Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Oregon’s underwater forests are vanishing. Can they be saved?

News Feed
Tuesday, July 23, 2024

On a chilly May morning at a sandy beach 15 miles southwest of Coos Bay, marine ecologist Sara Hamilton poured hot water from a thermos into her thick wetsuit, neoprene dive boots and gloves. Snorkeling mask and fins in hand, she made her way toward the jutting headland of Cape Arago State Park, across slippery rocks draped in seaweed, mussels and barnacles and crevices teeming with green sea anemones.Hamilton eased herself into the ocean, a frigid 49 degrees that day, followed by several colleagues who braced themselves on surf-drenched rocks. But the waves crashed too high, sending the team into shallower waters before they floated and dove down.A lush, towering kelp forest had sprung up under the waves in this cove in each of the past three summers, providing refuge to juvenile rockfish and salmon, shrimp, whales and countless other creatures. But it was unclear if it would regrow this year or become the latest casualty of an upended marine ecosystem that could herald the future impact of global warming on Oregon’s coast.For millennia, underwater forests of seaweed or large brown algae stretched from the seafloor to the ocean’s surface, forming canopies, much like trees, and providing food, shelter and hunting grounds to countless animals. Bull kelp, the predominant species found along the southern third of Oregon shores, is one of the world’s fastest growers – rising at a rate of up to 10 inches per day and reaching heights of up to about 100 feet, establishing itself as the sequoia of the seas. Kelp has helped protect the coastline from storms and supported local fisheries, tribal fishing and cultural practices.But over the past decade, according to new data, Oregon lost more than two-thirds of that kelp canopy.Kelp’s troubles on the West Coast started in 2013 when a mysterious illness began to decimate sunflower sea stars, the sole predators of purple sea urchins in Oregon. In turn, the purple urchins — small, spiky orbs that are native to the coast but previously dwelled in the crevices of tide pools, passively feeding on pieces of drifting kelp — had a bonanza population spurt.Purple urchins cover the sea floor at Cape Arago State Park on May 24, 2024. The urchins, whose population growth was exacerbated by a marine heat wave, have eaten most of Oregon’s kelp forests.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianWarmer water didn’t cause the stars’ disease, but scientists say the starfish died faster because of it. They have concluded that the Blob, an extreme heat wave in the Pacific Ocean that in 2014 raised temperatures between 4 and 10 degrees above average and lasted for more than 700 days, exacerbated both the star die-off and the urchin explosion. Without sunflower sea stars – considered the largest and fastest of the starfish species, able to grow up to 24 arms and easily outrun prey – hordes of purples took over underwater forests. They overgrazed the kelp, forming “urchin barrens,” lifeless zones covered with hungry purple urchins and not much else.The problem was not unique to the Pacific Ocean; purple urchins overran kelp forests across the globe, from Tasmania to Norway. On the West Coast, a collapse was first identified in northern California in 2019 when a study chronicled the abrupt decline of kelp there by more than 90% in 2014. Similar warning signs emerged in southern Oregon: the wads of snake-like tangles that had once washed up on beaches were becoming scarce and the dense floating mats of kelp along the shores had nearly vanished – and with them, the fish and animals that had once lived and hunted there.Despite the red flags, action to probe the extent of kelp’s loss and to stave it off has been slow. Oregon’s craggy, exposed shoreline and murky waters meant few divers had been taking stock of underwater conditions. And because the state doesn’t allow commercial harvesting of kelp, wildlife officials had neither the mandate nor the funding to regularly survey or monitor the situation.In the void, a nonprofit launched in 2019 in the small coastal town of Port Orford, about 60 miles north of the California border, bringing together local fishermen, researchers, tribal members, university students, recreational and commercial divers. The Oregon Kelp Alliance had a singular focus: to sound the alarm and take immediate action to protect Oregon’s underwater jungles.Tom Calvanese, the founder and director of the Oregon Kelp Alliance, helps lower a boat into the ocean at the Port Orford port in southern Oregon. Calvanese has been at the forefront of kelp restoration efforts in Oregon.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianPreviously, “the ocean felt alive, smelled alive and looked alive. The kelp was doing its job as a foundation species, supporting this vibrant ecosystem. The water was clearer. There were a lot of fish, marine mammals, birds and whales, right there, all around you,” said the group’s founder, Tom Calvanese, a fisheries scientist and former commercial urchin diver.“Fast forward to now,” he added, “the ocean without kelp doesn’t feel vibrant anymore, it doesn’t have much activity, much life.”Over the past five years, the Kelp Alliance has gained momentum, expanding up and down the coast. It’s secured more than $4 million in federal, state and private funding to conduct, in partnership with the state, a coast-wide survey of kelp and launch several scientific research and restoration projects aimed at saving kelp habitat, controlling purple urchins and bringing back sunflower sea stars. Later this summer, the group will publish a kelp status report and a comprehensive restoration plan that aims to rehabilitate Oregon’s underwater forests, although similar efforts in California so far have yielded only modest success.The soon-to-be-released report, shared early with The Oregonian/OregonLive, quantifies for the first time the amount of damage the state’s kelp forests sustained between 2010 and 2022.In all, more than two-thirds of Oregon’s kelp canopy disappeared from the southern shores. That’s nearly 900 acres, or the equivalent of 680 football fields.Floating kelp canopy observed in ODFW aerial surveys in 2010 and 2022 at three major kelp-bearing regions on the Oregon coast. Orford Reef (top, off Cape Blanco) historically held the largest kelp bed in the state by far, and has seen the most dramatic kelp decline. Meanwhile, Redfish Rocks (middle, near Port Orford) and Rogue Reef (bottom, off Gold Beach) both saw localized kelp losses that were largely balanced by a shifting kelp distribution.Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeThe repercussions of those massive losses are just starting to emerge. The state’s commercial red sea urchin harvest is down by half from a decade ago. The recreational red abalone fishery permanently closed in December. And recreational nearshore fishing has dwindled on the southern coast.Researchers with the Kelp Alliance have estimated, based on a global assessment of kelp ecosystem values, that the 900 acres of lost kelp canopy is costing Oregon $23 million to $53 million every year. This includes the value of shrinking local fisheries as well as the ocean’s lessened ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Underwater kelp forests are key to combating climate change – they can sequester up to 20 times more carbon per acre than land forests.How rising temperatures will impact kelp moving forward is unclear, although it typically does better in cooler waters that provide more nutrients. The state’s coastal surface waters warmed an average of half a degree per decade from the mid-20th century to the 2000s, according to the most recent state-funded analysis published in 2010. But the alliance’s report concludes that, unlike in other parts of the world, long-term ocean warming is likely not a cause of kelp’s decline in Oregon even as short-term heat waves played a significant role.While kelp is susceptible to heat – it experiences decreased growth and reproductive success when temperatures regularly reach 61 degrees and can die or fail to reproduce when the water warms past about 64 degrees – those thresholds have been rarely reached along Oregon’s southern shores. In fact, researchers noted that surface water temperatures at two locations, off Port Orford and at Charleston, near Coos Bay, have declined very slightly over the past 30 years.Complicating matters, a few areas, including Cape Arago State Park near Coos Bay, saw gains in kelp cover for reasons researchers don’t yet understand.Hamilton, the marine ecologist, has monitored kelp at Cape Arago for the past three years with a drone and by diving or snorkeling there about a dozen times. Every year, the underwater forest has regrown, making it one of Oregon’s bright spot outliers, with a 25% increase in canopy cover.She’s cautiously optimistic that, despite an abundance of purple urchins already on scene, it will come back this summer.Snorkeling through cloudy water at the cove this spring, the research team spotted signs of hope, anchored to the seabed.Hamilton broke the surface and yelled: “Baby kelp!”But she remains worried about the future.“There’s a theory known as tipping points. If you push a system closer and closer to a point where all of a sudden the urchins take over, they can quickly switch the kelp forest to an urchin barren,” Hamilton said after the snorkeling excursion. “We have these sites that still seem relatively healthy. We don’t know if they’re close to tipping. We don’t know if they can sustain those populations of urchins long-term. It fuels our sense of urgency and anxiety.”FEELING KELP’S LOSSThe disappearance of kelp – amid the rise and dominance of purple urchins – is being felt all along Oregon’s southern shores.This spring in Port Orford, Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance founder, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steered a small boat out of the tiny port toward a rocky headland known as The Heads. They circled just below at Nellies Cove, a sheltered bay.Tom Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance director, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steer a boat on May 25, 2024, out of Port Orford in southern Oregon toward Nellies Cove. The picturesque cove has become a wasteland of purple urchins.  Gosia Wozniacka / The OregonianThe cove is ground zero for Oregon’s kelp restoration efforts. It’s where Calvanese, Lacey and others first began to notice signs of dramatic change.The two men, both transplants from the East Coast, recalled paddling or kayaking together just past the breakwater with their fishing poles to where a dense mat of kelp encircled the shores. Lacey, the head of a local tour company, would bring groups of recreational fishing enthusiasts. They would park their kayaks right on the edge of the kelp forest and fish over it.“We never got skunked here. We always caught fish, always,” Calvanese said.Then, about six years ago, the kelp canopy disappeared – and with it, the fish at Nellies Cove.“It got so bad, we stopped doing kayak fishing tours,” Lacey said. “We used to pull in about $10,000 every summer. Now that’s totally gone. We just gave up on it. I didn’t want to take people’s money and not catch any fish.”Calvanese, who manages Oregon State University’s field station at Port Orford, also began fielding calls from commercial urchin divers alarmed by kelp declines on nearby reefs. They took him by surprise. He had worked for an urchin diving crew while finishing his graduate degree and had seen first-hand the thick forests stretching for hundreds of acres under the waves.He realized the stakes were high. Port Orford, population 1,149, is dependent on fishing. With kelp forests dwindling, both the commercial nearshore fishery – rockfish, cabezon and greenling – and the red urchin fishery could be threatened, not to mention recreational fishing and tourism.Calvanese wanted to see the underwater changes for himself, so he dove in Nellies Cove. What he found shocked him and brought tears to his eyes, he said. The entire sea bottom was covered in purple urchins actively foraging for food. Where a thriving kelp forest had once grown, bountiful with juvenile and adult fish, he now couldn’t spot a single kelp.The fish, too, were mostly gone.A few hundred yards from that spot in Nellies Cove, commercial urchin diver Tom Butterbaugh anchored his boat, the F/V Good News, surveying the area this spring for red urchins to harvest.Urchin diving in Oregon is a dangerous job, and Butterbaugh has been searching for them under water for 24 years. Unlike the small and skinny purple urchins that have no commercial value, red urchins are harvested throughout the world for their roe — also called uni — which is considered a delicacy, especially in Japan.The business was once lucrative. Now, it’s less so. Most of the red urchins in Oregon are either gone or their roe isn’t well developed because they have to compete for food with the masses of purple urchins.Butterbaugh remembers good kelp years and bad kelp years, but it’s never been as bad as it is now, he said.He estimates he has lost over 90% of red urchin picking territory in recent years, most of it at nearby Orford Reef – the hardest-hit area for kelp decline – where he had typically harvested for six months annually.“The feeling of loss, the frustration, the helplessness when we can’t get the urchins is constantly there,” he said. “‘Where are we going to go? We already went there.’ Our [harvest] counts are getting lower and lower. Maybe this will be the year that the kelp comes back. We thought it was going to come back last year. And look at Depoe Bay, the kelp is amazing, but the urchins are skinny anyway.”The only reason he’s still in business is because the domestic market for red urchins has grown. A decade ago, he picked urchins for 50 to 80 cents per pound. Now, depending on the season and whether there’s competition from divers in Mexico or Chile, the price is up at $2 to $4.“It’s been thin ice for urchin divers,” Butterbaugh said. “The only thing keeping us afloat are the higher prices. If we lost market value, we’d go out of business.”From left, black rockfish, red urchins, sunflower sea star and red abalone.  Photos courtesy Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Reserves ProgramConcern is also growing over the future of the commercial groundfish industry in Port Orford. Kelp forests act as nurseries for juvenile rockfish and other groundfish – providing shelter, food and a place to grow – so the drastic decline of kelp beds is bound to have an impact, said Port of Port Orford Commission president Aaron Ashdown. Although local fishermen have yet to see changes in fish availability, he said, that’s likely because rockfish are some of the longest-living fish.“We might not see the negative effects of this kelp die-off until a decade or two goes by because of how long it takes for these fish to grow up,” Ashdown said. “But by then, we could see the collapse of certain species.”For the Coquille Indian Tribe, too, the decline of underwater forests has been wrenching, spelling the disappearance of tribal foods and practices, said Shelley Estes, an enrolled member of the tribe, which has inhabited Oregon’s southwestern coast for thousands of years.“Our elders said the kelp was our ‘canoe superhighway,’” said Estes, who is on the tribe’s resiliency climate task force. “Our people ran canoes up and down the coastline. That’s where we felt safe. Kelp protected us. It absorbed the shocks of the waves coming onto the shore.”One of the early victims of the disappearing kelp is red abalone, a large ocean snail that grazes on kelp and is a traditional source of nourishment and spiritual protection for the tribe. Abalone shells are also used in smudging – cleansing rituals that use burning herbs to clear out negative energies – and to make tribal regalia.Without kelp, the abalone, whose populations were already in decline prior to kelp’s collapse, have starved. The tribe can no longer harvest them and must purchase their shells on Amazon.“As a tribal member, I’m alarmed,” Estes said.PATH TO RESTORATIONRestoring kelp along Oregon’s southern shoreline may require an assortment of strategies, including, crucially, removing most of the purple urchin – somehow.A healthy bull kelp forest swayed underwater in August 2021 at Redfish Rocks, one of Oregon’s five marine reserves just south of Port Orford. The tree-like algae float up to the surface buoyed by air-filled bladders, their fronds or blades forming a thick canopy.  Brandon Cole / Special to The OregonianThe Kelp Alliance initially focused on hand removing and composting purple urchins or smashing them with hammers on the seabed – under a permit from the state – at sites including Nellies Cove, Macklyn Cove in Brookings and Haystack Rock in Pacific City. But those efforts, as in California, have had limited impact thus far, due in part to limited funding that paid for only short-term removal actions.One challenge is that purple urchins can persist in a hungry zombie state for well over a year, easily outlasting the annual cycle of bull kelp and lying in wait to devour baby algae before it has a chance to regrow. As a result, scientists say, it’s extremely difficult to flip barrens back into kelp ecosystems – it requires continually removing most if not all urchins in an area. Short of that, studies and surveys have shown that urchin removal can be effective when it happens at larger, semi-discrete sites or focuses on barrens surrounded by healthy kelp.Restoring kelp forests coast-wide by removing urchins by hand is clearly not feasible.Case in point: At Orford Reef – where Butterbaugh traditionally dove for red urchins – state biologists in 2019 documented 350 million purple urchins sitting on the seabed, a 10,000% increase over a five year period. The reef, once the state’s largest underwater kelp forest, spanning about 1,655 acres or just under half the size of the city of Astoria, saw a 95% decline in kelp, the largest in Oregon, according to the new data.“We realized we could not smash our way out of this crisis,” said Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance’s founder.The group is now launching a new $2.5 million restoration initiative that ties targeted urchin removal with kelp revegetation. Divers in Oregon will remove urchins at six sites along the coast and then “seed” kelp via spore bags and other cultivation methods. The sites include not only urchin barrens such as Nellies Cove but also areas that have abundant kelp canopy yet are overrun with urchins, such as Cape Arago.Separately, the group is mounting a kelp mariculture project in the waters around Port Orford. It will grow bull kelp on vertical mooring lines off the ocean bottom and out of reach of hungry urchins. The kelp will be used to make animal feed or fertilizer – a boost to the local economy – and spores will be saved for the kelp revegetation at restoration sites. The group is also working with local seaweed farms to collect purple urchins to fatten them up in land-based tanks with the hope to make them commercially viable.Ultimately, said Calvanese, restoration can stave off the complete disappearance of kelp along the West Coast by protecting a network of small sites that can maintain kelp’s genetic diversity and eventually repopulate urchin barrens.“If we can restore and maintain these oases where we continue to produce kelp spores then we have a chance to regrow from there,” he said. “We can also protect the remaining kelp we still have and not just watch it shrivel up.”MORE: Does kelp restoration work?But to make kelp’s comeback viable at scale, Calvanese and others are betting big on returning the sunflower sea stars – purple urchins’ only predator in the state – to the ocean.Scott Groth, a marine scientist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, holds a sunflower sea star off the Oregon coast near Port Orford. The photo was taken before a mysterious wasting disease wiped out the population of the sea stars in Oregon beginning in 2013.  Scott Groth / Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeMarine ecologists Aaron Galloway and Sarah Gravem, with the University of Oregon and Oregon State University, have been able to show that the sunflower sea stars could potentially regulate purple sea urchin populations and, as a result, restore and maintain healthy kelp forests.Their study published last year indicates that sunflower sea stars don’t discriminate between fully grown healthy urchins and starved, nutritionally poor urchins similar to those that dwell in urchin barrens. In fact, during experiments the sea stars ate more skinny, hungry urchins than healthy ones, likely because it takes a shorter amount of time to digest them, Galloway said.Modeling also showed that, at the densities of sea stars before the wasting disease, there were enough stars to stop urchins from turning kelp forests into barrens.With those results in mind, the scientists, who are both members of the Kelp Alliance, are working toward a captive breeding program in Oregon, with the end-goal being reintroduction to the wild. That reality is now a step closer as Oregon has seen an increase in the sightings of sunflower sea stars, meaning researchers can start collecting them for local experiments and breeding. Earlier this year, Galloway secured approval for a permit to collect 20 in Oregon waters to launch the endeavors. He’s working closely with a lab in Washington that was the first to successfully breed the animals.Eventually, Galloway said, he hopes to breed and release thousands of sunflower sea stars into Oregon waters and see how they behave in urchin barrens. It’s unclear whether this will work, he admits. Though several research centers and aquariums around the U.S. are now racing to breed the stars, which the federal government last year proposed to list as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no one has attempted such a release thus far.“It’s a dream for us,” he said. “If we put a bunch of them at a reef or declining kelp forest, will it cause a recovery? Will the stars eat the urchins or will they just leave and go somewhere else?”In September 2023, a drone captured a thick bull kelp canopy growing just off of Cape Foulweather’s Otter Crest State Scenic Viewpoint. The cape, just south of Depoe Bay, was one of the few areas on Oregon’s coast that saw an increase in kelp last year.  Sara Hamilton / Oregon Kelp Alliance.Because that’s a long-term endeavor, Gravem said, the state needs to urgently step up to regularly monitor, manage and restore kelp forests, similar to how it manages land-based forests, grasslands and estuaries.“For a long time, we’ve been hesitant to intervene in the ocean. It’s so big and we thought that it would rebound if we just left it alone,” Gravem said. “But it’s becoming increasingly clear that it’s not rebounding on its own. If anything, it’s getting worse because of climate change. So we need to … start helping it along.”— Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.

As marine heat waves wreak havoc on Oregon’s ocean ecosystems, the collapse of kelp forests could prove catastrophic to marine life, fisheries and tribes.

On a chilly May morning at a sandy beach 15 miles southwest of Coos Bay, marine ecologist Sara Hamilton poured hot water from a thermos into her thick wetsuit, neoprene dive boots and gloves. Snorkeling mask and fins in hand, she made her way toward the jutting headland of Cape Arago State Park, across slippery rocks draped in seaweed, mussels and barnacles and crevices teeming with green sea anemones.

Hamilton eased herself into the ocean, a frigid 49 degrees that day, followed by several colleagues who braced themselves on surf-drenched rocks. But the waves crashed too high, sending the team into shallower waters before they floated and dove down.

A lush, towering kelp forest had sprung up under the waves in this cove in each of the past three summers, providing refuge to juvenile rockfish and salmon, shrimp, whales and countless other creatures. But it was unclear if it would regrow this year or become the latest casualty of an upended marine ecosystem that could herald the future impact of global warming on Oregon’s coast.

For millennia, underwater forests of seaweed or large brown algae stretched from the seafloor to the ocean’s surface, forming canopies, much like trees, and providing food, shelter and hunting grounds to countless animals. Bull kelp, the predominant species found along the southern third of Oregon shores, is one of the world’s fastest growers – rising at a rate of up to 10 inches per day and reaching heights of up to about 100 feet, establishing itself as the sequoia of the seas. Kelp has helped protect the coastline from storms and supported local fisheries, tribal fishing and cultural practices.

But over the past decade, according to new data, Oregon lost more than two-thirds of that kelp canopy.

Kelp’s troubles on the West Coast started in 2013 when a mysterious illness began to decimate sunflower sea stars, the sole predators of purple sea urchins in Oregon. In turn, the purple urchins — small, spiky orbs that are native to the coast but previously dwelled in the crevices of tide pools, passively feeding on pieces of drifting kelp — had a bonanza population spurt.

Purple urchins cover the sea floor at Cape Arago State Park on May 24, 2024. The urchins, whose population growth was exacerbated by a marine heat wave, have eaten most of Oregon’s kelp forests.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

Warmer water didn’t cause the stars’ disease, but scientists say the starfish died faster because of it. They have concluded that the Blob, an extreme heat wave in the Pacific Ocean that in 2014 raised temperatures between 4 and 10 degrees above average and lasted for more than 700 days, exacerbated both the star die-off and the urchin explosion. Without sunflower sea stars – considered the largest and fastest of the starfish species, able to grow up to 24 arms and easily outrun prey – hordes of purples took over underwater forests. They overgrazed the kelp, forming “urchin barrens,” lifeless zones covered with hungry purple urchins and not much else.

The problem was not unique to the Pacific Ocean; purple urchins overran kelp forests across the globe, from Tasmania to Norway. On the West Coast, a collapse was first identified in northern California in 2019 when a study chronicled the abrupt decline of kelp there by more than 90% in 2014. Similar warning signs emerged in southern Oregon: the wads of snake-like tangles that had once washed up on beaches were becoming scarce and the dense floating mats of kelp along the shores had nearly vanished – and with them, the fish and animals that had once lived and hunted there.

Despite the red flags, action to probe the extent of kelp’s loss and to stave it off has been slow. Oregon’s craggy, exposed shoreline and murky waters meant few divers had been taking stock of underwater conditions. And because the state doesn’t allow commercial harvesting of kelp, wildlife officials had neither the mandate nor the funding to regularly survey or monitor the situation.

In the void, a nonprofit launched in 2019 in the small coastal town of Port Orford, about 60 miles north of the California border, bringing together local fishermen, researchers, tribal members, university students, recreational and commercial divers. The Oregon Kelp Alliance had a singular focus: to sound the alarm and take immediate action to protect Oregon’s underwater jungles.

Tom Calvanese, the founder and director of the Oregon Kelp Alliance, helps lower a boat into the ocean at the Port Orford port in southern Oregon. Calvanese has been at the forefront of kelp restoration efforts in Oregon.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

Previously, “the ocean felt alive, smelled alive and looked alive. The kelp was doing its job as a foundation species, supporting this vibrant ecosystem. The water was clearer. There were a lot of fish, marine mammals, birds and whales, right there, all around you,” said the group’s founder, Tom Calvanese, a fisheries scientist and former commercial urchin diver.

“Fast forward to now,” he added, “the ocean without kelp doesn’t feel vibrant anymore, it doesn’t have much activity, much life.”

Over the past five years, the Kelp Alliance has gained momentum, expanding up and down the coast. It’s secured more than $4 million in federal, state and private funding to conduct, in partnership with the state, a coast-wide survey of kelp and launch several scientific research and restoration projects aimed at saving kelp habitat, controlling purple urchins and bringing back sunflower sea stars. Later this summer, the group will publish a kelp status report and a comprehensive restoration plan that aims to rehabilitate Oregon’s underwater forests, although similar efforts in California so far have yielded only modest success.

The soon-to-be-released report, shared early with The Oregonian/OregonLive, quantifies for the first time the amount of damage the state’s kelp forests sustained between 2010 and 2022.

In all, more than two-thirds of Oregon’s kelp canopy disappeared from the southern shores. That’s nearly 900 acres, or the equivalent of 680 football fields.

Kelp canopy map

Floating kelp canopy observed in ODFW aerial surveys in 2010 and 2022 at three major kelp-bearing regions on the Oregon coast. Orford Reef (top, off Cape Blanco) historically held the largest kelp bed in the state by far, and has seen the most dramatic kelp decline. Meanwhile, Redfish Rocks (middle, near Port Orford) and Rogue Reef (bottom, off Gold Beach) both saw localized kelp losses that were largely balanced by a shifting kelp distribution.Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

The repercussions of those massive losses are just starting to emerge. The state’s commercial red sea urchin harvest is down by half from a decade ago. The recreational red abalone fishery permanently closed in December. And recreational nearshore fishing has dwindled on the southern coast.

Researchers with the Kelp Alliance have estimated, based on a global assessment of kelp ecosystem values, that the 900 acres of lost kelp canopy is costing Oregon $23 million to $53 million every year. This includes the value of shrinking local fisheries as well as the ocean’s lessened ability to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Underwater kelp forests are key to combating climate change – they can sequester up to 20 times more carbon per acre than land forests.

How rising temperatures will impact kelp moving forward is unclear, although it typically does better in cooler waters that provide more nutrients. The state’s coastal surface waters warmed an average of half a degree per decade from the mid-20th century to the 2000s, according to the most recent state-funded analysis published in 2010. But the alliance’s report concludes that, unlike in other parts of the world, long-term ocean warming is likely not a cause of kelp’s decline in Oregon even as short-term heat waves played a significant role.

While kelp is susceptible to heat – it experiences decreased growth and reproductive success when temperatures regularly reach 61 degrees and can die or fail to reproduce when the water warms past about 64 degrees – those thresholds have been rarely reached along Oregon’s southern shores. In fact, researchers noted that surface water temperatures at two locations, off Port Orford and at Charleston, near Coos Bay, have declined very slightly over the past 30 years.

Complicating matters, a few areas, including Cape Arago State Park near Coos Bay, saw gains in kelp cover for reasons researchers don’t yet understand.

Hamilton, the marine ecologist, has monitored kelp at Cape Arago for the past three years with a drone and by diving or snorkeling there about a dozen times. Every year, the underwater forest has regrown, making it one of Oregon’s bright spot outliers, with a 25% increase in canopy cover.

She’s cautiously optimistic that, despite an abundance of purple urchins already on scene, it will come back this summer.

Snorkeling through cloudy water at the cove this spring, the research team spotted signs of hope, anchored to the seabed.

Hamilton broke the surface and yelled: “Baby kelp!”

But she remains worried about the future.

“There’s a theory known as tipping points. If you push a system closer and closer to a point where all of a sudden the urchins take over, they can quickly switch the kelp forest to an urchin barren,” Hamilton said after the snorkeling excursion. “We have these sites that still seem relatively healthy. We don’t know if they’re close to tipping. We don’t know if they can sustain those populations of urchins long-term. It fuels our sense of urgency and anxiety.”

FEELING KELP’S LOSS

The disappearance of kelp – amid the rise and dominance of purple urchins – is being felt all along Oregon’s southern shores.

This spring in Port Orford, Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance founder, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steered a small boat out of the tiny port toward a rocky headland known as The Heads. They circled just below at Nellies Cove, a sheltered bay.

Tom Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance director, and his friend Dave Lacey, a boat captain, steer a boat on May 25, 2024, out of Port Orford in southern Oregon toward Nellies Cove. The picturesque cove has become a wasteland of purple urchins.  Gosia Wozniacka / The Oregonian

The cove is ground zero for Oregon’s kelp restoration efforts. It’s where Calvanese, Lacey and others first began to notice signs of dramatic change.

The two men, both transplants from the East Coast, recalled paddling or kayaking together just past the breakwater with their fishing poles to where a dense mat of kelp encircled the shores. Lacey, the head of a local tour company, would bring groups of recreational fishing enthusiasts. They would park their kayaks right on the edge of the kelp forest and fish over it.

“We never got skunked here. We always caught fish, always,” Calvanese said.

Then, about six years ago, the kelp canopy disappeared – and with it, the fish at Nellies Cove.

“It got so bad, we stopped doing kayak fishing tours,” Lacey said. “We used to pull in about $10,000 every summer. Now that’s totally gone. We just gave up on it. I didn’t want to take people’s money and not catch any fish.”

Calvanese, who manages Oregon State University’s field station at Port Orford, also began fielding calls from commercial urchin divers alarmed by kelp declines on nearby reefs. They took him by surprise. He had worked for an urchin diving crew while finishing his graduate degree and had seen first-hand the thick forests stretching for hundreds of acres under the waves.

He realized the stakes were high. Port Orford, population 1,149, is dependent on fishing. With kelp forests dwindling, both the commercial nearshore fishery – rockfish, cabezon and greenling – and the red urchin fishery could be threatened, not to mention recreational fishing and tourism.

Calvanese wanted to see the underwater changes for himself, so he dove in Nellies Cove. What he found shocked him and brought tears to his eyes, he said. The entire sea bottom was covered in purple urchins actively foraging for food. Where a thriving kelp forest had once grown, bountiful with juvenile and adult fish, he now couldn’t spot a single kelp.

The fish, too, were mostly gone.

A few hundred yards from that spot in Nellies Cove, commercial urchin diver Tom Butterbaugh anchored his boat, the F/V Good News, surveying the area this spring for red urchins to harvest.

Urchin diving in Oregon is a dangerous job, and Butterbaugh has been searching for them under water for 24 years. Unlike the small and skinny purple urchins that have no commercial value, red urchins are harvested throughout the world for their roe — also called uni — which is considered a delicacy, especially in Japan.

The business was once lucrative. Now, it’s less so. Most of the red urchins in Oregon are either gone or their roe isn’t well developed because they have to compete for food with the masses of purple urchins.

Butterbaugh remembers good kelp years and bad kelp years, but it’s never been as bad as it is now, he said.

He estimates he has lost over 90% of red urchin picking territory in recent years, most of it at nearby Orford Reef – the hardest-hit area for kelp decline – where he had typically harvested for six months annually.

“The feeling of loss, the frustration, the helplessness when we can’t get the urchins is constantly there,” he said. “‘Where are we going to go? We already went there.’ Our [harvest] counts are getting lower and lower. Maybe this will be the year that the kelp comes back. We thought it was going to come back last year. And look at Depoe Bay, the kelp is amazing, but the urchins are skinny anyway.”

The only reason he’s still in business is because the domestic market for red urchins has grown. A decade ago, he picked urchins for 50 to 80 cents per pound. Now, depending on the season and whether there’s competition from divers in Mexico or Chile, the price is up at $2 to $4.

“It’s been thin ice for urchin divers,” Butterbaugh said. “The only thing keeping us afloat are the higher prices. If we lost market value, we’d go out of business.”

From left, black rockfish, red urchins, sunflower sea star and red abalone.  Photos courtesy Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Reserves Program

Concern is also growing over the future of the commercial groundfish industry in Port Orford. Kelp forests act as nurseries for juvenile rockfish and other groundfish – providing shelter, food and a place to grow – so the drastic decline of kelp beds is bound to have an impact, said Port of Port Orford Commission president Aaron Ashdown. Although local fishermen have yet to see changes in fish availability, he said, that’s likely because rockfish are some of the longest-living fish.

“We might not see the negative effects of this kelp die-off until a decade or two goes by because of how long it takes for these fish to grow up,” Ashdown said. “But by then, we could see the collapse of certain species.”

For the Coquille Indian Tribe, too, the decline of underwater forests has been wrenching, spelling the disappearance of tribal foods and practices, said Shelley Estes, an enrolled member of the tribe, which has inhabited Oregon’s southwestern coast for thousands of years.

“Our elders said the kelp was our ‘canoe superhighway,’” said Estes, who is on the tribe’s resiliency climate task force. “Our people ran canoes up and down the coastline. That’s where we felt safe. Kelp protected us. It absorbed the shocks of the waves coming onto the shore.”

One of the early victims of the disappearing kelp is red abalone, a large ocean snail that grazes on kelp and is a traditional source of nourishment and spiritual protection for the tribe. Abalone shells are also used in smudging – cleansing rituals that use burning herbs to clear out negative energies – and to make tribal regalia.

Without kelp, the abalone, whose populations were already in decline prior to kelp’s collapse, have starved. The tribe can no longer harvest them and must purchase their shells on Amazon.

“As a tribal member, I’m alarmed,” Estes said.

PATH TO RESTORATION

Restoring kelp along Oregon’s southern shoreline may require an assortment of strategies, including, crucially, removing most of the purple urchin – somehow.

A healthy bull kelp forest swayed underwater in August 2021 at Redfish Rocks, one of Oregon’s five marine reserves just south of Port Orford. The tree-like algae float up to the surface buoyed by air-filled bladders, their fronds or blades forming a thick canopy.  Brandon Cole / Special to The Oregonian

The Kelp Alliance initially focused on hand removing and composting purple urchins or smashing them with hammers on the seabed – under a permit from the state – at sites including Nellies Cove, Macklyn Cove in Brookings and Haystack Rock in Pacific City. But those efforts, as in California, have had limited impact thus far, due in part to limited funding that paid for only short-term removal actions.

One challenge is that purple urchins can persist in a hungry zombie state for well over a year, easily outlasting the annual cycle of bull kelp and lying in wait to devour baby algae before it has a chance to regrow. As a result, scientists say, it’s extremely difficult to flip barrens back into kelp ecosystems – it requires continually removing most if not all urchins in an area. Short of that, studies and surveys have shown that urchin removal can be effective when it happens at larger, semi-discrete sites or focuses on barrens surrounded by healthy kelp.

Restoring kelp forests coast-wide by removing urchins by hand is clearly not feasible.

Case in point: At Orford Reef – where Butterbaugh traditionally dove for red urchins – state biologists in 2019 documented 350 million purple urchins sitting on the seabed, a 10,000% increase over a five year period. The reef, once the state’s largest underwater kelp forest, spanning about 1,655 acres or just under half the size of the city of Astoria, saw a 95% decline in kelp, the largest in Oregon, according to the new data.

“We realized we could not smash our way out of this crisis,” said Calvanese, the Kelp Alliance’s founder.

The group is now launching a new $2.5 million restoration initiative that ties targeted urchin removal with kelp revegetation. Divers in Oregon will remove urchins at six sites along the coast and then “seed” kelp via spore bags and other cultivation methods. The sites include not only urchin barrens such as Nellies Cove but also areas that have abundant kelp canopy yet are overrun with urchins, such as Cape Arago.

Separately, the group is mounting a kelp mariculture project in the waters around Port Orford. It will grow bull kelp on vertical mooring lines off the ocean bottom and out of reach of hungry urchins. The kelp will be used to make animal feed or fertilizer – a boost to the local economy – and spores will be saved for the kelp revegetation at restoration sites. The group is also working with local seaweed farms to collect purple urchins to fatten them up in land-based tanks with the hope to make them commercially viable.

Ultimately, said Calvanese, restoration can stave off the complete disappearance of kelp along the West Coast by protecting a network of small sites that can maintain kelp’s genetic diversity and eventually repopulate urchin barrens.

“If we can restore and maintain these oases where we continue to produce kelp spores then we have a chance to regrow from there,” he said. “We can also protect the remaining kelp we still have and not just watch it shrivel up.”

MORE: Does kelp restoration work?

But to make kelp’s comeback viable at scale, Calvanese and others are betting big on returning the sunflower sea stars – purple urchins’ only predator in the state – to the ocean.

Scott Groth, a marine scientist with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, holds a sunflower sea star off the Oregon coast near Port Orford. The photo was taken before a mysterious wasting disease wiped out the population of the sea stars in Oregon beginning in 2013.  Scott Groth / Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Marine ecologists Aaron Galloway and Sarah Gravem, with the University of Oregon and Oregon State University, have been able to show that the sunflower sea stars could potentially regulate purple sea urchin populations and, as a result, restore and maintain healthy kelp forests.

Their study published last year indicates that sunflower sea stars don’t discriminate between fully grown healthy urchins and starved, nutritionally poor urchins similar to those that dwell in urchin barrens. In fact, during experiments the sea stars ate more skinny, hungry urchins than healthy ones, likely because it takes a shorter amount of time to digest them, Galloway said.

Modeling also showed that, at the densities of sea stars before the wasting disease, there were enough stars to stop urchins from turning kelp forests into barrens.

With those results in mind, the scientists, who are both members of the Kelp Alliance, are working toward a captive breeding program in Oregon, with the end-goal being reintroduction to the wild. That reality is now a step closer as Oregon has seen an increase in the sightings of sunflower sea stars, meaning researchers can start collecting them for local experiments and breeding. Earlier this year, Galloway secured approval for a permit to collect 20 in Oregon waters to launch the endeavors. He’s working closely with a lab in Washington that was the first to successfully breed the animals.

Eventually, Galloway said, he hopes to breed and release thousands of sunflower sea stars into Oregon waters and see how they behave in urchin barrens. It’s unclear whether this will work, he admits. Though several research centers and aquariums around the U.S. are now racing to breed the stars, which the federal government last year proposed to list as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, no one has attempted such a release thus far.

“It’s a dream for us,” he said. “If we put a bunch of them at a reef or declining kelp forest, will it cause a recovery? Will the stars eat the urchins or will they just leave and go somewhere else?”

In September 2023, a drone captured a thick bull kelp canopy growing just off of Cape Foulweather’s Otter Crest State Scenic Viewpoint. The cape, just south of Depoe Bay, was one of the few areas on Oregon’s coast that saw an increase in kelp last year.  Sara Hamilton / Oregon Kelp Alliance.

Because that’s a long-term endeavor, Gravem said, the state needs to urgently step up to regularly monitor, manage and restore kelp forests, similar to how it manages land-based forests, grasslands and estuaries.

“For a long time, we’ve been hesitant to intervene in the ocean. It’s so big and we thought that it would rebound if we just left it alone,” Gravem said. “But it’s becoming increasingly clear that it’s not rebounding on its own. If anything, it’s getting worse because of climate change. So we need to … start helping it along.”

— Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

What Cancún’s Tourists Don’t See Is a Sprawling Concrete Jungle

The rapid expansion of Cancún since the 1970s has created a vastly unequal city, with overpopulated neighborhoods deprived of public space propping up the city's lavish tourist districts.

This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.The wide mowed lawns and leafy trees, the sports fields shining under their illuminated lights, the bouncy castles in the children’s play areas—especially the bouncy castles—are what Celia Pérez Godínez envies. These are the trappings of the wealthy neighborhood she travels to every day as a domestic worker in Cancún. Pérez envies the rich.She tells me this sitting on a rotten wooden bench one August afternoon, her 7-year-old son getting his scooter stuck on the broken path here many miles away in the north of the city, in a tiny park. Full of garbage and wild vegetation, it’s a short distance from where Pérez lives, close to the city outskirts. As we talk, a homeless person in the background shouts and laughs as if at a joke only he understands.Pérez is a 33-year-old single mother from San Marcos, Guatemala. She migrated in 2013 to Cancún, Mexico’s over-promoted and hugely popular tourist destination. She rarely has enough time and money to go to the beach and cannot find green areas or decent, safe public spaces for her son to play, having to make do with the few parks, like this, that are available. This is not the life she expected. “You hear that Cancún is wonderful, but when you get here … it’s a disappointment.”At 54 years old, Cancún is the youngest city in Mexico. It was designed from scratch in the 1970s as a new holiday destination in the country. In this respect, it’s been a wild success. But as an urban project, it is a failure. Designed for 200,000 people, the population of its urban sprawl now exceeds 1 million. Before, much of this area was jungle; today there are hundreds of hotels. Accelerated real-estate development has bitten into the surrounding vegetation year after year.This growth has been an environmental nightmare but also a social one, giving vastly unequal benefits to the city’s richer and poorer inhabitants. According to recent research by Christine McCoy, an academic at the University of the Caribbean, most people in Cancún live without the minimum green areas or public spaces needed for proper recreation, leisure, rest, or socializing. This is especially true in those regions where the most vulnerable live.Click play to see Cancún’s urban development from 1984 to 2022. This inequality has evolved despite Cancún’s rapid expansion consuming huge amounts of green space. Between 2001 and 2021, the surrounding region lost at least 30,000 hectares of jungle, according to data from Mexico’s National Forestry Commission. On the land ripped from the jungle there are now residential and hotel projects. And according to data seen by WIRED, plenty more developents are on the way. At the federal level, since 2018 the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources has received 40 requests for further land use change in the area. If approved, 650 more hectares of jungle will disappear.Data obtained through freedom of information shows what urban development projects have been processed over this period, these ranging from 2,247 tiny, popular housing units on the one hand to a 20-story, 429-room all-inclusive luxury hotel. Crucially, none of these include applications for public parks or green areas to be developed or improved, in a city that is already bursting at the seams, having exceeded its tourist carrying capacity for more than a decade.

Judge in Brazil Orders Slaughterhouses to Pay for Amazon Reforestation

A court in the Brazilian state of Rondonia has found two beef slaughterhouses guilty of buying cattle out of what is supposed to be a protected area in the Brazilian Amazon, which is illegal

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — A judge in the Brazilian state of Rondonia has found two beef slaughterhouses guilty of buying cattle from a protected area of former rainforest in the Amazon. The companies Distriboi and Frigon, along with three cattle ranchers, were ordered to pay compensation for causing environmental damage, according to the decision issued Wednesday. Cattle raising drives Amazon deforestation. The defendants may appeal.It is the first decision in several dozen lawsuits seeking millions of dollars in environmental damages from the slaughterhouses for allegedly trading in cattle raised illegally in a protected area known as Jaci-Parana, which was rainforest but is now mostly converted to pasture. Four slaughterhouses are among the many parties charged, including JBS SA, which bills itself as the world’s largest protein producer. The court has not decided on the cases involving JBS.Brazilian law forbids commercial cattle inside a protected area, yet some 210,000 head are being grazed inside Jaci-Parana, according to the state animal division. With almost 80% of its forest destroyed, it ranks as the most ravaged conservation unit in the Brazilian Amazon. A court filing pegs damages in the reserve at some $1 billion.The lawsuits are based on transfer documents first reported by the Associated Press that show cattle going directly from protected areas to slaughterhouses. The documents were filled out by the illegal ranchers themselves. Part of the decision is a collective penalty of $453,000 against the five defendants, who are linked to one farm. The money will be used to reforest 232 hectares (573 acres) of what is now pasture there.“When a slaughterhouse, whether by negligence or intent, buys and resells products from invaded and illegally deforested reserves, it is clear that it is directly benefiting from these illegal activities,” according to part of the original complaint which Judge Inês Moreira da Costa sustained in her ruling. “In such cases, there is an undeniable connection between the company’s actions and the environmental damage caused by the illegal exploitation.”Frigon and Distriboi did not respond to questions sent by email. In a filing, Frigon argued the state of Rondonia allowed ranchers to sell the cattle and said there is no relation between buying beef cattle and deforestation. In filings, Distriboi also denies any wrongdoing.JBS also did not reply to a request for comment.Rondonia, on the border with Bolivia, is the most badly deforested state in the Brazilian Amazon. In the past few weeks, most cities have been covered by thick smoke from wildfires, a sign of rampant deforestation. The situation is so dire that its main airport in Porto Velho was closed for seven consecutive days.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - July 2024

Industry push to earn carbon credits from Australia’s native forests would be a blow for nature and the climate

Australia cannot risk any further declines in its biodiversity resulting from harvesting native forests, or actions that bring further risks to its emissions-reduction goal.

ShutterstockAustralia’s forestry industry raised eyebrows this month when it released plans to remove trees from native forests, potentially including national parks, and claim carbon credits in the process. Forestry Australia, the industry body behind the plan, claims it would make ecosystems more resilient and help tackle climate change. But decades of research findings clearly suggest the proposal, if accepted, will have the opposite effect. Scientific evidence shows some proposed practices make forests more fire-prone and undermine forest healthy. And the carbon released when cutting down and processing trees would undercut any climate benefits of the plan. Australia cannot risk any further declines in its biodiversity resulting from harvesting native forests, or actions that bring further risks to its emissions-reduction goal. On this basis, the Forestry Australia proposal should be rejected. Understanding Australia’s carbon credit scheme Under a federal government scheme, people and businesses can undertake projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions or store carbon, in exchange for financial rewards known as carbon credits. Projects can include changing the way vegetation is managed, so it removes and stores more carbon from the atmosphere. The government has invited proposals for new ways to generate carbon credits under the policy. Forestry Australia’s proposal involves a number of activities conducted in national parks, state forests and on private land. In return for conducting these activities, land managers – such as government agencies and private landowners – would be granted carbon credits. One part of the method involves “adaptive harvesting”. Forestry Australia says the approach would reduce carbon emissions and improve carbon storage in forests “while allowing for a level of ongoing supply of wood products”. Adaptive harvesting purports to reduce environmental impacts but still produce wood products. Techniques can include delaying logging until trees are older, resting areas from harvesting and minimising areas cleared for roads and log landings. The proposal also involves “forest thinning”, or removing trees. In a statement to The Conversation, Forestry Australia’s acting president William Jackson said thinning involves “selectively reducing the number of trees to enable the healthy trees to grow”. Forestry Australia says it has not proposed timber production from national parks. However, it did not say what would happen to trees cut down in thinning operations, including whether they would be sold or left on the forest floor. Forestry Australia has also proposed to change the way harvested wood is used, so it stores carbon for longer. So, instead of harvesting low-grade logs used for woodchips and paper, it would harvest more valuable logs to be made into longer-lived timber products, such as roof trusses and floorboards. However, plantation forests already produce about 90% of logs harvested in Australia, raising questions over the demand for native forest logs. The plan involves harvesting more valuable logs to be made into longer-lived timber products such as roof trusses. Shutterstock Logging does not make forests resilient Announcing Forestry Australia’s proposal, its president Michelle Freeman said forests were “more resilient if they are actively managed”. But several adaptive harvesting practices are scientifically shown to harm native forests. For example, analyses following the 2009 wildfires and after the 2019-2020 wildfires show thinning generally makes forests more fire-prone. Foresters have themselves highlighted this problem. And the heavy equipment used to log forests disturbs and degrades soil and the understorey. What’s more, young trees – the usual targets of thinning – provide understorey habitat for many species, including endangered mammals, such as Leadbeater’s Possum and many species of birds. And thinning undermines a forest’s ability to withstand other threats, such as climate change. A big climate risk Forestry Australia’s proposal is problematic if Australia hopes to achieve its emissions-reduction target of 43% by 2030, based on 2005 levels. First, logging releases carbon stored in trees and soil. So, even if some carbon was stored under the plan – through activities such as regeneration – this would be undermined by carbon released when removing trees. Second, there is a risk carbon credits may be granted for activities and emission reductions that would have happened anyway. Take the proposal to provide carbon credits for adaptive harvesting. Most of these activities, such as forest regeneration, are already required by regulation and forestry codes of practice. And in the case of the proposal to conduct regeneration activities after bushfires, forests will regenerate naturally if they are left alone. A similar issue arises if forest managers are offered carbon credits to encourage timber to be turned into long-lived wood products. These products are more lucrative than, say, woodchips. So the financial incentive to create them already exists – and there’s a good chance suitable logs would have been used for these products regardless of whether carbon credits were offered. What’s more, the average life of these longer-lived timber products is still far less than the standing trees. Rules under Australia’s carbon credit scheme are meant to prevent credits being given for activities that would have occurred anyway. However, serious concerns have been raised over the effectiveness of these rules. The answer is clear Australia’s native forest logging industry has long been in decline and operates at a financial loss in most states. Adding to the industry’s demise, Victoria and Western Australia have called an end to logging in public native forests and southeast Queensland is reportedly set to follow. The flailing, damaging native forest logging industry is on the way out and plantations already provide almost all our sawn wood supply. Propping up the industry via a badly designed carbon credit method does not make economic or climate sense. In response to the points raised in this article, Forestry Australia’s acting president William Jackson provided the following statement. It has been edited for brevity. Adaptive harvesting practices are proposed only for state forests and private native forests, within areas where timber harvesting is expressly permitted and regulated under state-based legislation. Thinning is conducted for ecological reasons, cultural values or fire management or other reasons. Forestry Australia disagrees with the view that thinning makes forests more fire prone. The inclusion of thinning in native forests in the method is supported by clear evidence from Australian and international research showing that thinning of forests, when combined with prescribed burning to reduce fuel hazards, can significantly reduce wildfire risks and impacts in dry forests. Not all forests are in the condition to regenerate naturally due to the impacts of climate change, invasive species and wildfire. The method encourages active and adaptive management to assist in restoring the health and resilience of these forests. This method would maximise carbon market opportunities to more landowners, from state government agencies managing state forests and national parks, as well as community groups, not-for-profits, private landowners and First Nations Peoples. David Lindenmayer receives funding from the Australian Government, the Victorian Government, and the Australian Research Council. He is a Councillor with the Biodiversity Council and a member of Birds Australia. Brendan Mackey receives funding from the Australian Government. His is a volunteer board member of the Great Eastern Ranges Ltd. Heather Keith receives funding from the Australian Government and is a member of the Environmental Economic Accounts and Environmental Indicators Technical Advisory Panel.

Forest Service orders Arrowhead bottled water company to shut down California pipeline

The Forest Service told bottled water company BlueTriton Brands to stop piping water out of a California national forest. The company is suing to challenge the decision.

In a decision that could end a years-long battle over commercial extraction of water from public lands, the U.S. Forest Service has ordered the company that sells Arrowhead bottled water to shut down its pipeline that collects water from springs in the San Bernardino Mountains. The Forest Service notified BlueTriton Brands in a letter last month, saying its application for a new permit has been denied.District Ranger Michael Nobles wrote in the July 26 letter that the company “must cease operations” in the San Bernardino National Forest and submit a plan for removing all its pipes and equipment from federal land.The company has challenged the denial in court.Environmental activists praised the decision.“It’s a huge victory after 10 years,” said Amanda Frye, an activist who has campaigned against the taking of water from the forest. “I’m hoping that we can restore Strawberry Creek, have its springs flowing again, and get the habitat back.”She and other opponents say BlueTriton‘s operation has dramatically reduced creek flow and is causing significant environmental harm.The Forest Service announced the decision one month after a local environmental group, Save Our Forest Assn., filed a lawsuit arguing the agency was illegally allowing the company to continue operating under a permit that was past its expiration date.The company has denied that its use of water is harming the environment and has argued it should be allowed to continue piping water from the national forest.BlueTriton Brands and its predecessors “have continuously operated under a series of special use permits for nearly a century,” the company said in an email.“This denial has no legal merit, is unsupported by the facts, and negatively impacts the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians,” the company said, adding that the tribe uses a portion of the water that passes through the pipeline and relies on that water for firefighting needs.Representatives of the tribe did not respond to a request for comment.If the Forest Service decision stands, it would prevent the company from using the namesake source of its brand, Arrowhead 100% Mountain Spring Water.The springs in the mountains north of San Bernardino, which have been a source for bottled water for generations, are named after an arrowhead-shaped natural rock formation on the mountainside.State officials have said that the first facilities to divert water in the Strawberry Creek watershed were built in 1929, and the system expanded over the years as additional boreholes were drilled into the mountainside.At the base of the mountain and near the company’s water pipeline stands the long-closed Arrowhead Springs hotel property, which the San Manuel tribe bought in 2016. The company has said that under a decades-old agreement, a portion of the water that flows through the 4.5-mile pipeline goes to the Arrowhead Springs property, and a portion of the water is delivered to a roadside tank and hauled on trucks to a bottling plant.The Forest Service has been charging a permit fee of $2,500 per year. There has been no charge for the water.Controversy over the issue erupted when the Desert Sun reported in 2015 that the Forest Service was allowing Nestlé to siphon water using a permit that listed 1988 as the expiration date.The Forest Service then began a review of the permit, and in 2018 granted a new permit for up to five years. The revelations about Nestlé piping water from the forest sparked an outpouring of opposition and prompted several complaints to California regulators questioning the company’s water rights claims, which led to a lengthy investigation by state water regulators.BlueTriton Brands took over the bottled water business in 2021 when Nestlé’s North American bottled water division was purchased by private-equity firm One Rock Capital Partners and investment firm Metropoulos & Co. (Last month, BlueTriton and Primo Water Corp. announced plans to merge and form a new company.)State officials determined last year that the company has been unlawfully diverting much of the water without valid water rights — agreeing with Frye and others, who had questioned the company’s claims and presented historical documents. The State Water Resources Control Board voted to order the company to halt its “unauthorized diversions” of water. But BlueTriton Brands sued to challenge that decision, arguing the process was rife with problems.In the July Forest Service letter, Nobles said the company was repeatedly asked to provide “additional information necessary to assure compliance with BlueTriton’s existing permit” but that the requests were “consistently left unanswered.”Nobles said that under the regulations, he may consider whether the water used exceeds the “needs of forest resources.”He also said that while the company had said in its application that the water would go for bottled water, its reports showed that 94% to 98% of the amount of water diverted monthly was delivered to the old hotel property for “undisclosed purposes,” and that “for months BlueTriton has indicated it has bottled none of the water taken,” while also significantly increasing the volumes extracted.“This increase represents significantly more water than has ever been delivered previously,” Nobles wrote. “The hotel and conference facility on the property is not operating, and there is no explanation of where the millions of gallons of water per month are going.”He said the decision is final and cannot be appealed.Nobles ordered the company to “stop use of the BlueTriton pipeline” within seven days “by severing or blocking the pipe at each tunnel or borehole” at a dozen sites; to remove the locks on its equipment; and to submit a plan within three months for removing all of its infrastructure.Forest Service officials did not respond to an email requesting comments about the decision.BlueTriton’s spokesperson said the Forest Service has agreed to a “temporary 30-day stay for the sole purpose of supplying the needs of the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, including for fire prevention.”“We will continue to operate in compliance with all state and federal laws while we explore legal and regulatory options,” the spokesperson said.The company argues in the lawsuit that the Forest Service has violated federal law with a decision that is “arbitrary and capricious.”BlueTriton said studies by its scientific consultants have found that the taking of water “has not negatively affected the Strawberry Canyon environment.”Records show about 319 acre-feet, or 104 million gallons, flowed through the company’s pipes in 2023.In the rugged canyon downhill from the springs, Strawberry Creek has continued flowing in recent years. But when Frye has hiked along the creek, she has found that its western fork, located downhill from the boreholes, is just a trickle, forming a series of puddles among the bushes and trees.“Our goal was to get that water back in the creek and protect the forest,” Frye said. “The proof will be when the pipes and all that infrastructure is taken out and it’s restored. But I think we’re nearing the end.”

More than half of NSW’s forests and woodlands are gone as ongoing logging increases extinction risks, study shows

Shifting from native forest logging to sustainable plantations will help protect these essential forests and the many threatened species that depend on them.

Since European colonisation, 29 million hectares (54%) of the forests and woodlands that once existed in New South Wales have been destroyed. A further 9 million ha have been degraded in the past two centuries. This amounts to more than 60% of the state’s forest estate. We will never know the full impacts this rampant clearing and degradation have had on the state’s wildlife and plants. But it is now possible to put into perspective the impacts of logging practices in the past two decades on species that have already suffered enormous loss. Cutting down native vegetation for timber destroys habitat for forest-dependent species. Our research, published today, has found ongoing logging in NSW affects the habitat of at least 150 species considered at risk of extinction, due mostly to historical deforestation and degradation. Thirteen of these species are listed as critically endangered. This means there is a 20% probability of extinction in ten years (or five generations, whichever is longer) without urgent conservation action. The bare and highly disturbed areas created by logging also increase risks of erosion, fire and invasion by non-native species. Other states and countries ban native forest logging Despite these impacts, Australia still logs native forests. Many countries have now banned native forest logging. They have recognised the enormous impact of intact forests on biodiversity and climate change, and rely entirely on plantations for wood production. New Zealand, for example, banned native forest logging two decades ago, in 2002. In Australia, South Australia has protected native forests since the 1870s. The ACT banned logging in the 1980s. As of 2024, Western Australia and Victoria have ended their native forest logging operations (except logging for fire breaks, salvage logging after windstorms, and logging on private land). The reasons are clear: native forestry is unpopular and unprofitable, contributes heavily to climate change and is a major cause of species decline. Yet government-owned logging operations in NSW, Tasmania and Queensland continue to erode their remaining forest estates. Logging impacts on habitats and species add up The current practice of impact assessment means logging activities are evaluated individually, without looking at the broader history of land management. On their own, small areas of logging might seem insignificant. However, logging these small areas can add up to a much larger long-term habitat loss. To assess what logging today means in terms of impacts on species, we need to assess how much habitat has been lost or degraded over long time periods. We used historical loss and degradation as a baseline to evaluate recent logging events (from 2000 to 2022) across NSW. We found continued logging is having impacts on 150 threatened species. Forty-three of these species now have 50% or less of their intact habitat remaining in NSW. They include the three brothers wattle, regent parrot and growling grass frog. Two species, Sloane’s froglet and Glenugie karaka, have less than 10% of intact habitat remaining. Some species’ distributions had high overlaps with recent logging. They include the floodplain rustyhood (75% overlap with logging), Orara boronia (26%), Hakea archaeoides (24%), long-footed potoroo (14%), southern mainland long-nosed potoroo (12%) and southern brown bandicoot (9%). Species with the most distribution by area that overlapped with logging included koala (400,000 ha), south-eastern glossy black-cockatoo (370,000 ha) and spot-tailed quoll (southeast mainland population, 310,000 ha). Our research shows the importance of a historical perspective. Almost all the forest-dependent species we assessed have suffered terribly from land clearing and fires over the past two centuries. They now survive in small parts of their natural range. Logging this remaining habitat is forcing many of these species into an extinction vortex. Environmental impact assessments and decisions about land use (such as converting land into conservation zones, solar farms or logging areas) must consider the historical legacies of logging for these species. Sloane’s froglet has been hit hard by logging and less than 10% of its habitat remains intact. How can we retain our remaining forest estate? Australia is a signatory to many international conservation goals. For instance, the Global Biodiversity Framework aims to “ensure urgent management actions to halt human-induced extinction of known threatened species and for the recovery and conservation of species”. The Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration committed us to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030. Logging native forests stands in stark contrast to these undertakings. In Australia, the states regulate forestry and, strangely, own the forestry business themselves. However, the Commonwealth has the power to intervene and halt native forest logging. With the federal government in the throes of reforming nature laws and an election coming up, the choice is simple: lock in extinction by continuing rampant logging, or lock in species recovery by working with land managers to secure the future of these species. Australia has a chequered recent history when it comes to protecting its environment. We have one of the highest mammal extinction rates in the world and the highest per capita greenhouse gas emissions of all OECD member countries. We are also the only developed nation identified as a deforestation hotspot. Native forests are essential for carbon sequestration, biodiversity and the cultural wellbeing of First Nations and local communities. An easy win for all these interests is within our reach. Shifting from native forest logging to sustainable plantations will help protect these essential forests while still meeting wood demands. Michelle Ward has received funding from The Australian Research Council and the Commonwealth National Environmental Science Program. She was Science and Research Lead at WWF-Australia and is currently on a Technical Advisory Panel for a project run by the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists.David Lindenmayer receives funding from the Australian Research Council, the Victorian Government, the Australian Government and the Ian Potter Foundation. He is a member of the Biodiversity Council and Birds Australia. James Watson has received funding from the Australian Research Council, National Environmental Science Program, South Australia's Department of Environment and Water, Queensland's Depart of Environment, Science and Innovation as well as from Bush Heritage Australia, Queensland Conservation Council, Australian Conservation Foundation, The Wilderness Society and Birdlife Australia. He serves on scientific committees for Subak Australia and BirdLife Australia and has a long-term scientific relationship with Bush Heritage Australia and Wildlife Conservation Society. He serves on the Queensland Government's Land Restoration Fund's Investment Panel as the Deputy Chair.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.