary – which covers a massive area about the size of Sweden – has soured among some Palauans. Those who rely on the ocean feel caught between the need to feed their families and the rules designed to protect their waters.“If 80% of Palauan waters is a marine sanctuary, where am I going to get my fish?” asks Dennis Daniel, a waste management worker, while drinking beer on the shoreline of Palau’s most populous town, Koror. Fishermen have struggled to supply the local tuna markets, fuelling frustration over the nation’s strict fishing restrictions.As a result, Palau’s government wants to reopen parts of the sanctuary to allow more fishing. It plans to shrink its no-fishing zone by more than a third and open a new fishing port on the west coast of its largest island.Officials argue the move will help families like Daniel’s, while still protecting half of Palau’s waters from commercial fishing. Critics, however, warn that scaling back protections will only harm Palau’s marine diversity, already vulnerable to the climate crisis.Palau’s struggle is not unique. In communities across the region, where the ocean is often their biggest resource, mounting economic pressures are forcing a rethink of environmental commitments.Collectively, small island Pacific states manage roughly 10% of the planet’s oceans, making their decisions critical not only for their own futures, but for the health of marine ecosystems worldwide. The Pacific is also home to some of the most valuable fisheries in the world, with the region supplying about 30% of the world’s tuna.In 2017, the Cook Islands designated its entire ocean as the world’s largest marine park, called Marae Moana. Beneath these same waters lie a vast wealth of polymetallic nodules rich in cobalt, copper, nickel and manganese – and over the past four years the Cook Islands’ government has been exploring the possibility of commercially developing these underwater minerals in areas outside certain protected zones, at least 100km off its coasts. That could include seabed mining.The Pacific nation has granted three exploration licences for companies to map and analyse its seabeds, and is working on developing technical and environmental assessments to guide any future seabed mineral activities.Seabed mining is not under way in Cook Islands as it conducts assessments and studies feasibility. In an email interview with the Guardian, the Cook Islands prime minister, Mark Brown, said no minerals harvesting or mining “will be permitted until the scientific basis is clear”.“We are 99.99% ocean and 0.01% land, so it is inevitable that we will turn to our blue economy for further opportunities for our future prosperity,” Brown said in written responses to the Guardian’s questions.“As a Pacific island nation, the Cook Islands are deeply conscious of the need to protect our environment while creating sustainable opportunities for our people.”Meanwhile, in 2021 Kiribati announced it would reopen a world heritage site and one of the world’s largest marine protected areas to commercial fishing, citing the strain of lost revenue. Palau’s president, Surangel Whipps Jr, said the move highlights the challenges Pacific nations often face meeting their conservation aspirations with economic survival.“There was no sustainable financing there, there was no system in place to ensure that [Kiribati’s marine sanctuary] can go on,” Whipps told the Guardian. “So at the end of the day, they had to feed their people.”Whipps says Palau is facing a similar predicament, but hopes the redesign of its marine sanctuary would prove to other Pacific nations they “can do both”: protect the ocean while reaping fish and profit from it.Not everyone agrees on how best to strike this balance. Palau’s former president Tommy Remengesau Jr, who led the sanctuary’s creation during his presidency, says the sanctuary rollback is an unnecessary undoing of Palau’s globally leading commitments.“It doesn’t make sense to open up a good thing,” he says. “The sustainability of our ocean resources are being threatened and, unless we balance conservation and harvesting, there won’t be a future for our children.”Palau’s waters are considered especially biodiverse; a recent National Geographic expedition recorded the region’s highest abundance of key species, like silky shark and yellowfin.However, researchers also found abandoned fishing gear and depleted shark populations: clear signs of overfishing. They concluded that Palau and similar Pacific nations needed “large protected areas” to prevent further decline.Though the size of this protection remains a subject of heated debate, the sanctuary is broadly supported by Palauans – particularly tourism workers who view it as a vital draw for visitors.----------Captain Troy Ngiraikelau weaves his boat through the emerald maze of Palau’s islets, shuttling tourists to dive sites. He says he has noticed fewer schools of fish on the reefs compared with when he was a child, and is therefore supportive of Palau’s ambitious marine protections.“There’s a lot of people who live in Koror, so if they go out every weekend and fish everything then we end up with nothing,” Ngiraikelau says. “I think it’s good that we have the marine sanctuary.”Tourism once employed a quarter of Palau’s workforce, generating more than 40% of the nation’s wealth. Legislators hoped the sanctuary would further boost ecotourism, but its launch in 2020 coincided with the Covid pandemic, causing a steep drop in the sector and plunging the country’s economy into crisis. I think it’s good that we have the marine sanctuary“One thing we learned from the impact of Covid-19 is that we cannot rely on developing Palau’s economy just based on tourism,” says Palau’s environment minister, Steven Victor. “We need to diversify our economy.”For fishing companies tasked with leading this economic revival, marine protections are harming their bottom line. Jackson Ngiraingas, a former politician who owns Palau’s only domestically flagged longline tuna fishing boat, says increasing the fishing zone is his only path to catching enough fish to sell overseas and become profitable.“We have to expand to the international market for export, because that’s where the money is,” he says.About 3% of the planet’s ocean is currently under adequate marine protections, according to the Marine Conservation Institute. The UN has set a goal to protect at least 30% of oceans by 2030, but there are fears marine sanctuaries are not being created fast enough to meet this target.Prof Kate Barclay, a marine social scientist specialising in Pacific fisheries from the University of Technology Sydney, says the region’s reefs are susceptible to overfishing so “those are where you really do need to be very careful for environmental sustainability”. Steven Victor, the minister of agriculture, fisheries and the environment, explains the purpose of the marine tanks at the Palau fisheries. At the same time, deep sea mining remains an emerging frontier for Pacific nations. Views on the practice are mixed – 32 countries around the world have called for a moratorium on the industry, while some Pacific nations like Kiribati, Tonga, Nauru and the Cook Islands are exploring the potential of the sector.Brown acknowledges and shares concerns that seabed mining could undermine marine health. Through its marine park, he says his government has built a sustainable model for balancing conservation and his people’s livelihoods.He adds that “robust laws and strict environmental safeguards” will ensure any future seabed development “protects the integrity of our ocean heritage and supports our conservation goals”.“Seabed minerals exploration provides an opportunity to diversify our economy and strengthen our resilience to challenges like climate change and global economic shifts, especially as we currently rely heavily on tourism,” he says. Barclay says it is unfair to criticise Pacific countries, who have limited industries and are suffering the impacts of climate change, for seeking wealth in their oceans.“I don’t think it’s my position … to tell them what they should or shouldn’t do with their resources,” she says.

Trying to Attract Tourists, Venezuela Builds Infrastructure in Fragile Ecosystems

LOS ROQUES ARCHIPELAGO, Venezuela (Reuters) - A push by Venezuela to attract tourists and boost its flailing economy by building infrastructure...

LOS ROQUES ARCHIPELAGO, Venezuela (Reuters) - A push by Venezuela to attract tourists and boost its flailing economy by building infrastructure including runways and hotels is doing environmental damage to ecologically-delicate areas, especially fragile Caribbean coral reefs already threatened by climate change, conservationists, scientists, government sources and locals say.The government of President Nicolas Maduro, who blames U.S. sanctions for his country's economic crisis, has called tourism the economy's "secret weapon".The push has so far failed to attract foreign investors, sources say, despite a tourism ministry meeting with French businesspeople and public overtures from Maduro to investors as recently as this month.But the infrastructure effort is already drawing criticism from biologists, activists and locals, with one conservation group alleging at least one major infrastructure project is illegal.The runway at the main airport serving Los Roques National Park - an archipelago of 45 islands, cays and crystalline waters spread over 550,000 acres in the Caribbean and recognized by the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands - was expanded to 1,300 meters this year from 800 meters, allowing larger planes to land.The extension destroyed coral, mangroves and a nesting beach for the critically endangered Eretmochelys imbricata turtle, covering it with asphalt and rocks, "among other disturbances that will affect the natural resources of the park," the Venezuelan Ecological Society said in a report.Maduro, who has also promoted foreign investment in a project to construct 10 hotels on the nearly virgin La Tortuga Island, says his plans respect the environment."Important investors from all over are coming, many from the Arab world, many from Turkey, many from Iran, from China, from India, from Brazil to invest in tourism," he said on state television in November, hailing "the growth of hotels, guesthouses and tourist services across the country."Maduro reiterated the call to investors in early December: "Tourism is already a great motor, but it still must cover a lot of ground to become the secret motor of the new economy."The government has signed tourism deals with Nicaragua, Cuba and Syria, tourism minister Leticia Gomez said during the same broadcast, without giving further details.She hailed a 69% increase in tourism through November, compared with the same period a year earlier, saying 1.8 million international tourists visited - including from Russia, Poland, Iran, Cuba and neighboring Colombia.By comparison, more than 3.1 million visitors entered Colombia in the first six months of 2024.The plans for La Tortuga, 53 miles off the country's northern coast, also include an airport and port."There is a master plan ... by transnational companies that are experts in these types of islands and who have done major developments in Qatar, in the Maldives, in French Polynesia and in Hawaii," Nicolas Maduro Guerra, Maduro's lawmaker son, told Reuters in May, without naming the companies.The plan is "ecologically stable and friendly to the island, keeping part of the island virgin," Maduro Guerra said.Environmental permits are not public and Venezuela's environment and tourism ministries did not respond to requests for comment, but two government sources said impact studies were not conducted for the runway extension in Los Roques, where one conservation group says the work violates a 2004 law."The national park has become a disaster," said retired Los Roques park ranger and conservationist Toribio Mata, who still lives on the archipelago, saying turtle hunting, spearfishing and visits by the public to restricted areas have all risen over the decade since his retirement because of lack of enforcement.National parks institute Inparques is responsible for managing the parks, sanctuaries and reserves that make up about a third of Venezuela's territory. It did not respond to a request for comment.Upon arrival at Gran Roque, Los Roques' largest island, about 88 miles north of the mainland, visitors pay an entrance fee and receive a wristband and a glossy pamphlet showcasing protected areas, recreational activities and places to stay.The pamphlet does not mention trash and sewage problems recounted by residents, who mostly live off fishing and tourism.Reuters witnesses saw what appeared to be sewage being dumped into the sea in a remote area of Gran Roque. Residents, who asked not to be named, said they fear increased tourism will worsen waste issues.La Tortuga has no capacity to process waste, environmental advocates say.Governance of that island, as well as of Los Roques and other islands, is the purview of government minister Anibal Eduardo Coronado, who is also the head of the department that monitors implementation of Maduro's policies.The communications ministry did not respond to a request for comment.The United Nations and coastal countries have warned coral reefs are being devastated by the effects of warming oceans, experiencing their worst bleaching on record.Los Roques' already-damaged reef and coral on La Tortuga are important incubators for coral and fish species present in other reefs in Curazao and Aruba, and also sustain fishing families in neighboring coastal states.Mata, the son of a park ranger, joined the service in 1979 at 22 and has kept years' worth of drawings of migratory birds and notes from 3 a.m. conservation missions."The park was conserved because we were paying attention, we conducted rounds to protect turtles in the park, marine species, to prevent construction on the cays," Mata said.Inparques now rotates rangers in monthly from Caracas.Mata's worries about faltering conservation were echoed by other residents.Three local fishermen told Reuters they have noticed a reduction in marine species including lobster and octopus, which they blame on over-fishing in protected areas and a lack of enforcement of regulations within the park.Fishermen told Reuters that illegal fishermen use chlorine to startle octopus out of reefs and capture them, also damaging the coral. Some tourists ignore warnings not to use sunscreen, which can harm reefs, and leave behind trash including cigarette butts.The local trash incinerator is broken, according to residents.The environment ministry did not respond to questions about park management, the destruction of coral and mangroves due to infrastructure construction or over-fishing.'CONSTRUCTION BRINGS CONSEQUENCES'The archipelago's reef suffered a bleaching in November 2023, according to biologist and university professor Angel Farina, and another bleaching began in October this year."We have the highest temperatures registered for Caribbean sea water and our coasts," he said, citing climate change but also use of the chemicals for fishing and the presence of sewage.Construction of more infrastructure would "obviously bring consequences," he said. "Construction creates pollution, it creates sedimentation that can affect reefs temporarily or permanently ... deforestation of mangroves is harmful anywhere because they are nurseries for diverse species."A resort constructed before Maduro's tourism push has already put pressure on La Tortuga's delicate ecosystem, the Venezuelan Observatory of Political Ecology said."It's a jewel, an ecological jewel," said a scientist who worked at a now-shuttered research station in Los Roques and who asked for anonymity, referring to the archipelago. "The regulations of the national park are not being respected, it's being pushed toward commercialization, toward mass tourism."(Reporting by Reuters; Editing by Julia Symmes Cobb and Daniel Wallis)Copyright 2024 Thomson Reuters.

From Giant Tortoises to Immortal Jellyfish, These Impressive Animals Are Eight of the Longest-Living Species on Earth

Aging gracefully comes naturally to these creatures, which can live for hundreds, and sometimes even thousands, of years

Life is short, the old saying goes, but in the world of animals, we humans are pretty fortunate: Our species is quite long-lived. With 122 being the oldest documented age, humans can enjoy decades more life than most fish, birds and mammals—including our primate relatives. But we’re not alone in experiencing longevity. Other rare species reach ages marked in centuries, and each class of animals boasts individuals that are unusually long-lived compared to their peers. Aging wild animals isn’t always easy—they don’t have birth certificates. But we’ve searched the scientific record to identify some of the world’s oldest species and revealed their secrets to staying alive. Giant tortoises are the longest-living reptiles Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise at 185 years old Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images The world’s oldest living land animal, Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise, celebrates his unofficial 192nd birthday this December 4. His estimated birth year is 1832, the year Andrew Jackson won re-election. He was fully mature, thus at least 50, when he was gifted to the governor of Saint Helena island in 1882. But nobody knows his real age, and some experts suspect Jonathan was probably born even earlier. And this ancient individual isn’t an outlier among his kind. Seychelles giant tortoises average a 150-year life span, and related species can be similarly long-lived. How? Genetic studies of Galápagos giant tortoises revealed variants that aid cancer suppression, anti-inflammatory immune responses and DNA repair. When some tortoise cells are subjected to age-related stresses, they tend to self-destruct before they are damaged in ways that could produce cancer or other fatal illnesses. Other research suggests that part of the tortoise’s secret lies in its shell. A study of 77 species of reptiles and amphibians showed that species with protective shells aged five times more slowly than those without the coverings. One theory holds that since shells frequently prevent tortoises from being eaten by predators, shelled species tend to live longer, and over time that may have helped to produce evolutionary pressures to age more slowly. Olms, the cave-dwelling salamanders, are the longest-living amphibians A young olm is released into an aquarium in a cave in Slovenia. Ure Makovec / AFP via Getty Images In the lightless caves of Croatia and Slovenia, the olm cave salamander has adapted superpowers to thrive in an isolated environment across generations over some 20 million years. Olms enjoy extreme senses of smell and hearing, and the ability to hunt by detecting faint electrical fields of other animals in the water nearby. They have also become very long-lived among amphibians, averaging 69 years and reaching ages of 100 or perhaps more. Those estimates come from research out of a cave laboratory in Moulis, France, where scientist have tracked olm births and deaths for some 70 years. Adult olms retain characteristics of their larval youth, like external gills, and show few signs of aging even as the decades pile up. But the reasons why they live so long aren’t clear. These salamanders go through life slowly with a low metabolism. They can go for years without eating and even spend years without moving much from a single location. But their metabolisms aren’t significantly lower than those of relatives that don’t live nearly as long. The olm’s caves are largely free from predators and external threats, so it’s possible that the environment encourages very high survival rates that in turn have somehow enabled olms to evolve extreme life spans. Greenland sharks are the longest-living fish A Greenland shark off the coast of Nunavut Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0 Could a contemporary of William Shakespeare still be swimming in the sea? Greenland sharks inhabit the deep, dark, frigid waters of the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans—and they do so for an astoundingly long time. Radiocarbon dating techniques on the fish’s eye lenses have found living sharks that are around 400 years old, according to a 2016 study, which means they could have been alive during the Bard’s days. In the frigid depths, the cold-blooded animals’ movements and metabolism slow dramatically. Greenland sharks’ metabolic rate is “just above a rock,” Chris Lowe, a shark biologist at the California State University at Long Beach, told Smithsonian magazine in 2016. Greenland sharks are slow-growing, less than half an inch per year, but live so long that mature specimens reach more than 19 feet in length. These sharks may not reach reproductive age until they are 150 years old—longer than any human has ever survived. Based on their growth rates and the size of some sharks, their maximum age could be as much as 500 years. In September 2024, an international team sequenced the shark’s very large genome—a genetic code of 6.5 billion base pairs, twice as long as the human genome. Greenland sharks boast high numbers of repetitive or duplicate genes. That’s often considered detrimental to a genome, but in this case it may be beneficial for longevity because many of the duplicated genes help to repair DNA damage in cells. Termite queens are the longest-living insects A termite queen in captivity China Photos / Getty Images Life is fleeting for most insects. “Generally insect life spans are measured in weeks to months,” says Floyd Shockley, an entomologist at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. These species tend to reproduce at a tender age, having many young as quickly as possible, because their days are numbered. But some social insects, like termites, employ a different strategy, and it enables their queens to defy death for 50 years or more. Among these insects, most individuals—the workers—are largely sterile and live just a few months. They spend that time supporting the queen’s efforts as an egg-laying machine—in some cases she’ll produce thousands a day for many years on end. “The queens reproduce nonstop upon reaching adulthood, and the reproductive cycle has many aspects to it that result in enhanced cellular regeneration,” Shockley explains. This genetic ability to regenerate cells keeps some queens going for decades, arresting their aging until they literally give out and run out of eggs. “At that point,” Shockley says, “they rapidly decline and die.” Laysan albatrosses are the longest-living wild birds An older albatross named Wisdom covers a recently hatched chick in 2011 at Midway Atoll. John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain Birds are relatively long-lived in the animal kingdom, averaging two to three times the life span of mammals of the same size, studies show. This longevity might be related to birds’ ability to fly. As evolution fine-tuned bird biology to engineer flight, building systems like strong muscles and efficient ways to process oxygen, it may have helped them to stay healthier longer—as well as enable them to fly away from potentially lethal situations. Most adult birds don’t show many obvious physical signs of aging, which makes it difficult to know just how long they have been alive in the wild. But one unusual example, a Laysan albatross named Wisdom, is at least 74 years old and has just laid another egg. The oldest-known wild bird in the world, Wisdom was banded in 1956. During her annual wanderings she returns to Midway Atoll each year, usually in December. Scientists estimate that Wisdom has flown over three million miles in her long life, and fledged as many as 30 chicks. Sponges are the longest-living invertebrates The glass sponge Euplectella aspergillum NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain Sponges aren’t the most dynamic animals; rooted to a spot on the seafloor, these filter feeders may appear more similar to plants than animals. But they have at least one jaw-dropping ability—survival. Glass sponge reefs found off British Columbia’s north coast are among the oldest in the entire ocean and have survived for more than 9,000 years. In the East China Sea, scientists discovered the skeleton of a glass sponge that had lived for some 11,000 years. The sponge is so ancient that its remains constitute an archive of ancient climate in the sea. Under chemical analysis, scientists were able to reconstruct past environmental changes like ocean temperature shifts and the eruptions of underwater seamounts, which left their marks on the ancient sponge. Fossils show that these sponges aren’t just long-lived individuals. As a group they are some of the earliest animals to appear on Earth. They may have been around as long as 890 million years ago—more than 600 million years before the dinosaurs emerged. Elephants are some of the longest-living land mammals An elephant mother walks with her baby in Kenya. Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images Elephant memories are long, and so are their lives. African elephants can live up to 70 years, while their slightly smaller Asian elephant relatives may reach 60 years of age. Big mammals like whales and elephants, which are less likely to die from predators or other accidents, tend to live longer lives. This in turn can spur evolutionary genetic and metabolic investments that protect against, or repair, the damage life exerts on cells. Elephants copy tumor-suppressing genes, for example, so that one can function if the other is damaged. That kind of anti-cancer adaptation is unlikely to arise in a short-lived small mammal, like a field mouse, that’s soon to become something’s dinner. And while many species strive to reproduce before they die but don’t have a huge role once their reproductive days have passed, elephants are different. These giants have a social structure that values elders for many years after their peak reproductive period is over. Studies show that elderly female elephants are leaders, valued for their roles as caregivers for the young and for their experience and knowledge to evaluate predatory threats and make good decisions for the group. Immortal jellyfish are the longest-living invertebrates The immortal jellyfish: is it possible to live forever? These tiny jellyfish have been drifting around the oceans since before the days of the dinosaurs—but how long has a single jellyfish lived? It appears to be biologically possible that, if not swallowed up by predators or killed by other factors, an immortal jellyfish could live indefinitely. Like other jellyfish, the species’ fertilized eggs develop into a larva form, which then drops to the seafloor and grows into a colony of polyps. The polyps later morph into the recognizable, free-floating jellyfish forms known as medusas. But incredibly, when faced with threats from injury to starvation, the immortal jellyfish can reverse the process, turning the clock backward. First the gelatinous layer thins out and the jellyfish settles on the bottom, where it becomes a cyst-like mass of cells. All features of the familiar “medusa” shape disappear. But within a few days it starts to show polyp features, and it begins the life cycle anew. “The process is a true metamorphosis, albeit in opposite direction to the normal developmental cycle,” says Maria Pia Miglietta, who studies the evolution and ecology of the immortal jellyfish at Texas A&M University. Miglietta adds that the transformation from jellyfish to polyp may involve transdifferentiation—a process in which mature cells transform from one type to another entirely different type of cell. Miglietta says that while the jellyfish life cycle has been reversed many times in the lab, nobody knows how often it happens or how long the jellyfish might survive in the wild. “Studying these animals in the ocean is hard,” she says, “and we haven’t figured out how to follow a two-millimeter jellyfish and see what happens to it.”Full Credit for Main Image: Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0; John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain; Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images; China Photos / Getty Images; Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images; NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Success for local residents as Florida council toppled over sewage plant plan

Entire slate of councilors in Milton defeated after grassroots revolt to proposal for facility close to treasured riverA citizens’ revolt in a small Florida city ousted an entire slate of councilors who were pushing for a new sewage plant to be built close to one of the state’s most pristine and treasured rivers.The Save Blackwater River campaign, in partnership with a citizen action group, toppled all four Milton politicians running for re-election last month in a remarkable victory for grassroots activism. Continue reading...

A citizens’ revolt in a small Florida city ousted an entire slate of councilors who were pushing for a new sewage plant to be built close to one of the state’s most pristine and treasured rivers.The Save Blackwater River campaign, in partnership with a citizen action group, toppled all four Milton politicians running for re-election last month in a remarkable victory for grassroots activism.As a result, plans for the 25-acre wastewater treatment facility that was to have been constructed partly on wetlands feeding the environmentally sensitive river are in suspension.And the new intake of Milton city councilors must work quickly with its other four members who were not up for election to decide how to deal with toxic effluent the previous panel wanted to spray on to fields that would, environmental engineers concluded, pose a likely threat to its drinking water.“It’s almost a cliche to say it, but it really is a new day in this city,” said Pam Mitchell, co-founder of the Concerned Citizens of Milton group that helped promote the four new councilors, who are all residents or business owners there.“The people here are very protective of their river and their community, and these elections showed that. And I think it just sets the work before us as grassroots organizations to educate the people how strong they’ve got to stay to stand up against the outside money that’s coming in here.”Mitchell said nobody disputes that Milton’s existing sewage treatment plant, a downtown relic built more than six decades ago when the city’s population was less than half the 10,000 it is now, needs to be replaced.The Florida department of environmental protection (DEP) has ordered the city to stop releasing treated effluent from it into the Blackwater, which is popular for fishing and other water-based recreation, by the end of next year.But she said residents could not accept the city’s solution, namely the proposed new plant on a clay-based site vulnerable to flooding, close to the banks of the Blackwater, and which geologists hired by the citizens’ groups determined was a potential hazard to the river in the event of the failure of a sewer line running under it.Outside developers, championed by some city officials and councilors, were in line for a lucrative payday to build the new, higher capacity plant, that protesters say was being railroaded through with insufficient discussion or input from residents.The city, meanwhile, lost $9m in federal funding for the project for missing deadlines to submit detailed environmental impact assessments. And a succession of council meetings turned fractious, with Mitchell saying she was escorted from one by the local police chief after she was ejected for protesting a lack of public comment, and another ending in an alleged threat of violence against one council member by a Republican elected county official.Ultimately, Mitchell said, Milton voters were worn out by the drama.“The disorganization and dysfunction of the city council and administration over about six years has steadily gotten worse,” she said. “Now it’s time for us to walk the walk. Now the work really begins. We told the public what we were going to do, now we’ve got to show them we mean business.”Working with the existing council members and staff to resolve the wastewater plant issue, including a search for a suitable new location, will be an early priority when the new faces are sworn in on 10 December.More immediately, Milton must decide whether to press ahead with a $16m contract with a local company to use field spraying to disperse effluent otherwise destined for the Blackwater.The Pensacola News-Journal reported in August that DEP had concerns about high levels of pollutants known as PFAs, or forever chemicals, seeping into the ground near aquifers and wells in Santa Rosa county that provide drinking water.But if no contract is in place by the end of the year, the city is set to miss out on an expiring $5m grant from the American Rescue Plan Act intended to fund necessary improvements to water and sewer infrastructures at state and local government level.“It’s a shambles,” Mitchell said. “They left it until the 11th hour and now they’ve allowed another deadline to sneak up on them. They were just ready to throw something out there and get it signed, it really doesn’t matter what it is, they just don’t want to lose the $5m.”One of the incoming councilors, retired postal supervisor Larry McKee, told the Florida Phoenix that he would not be rushed into any decision, and wanted to avoid the mistakes of the previous chamber.“I saw the dysfunctional family environment. I knew we needed a change. I don’t believe in fighting, I believe in figuring out what’s needed and getting it done,” said McKee, who had never previously run for office.Another incoming council member, nurse Ashley Fretwell, expressed a similar sentiment, telling the Phoenix: “The public was not being heard. Nobody would listen to each other.”Mitchell said their election was a victory for the entire Milton community. “The new faces are committed to doing their homework and research, while the prior council didn’t really ask questions,” she said.“If the city manager said this was the best place in Santa Rosa county to put a wastewater plant, then, by golly, it was the best place, and they never would look at the data and the science that we put in front of them.“This new council campaigned and won on a split platform of ending the dysfunction and siting the wastewater plant in an environmentally responsible location. It doesn’t mean they’re all going to blindly go in the same direction, but it does mean they’re not going to be calling one another names, and cussing and fighting all the time.”

No Results today.

Our news is updated constantly with the latest environmental stories from around the world. Reset or change your filters to find the most active current topics.

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.