Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Accept Deny

GoGreenNation news

Pope Francis ‘inspired us to embrace mercy,’ Portland archbishop says on day of mourning

News Feed
Monday, April 21, 2025

Oregon Catholics awoke the day after Easter to the news that Pope Francis, the first Latin American pontiff from the Americas and a transformative figure in the Roman Catholic Church, had died Monday at age 88. “Today, we remember and honor the life of a shepherd who devoted himself entirely to the service of Christ and His Church, a man of deep faith, compassion, and unwavering commitment to the Gospel,” The Most Rev. Alexander Sample, archbishop of the Archdiocese of Portland. The pope’s final public appearance was Easter Sunday, where he delivered a blessing at St. Peter’s Square. He later met with American Vice President J.D. Vance, who also had what the Vatican describes as an “exchange of opinions” over the Trump administration’s handling of immigration issues and international aid. News of the pope’s passing came in the early morning hours on the West Coast, taking many by surprise. “We’re all a little in shock right now,” Portland archdiocese spokeswoman Vanessa Gallant said Monday. “We had a day off today, it’s Easter Monday.” A cause of death has not been shared, but Francis had been facing medical issues for months, and was hospitalized earlier this year for respiratory issues that developed into double pneumonia. As a young man, Francis had one lung removed and lived with chronic lung disease throughout his life, according to the Associated Press. Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Argentina, Francis was elected in 2013 following the resignation of Pope Benedict XV. As leader of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics, Francis led the Catholic Church through periods of reform and controversy. Pope Francis is greeted by the then-new archbishop of Portland, Alexander King Sample, during the mass and imposition of the Pallium upon the new metropolitan archbishops during the solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul on June 29, 2013, at the Saint Peter basilica at the Vatican.ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP via Getty Images“He inspired us to embrace mercy, to walk in humility, and to live as true disciples of Jesus Christ,” Sample said. Francis took a different approach than his predecessor, focusing on humility, social justice and pastoral outreach. Francis spoke out on a range of topics, from environmental concerns and compassion for marginalized communities. “As a pastor of souls, Pope Francis shepherded us through times of joy and sorrow, guiding us with wisdom, gentleness, and a deep love for the people of God,” Sample said. “His teachings were a beacon of hope, calling us to renew our commitment to the Lord, to care for our common home, and to live with the joy of the Gospel in every corner of the world.” Francis faced some criticism over the church’s handling of clergy sex abuse cases. Francis initially defended a bishop in Chile accused of covering up abuse, but later reversed his position. Francis implemented new protocols for holding members of the church more accountable and made reporting abuse mandatory, although advocacy groups say more work is needed. A funeral will be held in St. Peter’s Basilica following a week of public mourning and official visits. A conclave will then be convened to elect the next pope.— Geoff Pursinger, The Bulletin

News of the pope’s death came in the early hours on the West Coast, taking many by surprise

Oregon Catholics awoke the day after Easter to the news that Pope Francis, the first Latin American pontiff from the Americas and a transformative figure in the Roman Catholic Church, had died Monday at age 88.

“Today, we remember and honor the life of a shepherd who devoted himself entirely to the service of Christ and His Church, a man of deep faith, compassion, and unwavering commitment to the Gospel,” The Most Rev. Alexander Sample, archbishop of the Archdiocese of Portland.

The pope’s final public appearance was Easter Sunday, where he delivered a blessing at St. Peter’s Square. He later met with American Vice President J.D. Vance, who also had what the Vatican describes as an “exchange of opinions” over the Trump administration’s handling of immigration issues and international aid.

News of the pope’s passing came in the early morning hours on the West Coast, taking many by surprise. “We’re all a little in shock right now,” Portland archdiocese spokeswoman Vanessa Gallant said Monday. “We had a day off today, it’s Easter Monday.”

A cause of death has not been shared, but Francis had been facing medical issues for months, and was hospitalized earlier this year for respiratory issues that developed into double pneumonia.

As a young man, Francis had one lung removed and lived with chronic lung disease throughout his life, according to the Associated Press.

Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Argentina, Francis was elected in 2013 following the resignation of Pope Benedict XV. As leader of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics, Francis led the Catholic Church through periods of reform and controversy.

Pope Francis smiles as he shakes hands with Archbishop Sample, both dressed in red vestments.

Pope Francis is greeted by the then-new archbishop of Portland, Alexander King Sample, during the mass and imposition of the Pallium upon the new metropolitan archbishops during the solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul on June 29, 2013, at the Saint Peter basilica at the Vatican.ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP via Getty Images

“He inspired us to embrace mercy, to walk in humility, and to live as true disciples of Jesus Christ,” Sample said.

Francis took a different approach than his predecessor, focusing on humility, social justice and pastoral outreach. Francis spoke out on a range of topics, from environmental concerns and compassion for marginalized communities.

“As a pastor of souls, Pope Francis shepherded us through times of joy and sorrow, guiding us with wisdom, gentleness, and a deep love for the people of God,” Sample said. “His teachings were a beacon of hope, calling us to renew our commitment to the Lord, to care for our common home, and to live with the joy of the Gospel in every corner of the world.”

Francis faced some criticism over the church’s handling of clergy sex abuse cases. Francis initially defended a bishop in Chile accused of covering up abuse, but later reversed his position. Francis implemented new protocols for holding members of the church more accountable and made reporting abuse mandatory, although advocacy groups say more work is needed.

A funeral will be held in St. Peter’s Basilica following a week of public mourning and official visits. A conclave will then be convened to elect the next pope.

— Geoff Pursinger, The Bulletin

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Related News

Greenwashing and Social Justice: Pro-Trophy Hunting Narratives Need Careful Examination

Arguments abound on the benefits and dangers of trophy hunting. We need a careful, measured approach to analyzing how it’s justified and promoted. The post Greenwashing and Social Justice: Pro-Trophy Hunting Narratives Need Careful Examination appeared first on The Revelator.

Trophy hunting remains a contentious subject amongst scientists, conservationists, and the public. Each side fervently defends its stance, but the underlying narrative pushed by trophy-hunting proponents urgently deserves close scrutiny. We saw it most recently in August, after trophy-hunting critic and economist Ross Harvey wrote an op-ed criticizing the killing of five “super-tusker” elephants from Kenya’s Amboseli National Park. In response, wildlife conservation professor Amy Dickman criticized his assertions as “knee-jerk reactions” ranging from “misunderstanding to misinformation.” She asserted we should aim for alternatives to trophy-hunting bans (something Harvey has previously proposed) but her language suggests those opposed to trophy hunting are too quick to engage in rash calls to action. This is where it becomes critical that we don’t accept the many rationalizations of trophy hunting at face value and examine each one. Who Benefits? Proponents often use the plight of local African communities to position trophy hunting as a contribution to social justice — usually poverty alleviation, a solution for human-wildlife conflict, and food provision. “Valuable revenue” is often touted as trophy hunting’s primary contribution to both conservation and local communities. Quantifying these benefits is a tricky affair, however. A 2013 study by Economists at Large examined the contributions of hunting and found that on average only 3% of hunting operators’ revenue trickled down to communities. More recently, a 2022 report from Harvey’s organization Good Governance Africa found that only 9% of trophy-hunting revenue (or a paltry R1,530,000, about $86,000) from South Africa’s privately owned Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR) was allocated to community outreach and low-income households — although where and how it was distributed remains unclear. Corruption is another significant concern, further running the risk that revenue destined for community development doesn’t reach its intended recipients, according to Economists at Large. The report goes on to quote a local village resident in Northern Tanzania who was interviewed for a paper by conservationist Hassanali Thomas Sachedina: “We’re more closely allied with the photographic operators than the hunters. They are finishing off the wildlife before we’ve had a chance to realize a profit from it. Hunters don’t recognize us; they only recognize the government… 25% of hunting fees goes into the ‘hole’ at the district. We’re supposed to get 5%: we don’t even see that.” Trophy hunting generates enormous revenue for hunting operators, with bull elephants fetching $20-40,000 depending on tusk weight. But as sustainable and ethical tourism researcher Mucha Mkono told me earlier this year, “the very underdeveloped status of many of the rural areas where hunting occurs tells us what we need to know. The benefits are not trickling down enough to make a real difference in the local communities. Whatever benefits there are, their scope fails to justify the ethical and environmental cost.”   View this post on Instagram   A post shared by Laura Dyer (@lauradyerphotography) Local Communities and Local Decision-Making The homogenous grouping of African communities in pro-trophy-hunting messaging is worryingly unsubstantiated and too often taken at face value. Dickman refers to “local people, who legitimately choose trophy hunting” as a wildlife management strategy. The statement requires analysis on two fronts. First, we require empirical evidence of multiple local communities freely choosing trophy hunting before a generalized statement can be made. Second, the use of “legitimately” is questionable. A 2019 paper by Mkono suggests that African social media users, for example, perceive trophy hunting as a holdover of colonialism and a sign of politicians’ greed. Furthermore, decision-making on trophy hunting often takes place at the national level, outside the realm of local communities and without public participation. Is there genuine participation by local stakeholders, or do governments and pro-hunting organizations speak on their behalf? To what degree are the carefully crafted narratives of pro-trophy hunting groups such as Safari Club International being taken at face value? A 2023 paper by environmental anthropologist Sian Sullivan explores Safari Club International’s original objective of making Africa the “greatest hunting grounds in the world” for its elite members. SCI’s argument that hunting contributes to conservation was promoted by dismissing any opposition as ‘neocolonial,’ despite their deeply extractivist practices that continue to see thousands of African animals exported as trophies and trinkets to the United States and other primarily western countries. Such activities benefit only a few and exploit natural resources and local community members, who are paid minimum wages for precarious jobs. Jobs within the hunting industry are temporary and the field requires fewer staff compared to safari and photographic tourism lodges, according to a 2020 paper in the journal Tourism Geographies. This leads to further discursive inconsistencies in the debate: The assertion that trophy hunting incentivizes local communities to coexist with wildlife cannot be reconciled with “legitimately” choosing trophy hunting if those living in close proximity to hunting areas are being incentivized (i.e., motivated or led to see something as attractive). A legitimate choice suggests something freely pursued, which does not appear to be the case. We must be cautious of the use of “local communities” as a blanket justification for trophy-hunting if this is used in place of admitting vested interests. In a recent article, conservation writer Jared Kukura highlighted a concern that JAMMA, an international conservation organization, has a vested interest (in the region of $10 million) in pursuing trophy hunting in Mozambique and providing significant funding to organizations with explicit pro-trophy-hunting agendas, including Morally Contested Conservation, a trophy-hunting public relations initiative, and Resource Africa, a campaign against anti-hunting legislation. The intricacies of the “local communities” angle being spun into a social justice argument require the most attention. If the community benefits are minimal, trophy hunting is perceived as a colonial pursuit, and genuine grassroots participation in decision-making is lacking, is the argument valid? As Dickman stated, “rather than amping up international pressure, we should give local stakeholders space to discuss among themselves, respect their decisions, and focus far more on listening rather than lecturing.” I couldn’t agree more, but the voices of well-funded organizations continue to drown out those of the people whose welfare they’re claiming to protect. Likewise, where are the voices of community members who do not agree with trophy-hunting practices and do not feel their purported benefits? Without the immense funding poured into public relations, organizational vested interests, and political influence, would trophy hunting still be legitimately chosen by local stakeholders? Ethics, Protocols, and Outright Disregard Dickman suggests a potential “collaborative” solution to protect Kenya’s tuskers in which Amboseli elephant researchers share their data with hunting operators to call certain elephants off-limits to hunters. She “thinks” hunters would be open to this and “apparently” concerned operators have agreed not to touch Amboseli’s most famous bulls. It is worth drawing attention to the multiple occasions in which trophy hunters and hunting operators have not acted ethically or in accordance with protocols or researchers. The very nature of trophy hunting is to pursue the most iconic animals for trophy purposes. Can we reliably assume that Amboseli’s most iconic elephants are therefore safe from hunters? Cecil the lion is an example that garnered immense uproar. He was being studied by Oxford’s WildCRU researchers, who had affixed him with a visible and recognizable GPS-tracking collar, when he was baited and lured outside of Hwange National Park before being shot in 2015. The hunters brazenly removed and dumped his tracking collar before discarding his body. Not only was Theo Bronkhorst, the professional hunter, a member of the Safari Operators Association of Zimbabwe, but he acted against their own regulations in which lions should not be lured and baited outside of no-kill zones. (Note: Dickman became the executive director of WildCRU in 2022.) According to a study in Biological Conservation cited in Africa Geographic, Cecil was not alone: 24 out of 62 tagged research lions were killed by trophy hunters in Zimbabwe between 1999 and 2004. Shockingly, 72% of the tagged Hwange male lions were killed for trophies and 30% of these lions were under the age of 4 years. In 2018 two elephant hunts occurred in Balule Nature Reserve in which the professional hunting outfitters and their clients acted against established protocols. In one hunt, Balule admits to a “harrowing and traumatizing incident” in which an elephant was shot 13 times several hundred yards from a lodge, in view of the guests. An illegal hunt also took place in 2018 in which a collared elephant studied by Elephants Alive was shot under the guidance of a professional hunter and reserve warden. Also in Maseke, a property within Balule Nature Reserve, a botched elephant hunt took place in which the animal was shot no less than eight times after fleeing onto a nonhunting property, followed by a helicopter chase back onto Maseke. Not only was this hunt grossly unethical, but according to HSI-International, it may have been illegal due to a court interdict. And in the APNR, Skye the lion was hunted despite several concerns raised that he should not be targeted by trophy hunters. Skye was baited using buffalo and elephant carcasses also killed by the client. Two things are striking here: First, the wasteful use of two carcasses to simply lure a lion as opposed to the oft-heard narrative of donating meat to those in need; second, wildlife contained within the Kruger National Park are “deemed public assets” according to the Protected Areas Act (2003). Baiting and luring this lion out of the park demonstrates gross neglect alongside the fact that the hunters did not take reasonable precautions to identify a lion who was agreed to be off limits. Another lack of reasonable precaution can be seen in the trophy hunting of young male lions. “Aging errors,” when lions of key reproductive age are killed instead of older males, further exacerbate lion mortalities, according to a study in Nature. And the trend continues: This October, another super tusker bull from Tanzania’s Serengeti was hunted and killed, despite “a mutual, informal agreement among stakeholders and hunters in the region that this elephant was off-limits for hunting,” according to a property owner interviewed by Africa Geographic. For many elephant conservationists and tourism operators in the region, this is simply another example of trophy-hunting greed overriding protection of East Africa’s dwindling super tuskers. If Dickman’s collaborative approach to elephant hunting were implemented, what guarantee could be provided that hunting operators would act ethically and transparently in light of existing transgressions? My goal here is not to engage in a “knee-jerk reaction” but to engage with the language and ideas of trophy-hunting proponents. With local communities and iconic African species being used to advance those narratives, critical consideration is the least we can give them. Scroll down to find our “Republish” button Previously in The Revelator: Lion-Hunting by Trump Donors Is Awful, But the Trade in Lion Bones Is Worse The post Greenwashing and Social Justice: Pro-Trophy Hunting Narratives Need Careful Examination appeared first on The Revelator.

Social Justice
Activism
Conservation

Social justice and equity are built into everything we teach'

At environmental charter schools, students are taught about the effects of environmental degradation — and how to be advocates for their community.

Is there a best practices model for climate literacy education in Los Angeles, a program that integrates lessons across all subjects for students of all ages in an environment prioritizing outdoor learning?Twenty years ago, when she founded Environmental Charter High School’s Lawndale campus, Alison Diaz believed the answer was no.A former public school teacher, Diaz said she believed that students from poor neighborhoods suffering the effects of environmental degradation would respond to learning about what was happening around them.That education needed to be taught on a campus full of trees, plants, ponds and animals reinforcing classroom learning. So, that’s what Diaz, who worked as an educator with Tree People, a Los Angeles nonprofit dedicated to wildland restoration, built.Today, there is a second environmental charter high school campus and a middle school in Gardena and an environmental charter middle school in Inglewood. The four schools serve 1,840 students. “Nature is a vehicle to teach students the tools and knowledge to be an advocate for their community,” said Tashanda Giles-Jones, director of the environmental program at Environmental Charter High School in Lawndale. (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times) “When students learn about environmental injustice in their community,” Diaz said, “they want to do something about it.” When students present their ideas to school boards and city councils, adult leaders listen, she said. “Kids don’t realize that will happen.”This type of education, Diaz said, inspires students to learn how to write persuasive letters to public officials. They are taught math and science skills so they can create and use statistics, surveys, data collection and observation. They learn the history of their community. They get to know their neighbors.“Nature is a vehicle to teach students the tools and knowledge to be an advocate for their community,” said Tashanda Giles-Jones, director of the school’s environmental program. “Social justice and equity are built into everything we teach.” Our Climate Change Challenge Creating their own curriculum California wants climate education for its students. Meet some of the teachers, schools and nonprofits making it happen. Diaz has retired but sits on the board of Green Schools National Network, an organization that embraces the ECS approach with other schools.Environmental science and biology classes are mandatory for every ECS student, but the linchpin of the climate curriculum is the 10th-grade Green Ambassadors environmental advocacy class, Giles-Jones said, where students learn the basics of community organizing and advocating for change, including written and oral arguments.“We make sure the kids understand that sharing what they learn here is their responsibility. Our mission is to change the world.”A 2016 ECS graduate, Tulsi Patel returned to the Lawndale campus after college to teach the advocacy class. She said she likes to teach in the school’s gardens, where student art and murals are scattered everywhere. 1 2 1. Student Julian Garcia, 16, holds up a jar containing the top of a pineapple that will eventually be planted on campus. to grow into an edible pineapple. 2. Jocelyn Hernandez, 16, shows one of the eggs she collected from the hens. (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times) “The school is very open to all different modes of using the outside space,” Patel said. “Students like to just sit outside and do their work as well.”“We provide adequate space for nature to have a commanding presence,” said Eddie Cortes, who manages the school’s garden. “Everywhere you look, every corner of this school, there’s something going on. There is a giant spider web. Butterflies and bees zip around. There’s bird nests in the bushes.”A Green Ambassador from last year’s class, Sophie Munguia-Rodriguez, said she grew up near the 405 Freeway, and her father, mother, sister and cousin all have asthma. The school, she said, motivates her to advocate for them. “Teachers don’t want us to ‘normalize’ injustice,” she said. Eddie Cortes holds up one of the hens that live on campus. (Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times) ECS schools depend on support from large local philanthropic organizations, including the Ahmanson foundation, plus a collection of nonprofit and corporate partners including the Nature Conservancy, Heal the Bay, the Bay Foundation and, surprisingly, Chevron Corp.Of nearly $1 million in private support raised in the last two years, $840,000 came from foundations and corporate funders. Partnerships and private donations account for the rest. Most of the funds go to facilities and operations.“Our kids are not hopeless,” said Patel. “Teachers are so invested in them. That makes them think about greater things and what can be done.”

Social Justice
Animals
Education

Suggested Viewing

Wastewater: A Tale of Two Cities

The other tale of two cities - both plagued by decades of lack of investment and racial discrimination in their wastewater infrastructure and facing further challenges amidst climate change - told by community members, advocates, utility operators, and elected officials. As the nation grapples with how to fund long overdue infrastructure needs, this film brings to light the need for urgency and equity in these decisions.

Social Justice
Waste
Water

Again, Together - The Cumulative Impact of Environmental Racism in Houston

"Again, Together" is a film created in partnership with Ronald L. Jones, bringing stories from communities across Houston that have been impacted by environmental racism — namely redlining, segregation, underinvestment, exposure to pollution, gentrification, inequitable disaster recovery resources and freeway development.

Social Justice
Pollution
Health

Becoming Fossil

Becoming Fossil invites viewers to become time travelers through kaleidoscopic sensations of touch and elemental change. Join in and travel backward and forward in time around our small precious planet. Ride the waves of climate emergencies, and experience both extinction and resiliency in human and more-than-human touches.

Social Justice
Culture
Experimental

Together We Grow

Together We Grow is a 40-minute documentary telling the story of Common Unity, in Aotearoa New Zealand. Introducing a thriving hub helping to build resilience into its local community by growing, sewing, repairing, sharing – you name it, Common Unity is doing it! Too many of our communities, here and around the world, are facing housing crises, food insecurity, social isolation, and more. In addition, the multiple impacts of the Covid pandemic and climate change are current and ongoing. How can we most effectively confront these challenges, and help our communities thrive in an economic system that leaves many feeling trapped in poverty? Founder Julia Milne and her team have created a completely replicable model for developing strong, connected, resilient communities – a model that could be put in place across thousands of communities in Aotearoa and millions of communities across the world. They’ve proven it can be done, this film was made to help them share the story!

Social Justice
Food
Agriculture

THE WATER WILL TAKE US

This film tells the story of the victims of the flood of 2019 in Iran, which happened in the three provinces of North, Central and South of the country and left a lot of damages. The main narrators are three women who reveal the causes of this incident and mismanagements and tell the story of the people who were left to fend for themselves during the flood and after.

Water
Social Justice
Climate

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.