Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

‘More profitable than farming’: how Ecuador’s birding boom is benefiting wildlife

News Feed
Saturday, June 1, 2024

When it came to dividing up his late father’s farm between five brothers, Vinicio Bacuilima says he drew the short straw. Maraksacha, on the main road out of Ecuador’s capital Quito, is a tiny patch of land on the edge of a steep ravine, making it very difficult to make a living from farming.Then Bacuilima’s wife Anita Cajas had an idea: turn their paltry inheritance into a site to attract visiting birders. Creating the Maraksacha Reserve was a risky venture, but it paid off, with feeders attracting a host of colourful hummingbirds and tanagers.“Because we’re on the main road from Quito to Mindo, we get lots of visitors – especially bird photographers,” Cajas says. They “enjoy sitting on our terrace, drinking coffee, and getting such closeup views of the birds”.Anita Cajas at Maraksacha Reserve. It was her idea to turn her family’s inheritance into a birding site. Photograph: Nicolás FaicánBirding tourism is thriving in Ecuador, with increasing numbers of specialist tour groups, local bird guides and wildlife lodges. The country boasts more than 1,600 different species – almost twice as many as the whole of Europe – in an area only slightly larger than the UK. As the business of birding grows, more and more subsistence farmers are transitioning their land from agriculture to bird reserves, benefiting not just the birds, but the country’s economy too.Angie Drake, a sustainable tourism consultant in the US, says by improving biodiversity and reaching out to wildlife tourists, some farmers have expanded their land’s potential far beyond the traditional farming model.“They are finding ways to balance profitability with environmental stewardship,” she says. “This innovative approach offers a blueprint for other farmers wanting to reconsider their relationship with the land.”One family, the Avilas, have devoted their lives to saving one of South America’s most bizarre species: the long-wattled umbrellabird. This black, crow-like species sports a teddy boy’s quiff and what looks like a long, woollen scarf hanging down from its throat. On his land near Recinto 23 de Junio, landowner Luis Avila has switched from dairy farming to conservation, replanting trees and promoting the site to wildlife tourists – work that he says is a better livelihood than farming.The sword-billed hummingbird (Ensifera ensifera). Photograph: Bill Coster/Alamy“Wildlife tourism is far more profitable than farming but that’s not the only reason we made the change,” says Avila’s son, Luis Jr. “We wanted to save not just the umbrellabird, but all the special creatures here, and safeguard them for future generations.”Projects such as this are eligible for funding from the Ecuadorian government. Launched in 2008, the Socio Bosque scheme offers “the poorest private and communal forest landowners annual payments for each hectare of forest cover maintained”, with sums of between $30 (£23) and $60 a hectare.However, the application process is complex and funding can be sporadic, so some landowners – including Bacuilima and Cajas – have given up applying.The Avila family: Luis Jr, Alejandra and Luis Sr. Photograph: Dr Stephen MossBut the income provided by birders alone has been enough to propel some farmers to take up the nature reserve model. A few years ago, Favián Luna decided to convert his 120-hectare tomato farm in the Tandayapa Valley, north-west of Quito, into a cloud-forest reserve and lodge called Alambi Reserve. Visitors go to photograph many species of hummingbirds, including the Andean emerald, native to the Chocó bioregion of the Ecuadorian Andes.Nearby, at Mashpi Amagusa, former farmers Doris Villalba and Sergio Basantes have created a reserve, lodge and garden, which attracts 260 species of sought-after birds. Highlights include glistening-green, flame-faced and beryl-spangled tanagers, and the rare, endemic rose-faced parrot.At Finca La Victoriana in Pichincha, the owner Jacqui bought the house and land, and began to reforest the site while growing crops to feed herself. But during lockdown, when she was stuck in nearby Quito, all her crops were stolen. She was saved from having to sell up by a visiting friend, who heard an unusual sound from lower down the valley and realised this was one of South America’s most charismatic birds: the Andean cock-of-the-rock.The bright orange and black males gather every day at their “lek”, a courtship arena where they perform to the watching females.Male Andean cocks-of-the-rock (Rupicola peruvianus) lekking to attract a mate. Photograph: Jiri Hrebicek/AlamySince 2005, Ángel Paz and his younger brother Rodrigo have transformed their former dairy farm in Mindo into a bird reserve. At first, things didn’t go to plan: it took a month for the first visitor to arrive, and he paid just $10 for a four-hour tour. Since then, however, thousands of people have made the pilgrimage.Ángel has slowly habituated five species of antpitta – a notoriously elusive family of birds – to appear more or less on cue. He calls one female Shakira, because when she appears she shakes her hips from side to side.Refugio Paz de las Aves became well known, yet it was nearly lost for ever. After the death of Ángel and Rodrigo’s mother, some of the siblings wanted to sell the site to local dairy farmers.A global crowdfunding appeal launched by Ángel’s son Vinicio with support from Drake raised $160,000 to buy the land, protecting the habitat for the foreseeable future.For Ángel, success is about allowing wildlife the time to return and prosper. “My brother and I have protected our home and its birdlife for almost two decades, and watched the wildlife – and the people who visit – flourish,” he says. “For us, it’s all about making a connection with the unique species that live here.”The chestnut-crowned Antpitta (Grallaria ruficapilla). Photograph: AlamyFind more age of extinction coverage here, and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on X for all the latest news and features

With hundreds of highly prized species, bird tourism is thriving in the country – and farmers are increasingly turning their land into nature reservesWhen it came to dividing up his late father’s farm between five brothers, Vinicio Bacuilima says he drew the short straw. Maraksacha, on the main road out of Ecuador’s capital Quito, is a tiny patch of land on the edge of a steep ravine, making it very difficult to make a living from farming.Then Bacuilima’s wife Anita Cajas had an idea: turn their paltry inheritance into a site to attract visiting birders. Creating the Maraksacha Reserve was a risky venture, but it paid off, with feeders attracting a host of colourful hummingbirds and tanagers. Continue reading...

When it came to dividing up his late father’s farm between five brothers, Vinicio Bacuilima says he drew the short straw. Maraksacha, on the main road out of Ecuador’s capital Quito, is a tiny patch of land on the edge of a steep ravine, making it very difficult to make a living from farming.

Then Bacuilima’s wife Anita Cajas had an idea: turn their paltry inheritance into a site to attract visiting birders. Creating the Maraksacha Reserve was a risky venture, but it paid off, with feeders attracting a host of colourful hummingbirds and tanagers.

“Because we’re on the main road from Quito to Mindo, we get lots of visitors – especially bird photographers,” Cajas says. They “enjoy sitting on our terrace, drinking coffee, and getting such closeup views of the birds”.

Anita Cajas at Maraksacha Reserve. It was her idea to turn her family’s inheritance into a birding site. Photograph: Nicolás Faicán

Birding tourism is thriving in Ecuador, with increasing numbers of specialist tour groups, local bird guides and wildlife lodges. The country boasts more than 1,600 different species – almost twice as many as the whole of Europe – in an area only slightly larger than the UK. As the business of birding grows, more and more subsistence farmers are transitioning their land from agriculture to bird reserves, benefiting not just the birds, but the country’s economy too.

Angie Drake, a sustainable tourism consultant in the US, says by improving biodiversity and reaching out to wildlife tourists, some farmers have expanded their land’s potential far beyond the traditional farming model.

“They are finding ways to balance profitability with environmental stewardship,” she says. “This innovative approach offers a blueprint for other farmers wanting to reconsider their relationship with the land.”

One family, the Avilas, have devoted their lives to saving one of South America’s most bizarre species: the long-wattled umbrellabird. This black, crow-like species sports a teddy boy’s quiff and what looks like a long, woollen scarf hanging down from its throat. On his land near Recinto 23 de Junio, landowner Luis Avila has switched from dairy farming to conservation, replanting trees and promoting the site to wildlife tourists – work that he says is a better livelihood than farming.

The sword-billed hummingbird (Ensifera ensifera). Photograph: Bill Coster/Alamy

“Wildlife tourism is far more profitable than farming but that’s not the only reason we made the change,” says Avila’s son, Luis Jr. “We wanted to save not just the umbrellabird, but all the special creatures here, and safeguard them for future generations.”

Projects such as this are eligible for funding from the Ecuadorian government. Launched in 2008, the Socio Bosque scheme offers “the poorest private and communal forest landowners annual payments for each hectare of forest cover maintained”, with sums of between $30 (£23) and $60 a hectare.

However, the application process is complex and funding can be sporadic, so some landowners – including Bacuilima and Cajas – have given up applying.

The Avila family: Luis Jr, Alejandra and Luis Sr. Photograph: Dr Stephen Moss

But the income provided by birders alone has been enough to propel some farmers to take up the nature reserve model. A few years ago, Favián Luna decided to convert his 120-hectare tomato farm in the Tandayapa Valley, north-west of Quito, into a cloud-forest reserve and lodge called Alambi Reserve. Visitors go to photograph many species of hummingbirds, including the Andean emerald, native to the Chocó bioregion of the Ecuadorian Andes.

Nearby, at Mashpi Amagusa, former farmers Doris Villalba and Sergio Basantes have created a reserve, lodge and garden, which attracts 260 species of sought-after birds. Highlights include glistening-green, flame-faced and beryl-spangled tanagers, and the rare, endemic rose-faced parrot.

At Finca La Victoriana in Pichincha, the owner Jacqui bought the house and land, and began to reforest the site while growing crops to feed herself. But during lockdown, when she was stuck in nearby Quito, all her crops were stolen. She was saved from having to sell up by a visiting friend, who heard an unusual sound from lower down the valley and realised this was one of South America’s most charismatic birds: the Andean cock-of-the-rock.

The bright orange and black males gather every day at their “lek”, a courtship arena where they perform to the watching females.

Male Andean cocks-of-the-rock (Rupicola peruvianus) lekking to attract a mate. Photograph: Jiri Hrebicek/Alamy

Since 2005, Ángel Paz and his younger brother Rodrigo have transformed their former dairy farm in Mindo into a bird reserve. At first, things didn’t go to plan: it took a month for the first visitor to arrive, and he paid just $10 for a four-hour tour. Since then, however, thousands of people have made the pilgrimage.

Ángel has slowly habituated five species of antpitta – a notoriously elusive family of birds – to appear more or less on cue. He calls one female Shakira, because when she appears she shakes her hips from side to side.

Refugio Paz de las Aves became well known, yet it was nearly lost for ever. After the death of Ángel and Rodrigo’s mother, some of the siblings wanted to sell the site to local dairy farmers.

A global crowdfunding appeal launched by Ángel’s son Vinicio with support from Drake raised $160,000 to buy the land, protecting the habitat for the foreseeable future.

For Ángel, success is about allowing wildlife the time to return and prosper. “My brother and I have protected our home and its birdlife for almost two decades, and watched the wildlife – and the people who visit – flourish,” he says. “For us, it’s all about making a connection with the unique species that live here.”

The chestnut-crowned Antpitta (Grallaria ruficapilla). Photograph: Alamy

Find more age of extinction coverage here, and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on X for all the latest news and features

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Landowners in England given £9bn in environment payments despite decline

Mandatory reports should be published on how taxpayers’ money is spent on environmental stewardship, says campaignerLandowners in England have been paid more than £9bn of taxpayers’ money in the past 30 years for environmental benefits, despite the decline in nature that has taken place during that time, data reveals.The nature campaigner and author Guy Shrubsole, who unearthed the data for his new book, The Lie of The Land, said large landowners should be forced to publish regular reports showing how they are stewarding their land for nature and carbon.The Lie of the Land is published on 12 September by HarperCollins. Continue reading...

Landowners in England have been paid more than £9bn of taxpayer’s money in the past 30 years for environmental benefits, despite the decline in nature that has taken place during that time, data reveals.Nature campaigner and author Guy Shrubsole, who unearthed the data for his new book The Lie of The Land, said large landowners should be forced to publish regular reports showing how they are stewarding their land for nature and carbon.This “ecological doomsday survey” would ensure that landowners are using the public money they are given to improve nature, rather than simply becoming rich by dint of owning more than 1,000 acres of land.Shrubsole argues that those who own these vast amounts of land should be held accountable over the nature and biodiversity crises and that estates of more than 1,000 acres should publish five-yearly reports on what they are doing to restore habitats, help wildlife recover and boost natural carbon sinks.Landowners and farmers in England were given £9.2bn in environmental stewardship grants between 1992 and 2022, equivalent to £12.5bn when adjusted for inflation. Despite this, nature’s health has plummeted in England, and only 39% of England’s sites of special scientific interest are in favourable condition, while farmland bird numbers have halved since 1970.These stewardship schemes include action to improve soil health, protect water from pollution, boost wildlife numbers, manage floods and provide public access to land.Shrubsole said: “For decades, the public has paid billions of pounds to landowners to be good stewards of nature. In some cases it’s worked – but too often, landowners have failed to deliver, leaving habitats and wildlife in near-terminal decline.“The definition of stewardship means looking after the land on behalf of someone else – us, the public. So, tell us what you’re doing to be a good steward. Let’s carry out an ecological doomsday survey: if you’re fortunate enough to own 1,000 acres or more, you should publish a map of your estate, a baseline ecological survey and a plan for how you’ll be restoring habitats, species and carbon over the next five years.“It’s time we made the 1% of the population who own half of England – and who often claim to be ‘custodians of the countryside’ – accountable to the public.”

Illegal Raves on Costa Rican Beaches Raise Concerns

Costa Rican beaches, known for their natural beauty, are increasingly being used as venues for illegal raves, sparking significant concern among local residents and environmentalists. These “jungle raves,” taking place in Santa Teresa, Manzanillo, Bello Horizonte, and Santiago, promise partygoers an immersive experience in nature but come at a high cost to the environment and […] The post Illegal Raves on Costa Rican Beaches Raise Concerns appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Costa Rican beaches, known for their natural beauty, are increasingly being used as venues for illegal raves, sparking significant concern among local residents and environmentalists. These “jungle raves,” taking place in Santa Teresa, Manzanillo, Bello Horizonte, and Santiago, promise partygoers an immersive experience in nature but come at a high cost to the environment and local communities. The Blue Zone Chamber of Tourism and Commerce (CATUZCA), which represents areas like Malpaís, Santa Teresa, and Playa Hermosa, reported 22 complaints related to these raves between November 2023 and May 2024. Residents are frustrated by the noise pollution that these events generate, with music blaring from as early as 11 p.m. until 8 or 9 a.m. the following morning. One resident noted that although the rave was a kilometer away, the sound was so loud it felt as if it were right next door. Attendees often spill onto the beach after the official rave ends, continuing their festivities into the morning hours, much to the dismay of those living nearby. These raves are not small gatherings; some attract as many as 600 people, transforming them into massive, unregulated events. Despite their size, these gatherings lack the necessary permits, including sanitary licenses and emergency medical teams, and fail to implement any safety measures for the attendees. This has led to increasing tensions between the organizers and local authorities. Cóbano Mayor Ronny Montero pointed out that property owners hosting these raves can earn between $6,000 and $7,000 per night, making it a lucrative business. However, this financial gain comes at the expense of the community and the environment. Some organizers even offer to pay potential fines upfront to ensure their events proceed without interruption. The environmental impact of these raves is particularly troubling. The loud music and large crowds disturb local wildlife, forcing animals out of their natural habitats and into populated areas, where they face increased risks from pets, traffic, and human activity. The lack of proper planning or consultation with wildlife specialists exacerbates the situation, potentially leading to long-term damage to the local ecosystem. Despite the growing number of complaints, the Municipality of Cóbano has struggled to impose fines or take significant action against the organizers. However, in response to the mounting concerns, the municipality is preparing its first judicial complaint, which will be submitted to the Public Prosecutor’s Office in an effort to curb these illegal activities and protect the community and environment. The ongoing situation highlights the need for more stringent regulations and enforcement to prevent such events from continuing to disrupt the peace and harmony of Costa Rica’s beautiful coastal regions. The local community, along with formal businesses and government bodies, is calling for immediate action to address this pressing issue. The post Illegal Raves on Costa Rican Beaches Raise Concerns appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Wildlife boosted by England’s nature-friendly farming schemes, study finds

Areas where farmers provide good habitats show notable increase in butterflies, bees, bats and breeding birdsButterflies, bees and bats are among the wildlife being boosted by England’s nature-friendly farming schemes, new government research has found.Birds were among the chief beneficiaries of the strategy, particularly ones that largely feed on invertebrates. An average of 25% more breeding birds were found in areas with more eco-friendly schemes. Continue reading...

Butterflies, bees and bats are among the wildlife being boosted by England’s nature-friendly farming schemes, new government research has found.Birds were among the chief beneficiaries of the strategy, particularly ones that largely feed on invertebrates. An average of 25% more breeding birds were found in areas with more eco-friendly schemes.A shift away from eating meat will be required if agriculture in England is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as more land will need to be used to store nature and carbon, the peer-reviewed study by Natural England, the government advisory body, also warned.“Under the most ambitious climate change mitigation scenario, food production is expected to decline by up to 25%,” the report reads. “Ambitious combinations of measures, including reducing food waste, using arable land to grow crops for direct human consumption rather than livestock feed (and thus implying a dietary change), and increased productivity on remaining farmland, could fully mitigate expected reductions in food production.”After the UK left the EU, farmers were no longer part of the Common Agricultural Policy subsidies scheme, which paid land managers according to the acreage they farmed. Instead the devolved nations have set up their own farming payments system. In England, this is the sometimes controversial Environment Land Management Scheme (ELMS), which pays farmers to make room for nature by letting hedges grow wilder, or sowing wildflowers for birds and bees on field margins.Anecdotally, farmers taking part in the schemes have noticed more wildlife, but until now no data has been available. The new government studies found that more mobile creatures, such as butterflies, moths and hoverflies, fared better when larger areas of land – a large farm or multiple small neighbouring ones – were involved in the scheme.Surveyed squares with high levels of eco-friendly schemes in the surrounding landscape had on average 117 more butterflies (a 53% increase), compared with the average for squares with low scores for schemes in the surrounding landscape. There were an average of 12 more moth species in areas with more eco-friendly schemes. Smaller, less mobile insects were boosted in smaller, more local areas signed up to the schemes. Numbers of barbastelle and Daubenton’s bats were also found to respond positively to eco-friendly schemes at the landscape level.Martin Lines, CEO of the Nature Friendly Farming Network, told the Guardian: “The evidence in the Natural England report confirms what many nature-friendly farmers are finding: delivering good-quality habitats, supported by public money, is helping to stop nature’s decline or even reverse it. Many farmers are pleased that their hard work is showing positive results, and with the support of well-funded ELMS, more farmers can deliver or help reverse nature’s decline.”The report also modelled future land use, balancing the need to produce food with reducing greenhouse gas emissions and making space for wildlife. It warns that “finite land is under pressure to deliver (among other things) food, timber and fuel production, climate change mitigation and biodiversity conservation. At present the land sector (agriculture, forestry and peatlands) is a substantial greenhouse gas emitter and contributor to climate change.”Nine land-use scenarios were explored, each representing an alternative UK land-use future, which saw up to 10 land-based climate change mitigation measures deployed in different combinations. Each scenario was run from a 2015 baseline to 2100, in five-year intervals. No scenario delivered strong reductions in greenhouse gas emissions or large increases in bird populations without significant drops in food production. Labour and the Conservatives have been reticent to say that people in the UK should eat less meat, but the previous food tsar Henry Dimbleby has said meat consumption should be reduced by 30% to make room for growing crops for human use rather than animal feed. The Climate Change Committee similarly recommends a 35% reduction in meat consumption by 2050.Farmers have recently warned that they will find it difficult to take part in ELMS if the amount they are paid falls, as they are having to repurpose land formerly used for food production to help wildlife, as well as facing additional pressures from extreme weather and price inflation. The schemes were put in place by the previous Conservative government, and the new Labour administration has refused to commit to the current £2.4bn annual budget.

Banksy Unveils Two New Animal Murals in Two Days

One piece features a goat perched on a ledge, while the other shows two elephants in windows

Banksy announced this mural featuring a goat on a ledge on August 5. Aaron Chown / PA Images via Getty Images The anonymous street artist Banksy has claimed credit for two murals that recently popped up on the sides of buildings in London. The first artwork, located on a wall in the town of Richmond, features a goat that appears to be perched on a narrow ledge. Besides it, painted rocks tumble to the ground. The artist also repositioned a nearby CCTV camera so that it pointed up at the goat, but the device has since been restored to its usual street-level position. Is there a larger message behind the work? Nobody is quite sure. According to the Telegraph, some think it was meant to be an environmental statement. Others wonder whether Banksy is referring to the acronym “greatest of all time.” Meanwhile, some Londoners who live nearby are excited to have a Banksy so close to home. “I think it’s incredible—we hope it stays here,” local resident Malcolm Taylor tells BBC News’ James W. Kelly and Harry Low. The second Banksy piece appeared in Chelsea, an area in west London not far from Richmond. It depicts two elephants sticking their heads out of two windows of a building, reaching towards each other with their trunks. Banksy unvieled a second mural on August 6 featuring two elephants poking their heads out of windows. Yui Mok / PA Images via Getty Images “Some have noted that one elephant is tusked while the other is not, perhaps representing a generational divide,” writes Time Out’s Amy Houghton. “Others reckon it has an ecological message.” This isn’t Banksy’s first work featuring elephants. At a Los Angeles exhibition in 2006, the artist brought in a real elephant and painted it to match the red and gold pattern of the room’s wallpaper. The real-life “elephant in the room” symbolized global issues that often go ignored. On his Instagram, Banksy revealed the goat mural on August 5, followed by the elephant mural on August 6. He did not provide an explanation for either of the pieces. Still, that didn’t stop art lovers from speculating. “The goat’s precarious position on the edge mirrors the fragile state of U.K. society, teetering on the brink of chaos due to the recent disturbances,” wrote one Instagram user on Monday. On Tuesday, another user offered an interpretation of the elephant artwork: “For me, this represents the individualized family, distanced and removed connection as the social rule, opposing the very nature of elephants as highly familial and connected creatures.” Banksy also did not say whether the two works are connected in any way. While it’s rare for the artist to unveil two new pieces in such close succession, this is not the first time he’s done so. In October 2013, he began a project called Better Out Than In in New York: Every day that month, he unveiled a new public artwork in a different part of the city. It’s also unclear if the goat and elephant stencils will be the only pieces Banksy reveals this week. Only time will tell. Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Reimagining Earth’s History: New Study Challenges Long-Held Theories of Continent Formation

A recent study challenges traditional views on how Earth’s continents were formed, suggesting that subduction may not have been necessary. His findings propose that the...

New research proposes that Earth’s early continents could have formed through high-pressure melting of the crust rather than subduction, potentially delaying the start of plate tectonics and revising our understanding of Earth’s geological history and its impact on life.A recent study challenges traditional views on how Earth’s continents were formed, suggesting that subduction may not have been necessary. His findings propose that the melting of Earth’s crust could explain the formation of continents, casting doubt on when plate tectonics began and highlighting its impact on life’s origin.The formation of Earth’s continents billions of years ago created a foundation for life to flourish. However, scientists remain divided on how these landmasses came into existence and whether the geological processes involved are the same as those we observe today.A recent paper from the University of Illinois Chicago’s David Hernández Uribe in Nature Geoscience adds new information to that debate, poking holes in the leading theory of continent formation. Hernández Uribe used computer models to study the formation of magmas thought to hold clues to the origin of continents. Geological Processes and Zircon StudiesMagma is the molten substance that, when it cools, forms rocks and minerals. Hernández Uribe looked for magmas that match the compositional signature of rare mineral deposits called zircons that date back to the Archaean period of 2.5 to 4 billion years ago, when scientists believed that continents first formed.Last year, scientists from China and Australia published a paper arguing that Archaean zircons could only be formed by subduction — when two tectonic plates collide underwater, pushing land mass to the surface. That process still happens today, causing earthquakes and volcanic eruptions and reshaping the coasts of continents.But Hernández Uribe, assistant professor of earth and environmental sciences, found that subduction was not necessary to create Archaean zircons. Instead, he found that the minerals could form through high pressure and temperatures associated with the melting of the Earth’s thick primordial crust.“Using my calculations and models, you can get the same signatures for zircons and even provide a better match through the partial melting of the bottom of the crust,” Hernández Uribe said. “So based on these results, we still do not have enough evidence to say which process formed the continents.”Implications on Plate Tectonics and Life on EarthThe results also raise uncertainty about when plate tectonics started on Earth. If Earth’s first continents formed by subduction, that meant that continents started moving between 3.6 to 4 billion years ago — as little as 500 million years into the planet’s existence. But the alternative theory of melting crust forming the first continents means that subduction and tectonics could have started much later.“Our planet is the only planet in the solar system that has active plate tectonics as we know it,” Hernández Uribe said. “And this relates to the origin of life, because how the first continents moved controlled the weather, it controlled the chemistry of the oceans, and all that is related to life.”Reference: “Generation of Archaean oxidizing and wet magmas from mafic crustal overthickening” by David Hernández-Uribe, , 11 July 2024, Nature Geoscience.DOI: 10.1038/s41561-024-01489-z

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.