Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Scientists Clone Two Black-Footed Ferrets From Frozen Tissues in Conservation Effort

News Feed
Monday, April 22, 2024

Antonia, one of the new black-footed ferret clones. The first black-footed ferret clone was born in 2020. The two new ferrets are the second and third successful clones. Roshan Patel / Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Researchers have cloned two black-footed ferrets from preserved tissue samples in an effort to conserve the creatures, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service announced last week. The animals are the second and third ferret clones in history—the first was born in December 2020. Black-footed ferrets are endangered, and scientists hope the new clones can increase the genetic diversity of the species. The limited genetic diversity of the current population makes the animals more susceptible to diseases and genetic abnormalities, decreases their fertility rates and makes it harder for them to adapt in the wild, hampering their recovery. “Genetic diversity is critical for resilience to environmental change,” Megan Owen, vice president of conservation science at the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, which contributed to the cloning effort, tells the Washington Post’s Dino Grandoni. “It’s basically the raw material of adaptive evolution.” The two new clones, named Noreen and Antonia, are healthy, and they have been reaching their expected developmental and behavioral milestones. Noreen was born at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado, while Antonia was born at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute. One of three ferret species, black-footed ferrets are native to North America and have lived on the continent for at least 100,000 years. Long and skinny, with light fur everywhere except for their black face masks, feet and tail tips, the mammals are nocturnal and mostly live underground. An estimated 500,000 to 1 million black-footed ferrets lived during the late 1800s, and they historically roamed 12 states, northern Mexico and southern Canada. But in the 20th century, their numbers declined dramatically as farmers eradicated prairie dogs, which make up most of a black-footed ferret’s diet. Diseases including canine distemper and a form of plague wiped out ferrets and prairie dogs alike. Researchers thought the last black-footed ferret might have died in 1979. But in 1981, a ranch dog brought a dead ferret home, leading to the discovery of a small population of the species near the town of Meeteetse, Wyoming. In the following years, officials captured 24 ferrets and started a breeding program. Since then, they have grown the species’ population and introduced ferrets back into the wild at 34 sites across eight states, Canada and Mexico. The Fish and Wildlife Service estimates several hundred black-footed ferrets currently live in the wild. While this effort preserved the species, it also set up a problem: All living black-footed ferrets are descended from only seven of the wild-caught animals, severely limiting their genetic diversity. But the three cloned ferrets come from frozen tissue samples collected in 1988 from a ferret called Willa, which had been stored at the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance’s Frozen Zoo. Willa never reproduced, so her genes are not part of the captive black-footed ferret gene pool. Her samples contain three times as many unique genetic variations than the average in the current population, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. The cloned ferret Noreen, born at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado Kika Tuff / Revive & Restore To clone the ferrets, researchers injected a cell from Willa into a domesticated ferret egg, per the Washington Post. The Fish and Wildlife Service announced the birth of the first clone, Elizabeth Ann, in 2021. She lives at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center and is healthy, but she has been unable to give birth. Elizabeth Ann has a condition called hydrometra, where fluid fills the uterus. One of her uterine horns, where the fallopian tubes open into the uterus, did not fully develop. Since this condition is not unusual in black-footed ferrets, researchers don’t think it’s related to the cloning, per the Fish and Wildlife Service. Once the two newborn ferrets reach maturity later this year, researchers will try to get them to have babies to pass on their genetic diversity. Some of the ferret cloning project’s collaborators are also working to freeze tissue samples from every endangered species in the U.S., in case they can help combat extinction of these species in the future, reports Scientific American’s Cari Shane. The cloning research doesn’t replace the need for recovering ferrets in the wild, and the Fish and Wildlife Service is continuing to work on reintroducing animals, monitoring ones currently living in the wild and preserving their habitats. “Some people think if you have [species] in a freezer, you don’t need them in the wild,” Seth Willey, a Fish and Wildlife Service deputy assistant regional director, tells Scientific American. “That’s just not true… We can’t lose what we have in the wild. But if we do, it’s good to have an insurance policy.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

The aim of cloning the animals is to increase the genetic diversity of the endangered species

A baby ferret
Antonia, one of the new black-footed ferret clones. The first black-footed ferret clone was born in 2020. The two new ferrets are the second and third successful clones. Roshan Patel / Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute

Researchers have cloned two black-footed ferrets from preserved tissue samples in an effort to conserve the creatures, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service announced last week. The animals are the second and third ferret clones in history—the first was born in December 2020.

Black-footed ferrets are endangered, and scientists hope the new clones can increase the genetic diversity of the species. The limited genetic diversity of the current population makes the animals more susceptible to diseases and genetic abnormalities, decreases their fertility rates and makes it harder for them to adapt in the wild, hampering their recovery.

“Genetic diversity is critical for resilience to environmental change,” Megan Owen, vice president of conservation science at the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, which contributed to the cloning effort, tells the Washington Post’s Dino Grandoni. “It’s basically the raw material of adaptive evolution.”

The two new clones, named Noreen and Antonia, are healthy, and they have been reaching their expected developmental and behavioral milestones. Noreen was born at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado, while Antonia was born at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo & Conservation Biology Institute.

One of three ferret species, black-footed ferrets are native to North America and have lived on the continent for at least 100,000 years. Long and skinny, with light fur everywhere except for their black face masks, feet and tail tips, the mammals are nocturnal and mostly live underground.

An estimated 500,000 to 1 million black-footed ferrets lived during the late 1800s, and they historically roamed 12 states, northern Mexico and southern Canada. But in the 20th century, their numbers declined dramatically as farmers eradicated prairie dogs, which make up most of a black-footed ferret’s diet. Diseases including canine distemper and a form of plague wiped out ferrets and prairie dogs alike.

Researchers thought the last black-footed ferret might have died in 1979. But in 1981, a ranch dog brought a dead ferret home, leading to the discovery of a small population of the species near the town of Meeteetse, Wyoming.

In the following years, officials captured 24 ferrets and started a breeding program. Since then, they have grown the species’ population and introduced ferrets back into the wild at 34 sites across eight states, Canada and Mexico. The Fish and Wildlife Service estimates several hundred black-footed ferrets currently live in the wild.

While this effort preserved the species, it also set up a problem: All living black-footed ferrets are descended from only seven of the wild-caught animals, severely limiting their genetic diversity.

But the three cloned ferrets come from frozen tissue samples collected in 1988 from a ferret called Willa, which had been stored at the San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance’s Frozen Zoo.

Willa never reproduced, so her genes are not part of the captive black-footed ferret gene pool. Her samples contain three times as many unique genetic variations than the average in the current population, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service.

baby ferret on a table
The cloned ferret Noreen, born at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado Kika Tuff / Revive & Restore

To clone the ferrets, researchers injected a cell from Willa into a domesticated ferret egg, per the Washington Post.

The Fish and Wildlife Service announced the birth of the first clone, Elizabeth Ann, in 2021. She lives at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center and is healthy, but she has been unable to give birth.

Elizabeth Ann has a condition called hydrometra, where fluid fills the uterus. One of her uterine horns, where the fallopian tubes open into the uterus, did not fully develop. Since this condition is not unusual in black-footed ferrets, researchers don’t think it’s related to the cloning, per the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Once the two newborn ferrets reach maturity later this year, researchers will try to get them to have babies to pass on their genetic diversity.

Some of the ferret cloning project’s collaborators are also working to freeze tissue samples from every endangered species in the U.S., in case they can help combat extinction of these species in the future, reports Scientific American’s Cari Shane.

The cloning research doesn’t replace the need for recovering ferrets in the wild, and the Fish and Wildlife Service is continuing to work on reintroducing animals, monitoring ones currently living in the wild and preserving their habitats.

“Some people think if you have [species] in a freezer, you don’t need them in the wild,” Seth Willey, a Fish and Wildlife Service deputy assistant regional director, tells Scientific American. “That’s just not true… We can’t lose what we have in the wild. But if we do, it’s good to have an insurance policy.”

Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Destruction of Ukraine dam caused ‘toxic timebomb’ of heavy metals, study finds

Researchers say environmental impact from Kakhovka dam explosion comparable to Chornobyl nuclear disasterThe destruction of a large Ukrainian dam in 2023 triggered a “toxic timebomb” of environmental harm, a study has found.Lakebed sediments holding 83,000 tonnes of heavy metals were exposed when the Kakhovka dam was blown up one year into Russia’s invasion, researchers found. Continue reading...

The destruction of a large Ukrainian dam in 2023 triggered a “toxic timebomb” of environmental harm, a study has found.Lakebed sediments holding 83,000 tonnes of heavy metals were exposed when the Kakhovka dam was blown up one year into Russia’s invasion, researchers found.Less than 1% of these “highly toxic” heavy metals – which include lead, cadmium and nickel – are likely to have been released when the reservoir drained, the scientists found. They said the remaining pollutants would leach into rivers as rains wore down the sediment, threatening human health in a region where river water is widely used to make up for shortages in municipal water supplies.The lead author, Oleksandra Shumilova, said the scale of the environmental impacts was comparable to the Chornobyl nuclear disaster.“All these pollutants that were deposited on the bottom can accumulate in different organisms, pass through the food web, and spread from vegetation to animals to humans,” said Shumilova, a scientist at the Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries. “Its consequences can be compared to the effects of radiation.”The researchers linked on-the-ground measurements with remote sensing data and hydrology models to map the environmental impacts of the dam’s destruction, which flooded the region and killed 84 people. They estimated water from the breach killed 20-30% of floodplain rodents, along with the entire juvenile fish stock.They said the reservoir released 9,000-17,000 tonnes of phytoplankton each day in the first week after the dam was blown up, driving an increase in water turbidity that led to the “probable loss” of 10,000 tonnes of macroinvertebrates.The destruction of natural life detailed in the study appears to contrast with the striking images of wildlife that has returned to the reservoir since the dam burst. White willows and black poplars have reforested the land, and wild boars and other animals have taken over areas that people still avoid. Fish that have not been seen for decades, such as sturgeon and herring, have returned to the water.The researchers expect that the area will reach a level of biodiversity equivalent to 80% of an undammed ecosystem within five years.“It’s not recovery, it’s better to use a word such as re-establish,” said Shumilova. “It means that it will develop its own way, but not necessarily to the initial conditions.”The Kakhovka dam, which was built in the 1950s on the Dnipro River, was destroyed on 6 June 2023 while under Russian occupation. Its reservoir supplied water to cool the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and irrigate southern Ukraine.Before and after Nova Kakhovka dam collapse in Ukraine – videoUkrainian ecologists have debated whether the dam should be rebuilt after the war – and how much land should be flooded if it is – with some arguing for the new ecosystem to be left alone as part of a growing movement to rewild human-disturbed areas. Shumilova said that the unresolved question of heavy metal contamination complicated this approach, because it was unclear whether the vegetation was enough to keep the exposed sediments in place.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotion“It’s still something that people have to investigate,” she said. “Presently, it’s difficult because of the war – it’s difficult for scientists to go there to take samples and conduct experiments.”Shumilova, a Berlin-based researcher whose home town of Mykolaiv was cut off from water for a full month at the start of the war, said the study findings were relevant for peacetime removals of large dams, as well as for other wars between industrialised countries.Water has repeatedly been used as a weapon of war in Ukraine, with attackers and defenders having blown up dams for military gain. Legal scholars say the destruction of the Kakhovka dam, which Ukraine blames on Russia, and which Russia disputes, could constitute an environmental war crime.Shah Maruf, a law researcher at the University of Dhaka who has published research on the legal consequences of the Kakhovka dam’s destruction, said the new findings “suggest that the damage is ‘widespread, long-term, and severe’, fulfilling one of the key requirements for an environmental war crime”.But he added that the speed of the ecosystem’s recovery could affect the strength of the case. “If the recovery is faster – and if that was anticipated by the perpetrator while attacking – that may compromise the finding of ‘long-term’ damage in the context of environmental war crime.”Last month, a separate study exploring the effects of the Kakhovka dam destruction on the Black Sea ecosystems observed some habitats and species replenishing, but found “significant habitat destruction, disturbances and pollutant damages remain”.Carol Stepien, an ecologist at the Smithsonian Institution and co-author of the study, said Ukraine’s freshwater, estuarine and marine species “evolved under conditions of longtime flux”, exposing them to a range of temperatures, salinity levels and habitat qualities. This “may aid their resilience and recovery”, she added.

Cattle killed by wolves could net Oregon ranchers bigger state payouts. If Democrats defy environmentalists

For years, Oregon ranchers have complained about wolves preying on their cows, horses and other animals.

Oregon ranchers want higher payouts from the state to recoup their losses for cattle and other livestock killed by wolves. But the fate of a bill that would increase those payments will be determined by whether enough Democratic lawmakers, who hold the majority in Salem, are willing to defy environmentalists and support the proposal.For years, Oregon ranchers have complained about wolves preying on their cows, horses and other animals. Because shooting a wolf is against state hunting laws, lawmakers in 2011 agreed to compensate ranchers for the financial loss of any animal that dies following a wolf attack.Ranchers say the money is vital to keeping their operations profitable. In 2023, Oregon counties gave ranchers $70,300 from state coffers for dead or injured cattle that experts determined were likely attacked by wolves. Ranchers are currently compensated for the market value of the cattle lost to wolves.But ranchers say the losses they suffer are deeper than merely the cost of a replacement calf or cow. “Wolf depredation is not only a financial concern, it is an emotional and mental concern and it is causing a great deal of stress to ranchers across entire sections of the state,” Gabrielle Homer, president-elect of Oregon CattleWomen, said in written testimony to lawmakers.Numerous Republican lawmakers agree.Sen. Todd Nash, a Republican from Enterprise and former president of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association, introduced a bill in January that would require the state to pay ranchers at least the fair market value – and in many cases far more – for animals injured or killed by wolves. Under the bill, Oregon would have to pay seven times the market value of cow calves, sheep and goats, and three times the market value for other cows.These multipliers, ranchers say, are necessary because wolf attacks on herds can negatively impact cattle and ranchers in many unseen ways. “This stress impacts every animal and comes at a cost to the rancher in the way of less pounds to sell, an animal aborting or not rebreeding, and the overall disposition of their cattle,” Oregon cattle ranchers Creighton and Gabriella Nevin wrote to lawmakers.Republicans and a few moderate Democrats have expressed support for the bill. But some Democrats, who have a supermajority in both chambers and will ultimately control which bills pass this session, have shown reluctance to support the proposal. A large reason for their hesitancy: environmentalist opposition to the bill.Wildlife and environmental advocacy groups argue the proposal would worsen the already-tense relationship between ranchers and wolves and could result in ranchers getting money that would be better spent on preventing wolves from attacking cattle in the first place. In 2023, Oregon counties spent more than $400,000 from the state on preventative measures to stop wolves from attacking cattle. Those included building new fences, reducing cattle bone piles or carcasses that can draw wolves and installing alarm systems that can sense and deter wolves. But because that program receives funding from the same pool of money that pays farmers for livestock lost to wolves, environmentalists worry that the bill will decrease funding for preventative efforts. (Another Republican bill would deposit $2 million into this pool, to be used for preventative efforts and to compensate ranchers).“At a time when Oregonians and the Legislature are being asked to tighten our belts due to shifting funds, this bill benefits only a small number of Oregonians who are already eligible for market-rate compensation of lost or missing livestock,” Michael Dotson, executive director of the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, wrote to lawmakers.Also, wildlife advocates say, increasing the amount of money that ranchers receive for lost cattle will decrease their desire to use non-lethal methods to deter wolves.“Why bother to implement those methods if, when one of your livestock becomes a confirmed or probable wolf kill, you’ll receive payments of up to seven times their value?” Amaroq Weiss, senior wolf advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity, wrote to lawmakers.Environmentalists also push back on several of the ranchers’ assertions. While ranchers say they should receive more money for indirect effects on their cattle following wolf attacks, environmentalists say those effects have not been closely studied and are difficult to quantify, and therefore should not necessarily result in higher payouts to ranchers.Wildlife advocates say they don’t have a problem with ranchers being compensated for killed animals, but they want to negotiate with lawmakers and ranchers to reach a compromise that would prioritize the safety of wolves. Now, lawmakers are conflicted. On Tuesday, the Senate Committee On Natural Resources and Wildfire decided to postpone a vote on the bill after two Democrats expressed hesitancy to support it.“Is the real complaint that we’re not doing enough on the prevention part?” Sen. Kathleen Taylor, D-Portland, asked Tuesday. “If that’s what’s actually really going on, then maybe we could have an opportunity to achieve both.”Similar bills in at least two previous legislative sessions have died after ranchers, environmentalists and lawmakers failed to reach a consensus. But three Senate Democrats have joined several Republicans in co-sponsoring the bill, signalling that at least some Democrats are ready to pass the proposal. With Republicans making up 12 of the Senate’s 30 members, it will take at least four Democrats’ agreement to pass the bill through that chamber.But whether they can convince enough of their colleagues in both chambers to agree remains to be seen.Sen. Jeff Golden, a Democrat from Ashland and chair of the committee, acknowledged Tuesday that Democrats in the full House and Senate might not want to support the bill. But he said passing the proposal as written, meeting some of the ranchers’ long standing requests, would be a strong starting point to eventually reach a compromise.“What we are doing here is putting on the table a specific proposal, instead of saying, ‘“Let’s work group this more,’” he said.— Carlos Fuentes covers state politics and government. Reach him at 503-221-5386 or cfuentes@oregonian.com.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.Latest local politics stories

Dead and dying Port Pirie birds and bats exposed to lead at 3,000 times acceptable levels

South Australia’s EPA did not open a formal investigation into the source of the lead poisoning, despite referral from the Department of Primary IndustriesFollow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastSouth Australia’s Environment Protection Authority did not open a formal investigation into what may have killed dozens of birds in Port Pirie, despite tests showing some of the animals had been exposed to 3,000 times the acceptable level of lead.In July 2024, residents of the industrial town raised the alarm when they found dead and dying native birds and flying foxes in local parks and green spaces. Continue reading...

South Australia’s Environment Protection Authority did not open a formal investigation into what may have killed dozens of birds in Port Pirie, despite tests showing some of the animals had been exposed to 3,000 times the acceptable level of lead.In July 2024, residents of the industrial town raised the alarm when they found dead and dying native birds and flying foxes in local parks and green spaces.Pictures of dead and sick animals were posted on social media, and testing by the Department of Primary Industries and Regions, South Australia (Pirsa) later confirmed they had died from acute lead toxicosis.Autopsy reports on two bats, a lorikeet and a honey eater obtained via freedom of information (FoI) requests show the animals died with massive amounts of lead in their systems.Notes from one of the bats’ autopsies recorded “the nasal passages are distended by fine pale white gritty material admixed with red exudate”. Testing on one bat’s kidney showed about 3,000 times the acceptable level of lead, while another showed about 1,500 times acceptable levels.Wayne Boardman, an associate professor of wildlife, biodiversity and ecosystem health at the University of Adelaide, said that in his opinion the testing showed that “the scale of the exposure was highly significant” and that it was probable the animals died within 24 to 48 hours of exposure.“It’s not surprising these animals died acutely and were easily found by members of the public,” Boardman said. “It also indicates that, at the time, humans, other wildlife species, dogs and cats, livestock and marine wildlife would likely have been exposed to significant levels of lead in the air.”“This is a public health issue and potentially an animal welfare issue. This lead exposure should not be taken lightly.”Boardman, who has experience in forensic investigations and working with bat populations, said the evidence suggested that at some time towards the end of July or early August, lead dust had probably settled on flowering plants that attract flying foxes. When these plants blossomed, the animals ingested the dust as they fed.He said it was probable that a lack of rain meant the lead remained in the environment and that “given a timely” investigation comparing Bureau of Meteorology weather data and known bat feeding locations, “the site of the source of the lead on flowering contaminated plants and trees could have been determined”.Other documents reveal that Pirsa first contacted the EPA on 10 October 2024 to alert it to the test results and ask whether it would undertake an investigation. Pirsa’s authority to investigate extends to disease control within animal populations, not heavy metal pollution or regulatory issues, which fall under the EPA’s remit.The EPA declined. In a response marked “sensitive” sent a day later at 4.19pm, the EPA said that “to contemplate any involvement” it would require the full disclosure of all available evidence.“Any specific lead point source that may have caused this ‘event’ would likely be extremely difficult to locate/identify, and the EPA would not be in a position to offer assistance to Pirsa in this regard,” it said.Port Pirie is home to one of the world’s largest lead refineries operated by the Belgium-based Nyrstar that serves as the major employer in the town. It has been in continuous operation since 1889.In response to questions from Guardian Australia, an EPA spokesperson said the agency was “made aware of this incident by Pirsa as part of their investigations”.Documents obtained under freedom of information laws from the EPA show that 13 days later the agency began to consider the issue more closely after it was raised by the South Australian Chief Veterinary Officer. Management within the EPA then assigned an officer to make additional inquiries.“This is pretty random – but I am wondering if you can help me with it?” the request said.These inquiries appear to have involved following up with six contacts suggested by the chief veterinary officer over three weeks, with the final contact made on the day the officer reported back to management. The officer was told the EPA’s leadership did not want them to “raise [it] with anyone from Nyrstar at this point in time”.An EPA spokesperson later told Guardian Australia: “The EPA followed up on this matter by interviewing stakeholders, including Pirsa, the local council, vets and relevant animal welfare NGOs but was unable to establish any leads as to the specific source of the acute lead toxicity,”FOI documents show these inquiries concluded with a report to EPA management that recommended “no further investigation should be undertaken by EPA staff in relation to this matter, other than discussions as needed between Nyrstar staff and the Principal Adviser - Port Pirie and Nyrstar and the Senior Environmental Advisor - Port Pirie and Nyrstar”.“In relation to the Nyrstar lead and multi-metal smelter, the EPA’s primary role is to ensure compliance with the licence issued under the Environment Protection Act. The EPA continues to monitor Nyrstar’s compliance with its licence,” an EPA spokesperson said.Nyrstar was contacted for comment. The company reissued a statement it provided to Guardian Australia last December saying: “We understand that the source of lead has not been able to be determined.”South Australia’s chief veterinary officer and chief health officer were contacted for comment.

Narwhals play and forage using their amazing tusks

Scientists observing narwhals with drones in the Arctic found these whales use their tusks to go after fish and engage in play-like behavior. The post Narwhals play and forage using their amazing tusks first appeared on EarthSky.

This video shows narwhals in the Canadian High Arctic. It is a compilation of several drone footage clips. Some of the clips show Arctic char (shown in yellow circles for clarity) as the narwhals pursue them. The clips also show glaucous gulls stealing some of the fish from the whales. Video via O’Corry-Crowe, FAU / Watt, DFO. Narwhals use their tusks for various purposes, including foraging, exploration and play. Drone footage has revealed that narwhals use their tusks with agility to target prey like Arctic char and engage in social behaviors. Drones provide researchers with valuable insights into narwhal behavior, offering a non-invasive way to study them. New drone footage of narwhals reveal more about their lives Narwhals, whales with a long tusk, seem like otherworldly creatures. We don’t know much about these elusive whales because they live in remote parts of the Arctic, making them hard to observe. As a result, there’s been much debate about how they use their tusks. On February 28, 2025, a team of researchers said they’ve used drones to observe them from above, revealing new details about narwhal behavior. For instance, they learned narwhals use their tusks to go after prey like Arctic char and engage in play-like behavior. The researchers published their study in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Marine Science on February 28, 2025. Narwhals are the only whales with tusks Narwhals (Monodon monoceros) are known as unicorns of the sea. They live in the icy Arctic waters of Canada, Greenland and Russia. These whales are primarily fish-eaters, but they also consume cuttlefish, shrimp and squid. They’re one of the deepest divers among whales, able to reach depths of 7,780 feet (2,370 meters). The narwhal tusk is really an elongated spiral-shaped tooth that projects out of the left side of the whale’s upper jaw. It’s mostly males that have tusks that can grow up to 10 feet long. However, the researchers note in their paper that some females also grow tusks. That tusk length is pretty impressive considering the length of a narwhal body’s tops out at around 18 feet. Tusks grow continuously throughout a narwhal’s life. They are hollow and can weigh as much as 16 pounds (about 7 kilograms). And tusks have a lot of nerves running through them. So it also acts as an environmental sensor, detecting water temperature and salinity. The research team captured drone video of these 3 narwhals in the Canadian Arctic. Image via O’Corry-Crowe, FAU / Watt, DFO. What the scientists saw in the drone footage Scientists have long wondered how narwhals use their tusks. Greg O’Corry-Crowe is part of the research team that used drones to observe narwhals in Canada’s High Arctic during the summer of 2022. O’Corry-Crowe said: Narwhals are known for their ‘tusking’ behavior, where two or more of them simultaneously raise their tusks almost vertically out of the water, crossing them in what may be a ritualistic behavior to assess a potential opponent’s qualities or to display those qualities to potential mates. But now we know that narwhal tusks have other uses, some quite unexpected, including foraging, exploration and play. According to the researchers, drone footage revealed that narwhals wielded their tusks with great agility, accuracy and speed. They often used their tusks to investigate and target their prey, such as Arctic char. The researchers saw some using their tusks to stun or kill fish. Scientists also observed that opportunistic glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus) sometimes stole fish near the ocean surface that the narwhals were chasing. O’Corry-Crowe remarked: Our observations provide clear evidence of narwhals chasing fish and using their tusks to interact directly with the fish and to influence the fish’s behavior. Some of the interactions we saw appeared competitive in nature with one whale blocking or trying to block another whale’s access to the same target fish, while others may have been more subtle, possibly communicative and even affiliative. None appeared overtly aggressive. The researchers also observed narwhals use their tusks to engage in play-like behavior, such as exploring objects like fish. Plus, some of the observed behaviors suggest social learning (learning from other narwhals), and maybe even distinct personality traits in individuals. Using drones to study narwhals Co-author Cortney Watt of Fisheries and Oceans Canada commented: I have been studying narwhals for over a decade and have always marveled at their tusks. To observe them using their tusks for foraging and play is remarkable. This unique study where we set up a remote field camp and spent time filming them with drones is yielding many interesting insights and is providing a bird’s eye view of their behavior that we have never seen before. The whales appeared to be learning from each other. This trait could help them adapt to changes in the Arctic environment due to climate change. O’Corry-Crow added: To understand how narwhals are being affected by and adapting to the changing Arctic, field studies using innovative, non-invasive tools like drones are essential to observe them in their natural environment without disturbing them. Drones provide a unique, real-time view of their behavior, helping scientists gather crucial data on how narwhals are responding to shifts in ice patterns, prey availability and other environmental changes. Such studies are key to understanding the impact of global warming on these elusive animals. Bottom line: Scientists observing narwhals with drones in the Arctic found these whales use their tusks to go after fish and engage in play-like behavior. Source: Use of tusks by narwhals, Monodon monoceros, in foraging, exploratory, and play behavior Via Florida Atlantic University Read more: Meet the narwhal, ‘unicorn of the sea’The post Narwhals play and forage using their amazing tusks first appeared on EarthSky.

Wildlands Conservancy co-founder David Myers, who saved vast stretches of land from development, dies

Myers helped save vast stretches of land from development, including 400,000 acres in San Bernardino County — the largest purchase of land for preservation in the state.

David Myers, whose reverence for California’s natural beauty led him to co-found the Wildlands Conservancy and save hundreds of thousands of acres from development, including a patchwork of 400,000 acres in San Bernardino County — the largest purchase of land for preservation in the state — died on Monday at the age of 73. The former executive director and most recent president of the Wildlands Conservancy, Myers died of natural causes at his home on the Oak Glen Preserve in the San Bernardino County mountains — on the land that he fought so hard to preserve, said Frazier Haney, the Wildlands Conservancy’s current executive director. In recent years, Myers had battled several health issues, including Parkinson’s disease, Haney said. The Oak Glen, Calif.-based nonprofit, which he co-founded in 1995 with retired financier David Gelbaum, built a reputation as one of the most effective conservancies in the country with a unique vision that combines land stewardship with outdoors education for young people.Myers also spearheaded the fight to create the 154,000-acre Sand to Snow National Monument, which extends from the Sonoran Desert floor up to over 10,000 feet in the San Bernardino National Forest, about 90 minutes east of Los Angeles.“David Myers was an inspirational and tireless crusader for wild places,” said Peter Galvin, founder of the Center for Biological Diversity. “Anyone concerned with the health of majestic landscapes from Southern California’s Mojave Desert to Northern California’s Eel River, stands in his debt.”“David also worked harder than anyone I know in the conservation movement,” he said, “to introduce low-income kids and their families to natural realms beyond their neighborhoods.”A native Californian, Myers led his first conservation battle when he was a student of philosophy and literature at Cal State Fullerton in the 1970s. He was galvanized by a proposal to bulldoze the sycamores blanketing Pipes Canyon, west of Yucca Valley, for an international airport.“I just couldn’t believe it when I started seeing bulldozers tipping over oak trees,” Myers recalled in a 2000 interview with the Riverside Press-Enterprise. “And my thoughts at the time were, ‘What would people think about destroying their churches?’ Because they were destroying mine.”Myers responded by helping organize a group called Hills for Everyone, which in 1977 won state approval to place 2,200 acres into the California State Parks system. Chino Hills State Park is now a 12,000-acre preserve that stretches from the Santa Ana Mountains to the Whittier Hills.Myers, who grew up in Chino Hills, developed a love of nature as a boy during summer camping trips to Mammoth Lakes in the eastern Sierra. He also was influenced by the writings of John Muir, the legendary conservationist who founded the Sierra Club.What had inspired him to follow in Muir’s path was the sudden realization that California’s natural beauty could be so easily destroyed.“One winter he was looking down on a wetland in Chino Hills and about 10,000 Canada geese. The next year,” said Dan York, a close friend and associate director of the Wildlands Conservancy, “it was a parking lot for a mall. He realized then that it could all be gone in a generation.”After college, Myers built furniture for a living but, according to York, “always had a remarkably sharp eye for real estate and land.”In 1994, he decided to sell 640 acres of desert land he owned near Yucca Valley and apply most of the proceeds to conservation projects. He placed a newspaper ad seeking “a conservation-minded donor” who would buy the land but not develop it. Gelbaum, a mathematician who had made a fortune managing hedge funds, became his financial angel.Together they began strategically buying up land to link the San Bernardino, San Jacinto and Big Horn Mountains with Joshua Tree National Park. Those purchases totaled 70 square miles.The conservancy’s next big purchase was a 97,000-acre ranch in the foothills of the San Emigdio Mountains, northwest of Gorman, which once had been slated for a massive luxury home development. Renamed Wind Wolves, it is now the largest privately owned nature preserve on the West Coast, where endangered kit foxes and leopard lizards thrive along with elk, blacktail deer, great horned owls and bobcats. It also is home to marine fossils and Chumash paintings considered among the most impressive examples of Native American rock art.Myers’ vision for the area included reintroducing animals that had once been native inhabitants, including tule elk and bighorn sheep, and obliterating man-made intrusions, such as a rock quarry, petroleum waste pits, fences and roads. He said the process would enable visitors the increasingly rare experience of looking “face-to-face at something that is truly wild.” He called it “rewilding” the land.The conservancy’s crowning achievement was acquiring almost 1,000 square miles — about 580,000 acres — of desert land stretching from Barstow to Needles that had been owned by Catellus Development Corp., the real estate division of the Santa Fe Pacific railroad. Myers led the complex negotiations, finalizing the largest section of the deal in 2000 at a cost of $30 million in conservancy funds and $15 million from federal sources. The acquisition kept the land out of the hands of a developer with plans to carve its spectacular rock ranges, lava flows, sand dunes, valleys and cactus gardens into 40-acre ranches. Myers and his team donated all the purchased land to the public, greatly expanding Joshua Tree National Park, the Mojave National Preserve and the Bureau of Land Management’s wildlands, which reconnected a massive corridor for wildlife. “David was a man of courage, ambition and a boyish enthusiasm that was infectious,” Haney said. “He left us with a lot of big dreams and the tools needed to make them come true.”Myers came up with the conservancy’s motto, “Behold the Beauty,” which Haney said captured the spirit of his longtime friend and mentor.“David’s vision of conservation was one not simply based on science, but also based on the way that natural beauty can improve human lives ...[and is] a symbol of environmental health,” Haney said. He called him audacious, in the best way.“I’ll never know another person like David,” he said. “I’ll miss that kind of reality-bending power that he had.”The conservancy currently owns about 208,000 acres across California, Oregon and Utah — the vast majority in California — where the preserve system sees more than 1.4 million people each year. The group also provides free outdoor education on its lands, reaching more than 25,000 low-income students and families a year. The programs at Wind Wolves, Los Rios Rancho in Oak Glen and Grace Valley Ranch in the San Bernardino National Forest have provided many of the children their first experience with the state’s natural wonders. At Los Rios, the students hike on a nature trail designed by Myers with boulders etched with quotes from Emerson, Thoreau and Muir. He linked conservation with the nurturing of new generations of thinkers and naturalists and regarded outdoors education as a crucial strategy.“We are showing these kids things that make their eyes grow wide, that make them say, ‘Oh, wow!’” Myers told The Times in 2003. “Isn’t that what the environment is all about?”Myers is survived by his wife, two brothers, two sisters and many beloved nieces and nephews. Times staff writers Grace Toohey and Louis Sahagun contributed to this report. Woo is a former Times staff writer.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.