Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Portland International Airport’s timber roof is famous. How PDX shows where the wood’s from

News Feed
Friday, March 14, 2025

Since the remodeled Portland International Airport was unveiled in August 2024, reviews have been effusive.Enter the first major U.S. airport with a timber roof and the wow factor is everywhere.Undertaken at a cost of $2.1 billion, the four-year PDX remodel uses 3.7 million board feet of wood. It features a nine-acre Douglas fir roof, Oregon white oak flooring and expansive ligneous detailing everywhere in between.Its latticed ceiling includes 35,000 individual three-by-sixes, alongside 2 million board feet of arched glulam beams. Tree-adorned wooden concessions, sky-lit oak flooring and seating, and decorative wood walls are as un-O’Hare as it gets.Even the terminal’s wood-slatted TSA screening booths have been described as “ease-inducing” and “biophilic.” (Well, okay …)All very Oregon. The remodel has been touted as the largest public works project in state history.Now there’s a new feature that helps those with an abiding interest its construction gain an even greater appreciation of all that wood.One of the project’s more ambitious (if less obvious) achievements was its effort to keep track of where all the wood it uses comes from.Trace elements: Wood origin signage is found throughout Portland International Airport’s main terminal. Chuck ThompsonTelling that story are new signs scattered around the terminal titled “Where’s the Wood From?”“EVERY BOARD COMES FROM WITHIN A DAY’S DRIVE,” notes a wooden sign in carved caps in the mezzanine near the Loyal Legion beer hall in the upper level. “WE SET OUT TO SOURCE THE WOOD AS LOCAL AS YOUR FARMER’S MARKET, SO WE KNOW THE FORESTS LIKE WE KNOW OUR NEIGHBORS.”Translation: the airport’s wood-sourcing efforts are worth marveling over, too.If the heritage of Colin the Chicken can become an international sensation, why not wood?The wooden signs, which weren’t ready for the grand opening last summer, were installed over the winter.They’re worth seeking out. How do you trace wood, anyway?Every piece of wood in the main terminal comes from Oregon and Washington, within 300 miles of the airport, according to airport operator Port of Portland, the project’s architectural firm ZGF and conservationist wood consultant Sustainable Northwest:Most eye-catching of all on a self-guided PDX “Where’s the Wood From?” sign tour is the wood’s traceability.COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE GREW THE DOUGLAS FIR FOR THE DOUBLE BEAMS IN THE OVAL SKYLIGHT ABOVE YOU.ZENA FOREST GREW THE OREGON WHITE OAK FOR THIS BENCH.COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF INDIANS GREW THE DOUGLAS FIR FOR THIS WALL.About 30% of the wood in the PDX remodel can be traced to its specific forest of origin.While that may not sound like a high number, it represents a huge amount of traceable timber in an industry that doesn’t do that sort of thing.“The current, opaque supply chain makes it difficult to know how wood is harvested, exactly where it is harvested, who owns the land and the values that drive the forest’s management,” co-wrote ZGF Principal Jacob Dunn and Sustainable Northwest Senior Director of Wood Markets Paul Vanderford, in a blog outlining the PDX project’s multi-year efforts to engage with landowners and mills across the Pacific Northwest, and shift the usual timber production protocol.Once it was decided that the PDX remodel would be done with wood that was both local and sustainably managed, tracking where that wood came from would be the biggest challenge of all, according to Dunn and Vanderford.It would also become a touchstone for the entire project.“It was the first attempt at anything like this,” they wrote. “And while we didn’t achieve it all, we reached targets no other projects have.”One million board feet in the airport terminal’s roof can be directly traced to wood from 13 regional, tribal-owned, family-owned, community, public and nonprofit forests, according to a sourcing chart by Sustainable Northwest that’s reminiscent of a farm-to-table menu detailing the origin of every item on a plate.“If salmon that we consume can be tracked back to its source of origin, and our coffee traced back to the farm where it was grown, why can’t we know where our wood comes from?” asks ZGF’s Dunn. The project’s traceability effort reimagines “farm-to-table” as a new tagline: forest-to-frame.“I’ll go on record and say it’s possible ‘forest-to-frame’ was coined for this project. It’s the first time I’d ever heard it,” says Ryan Temple, president of Sustainable Northwest Wood, a subsidiary of Portland-based Sustainable Northwest and the wood consultant that championed the project’s traceability effort.“Wood traceability doesn’t happen on a large scale,” says Temple. “Logs come in, get mixed together and there’s no way to trace what comes out the back end—unless a mill is willing to actually separate logs from a specific forest, run that batch on its own and say, ‘Here’s your three-by-eight from the Chimacum Ridge Community Forest.’ That’s a whole different way of doing things, so it took some time, effort and convincing.”Was there pushback from the mills?“There were mixed feelings,” says Temple. “Some mills were on board from the start and thought it was really cool that people know where the wood comes from. Others were initially like, ‘This is gonna require way more work and transparency than we’re used to. Can’t we just do business as usual?’”Most of those reluctant mills came around, says Temple.As the project progressed, and sawmills and forest owners started getting more attention, accolades and positive press than they’re used to “a lot of those skeptics became believers.”Source of pride: Sarah Deumlingan and her son, Ben, run Zena Forest Products, an Oregon-based, multigenerational family business that contributed to the PDX remodel.Aedin Powell/Sustainable Northwest Tribal timber, legacy loggersAnother project goal was targeting underrepresented links in the supply chain—small mills, family forests, nonprofits and tribal nations—as well as forests from both western and eastern Oregon and Washington.Nearly a third of the wood in the new terminal was sourced from underrepresented landowners—including 16% tribal wood.“When you use traceable timber, all that wood has a story behind it,” says Temple. “One of my favorites is with the terminal’s seam wall—this grid-work of Douglas fir that kind of looks like a giant wine rack and happened later in the project.“The airport was scrambling to get it done, came to us and said, ‘Hey, we need some Doug fir, and it would be great if it came from a well-managed forest with a story behind it, but we really just need to get this thing done.’”As it happened, the Cow Creek Band of the Umpqua Tribe of Indians, south of Roseburg, Ore., had recently started a forest program and was stocking loads of reclaimed wood.“They were salvaging wood that was the result of a fire which had started off of the reservation and had burned onto it,” says Temple. “They lost thousands of acres, but were doing the best to try to create something out of this wood.”PDX ended up using some of that wood for the seam wall.“It was absolutely perfect for what the airport had in mind,” says Temple. “Not only was the wood harvested and salvaged by the Tribe, but it was turned into lumber at their own mill. That revenue from the Tribe’s forestry and mill operation is now being used to reacquire parcels of ancestral land.”Stories are ingrained in wood used all over the terminal.The pergola designs by the coffee shop concessions are built with beams from the Yakama Nation. They support a lattice structure of Douglas fir from JayZee Lumber based in northeast Oregon’s Wallowa County, “where fourth-generation loggers work with fourth-generation ranchers,” says Temple.“It’s local wood, it’s good wood, it’s sustainable wood, but it’s more than that—and more than just a magnificent airport project,” says Temple. “It’s a celebration of the people, places, communities, businesses and individual forests where all of that wood has come from.”Can a project of this magnitude inspire a broader forest-to-frame movement?“Our hope is that this project helps catalyze a new level of rigor and options for sourcing and tracing mass timber and other wood products sustainably,” Dunn and Vanderford wrote. “Hopefully this makes it easier for future project teams to follow suit and ask—Where does the wood come from?”Jordan Rane is an award-winning journalist whose work has appeared in CNN.com, Outside, Men’s Journal and the Los Angeles Times.##Columbia Insight, based in Hood River, Oregon, is a nonprofit newsroom focused on environmental issues of the Columbia River Basin and the Pacific Northwest.

New signs invite travelers to take in a self-guided, "forest-to-frame" tour before their next flight.

Since the remodeled Portland International Airport was unveiled in August 2024, reviews have been effusive.

Enter the first major U.S. airport with a timber roof and the wow factor is everywhere.

Undertaken at a cost of $2.1 billion, the four-year PDX remodel uses 3.7 million board feet of wood. It features a nine-acre Douglas fir roof, Oregon white oak flooring and expansive ligneous detailing everywhere in between.

Its latticed ceiling includes 35,000 individual three-by-sixes, alongside 2 million board feet of arched glulam beams. Tree-adorned wooden concessions, sky-lit oak flooring and seating, and decorative wood walls are as un-O’Hare as it gets.

Even the terminal’s wood-slatted TSA screening booths have been described as “ease-inducing” and “biophilic.” (Well, okay …)

All very Oregon. The remodel has been touted as the largest public works project in state history.

Now there’s a new feature that helps those with an abiding interest its construction gain an even greater appreciation of all that wood.

One of the project’s more ambitious (if less obvious) achievements was its effort to keep track of where all the wood it uses comes from.

A wooden sign titled where's the wood from shows maps of Oregon and Washington

Trace elements: Wood origin signage is found throughout Portland International Airport’s main terminal. Chuck Thompson

Telling that story are new signs scattered around the terminal titled “Where’s the Wood From?”

“EVERY BOARD COMES FROM WITHIN A DAY’S DRIVE,” notes a wooden sign in carved caps in the mezzanine near the Loyal Legion beer hall in the upper level. “WE SET OUT TO SOURCE THE WOOD AS LOCAL AS YOUR FARMER’S MARKET, SO WE KNOW THE FORESTS LIKE WE KNOW OUR NEIGHBORS.”

Translation: the airport’s wood-sourcing efforts are worth marveling over, too.

If the heritage of Colin the Chicken can become an international sensation, why not wood?

The wooden signs, which weren’t ready for the grand opening last summer, were installed over the winter.

They’re worth seeking out.

How do you trace wood, anyway?

Every piece of wood in the main terminal comes from Oregon and Washington, within 300 miles of the airport, according to airport operator Port of Portland, the project’s architectural firm ZGF and conservationist wood consultant Sustainable Northwest:

Most eye-catching of all on a self-guided PDX “Where’s the Wood From?” sign tour is the wood’s traceability.

COQUILLE INDIAN TRIBE GREW THE DOUGLAS FIR FOR THE DOUBLE BEAMS IN THE OVAL SKYLIGHT ABOVE YOU.

ZENA FOREST GREW THE OREGON WHITE OAK FOR THIS BENCH.

COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF INDIANS GREW THE DOUGLAS FIR FOR THIS WALL.

About 30% of the wood in the PDX remodel can be traced to its specific forest of origin.

While that may not sound like a high number, it represents a huge amount of traceable timber in an industry that doesn’t do that sort of thing.

“The current, opaque supply chain makes it difficult to know how wood is harvested, exactly where it is harvested, who owns the land and the values that drive the forest’s management,” co-wrote ZGF Principal Jacob Dunn and Sustainable Northwest Senior Director of Wood Markets Paul Vanderford, in a blog outlining the PDX project’s multi-year efforts to engage with landowners and mills across the Pacific Northwest, and shift the usual timber production protocol.

Once it was decided that the PDX remodel would be done with wood that was both local and sustainably managed, tracking where that wood came from would be the biggest challenge of all, according to Dunn and Vanderford.

It would also become a touchstone for the entire project.

“It was the first attempt at anything like this,” they wrote. “And while we didn’t achieve it all, we reached targets no other projects have.”

One million board feet in the airport terminal’s roof can be directly traced to wood from 13 regional, tribal-owned, family-owned, community, public and nonprofit forests, according to a sourcing chart by Sustainable Northwest that’s reminiscent of a farm-to-table menu detailing the origin of every item on a plate.

“If salmon that we consume can be tracked back to its source of origin, and our coffee traced back to the farm where it was grown, why can’t we know where our wood comes from?” asks ZGF’s Dunn.

The project’s traceability effort reimagines “farm-to-table” as a new tagline: forest-to-frame.

“I’ll go on record and say it’s possible ‘forest-to-frame’ was coined for this project. It’s the first time I’d ever heard it,” says Ryan Temple, president of Sustainable Northwest Wood, a subsidiary of Portland-based Sustainable Northwest and the wood consultant that championed the project’s traceability effort.

“Wood traceability doesn’t happen on a large scale,” says Temple. “Logs come in, get mixed together and there’s no way to trace what comes out the back end—unless a mill is willing to actually separate logs from a specific forest, run that batch on its own and say, ‘Here’s your three-by-eight from the Chimacum Ridge Community Forest.’ That’s a whole different way of doing things, so it took some time, effort and convincing.”

Was there pushback from the mills?

“There were mixed feelings,” says Temple. “Some mills were on board from the start and thought it was really cool that people know where the wood comes from. Others were initially like, ‘This is gonna require way more work and transparency than we’re used to. Can’t we just do business as usual?’”

Most of those reluctant mills came around, says Temple.

As the project progressed, and sawmills and forest owners started getting more attention, accolades and positive press than they’re used to “a lot of those skeptics became believers.”

Sarah and Ben are shown with a dog as they stand in front of a barn with stacks of lumber on the exterior

Source of pride: Sarah Deumlingan and her son, Ben, run Zena Forest Products, an Oregon-based, multigenerational family business that contributed to the PDX remodel.Aedin Powell/Sustainable Northwest

Tribal timber, legacy loggers

Another project goal was targeting underrepresented links in the supply chain—small mills, family forests, nonprofits and tribal nations—as well as forests from both western and eastern Oregon and Washington.

Nearly a third of the wood in the new terminal was sourced from underrepresented landowners—including 16% tribal wood.

“When you use traceable timber, all that wood has a story behind it,” says Temple. “One of my favorites is with the terminal’s seam wall—this grid-work of Douglas fir that kind of looks like a giant wine rack and happened later in the project.

“The airport was scrambling to get it done, came to us and said, ‘Hey, we need some Doug fir, and it would be great if it came from a well-managed forest with a story behind it, but we really just need to get this thing done.’”

As it happened, the Cow Creek Band of the Umpqua Tribe of Indians, south of Roseburg, Ore., had recently started a forest program and was stocking loads of reclaimed wood.

“They were salvaging wood that was the result of a fire which had started off of the reservation and had burned onto it,” says Temple. “They lost thousands of acres, but were doing the best to try to create something out of this wood.”

PDX ended up using some of that wood for the seam wall.

“It was absolutely perfect for what the airport had in mind,” says Temple. “Not only was the wood harvested and salvaged by the Tribe, but it was turned into lumber at their own mill. That revenue from the Tribe’s forestry and mill operation is now being used to reacquire parcels of ancestral land.”

Stories are ingrained in wood used all over the terminal.

The pergola designs by the coffee shop concessions are built with beams from the Yakama Nation. They support a lattice structure of Douglas fir from JayZee Lumber based in northeast Oregon’s Wallowa County, “where fourth-generation loggers work with fourth-generation ranchers,” says Temple.

“It’s local wood, it’s good wood, it’s sustainable wood, but it’s more than that—and more than just a magnificent airport project,” says Temple. “It’s a celebration of the people, places, communities, businesses and individual forests where all of that wood has come from.”

Can a project of this magnitude inspire a broader forest-to-frame movement?

“Our hope is that this project helps catalyze a new level of rigor and options for sourcing and tracing mass timber and other wood products sustainably,” Dunn and Vanderford wrote. “Hopefully this makes it easier for future project teams to follow suit and ask—Where does the wood come from?”

Jordan Rane is an award-winning journalist whose work has appeared in CNN.com, Outside, Men’s Journal and the Los Angeles Times.

##

Columbia Insight, based in Hood River, Oregon, is a nonprofit newsroom focused on environmental issues of the Columbia River Basin and the Pacific Northwest.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

A Sequoia Forest in Detroit? Plantings to Improve Air Quality and Mark Earth Day

Arborists are hoping to transform vacant land on Detroit’s eastside by planting giant sequoias, the world’s largest trees

DETROIT (AP) — Arborists are turning vacant land on Detroit's eastside into a small urban forest, not of elms, oaks and red maples indigenous to the city but giant sequoias, the world's largest trees that can live for thousands of years.The project on four lots will not only replace long-standing blight with majestic trees, but could also improve air quality and help preserve the trees that are native to California’s Sierra Nevada, where they are threatened by ever-hotter wildfires.Detroit is the pilot city for the Giant Sequoia Filter Forest. The nonprofit Archangel Ancient Tree Archive is donating dozens of sequoia saplings that will be planted by staff and volunteers from Arboretum Detroit, another nonprofit, to mark Earth Day on April 22.Co-founder David Milarch says Archangel also plans to plant sequoias in Los Angeles, Oakland, California, and London. The massive conifers can grow to more than 300 feet (90 meters) tall with a more than 30-foot (9-meter) circumference at the base. They can live for more than 3,000 years.“Here’s a tree that is bigger than your house when it’s mature, taller than your buildings, and lives longer than you can comprehend,” said Andrew “Birch” Kemp, Arboretum Detroit's executive director.The sequoias will eventually provide a full canopy that protects everything beneath, he said.“It may be sad to call these .5- and 1-acre treescapes forests,” Kemp said. “We are expanding on this and shading our neighborhood in the only way possible, planting lots of trees.”Giant sequoias are resilient against disease and insects, and are usually well-adapted to fire. Thick bark protects their trunks and their canopies tend to be too high for flames to reach. But climate change is making the big trees more vulnerable to wildfires out West, Kemp said.“The fires are getting so hot that its even threatening them,” he said. Descendants of Stagg and Waterfall Archangel, based in Copemish, Michigan, preserves the genetics of old-growth trees for research and reforestation. The sequoia saplings destined for Detroit are clones of two giants known as Stagg — the world's fifth-largest tree — and Waterfall, of the Alder Creek grove, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) north of Los Angeles.In 2010, Archangel began gathering cones and climbers scaled high into the trees to gather new-growth clippings from which they were able to develop and grow saplings.Sequoias need space, and metropolitan Detroit has plenty of it.In the 1950s, 1.8 million people called Detroit home, but the city's population has since shrunk to about one-third of that number. Tens of thousands of homes were left empty and neglected.“There’s not another urban area I know of that has the kind of potential that we do to reforest," he said. “We could all live in shady, fresh air beauty. It's like no reason we can’t be the greenest city in the world.”Within the last decade, 11 sequoias were planted on vacant lots owned by Arboretum Detroit and nine others were planted on private properties around the neighborhood. Each now reaches 12 to 15 feet (3.6 to 4.5 meters) tall. Arboretum Detroit has another 200 in its nursery. Kemp believes the trees will thrive in Detroit.“They’re safer here ... we don’t have wildfires like (California). The soil stays pretty moist, even in the summer,” he said. “They like to have that winter irrigation, so when the snow melts they can get a good drink.” How will the sequoias impact Detroit? Caring for the sequoias will fall to future generations, so Milarch has instigated what he calls “tree school” to teach Detroit’s youth how and why to look after the new trees.“We empower our kids to teach them how to do this and give them the materials and the way to do this themselves,” Milarch said. “They take ownership. They grow them in the classrooms and plant them around the schools. They know we’re in environmental trouble.”Some of them may never have even walked in a forest, Kemp said.“How can we expect children who have never seen a forest to care about deforestation on the other side of the world?" Kemp said. "It is our responsibility to offer them their birthright.”City residents are exposed to extreme air pollution and have high rates of asthma. The Detroit sequoias will grow near a heavily industrial area, a former incinerator and two interstates, he said.Kemp’s nonprofit has already planted about 650 trees — comprising around 80 species — in some 40 lots in the area. But he believes the sequoias will have the greatest impact.“Because these trees grow so fast, so large and they’re evergreen they’ll do amazing work filtering the air here,” Kemp said. “We live in pretty much a pollution hot spot. We’re trying to combat that. We’re trying to breathe clean air. We’re trying to create shade. We’re trying to soak up the stormwater, and I think sequoias — among all the trees we plant — may be the strongest, best candidates for that.”Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Feb. 2025

Banned DDT discovered in Canadian trout 70 years after use, research finds

Potential danger to humans and wildlife from harmful pesticide discovered in fish at 10 times safety limitResidues of the insecticide DDT have been found to persist at “alarming rates” in trout even after 70 years, potentially posing a significant danger to humans and wildlife that eat the fish, research has found.Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, known as DDT, was used on forested land in New Brunswick, Canada, from 1952 to 1968. The researchers found traces of it remained in brook trout in some lakes, often at levels 10 times higher than the recommended safety threshold for wildlife. Continue reading...

Residues of the insecticide DDT have been found to persist at “alarming rates” in trout even after 70 years, potentially posing a significant danger to humans and wildlife that eat the fish, research has found.Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, known as DDT, was used on forested land in New Brunswick, Canada, from 1952 to 1968. The researchers found traces of it remained in brook trout in some lakes, often at levels 10 times higher than the recommended safety threshold for wildlife.“DDT is a probable carcinogen that we haven’t used in 70 years here [Canada], yet it’s abundant in fish and lake mud throughout much of the province at shockingly high levels,” said Josh Kurek, an associate professor in environmental change and aquatic biomonitoring at Mount Allison University in Canada and lead author of the research.The research, published in the journal Plos One, discovered that DDT pollution covers about 50% of New Brunswick province. Brook trout is the most common wild fish caught in the region, and the research found DDT was present in its muscle tissue, in some cases 10 times above the recommended Canadian wildlife guidelines.Researchers said DDT, which is classified by health authorities as a“probable carcinogen”, can persist in lake mud for decades after treatment and that many lakes in New Brunswick retain such high levels of legacy DDT that the sediments are a key source of pollution in the food web.“The public, especially vulnerable populations to contaminants such as women of reproductive age and children, need to be aware of exposure risk to legacy DDT through consumption of wild fish,” said Kurek.Throughout the 1950s and 60s, half the province’s conifer forests were sprayed with DDT, a synthetic insecticide used to control insects carrying diseases such as malaria and typhus. Canada banned the use of the substance in the 1980s.The 2001 Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants banned DDT worldwide for mass agricultural use, although it is still permitted in small quantities for malaria control.“This mess can’t be cleaned up,” said Kurek. “DDTs can persist in lake mud for decades to centuries and then cycle in the food web. The best approach is to manage the public’s exposure of legacy DDTs by encouraging everyone to follow fish consumption guidelines and consider reducing exposure.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotion“Our findings are a clear wake-up call to abandon our overreliance on synthetic chemicals. Lessons need to be learned so we don’t repeat past mistakes. Our study hopefully informs on other contaminants that we apply broadly today, such as road salt and herbicides like glyphosate. We absolutely need to do things differently or our ecosystems will continue to face a lifetime of pollution.”

Portland City Council moves to reject controversial PGE Forest Park transmission project

The Portland City Council moved Thursday to reject a PGE transmission upgrade project in Forest Park that would require the utility to clearcut more than 370 trees on about 5 acres in the park.

The Portland City Council moved Thursday to reject a Portland General Electric transmission upgrade project in Forest Park that would require the utility to clearcut more than 370 trees on about 5 acres in the park. The decision Thursday night – described as “tentative” until a final vote on May 7 – came after councilors considered appeals by the Forest Park Conservancy and Forest Park Neighborhood Association to overturn a city of Portland hearings officer approval in March of PGE’s proposal. The vote followed five hours of presentations and public testimony and directs city attorneys to write an ordinance to grant the appeals and overturn the hearings officer’s decision. PGE can appeal to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. PGE wants to rewire a 1970s transmission line and add a second line in the utility’s existing right-of-way and said the upgrade will address an increase in the region’s energy demand and prevent rolling blackouts in North and Northwest Portland. A report from Portland’s Permitting and Development Office in January recommended that the hearings officer turn down PGE’s project due to non-compliance with environmental standards and the city’s Forest Park management plan. But hearings officer Marisha Childs last month went against those recommendations, agreeing with PGE about the need for the project and finding that routing through Forest Park “is the least environmentally detrimental option” of all the alternatives PGE analyzed. The two groups that filed the appeals said PGE failed to meet city approval criteria and that project would set a precedent for further development in the park. PGE’s proposal had touched off a months-long clash between the utility and opponents who seek to protect the trees in the 5,200-acre park because they provide valuable habitat for countless wildlife species and climate benefits to all city residents. More than 3,000 people filed testimony about the project, including over 1,000 who sent in comments ahead of the appeals hearing, with the vast majority against the upgrade. Several hundred protesters gathered at City Hall before the hearing. They held cardboard cutouts of trees, animals and insects and signs that read “Save Forest Park,” “No more ecocide” and “You have to be nuts to destroy Forest Park.” A protester at Portland City Hall holds a sign opposing PGE's transmission upgrade project in Forest Park ahead of a City Council appeals hearing. Beth Nakamura“It’s important to have more energy transmission infrastructure, power lines and responsive grids, yet this is one of the situations where it is very clear there is no ambiguity. PGE can build this project elsewhere in order to keep the lights on,” Damon Motz-Storey, the Sierra Club Oregon chapter’s director, told the crowd. “These trees have been standing since before we even had electricity in homes.”Motz-Storey then led the rally in a chant: “Listen to the people and the trees, not PGE.” Protesters and park advocates filled the council chambers and two overflow rooms, testifying one after another that the PGE project runs counter to the city’s plan to sustain an old-growth forest in Forest Park and asking for the council to save the trees and protect the park. Protesters at Portland City Hall listen as the City Council considers the appeals on PGE's controversial Forest Park transmission project. Beth Nakamura“This project is unacceptable to us and the community and the critters and plants that depend on us to say no to cutting trees, building roads, bulldozing, filling in wetlands and streams and saying this is good for climate resilience,” said Scott Fogarty, executive director with Forest Park Conservancy, the group that filed one of the appeals. The conservancy formed to maintain trails and restore native habitat in the park. Fogarty said PGE’s proposed plan to offset losses from the upgrade does not address cutting down 100-year-old trees and the benefits they bring. The mitigation proposal includes planting Oregon white oak seedlings near the project area, seeding the transmission corridor and access road edges with a pollinator-friendly native seed mix and paying a fee to the city to remove invasive species in the park. He also said the upgrade would pave the way for city approval of future phases of the project in Forest Park and lead to more tree removal. PGE has said those future phases could affect another 15 acres of the park. “Is 5 acres acceptable? Is 20 acres acceptable? Where do we draw the line?” Fogarty asked the council members. “One could argue losing just one 100-year-old tree is unacceptable, let alone 5 acres. In the age of climate resilience, this project flies in the face of retaining carbon suckers in a region that is seeing increased impacts from climate change, including potential fire danger.” PGE argued before the council that the project area is neither old nor ancient forest and that the maintenance of existing transmission lines is key to preserving blackout-free electricity. A proposal by Portland General Electric to cut more than 370 trees in Forest Park to upgrade transmission lines has spurred opposition. The utility and renewable energy proponents say the upgrades are needed to address transmission bottlenecks and fulfill state clean energy mandates.courtesy of Portland General Electric“Alleviating this choke point is important because our experts predict that as early as 2028 there is the risk of outages during times of peak demand,” said Randy Franks, a senior project manager for PGE. “Think about the hottest part of the day, during an ongoing heat wave, with no fans and no air conditioning.”Franks said the more than 20 alternatives PGE examined were not practical, would require the utility to take property through eminent domain, would take too much time or cost too much – and could lead to similar or even greater negative impacts to trees and wildlife outside the park. He said the city’s Forest Park management plan acknowledges the existence of utility corridors and the need to maintain and upgrade them over time and that doing so will help reduce global warming.“If we are serious about combating climate change, we simply have to improve the grid, keep it reliable and increase transmission capacity,” Franks said. Only a handful of people testified in favor of PGE’s plans. “Utilities around the country, including ours, are facing the most rapid load increases in a generation and concomitant reliability challenges. At the same time, our state is laboring to remove from the grid the coal and gas plants that are fueling climate change locally,” said Angus Duncan, the former chair of the Northwest Conservation and Power Planning Council, a group tasked with developing and maintaining a regional power plan. “We need to rebuild the power system to exclude fossil generation.” Council members Angelita Morillo and Steve Novick questioned the assertion that PGE’s proposal would help combat climate change. Novick also asked why PGE did not provide more evidence as to why the transmission upgrades are needed by 2028, not at a later date. Other councilors said they did not feel PGE had proved an alternative outside the park was unfeasible and did not present a compelling mitigation plan. And most of the 12 council members said they disagreed with PGE and the hearings officer that the proposal meets the parameters of the park’s management plan. “Ultimately, I think what has been proposed is probably the best option in the park,” said Councilor Eric Zimmerman. But, he said, nothing in PGE’s proposal showed that the council should overrule the Forest Park management plan. “I don’t think the standard has been met to not follow that plan,” Zimmerman said.Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney agreed. “If an alternative (to the project) exists, we should not be granting an exception,” she said. Councilor Dan Ryan said the decision will likely be one of many to pit the needs for clean electricity against those of protecting the environment. “Portland will be having more and more tough decisions that include extremely difficult trade-offs. This is just where we are in managing the climate crisis,” Ryan said. “I think PGE worked really hard to find the best option and yet we all want a different option.” That’s because, he added, he – like other Portlanders – loves the park and its trees. “Forest Park is a cathedral,” Ryan said. “And maybe it’s Holy Week and I’m just treating this in a very spiritual way, but it’s just really difficult for me to think I could take a vote that would on the appearance be about deforesting Forest Park during this sacred week.” — Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Revealed: world’s largest meat company may break Amazon deforestation pledges again

Brazilian ranchers in Pará and Rondônia say JBS can not achieve stated goal of deforestation-free cattleBibles, bullets and beef: Amazon cowboy culture at odds with Brazil’s climate goalsThe life and death of a ‘laundered’ cow in the Amazon rainforestThe world’s largest meat company, JBS, looks set to break its Amazon rainforest protection promises again, according to frontline workers.Beef production is the primary driver of deforestation, as trees are cleared to raise cattle, and scientists warn this is pushing the Amazon close to a tipping point that would accelerate its shift from a carbon sink into a carbon emitter. JBS, the Brazil-headquartered multinational that dominates the Brazilian cattle market, promised to address this with a commitment to clean up its beef supply chain in the region by the end of 2025. Continue reading...

The world’s largest meat company, JBS, looks set to break its Amazon rainforest protection promises again, according to frontline workers.Beef production is the primary driver of deforestation, as trees are cleared to raise cattle, and scientists warn this is pushing the Amazon close to a tipping point that would accelerate its shift from a carbon sink into a carbon emitter. JBS, the Brazil-headquartered multinational that dominates the Brazilian cattle market, promised to address this with a commitment to clean up its beef supply chain in the region by the end of 2025.In a project to understand the barriers to progress on Amazon deforestation, a team of journalists from the Guardian, Unearthed and Repórter Brasil interviewed more than 35 people, including ranchers and ranching union leaders who represent thousands of farms in the states of Pará and Rondônia. The investigation found widespread disbelief that JBS would be able to complete the groundwork and hit its deforestation targets.“They certainly have the will to do it, just as we have the will to do it,” said one rancher. But the goal that all the cattle they bought would be deforestation-free was unreachable, he said. “They say this is going to be implemented. I’d say straight away: that’s impossible.” The problem of illegal cattle laundering would also not be resolved in time, said many, while another interviewee said land ownership issues meant quite simply that the deadline was “impossible”.JBS told the Guardian that it contested the conclusions. “Drawing inferences and conclusions from a limited sample of 30 farmers while disregarding that JBS has over 40,000 registered suppliers is entirely irresponsible,” the company said in a statement. It said that “while the sector-wide challenges are significant and larger than any one company can solve on its own, we believe JBS has an in-depth and robust series of integrated policies, systems, and investments that are making a material and positive impact on reducing deforestation risks.”To hit its targets, JBS needs to register all its direct and indirect suppliers and ensure none of the meat it buys from the Amazon is from cattle that has grazed on deforested land. It has established a network of “green offices” to provide free consultation to ranchers on how to comply with the three- to six-month process of regularisation, which involves drawing up a plan to plant more trees, withdrawing from contested territory, or making other environmental remediations. Then details will go into the JBS database, which continually monitors farms using artificial intelligence, and owners will be contacted if they fail to meet their obligations. In Pará, the company is also working with the state government on an ear-tagging scheme that would track the state’s entire herd of 26 million cattle by 2026.The Pará state governor, Helder Barbalho, who has supported the traceability plan, expects JBS to meet its deadline, but he acknowledged there had been resistance and that small farmers in particular would need more support. He said the Bezos Earth Fund had committed 143m reais to this task: “We are still mobilising resources so that we can finance this policy that is very important for us to present to livestock farmers.”But ranchers and rancher unions interviewed by the Guardian and its partners said that technical hurdles and uncertainties over land ownership – many ranches were created by invading public land – stood no chance of resolution by the company’s self-imposed deadline.Adelosmar Antonio Orio, known as Ticão, who works for the Tucumaã-Ourilaãndia Union of Rural Producers, said the logistical challenges, such as ranchers needing special equipment including ear trackers and satellite internet systems, would make the scheme impossible to complete before the year-end deadline. “Not even they [JBS] know how this traceability is going to be implemented,” he said. Others argued that new small- and medium-sized producers were being asked to bear most of the burden of the new system and that JBS and the government had not done enough to explain the new tracking system and provide the technological support needed to make it work.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionThe thorny subject of land ownership would also be impossible to resolve, argued many, including Cristina Malcher, the president of the Commission of Women in Agribusiness, a national advocacy body for women in agriculture. “The deadline of 2025 is impossible to meet, because if you don’t know who owns the land, then you don’t have environmental regularity,” Malcher told the Guardian.Ticão agreed. “By the end of the year, we need to resolve all the land problems, all the environmental problems.” Could it be done in time? “Definitely not,” he said. His union colleagues expressed similar disbelief that the deadline could be met.The investigation also spoke to indirect suppliers who openly admitted to using middlemen to clean up the environmental record of their livestock, a practice known as cattle laundering. Several producers predicted that a new tracing system would lead to new loopholes, such as slaughtering the cattle elsewhere and then selling the meat – rather than live cattle – at a low price to JBS.JBS has not mapped its entire supply chain, due under its deforestation commitments by the end of this year. But the company said: “JBS has already enrolled the equivalent of over 80% of its annual cattle purchases on to a blockchain-enabled, web-based transparent farming livestock platform.”JBS has previously been linked to deforestation on a number of occasions, and the New York attorney general, Letitia James, filed a lawsuit last year accusing the company of misleading consumers with its climate goals in an effort to increase sales. A bipartisan group of 15 US senators urged the Securities and Exchange Commission to reject JBS’s application for a share listing. “Dozens of journalistic and NGO reports have shown that JBS is linked to more destruction of forests and other ecosystems than any other company in Brazil,” they wrote in an open letter.JBS told the Guardian: “The challenges of addressing illegal deforestation on cattle operations that span millions of farms across hundreds of thousands of square kilometresare significant.” It detailed its response, which includes zero tolerance for deforestation sourcing policy, state-of-the-art supply chain monitoring, free technical assistance for producers to help regularise their farms, and the JBS Fund for the Amazon, which finances projects focused on the sustainable development of the Amazon biome.The company also said: “JBS works with farmers, ranchers and partners across the food system to develop solutions that support a growing global population while optimising resources and reducing agriculture’s environmental impact. Cattle raising in the Amazon is undergoing a sectoral transformation, and one company cannot solve all the industry’s challenges.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.