Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

LISTEN: Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico

News Feed
Wednesday, July 17, 2024

Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico. Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In MexicoTranscriptMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.Brian Bienkowski 00:11Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?Brian Bienkowski 01:18I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, butBrian Bienkowski 01:41almost zeroMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.Brian Bienkowski 02:12Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.Brian Bienkowski 02:54And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.Brian Bienkowski 03:48So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.Brian Bienkowski 04:42The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.Brian Bienkowski 05:05eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.Brian Bienkowski 05:21That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.Brian Bienkowski 06:16Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.Brian Bienkowski 08:18So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.Brian Bienkowski 09:38And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.Brian Bienkowski 10:54Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.Brian Bienkowski 11:13Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.Brian Bienkowski 13:11You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.Brian Bienkowski 14:21Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.Brian Bienkowski 16:03So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.Brian Bienkowski 19:54You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.Brian Bienkowski 24:06I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.Brian Bienkowski 26:41This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.Brian Bienkowski 27:28I mean, you can have a no comment.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.Brian Bienkowski 28:39And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.Brian Bienkowski 29:37I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.Brian Bienkowski 30:43100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to doBrian Bienkowski 31:09What what type of crafting do you like do?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.Brian Bienkowski 31:22So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craftBrian Bienkowski 31:58100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received isMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22I'm gonna see my family.Brian Bienkowski 32:24And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would beMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.Brian Bienkowski 32:37Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.Brian Bienkowski 33:46Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.Brian Bienkowski 33:59That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.

Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico. Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In MexicoTranscriptMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.Brian Bienkowski 00:11Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?Brian Bienkowski 01:18I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, butBrian Bienkowski 01:41almost zeroMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.Brian Bienkowski 02:12Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.Brian Bienkowski 02:54And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.Brian Bienkowski 03:48So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.Brian Bienkowski 04:42The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.Brian Bienkowski 05:05eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.Brian Bienkowski 05:21That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.Brian Bienkowski 06:16Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.Brian Bienkowski 08:18So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.Brian Bienkowski 09:38And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.Brian Bienkowski 10:54Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.Brian Bienkowski 11:13Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.Brian Bienkowski 13:11You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.Brian Bienkowski 14:21Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.Brian Bienkowski 16:03So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.Brian Bienkowski 19:54You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.Brian Bienkowski 24:06I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.Brian Bienkowski 26:41This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.Brian Bienkowski 27:28I mean, you can have a no comment.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.Brian Bienkowski 28:39And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.Brian Bienkowski 29:37I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.Brian Bienkowski 30:43100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to doBrian Bienkowski 31:09What what type of crafting do you like do?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.Brian Bienkowski 31:22So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craftBrian Bienkowski 31:58100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received isMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22I'm gonna see my family.Brian Bienkowski 32:24And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would beMaria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.Brian Bienkowski 32:37Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.Brian Bienkowski 33:46Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.Brian Bienkowski 33:59That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.



Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino joins the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast to discuss why she switched careers from physician to environmental health researcher, and how she’s using this new training to advocate for environmental justice in Mexico.


Talayero Schettino, a current Agents of Change fellow and a DrPH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at The George Washington University, also talks about the challenges of immigrating to the U.S. and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health.

The Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast is a biweekly podcast featuring the stories and big ideas from past and present fellows, as well as others in the field. You can see all of the past episodes here.

Listen below to our discussion with Talayero Schettino and subscribe to the podcast at iTunes or Spotify.


Agents of Change in Environmental Justice · Maria Jose Talayero Schettino on using her research to advocate for environmental justice In Mexico

Transcript


Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 00:00

I don't I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries.

Brian Bienkowski 00:11

Hello and welcome back to the Agents of Change in Environmental Justice podcast, a partnership between Environmental Health News and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. I'm your host Brian Bienkowski, editor of Agents of Change, and senior editor at Environmental Health News. Folks, we are so grateful for your support. We've been at this a few years now and we would love to continue to grow. Please share this podcast with your family and friends, colleagues, and subscribe to us on Spotify or iTunes and please leave us a review. Today's guest is Dr. Maria Jose Talayero Schettino, a current fellow and a doctorate pH candidate in the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at the George Washington University. Maria talks about switching careers from a physician to an environmental health researcher, using her research to advocate for environmental justice in her native Mexico and how the medical field can better prepare doctors to understand the effects of environmental pollutants on our health. Enjoy. All right, I am now joined by Dr. Maria,Jose Talayero Schettino. Maria, how are you doing today?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:14

I'm doing great. Thanks for having me here. Brian, how are you?

Brian Bienkowski 01:18

I am doing wonderful. And I'm really excited to hear about all the work that you're doing. But I want to start at the very beginning. Tell me about growing up in Mexico City.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:29

Oh, yeah, I honestly have very good memories about growing up in Mexico City. But I'm not sure how familiar you are with Mexican culture or if you've ever traveled there, but

Brian Bienkowski 01:41

almost zero

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 01:42

Mexicans really highly, highly value things like hospitality, generosity, respect for elders, solidarity. And it might sound really funny, but we highly value social connections and gatherings. I mean, it's weird to say that we really value parties, but we do. And that's why our food and culture is so important. So I feel like growing up in Mexico City was just like that: full of culture, tradition, family gatherings. And I feel like I'm very lucky to be able to call myself Mexican.

Brian Bienkowski 02:12

Is there a certain food or or holiday or gathering? Are there certain ones that kind of stick out in your mind as being particularly poignant?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 02:22

I mean, yes, I think so. Particularly, Independence Day. I have very good memories about going to watch the fireworks. Independence Days in September. Most people in America think it's Cinco de Mayo. But that's not it. It's in September. But other holidays that really stick up for me are the other mortos which is in November, and also Posadas, which are held during like, December. So Christmas is very important to us too.

Brian Bienkowski 02:54

And the only thing I really know about Mexico City, and pardon my American ignorance, is it's it's a massive city, right? I mean, were you in kind of a dense urban area?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:04

I mean, yeah, it's a huge, huge city. And I feel like there's a lot of people living around Mexico City, I did feel like I lived with my family in one of like, more suburban area, not closer to like, the historical center or anything. But we travel a lot by car. I mean, we have a huge air pollution problem because of that. But I feel like yeah, it's a huge city, and everyone's all around it in. I mean, it's very, very well connected when it comes to streets, we have a lot of traffic, but that's how people go around Mexico City by staying in traffic for really long periods of time.

Brian Bienkowski 03:48

So how and when did you become interested in health and the environment?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 03:53

I mean, this is a great question. And every time I get it, I wish I had that story, "like when I was younger, I used to tell my parents that I wanted to be a doctor since I was a little girl." Unfortunately, that was not me. I wanted to be a singer. I wanted to be an artist. I wanted to be a painter. So that was not me. So I think I ended up in like healthcare and the environment because I really loved science. And don't get me wrong, I really hated physics and math. So because they hated it, I feel like that drew me into chemistry and biology. And I I think I ended up in medical school because of that, because my love for science and honestly, I never knew I was gonna end up doing research and doing a lot of statistics. Even after I ran away from math.

Brian Bienkowski 04:42

The only class I ever got to see in growing up was chemistry that that that for some reason that subject gave me such fits. And I don't know if it was my teacher, or what but it really bothered me.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 04:54

I mean, yeah, it's a really, really hard, hard subject! and I I feel you I feel like I just don't know, I don't know what it was. But chemistry and biology always caught my eye.

Brian Bienkowski 05:05

eye. And the weird thing is now I, you know, I've spent most of my career writing about chemicals in the environment. So it's, it's strange, I hope I'm not just writing a bunch of incorrect things.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:17

I guess I guess you've made peace with it. And now you love it.

Brian Bienkowski 05:21

That's right. So before we get into your your career has been fascinating because you, you started off in healthcare as a physician, and I want to talk about your journey. But first, what is a moment or event that has helped shape your identity?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 05:35

Wow, that's a really hard question. I think there are a couple of things that I want to mention that really shaped my identity as I was growing up. And I feel like the first one was really practicing medicine in public hospitals, that really showed me that life is not fair. And that made me want to work on that. And I think the other thing I want to mention that really shaped my identity is immigrating to the United States, even though I emigrated when I was, I think, 26 years old. Even though I'm like a short four-hour flight away from home, I think immigrating made me realize about all the things that I took for granted, and now I really highly value.

Brian Bienkowski 06:16

Luckily, we're going to talk about both of those things. Because I think that's, it's a really important part of your journey. And starting with this idea of you became a physician in practice in rural communities around Mexico City. So can you tell me about this work, what you learned from this time with patients and why ultimately, you decided to switch careers?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 06:34

Of course. So I guess, practicing medicine in rural communities, and even public hospitals, or public health care centers in Mexico, it really does feel like an art. Because you need to learn how to treat disease differently. Sometimes the medicines that you learn on a book that were the best for a specific disease are not available. So you have to work around it. And the same comes for like diagnostic diagnostic tools, you don't have fancy equipment, or even sometimes you don't even have basic equipment to make a diagnosis. So you have to really focus on talking to the patient. And that's the only thing that you often have, and you have to learn how to practice medicine with that, which is the only thing that you have. And I think when it comes to the change that I made from like, a very clinical-practice-based career into like an research and an environmental one is that one of the things that frustrated me that most while I was practicing medicine is that there were and there are still a lot of things that we do not have answers for in patients. When they come to get a diagnosis, they sometimes ask you were themselves like why something happened. And most of the time, we really have to say that we don't know why. I think there's even a medical term for this, which is that something it's adiabatic, which means that we have absolutely no idea what costed and I really hated it. I hated not being able to have answers for my patients. And I mean, I still don't have all the answers. But I think as I moved forward into an environmental health career, I realized that this field of environmental health had a lot of those answers. And that through my medical education, I barely heard of those. So I think that's what made me shift.

Brian Bienkowski 08:18

So we're going to talk more about your your research and that switch. And, you know, maybe some ideas you have for the medical field to bridge some of these gaps. But I have to ask, did your did family and friends question your decision? I mean, being a physician is a is a career that I think most of us know. I mean, we all know that career. It's familiar to us. It's a pillar in most communities. And I think researcher is a little more esoteric to a lot of folks. So I'm wondering if your family was like, What are you doing?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 08:48

Oh, my gosh, yeah, I every single person that went through medical school with me or even my family, or even friends, or even now that I meet people, when I tell them that I went through medical school and that I became a physician. Now I do environmental health, every single person has questioned that. And I feel like sometimes, when like for the Mexican perspective, a lot of people questioned this because they don't really know much about the field, and how important it is. But I don't know like having all these people question your life decision makes it like just harder to move forward and harder to realize if you're in the right path. And I think that was really hard when I first made the decision to switch. But now looking back, I don't think I would do anything differently.

Brian Bienkowski 09:38

And to keep on this theme of challenges. I want to reflect a bit on your move to the US. You mentioned how important Mexico City and family and gathering was to your, to your upbringing and identity. And I don't know that most folks understand the toll of immigrating even under positive circumstances like yourself. So can you talk about this experience and what people should know about the personal channel changes and sacrifices for immigrants?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:02

Yeah, honestly, thanks for asking this questions. I think that sometimes the challenges for like immigrating in good, some good circumstances, like I did is invisible to others. But from my experience, I really want to say that immigrating in good circumstances to the US is extremely challenging. There are so many rules and steps that you need to take that often really don't even make sense and can really make your life harder. But I do have to say that I'm really fortunate to be here. And I'm really grateful to the US for the all the all the opportunities that I've had. But moving away from family is so hard. Like you move to a country where you don't have this support system, the culture is extremely different. And you need to talk and communicate using a different language. I don't know if you've watched Modern Family. I really like that show. But there's this episode.

Brian Bienkowski 10:54

Modern Family? Yeah, gosh, yes. I'm a yes. I'm rewatching it right now. Yes.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 10:59

I love it. I love it. But there's this episode, where Sofia Vergara says, "do you know how smart I am in Spanish?" And it's so funny. But it's so relatable. Like, there's so many things that I want to say, but I just cannot find the words.

Brian Bienkowski 11:13

Well, thank you so much for sharing that. And I want to talk now about the work that you're doing as you've made the switch to research. So you're examining environmental exposures, and birth defects in Mexico. That's one of the things you're working on. So I wanted to talk about talk, you know, if you can explore this link between these exposures and birth defects, why it's concerning, and who is most impacted?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 11:34

Of course, yeah. So through my dissertation, I'm on the final stages of my doctoral program, hopefully graduating this August. But through my dissertation, I've been studying birth defects and their relationship that they have with the polluting industry in the country, in Mexico. It has been challenging to do something like this with public databases that the Mexican government has, but I found really interesting things. For example, I've seen that the reporting for genital birth defects in Mexico in the last couple of years has been steadily increasing. I mean, this could be due to so many things –like people know now how to recognize them better or many other things. But when you compare that to other countries, this seems to be happening, too. And it's making us think about the impact endocrine disrupting chemicals are having in communities around industrial areas. I think it is very concerning to see the impact that pollution has in your health even before you were born. Like I don't think people realize that we used to think in a medical field that that placenta was like this major barrier where nothing could go through it. But we've realized that that's not the case. And I really think that we don't have strict enough regulations for most chemicals. But overall, like if you asked me like, What was the most concerning thing that you saw is the lack of data that Mexico has for both health effects and polluting chemicals. I'm always amazed that countries like the US, for example, like researchers in the US say that they are so far behind, but they don't really realize if they're far behind where developing countries are.

Brian Bienkowski 13:11

You mentioned a term their endocrine disrupting chemicals, which I think a lot of Environmental Health News readership is aware of. But for our listening audience, can you explain what those chemicals are? And kind of the plausible ways that they could possibly be behind some of these birth defects?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 13:26

Of course, yeah, sorry, I forgot to explain that! But yeah, endocrine disrupting chemicals are generally what we say are chemicals that are capable of interfering with the way your hormones work. And your hormones are very important since the beginning of life, because hormones are also chemicals, but they mediate a lot of processes in your body. So if there's a chemical there's interrupting those pathways, then you can see problems with your development or the endocrine system diseases, for example, reproductive issues, or diabetes, or thyroid problems. So mostly, those are the things that we're concerned when we get exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, which are almost in everything. But one of the major things that we know, gets us exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, are plastics.

Brian Bienkowski 14:21

Soyou mentioned gaps in the research. And you noticed this pretty early on that there were some gaps in environmental health and environmental justice data in Mexico. And I know you're just one researcher, but can you talk about this dearth of research and how you're trying to tackle this?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 14:35

So I feel like environmental justice has been overlooked for centuries in both the community scale and the global scale. I really don't think high income countries realize how all their decisions impact developing countries. For example, I remember a few years ago, there was this Super Bowl held in Arizona or one of the border, one of the border states, but I think it was Arizona. And they said that they weren't going to have have a zero-waste Super Bowl because all the plastic generated was going to be recycled. But that plastic was shipped to Mexico, to northern Mexico, where plastic recycling plans are polluting the water and air of Mexican communities. So is one of the of the issues that we see in the global health realm. Like, this is not something that only happens in Mexico, but it happens everywhere. But with things like in the country level, when I first started the process to find something I wanted to do for my dissertation, I remember talking to my chair, about wanting to do something on environmental justice. So I started doing research on what was out there. And unfortunately, I wasn't able to find much. And I think this is related to what I was talking about, that we don't have a lot of data. And there's also something going on in Mexico and you know, other Latin American countries like Colombia, where it's very dangerous to be in environmentalist in those countries. Mexico is one of the deadliest country to be an environmentalist. So advocating for these things can get really challenging.

Brian Bienkowski 16:03

So can you talk about your efforts, in particular to advance environmental health policy in Mexico, including on lead and criminal behavior? And can you talk a little bit about your involvement with Mundo Químico, boy, I'm probably butchering these words. I'm really smart English, I swear. And what have you learned? And have you had any victories along the way in your in your efforts to advance environmental health policy down there?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 16:28

Yeah, so let me talk a little bit about what Mundo Químico is, which translates to chemical world because we live in a chemical world. So this Mundo Químico is like a collaborative of scientists and other professionals in Mexico that got together and are really trying to push programs and policies related to environmental health in the country. Honestly, I feel like I'm very lucky to be part of it. I am the youngest member. And I ended up being there because as I was finishing up my master's program, I always felt like I owed something to my country, and I needed to do something in Mexico. So I did some research and who was working on environmental health in the country. And I found this very big and famous scientist, his name is Dr. Carlos Santos Burdoa. He's US-based. He was at the George Washington University, when I first heard of that of him. So I email him. Honestly, I didn't expect a reply, because like, senior scientists are really busy. But I did get a reply. And I was really surprised. But he told me that he was building this collaborative called Mundo Químico, and he asked me if I wanted to join him. So of course, I said, Yes. So what we've been trying to do, as I was saying, is to push environmental health agenda into the policies and to do some programs to reduce environmental health exposures. And we started with lead exposure, because Mexico has a really big problem with lead. I think we've done different things that I don't think I have enough time to talk about during our podcast. But what I have learned, and I think I have learned a lot of things, but one of the most important ones, is that it is so hard to communicate to the public and with policymakers. And I really did not expect that when I started my career in environmental health. And I think that's how I ended up studying lead exposure and criminal behavior. Because often when you want policymakers to listen to what you have to say, you have to talk to them in their terms, and talk to them in topics that that you feel that they will prioritize. So we know crime is a big thing in Mexico. So what we did is where we viewed all the available evidence to see how lead exposure was related to criminal behavior, we found that there's a link. But we still need research on this. And we need research to understand what the relationship means in the Mexican context. But yeah, I feel like that's how it started because we need to learn to communicate with policymakers. And I really don't want to stop talking about this question without mentioning some of the wins that we had, because I feel like in environmental health, we will always hear a lot about our fatals and not our wins. So we have had some wins, we have been able to produce some programs on lead exposure. And one of them is we were able to partner with WONART, which is an Arts Fund that the government of Mexico has and through their through them, we've been able to push this program to train pottery workers to produce lathe, Clay ceramics, which are a major traditional thing in Mexico and they usually have led in it. But we're pushing this program to produce lead-free clay ceramics and to certify that they're lead free. And even though we still have a lot of work to do on that issue, the start of the program to me is just a great win.

Brian Bienkowski 19:54

You mentioned two things there that I have a follow up on and you started to get to it a little bit at the end is is you meantioned that lead exposure is a big issue in Mexico. And I'm wondering if you can just kind of give a brief overview of the ceramics and potentially other sources of lead in the environment there. And then second, if you can kind of walk us through why there's this possible link to crime, what does lead do to people that could make them more susceptible to committing crime?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 20:20

Of course, yeah. So I'll start with at glaced clay ceramics. So in Mexico, we use traditional pottery for cooking, storing, or even serving food. And one of this traditional pottery is called glaced clay ceramics and the glaze that the ceramics have, it has lead in it. And because it's not produced in ovens, that can reach high enough temperatures, in like close ovens, because it's a very artisanal process, the lead stays there, and it leeches into food. And he usually leeches when you like cook, or store food that's very acidic. And Mexican cuisine is really acidic. So it leaves us a lot of lead. And we have a major problem of lead exposure. Because of that, that's actually the main source of lead exposure in the country, because most of the people in Mexico use it. Like if you go down there, you'll see it in restaurants, you'll see your honestly see it everywhere. And the latest numbers show that children from one to four ages in Mexico, 17% of all children from one to four years of age in Mexico have lead poisoning. So it's a really public health issue, we don't have data to see if older kids have lead, we don't have data on adults. But it's a really big concern, because lead is very toxic, like the WHO says that there is no safe level of exposure to lead because of how toxic it is. And he causes a variety of things. It can increase cardiovascular disease, it can damage the kidneys. But one of the ones, one of the things that we have studied the most is how it damages the nervous system and the brain. And this goes back to the question that you asked about criminal behavior. So we've seen that lead damages the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is in charge of, of behavior, and, yeah, to put it in, like, easier terms, yeah, it's in charge of behavior and how you react to things. So when it damages the neurons there, it can cause antisocial behavior, and it can cause aggressiveness, and it can cause violent behaviors. So that's how we've seen it has associated with criminal behavior. So in addition to that communication work directly with policymakers and residents, I know you're also active on social media. And I'm wondering how you've leveraged those platforms to try to get the word out on some of these environmental ills. Oh, my gosh, being on social media is so hard. I don't know if you've tried it. But seriously, it takes a lot of effort to create content on social media. But yeah, so I ended up in social media, because going back to this environmental justice issues, Spanish speaking countries, and communities really don't have as much information as English speakers do. And that's something I really noticed while I was scrolling down on every social media platform, so I saw hundreds of videos on how to reduce environmental exposures, but almost none, were in Spanish. So I decided to venture into social media. And honestly, I don't have that many followers, my platform is growing. But one of the things that I've noticed is that many health professionals are starting to follow me because they're interested. And they want to learn more, because some of their patients are asking about these topics. So I feel like it's a great way to do outreach and communication, things when you're in the environmental health field.

Brian Bienkowski 24:06

I have not tried it. Of course, I had I had social media accounts. It's been more than a decade. I think since I've had one, I don't even have LinkedIn anymore. I am really happy that people like you are on them, because I think it is a counterbalance to the reason that I got off, which is a lot of kind of miss information and hatred. But it is really heartening for me to see folks like yourself and scientists in general and health professionals are able to take their message directly to people as opposed to kind of being mediated through, you know, newspapers or whatever happened back in the day. So I think that's a good thing. And we have noticed though, as a newsroom, a lack of Spanish language environmental content and information and we are trying to trying to combat that with some eh en español coverage. So We have noticed the same thing as you. And there is a real language justice issue in the United States when it comes to environmental information. So I hope people will follow you. We will add a link in this podcast article so people can follow you if you want. Having spent some time now in the environmental health research field, and we were talking earlier about how you started as a physician, how do you think the medical field could better incorporate environmental health information for patients and prepare those physicians?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 25:28

I mean, I honestly wish health care workers have better training in environmental health. From my experience, which is going through medical school in Mexico, I really can't speak for other countries. I barely heard about environmental exposures as causes of disease, when I was in medical school, maybe I heard about asbestos or silicosis or occupational exposures, but non an environmental exposures like a social determinants of health, which they are. So I'm currently working actually on a project with some peers on how there is a huge gap in medical and other other healthcare professions school curriculum when it comes to environmental health in Latin America. And it is a sad reality that we barely see courses on environmental health in these curriculums. But I can tell you that I like I can see myself advocating about this for a really long time. And I think we need to get to a point where every single doctor, every single dentist, every single nutritionist, every single nurse knows that this exists, and that we need to know about it and talk to our patients about it.

Brian Bienkowski 26:41

This is purely anecdotal. But I do feel like I'm seeing more on the climate side of things where physicians are being more active and perhaps more trained in climate change and extreme heat, but less so on –surprisingly– less so on things like chemical exposure, and the things that you've been talking about endocrine disrupting chemicals. So hopefully, hopefully, that changes because I think that would be a real public health win. So, Maria, this has been so much fun hearing about you and your work. And I have to ask you, before we get to some of the fun questions, I have a couple more questions. And one is do you plan on going back to Mexico? Would you want to work there? Or do you think you'll stay in the United States? What do you want to do with this environmental health research training?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:25

Oh, my gosh, you're putting me on the spot.

Brian Bienkowski 27:28

I mean, you can have a no comment.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 27:30

I know my family's gonna want me to give an answer that maybe it's not the one that they like. But I do feel that the work that I'm doing for Mexico in the United States, is far like, I feel like I have way more opportunities to do something for my country from the United States, than the ones that I see that are my country. And it's a really sad reality, because I would give the world to just go back to my family and my nephews. But if I really want to see a change, I really feel like I have to stay in the United States for at least a couple of years. To improve, like my research techniques to get a better sense of what's out there and what I can do for Mexico. I mean, in the future. I don't know how long from from now, I do see myself going back to Mexico at some point. But right now, I don't think it is an option. And it is a sad reality, not only for me, but for other immigrants that are doing science in the United States, because our countries lack opportunities.

Brian Bienkowski 28:39

And Maria, before we get to the fun stuff, what are you optimistic about?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 28:44

Oh, that's a really important question! I feel like we don't hear about optimism sometimes in the environmental field, like there are so it's filled with bad news sometimes. But I feel like I'm optimistic about hearing more people are learning about environmental exposure. So how they can affect their health, because honestly, sometimes social movements can move policies faster. So we really need that. I'm optimistic about how younger generations are thinking more about the environment now. And they're joining this fight. There are so many things I'm optimistic about. And I'm glad you brought this up. Because again, I don't think that this field is full of good news. So we need to, to have these victories and these things that we're optimistic about really present in our day to day because he can get overwhelming at times.

Brian Bienkowski 29:37

I think the hard thing in my profession and maybe this is true in science in science communication as well, is whenever we try to talk about good news, it often feels like we're perhaps greenwashing or perhaps we're overlooking, you know, renewable energy is a great example. You know, solar energy and wind energy are less polluting, however now we have to go get those chemicals to make those panels in the ground and community. You know, so there's always there's other problems and we don't want to overlook those. But I totally agree with you that we need to be better as a, as a country in general about celebrating environmental wins, so people just don't get so down about it.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 30:17

Yeah, cuz I mean, when I talk to people about toxic exposures, I usually get the same reaction, like, everything's toxic, I'm gonna die from something. So I might as well just stop thinking about this. And I don't think that's a great approach. So, I mean, that should go back to our communication efforts, like, what are we saying, what are we doing? And how can we make this better? So our message gets out there, and it's not as overwhelming as it is currently.

Brian Bienkowski 30:43

100% totally agree with you. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time. I'm just so I'm so happy to have met you and have you in this program. I'm just really excited about the work you're doing. So before I get you out of here, I have a few rapid fire questions where you can just answer with a one word or a phrase, if I have a whole day off, I am likely.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:05

Oh my gosh, I'm probably hitting the craft store to find a new craft to do

Brian Bienkowski 31:09

What what type of crafting do you like do?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:12

anything, like anything like it, maybe it's knitting, maybe it's stitching, maybe it's painting, whatever, like, whatever is new, I'm doing it.

Brian Bienkowski 31:22

So my wife and I, we live in the Upper Peninsula. And so we have very long winters. And I find myself this time of year. And I hesitate to even say this pining for winter, because it is such a great time to be quiet. And I play I'm playing music and my wife does be beadwork and stuff like that. Or we do some paintings together. And it's all crafty, and it's cozy and quiet. And then in the summer, I find that I really miss those. I really missed those times. So I need to find a way to do more crafty things, when it's nice outside. Yeah,

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 31:54

I can relate to that. 100% I feel like it's a great therapy to do craft

Brian Bienkowski 31:58

100%. Well, I just had a guest on who was the guest, I'm forgetting now. But I had a guest on we were talking crafts not too long ago, I'll have to dig that out. Because I think it's for folks like yourself who are really busy doing this kind of work. It's good to have that other side of your creative brain get used every now and then. So the best gift I've ever received is

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:22

I'm gonna see my family.

Brian Bienkowski 32:24

And if I could immediately gain one talent or ability it would be

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:31

I know, to be able to get grants for research without being rejected.

Brian Bienkowski 32:37

Not flight or invisibility, just just grants! this one good for research. keeping it simple. I like that. And you do not have to. You can talk more than one word or a phrase here. What is the last book you read for fun?

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 32:53

Oh, this is a good one. So lately because I've been working on my dissertation. I feel like I've been reading a lot of science stuff. But I feel like the last book that I read it was, I feel it was last year. And it's a book by a Mexican Indigenous woman, well, Ilfrosina Cruz who is now a representative in the Mexican government. And it's a great book. I'm not gonna spoil it for everyone. But she talks about her life as an Indigenous girl and how she wanted something different. And she wanted to create opportunities. And she moved on to be a representative and changing the laws in Mexico. So it's a really inspiring book, and I highly recommend it, it is called "Los Sueños de la niña de la montaña," which translates to "The Dreams from the girl up the mountain. I don't know if it's available in English yet, but I know it's in Spanish and I really highly recommended.

Brian Bienkowski 33:46

Excellent. Well, Maria, thank you so much for your time today. Thank you for being part of this program, and we'll have you back soon.

Maria Jose Talayero Schettino 33:51

Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. It was a great talk.

Brian Bienkowski 33:59

That's all for this week. folks. I hope you enjoyed my conversation with Maria. If you enjoyed this podcast, visit agentsofchangeinej.org. And while you're there, click the donate button to support us or sign up for our free monthly newsletter. You can also find us on X, Instagram and follow us on Spotify or iTunes and never miss an episode give us a rating. This agency chain podcast was recorded written produced and edited by me with outreaching scheduling and support from the rest of the team Dr. Ami Zota Dr. Yoshiro Cornelis Van Horn Dr. Veena singlet, Dr. Max on Dr. Laura Edwards, summer Ahmad and Maria Paula Rubiano. Our music is now sung by Paddington Bear. Thanks for joining us. We hope to keep these important conversations on diversity in science and health. Go. Have a great week folks.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Dow Wants to Power Its Texas Manufacturing Complex With New Nuclear Reactors Instead of Natural Gas

Dow, a major producer of chemicals and plastics, wants to use next-generation nuclear reactors for clean power and steam at a Texas manufacturing complex instead of natural gas

Dow, a major producer of chemicals and plastics, wants to use next-generation nuclear reactors for clean power and steam at a Texas manufacturing complex instead of natural gas.Dow's subsidiary, Long Mott Energy, applied Monday to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a construction permit. It said the project with X-energy, an advanced nuclear reactor and fuel company, would nearly eliminate the emissions associated with power and steam generation at its plant in Seadrift, Texas, avoiding roughly 500,000 metric tons of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions annually.If built and operated as planned, it would be the first U.S. commercial advanced nuclear power plant for an industrial site, according to the NRC.For many, nuclear power is emerging as an answer to meet a soaring demand for electricity nationwide, driven by the expansion of data centers and artificial intelligence, manufacturing and electrification, and to stave off the worst effects of a warming planet. However, there are safety and security concerns, the Union of Concerned Scientists cautions. The question of how to store hazardous nuclear waste in the U.S. is unresolved, too.Dow wants four of X-energy's advanced small modular reactors, the Xe-100. Combined, those could supply up to 320 megawatts of electricity or 800 megawatts of thermal power. X-energy CEO J. Clay Sell said the project would demonstrate how new nuclear technology can meet the massive growth in electricity demand.The Seadrift manufacturing complex, at about 4,700 acres, has eight production plants owned by Dow and one owned by Braskem. There, Dow makes plastics for a variety of uses including food and beverage packaging and wire and cable insulation, as well as glycols for antifreeze, polyester fabrics and bottles, and oxide derivatives for health and beauty products.Edward Stones, the business vice president of energy and climate at Dow, said submitting the permit application is an important next step in expanding access to safe, clean, reliable, cost-competitive nuclear energy in the United States. The project is supported by the Department of Energy’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program.The NRC expects the review to take three years or less. If a permit is issued, construction could begin at the end of this decade so the reactors would be ready early in the 2030s, as the natural gas-fired equipment is retired.A total of four applicants have asked the NRC for construction permits for advanced nuclear reactors. The NRC issued a permit to Abilene Christian University for a research reactor and to Kairos Power for one reactor and two reactor test versions of that company's design. It's reviewing an application by Bill Gates and his energy company, TerraPower, to build an advanced reactor in Wyoming. X-energy is also collaborating with Amazon to bring more than 5 gigawatts of new nuclear power projects online across the United States by 2039, beginning in Washington state. Amazon and other tech giants have committed to using renewable energy to meet the surging demand from data centers and artificial intelligence and address climate change.The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Feb. 2025

Oil and gas money shapes research, creates ‘echo chamber’ in higher education

Louisiana’s flagship university is looking to partner more closely with petrochemical industries in the state.

Jackson Voss loves his alma mater, Louisiana State University. He appreciates that his undergraduate education was paid for by a program dreamed up by an oil magnate and that he received additional scholarships from ExxonMobil and Shell. But the socially conscious Louisiana native was also aware of what the support of those companies seemed to buy — silence. Voss, who graduated from LSU in Baton Rouge 11 years ago with a degree in political science, says when he attended school there, he didn’t hear discussions of how climate change made Hurricane Katrina worse; why petrochemical plants along the Mississippi River sickened residents of the mostly Black communities around those facilities; or about the devastating and permanent impact of the BP oil spill that happened during Voss’ time at LSU. Voss, now director of climate policy for the New Orleans-based consumer advocacy group, the Alliance for Affordable Energy, says he didn’t hear climate change or “Cancer Alley” openly discussed until he went to the University of Michigan, 1,100 miles away, for graduate school. “It was not a place that was really discussing these issues in the way that should have been discussed at the time,” he said of LSU, where oil wells dotted the campus at least into the 1970s. Any such discussions weren’t taken seriously, he said, and even fellow students were often defensive of the industry.  “The discussions that did happen had to focus on, kind of finding a way to talk about climate without talking about climate,” Voss said, “and it was especially important not to talk about the role that oil and gas played in worsening climate change.” Louisiana State University graduate Jackson Voss attended the Baton Rouge-based school as an undergraduate about a decade ago. Pam Radtke / Floodlight Whether through funding of research projects, the creation of new academic programs focused on energy or, more subtly, through support of everything from opera to football, the oil and gas industry has been shaping discourse at LSU — and universities around the world — for decades. LSU administrators insist they have safeguards against undue influence by fossil fuel companies, which have given tens of millions of dollars to the university in just the past three years. But a joint investigation by Floodlight, WWNO/WRKF and the Louisiana Illuminator found the funding allows the industry to place a thumb on the scale of what gets studied at the state’s flagship university — and what is left out. Research by Floodlight shows between 2010 and 2020, petrochemical companies gave LSU at least $44 million through their charitable foundations, making it one of the top recipients of fossil fuel funding among U.S. universities, based on research from the nonprofit Data for Progress. LSU received more from petrochemical companies than the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard and Texas A&M — and 20 times more than Voss’s other alma mater, the University of Michigan. The Data for Progress research showed over that decade, the 27 schools they examined received almost $700 million total. Increasingly, researchers are questioning the longstanding ties between fossil fuels and universities at a time when scientists and governments across the globe overwhelmingly agree that sharply reducing the use of fossil fuels and increasing reliance on renewable energy are crucial to stalling or reversing climate change. Last year, a joint report from Congress found “the oil and gas industry cultivates partnerships with academic institutions as a way to influence climate research.” And a first-of-its-kind study released by researchers last year found the fossil fuel industry’s approach is similar to how the tobacco, pharmaceutical and other industries co-opted academics.  “It’s a situation exactly parallel to public health research being funded by the tobacco industry. It’s a conflict of interest — the size of an oil tanker,” said Geoffrey Supran, associate professor of environmental science and policy who studies fossil fuel disinformation at the University of Miami and is director of its Climate Accountability Lab. He says LSU and other schools like it have become “an echo chamber for pro-fossil-fuel narratives.” LSU and its president, William Tate IV, have doubled down on the university’s ties with the fossil fuel industry in recent years, despite its shrinking importance to the Louisiana economy. Since 2020, Tate has solicited and received more than $30 million from fossil fuel companies, including a record $27.5 million from Shell. During LSU’s Giving Day campaign on Wednesday, Shell plopped down another $1.5 million for LSU libraries and the College of Science. “It’s time for a partnership in significant fashion to link the work at LSU in our energy areas, including alternative energy, and creating ways to keep that industry vibrant here in this state and for our country,” Tate told reporters in 2022, about a year after he was named to head the school.  LSU insists there are firewalls in place to prevent oil and gas companies from unduly influencing research and study. But public records and interviews indicate that fossil fuel funding can have a subtle and even direct impact on research and critical discourse.  “Universities are at risk of being pawns in a climate propaganda scheme devised and implemented by fossil fuel interests for decades,” Supran said.  ‘Tip of the iceberg’ It’s impossible to pin down how much money fossil fuel interests — or any industry — gives to universities such as LSU. Although it is a public institution, much of the money for scholarships, workforce development and buildings goes through LSU’s foundation — a nonprofit separate from the university. The foundation, in accordance with philanthropic standards, does not disclose its donors unless they agree to be identified. In its research, Data for Progress used public announcements from universities and companies, along with tax filings from fossil fuel companies’ foundations, to determine how much the universities received from those companies. “It’s most likely the tip of the iceberg,” said Jake Lowe, executive director of Campus Climate Network, which under its previous name, Fossil Free Research, worked with Data for Progress to create its 2023 report.  Louisiana State University President William Tate IV visits Shell’s facility in Convent, La., in 2023 to talk about his plan to focus on five areas at the university, including energy. Louisiana State University For example, the report includes millions of dollars the ExxonMobil Foundation gives for scholarships — but not the money going directly from the company to a school or its foundation. “If the ExxonMobil corporation has a research contract with LSU, you’re not going to see that in the tax documents or annual reports,” Lowe said. Floodlight, with the help of a Data for Progress researcher, used the same method to look at how much petrochemical money went to LSU. The analysis included examining public announcements from the companies and tax filings, called 990s, of the foundations for Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Entergy, Koch Inc., Southwest Electric Power Corp., Schlumberger (now known as SLB), Dow and Taylor Oil. From 2010 to 2020, Taylor Oil’s foundation gave the most to LSU, almost $21 million.   The second highest amount was from ExxonMobil, which gave more than $10 million — the majority of which came from a matching gift program in which the company gave $3 for every dollar donated by an employee or retiree to a college or university. Louisiana State University’s “Quad” is the heart of the campus and was named after ExxonMobil in 1999. Piper Hutchinson / Louisiana Illuminator But then, in 2022, Shell dwarfed the amount given over the previous decade with a single $27.5 million donation to LSU. The majority, $25 million, was for a new Institute for Energy Innovation to focus on “scholarship and solution delivery” on “hydrogen and carbon capture … the coast; and low-carbon fuels.” Donations buy influence  LSU doesn’t hide that the institute’s mission was shaped in partnership with the industry. In the early days, a former Shell executive, Rhoman Hardy, served as the research center’s interim director. The company also has three of the institute’s seven board seats; industry groups hold another two. Last year, the nonprofit New Orleans news outlet The Lens discovered LSU created a system: If a fossil fuel company gives $50,000 or more to the institute, it gets the right to participate in a specific research project, to use the intellectual property from that project and “robust review and discussion of the specific study and project output.” For a $1.25 million donation, a company also receives “voting rights for selected institute activities, including research.” A contribution of $5 million or more earns a donor a seat on the institute’s board. LSU president William Tate IV poses with LSU mascot Mike the Tiger. Louisiana State University When reached for comment about the institute, its donations and its potential influence, Shell responded, “We’re proud to partner with LSU to contribute to the growing compendium of peer-reviewed climate science and advance the effort to identify multiple pathways and build the ecosystems that can lead to more energy with fewer emissions.” In 2023, ExxonMobil gave $2 million to LSU and became a “strategic” partner. With the donation, ExxonMobil will work with the institute to study batteries, solar power, carbon capture and “advanced” plastics recycling. ExxonMobil did not respond to a request for comment about the donation or about the money it has previously given to LSU. At a Louisiana Board of Regents’ Energy Transition Research Symposium at LSU later that year, ExxonMobil gave a presentation on advanced plastics recycling, a controversial technology that opponents say amounts to greenwashing the problem of plastic waste by burning it rather than reusing it. “It is clear based on the board and research focus areas of the new Institute for Energy Innovation that it is focused squarely on innovations using fossil fuels,” said Logan Atkinson Burke, Voss’ boss at the Alliance for Affordable Energy, an energy consumer advocacy group. Environmentalists say technologies being studied by the institute, including carbon capture, hydrogen and low-carbon fuels, are “false solutions” that will do little to address the climate crisis. ‘Subconscious’ bias?  The institute’s current director, Brad Ives, and LSU’s vice president for research and economic development, Robert Twilley, say they have put safeguards in place to prevent industry influence. And Twilley says this type of research — working hand in hand with industries on the ground — is core to the mission of LSU as a land grant university, a program Abraham Lincoln established in 1862 that used federal land sales to fund universities focused on practical subjects including architecture, engineering and agriculture. “It’s how we as an institution manage it and the safeguards and being very conscious of our ethics, being very conscious of what projects we work on,” Twilley said. He points to federal guidelines, the scientific method and peer review as some of the safeguards that keep the university’s research independent from industry influence. The institute sends its research proposals to an anonymous third-party panel of scientists to be ranked, Twilley says. Those rankings help decide what research it funds. Louisiana State University’s Petroleum Engineering Research & Technology Transfer, or PERTT, Laboratory, is an industrial-scale facility for training and research on borehole technology. According to LSU, it is the only such facility in North America. Louisiana State University Ives says funders aren’t allowed contact with researchers either. “What we’re doing is making sure that the researchers have total academic freedom to let the research take them where it goes,” Ives said. “We know we can sleep at night because we are not doing anything that’s wrong.” But Supran, who once worked on projects funded by oil and gas, says it’s not always as simple as a researcher purposefully skewing results. Scientists are only human, making these relationships inherently fraught. “We’re all subject to biases,” he said. “Things like reciprocation. You know that if I give you a pen, you have some small subconscious desire to reciprocate it in some sense down the line.” For example, one study showed how reviews of the health effects of secondhand smoke funded by the tobacco industry were almost 90 times more likely to conclude that it was not harmful compared to reviews funded by other sources. There’s evidence that the lines between funding and academic independence are sometimes blurred at LSU. Several influential reports and studies from LSU’s Center for Energy Studies have drawn scrutiny over the years for being misleading. In one case, a utility-funded report led to the dismantling of Louisiana’s successful rooftop solar program. In another, a report helped curb efforts to sue oil and gas companies for decades of environmental damage, claiming the lawsuits cost the state more than it would gain. A more recent example was found in public records reviewed by WWNO, including a contract between the Center for Energy Studies and the Bracewell law firm, representing Gulf Coast Sequestration. That company wants to store millions of tons of carbon dioxide underground in southwest Louisiana. It asked the center to use the project as a case study for the economic impact of a carbon capture industry on the Gulf Coast. Climate advocates Corinne Salter and Jill Tupitza, who started a group and podcast called Climate Pelicans, and Cheyenne Autin discuss divestment in fossil fuels in November 2023 at Louisiana State University’s Baton Rouge campus. Tarun Kakarala / The Reveille The contract suggests that some of the report’s conclusions were reached even before the study began. The researchers said they planned to “underscore the transformative nature of CCS (carbon capture and sequestration) on the Louisiana economy.” LSU’s final report ultimately listed all of the financial reasons the Gulf Coast should welcome the projects like this one — while barely mentioning the economic risks, such as the cost and financial viability of  carbon capture facilities. WWNO showed the report to several researchers familiar with sponsored research. All of them shared concerns over the prescriptive nature of the research proposal or the terms of the contract itself. LSU allows research sponsors to give feedback on drafts before they’re published. Sponsors are also allowed to stay anonymous — meaning, the public doesn’t know who funds the research. “It gets a D grade and it’s not quite an F,” Supran said, noting that in this case, the funder was disclosed. “ The fact that this report just touts the economic benefits of this specific company funding the report — it kind of makes you wonder if it’s worth the paper it’s written on.” The report’s authors declined to comment. Twilley defended the contract, saying its terms are standard throughout the university and that researchers are allowed to propose hypotheses.  The contract is not illegal nor does it constitute research misconduct such as using fake data or plagiarizing. But according to one elected official, reports like these, which carry the credibility of a university without the scrutiny of peer review, could influence public policy. “The research plays a significant role in determining whether or not we’re on the right or wrong course,” said Davante Lewis, a public service commissioner in Louisiana. His commission regulates services in Louisiana including the electric utilities. Lewis said he counts on such academic reports to provide a fair and comprehensive picture of an issue. But, as more industry money enters research, he said he was concerned, noting, “Oftentimes we have seen where money drives facts, not facts drive money.” Burnishing their reputations Besides funding LSU’s energy institute, oil and gas interests also pays for things everyone likes, such as health programs, tutoring and even halftime kicking contests with football fans. Supran says he and other researchers have a working theory that while oil and gas companies pour big money into big research institutions such as MIT and Stanford to give them credibility, they spend money at regional universities in states including Louisiana and Texas to build a compliant population. “It doesn’t take a genius to imagine that that money may be used to burnish the reputation locally of those companies and foster a vibrant recruitment pool,” Supran said. Geoffrey Supran, an associate professor at the University of Miami, tells members of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee at a May 1, 2024 hearing that his research has found “widespread infiltration of fossil fuel interests into higher education.” U.S. Senate Budget Committee Voss says the oil and gas industry’s support of benefits for the state are “one of the few things that it actually has right.” On the flip side, he added, “I think it protects the industry from criticism, because it makes people feel like they’re a part of the community.” But the heavy presence of oil and gas on campus can have a chilling effect on people and groups who don’t support those industries. Jill Tupitza, now a marine scientist in California, was a graduate student at LSU when she and fellow graduate student Corinne Salter started Climate Pelicans, an advocacy organization that worked to get LSU to stop investing in fossil fuels. When they started questioning the ties between LSU and fossil fuels, they were met with resistance. “Immediately, doors were shut,” Tupitza said. One administrator told her, “‘I can’t tell you what to do, I can’t punish you for going further. But I would strongly recommend that you stop asking questions about this,’” she recalled. “So that, obviously, that made us double down.” The group led marches and a petition drive urging climate divestment. They started a podcast that explored topics including environmental justice and false climate solutions. Tupitza said the LSU Foundation stonewalled the group’s requests for information about how much money it had invested in fossil fuels and refused requests to attend meetings about the foundation’s $700 million endowment. Later, the foundation told Tupitza that less than 4% of its holdings were invested in fossil fuels And then, while Tupitza and fellow graduate students were writing “Divest from Fossil Fuels,” in pink chalk in front of the foundation building, they were arrested on graffiti charges.  Those charges were eventually dropped. School rules prohibit writing on the sidewalks with chalk, but it is not an arrestable offense. Tupitza described her arrest as “a huge scare tactic.”.  Supran says LSU isn’t unique in its hesitation to cut ties with the oil and gas industry.  “I think it’s fair to say that for the most part, there has not been careful deliberation about the costs and the benefits of these ties, but rather a head down, and aggressive, solicitation of as much funding as they can receive from anyone.” Voss predicts that if conditions worsen in an industry known for its booms and busts, its support for LSU will disappear. And as climate change worsens, it will make it harder for businesses and people to stay in Louisiana, which is already near the top of U.S. states when it comes to population loss.  “In many ways, higher education is sitting upon a house of cards, and relying upon oil and gas is incredibly risky — as it always has been.” Instead, he said, “I think that LSU could and should be a really critical voice in climate change and environmental justice in Louisiana. I do worry that in failing to do so and by being so heavily tied up in oil and gas interests, it actually puts the university in a worse position.” This is Part 2 of a two-part investigative series exploring the relationship between the fossil fuel industry and Louisiana State University. This story was reported by a partnership with WWNO/WRKF, the Louisiana Illuminator and Floodlight. This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Oil and gas money shapes research, creates ‘echo chamber’ in higher education on Mar 29, 2025.

As Starlink and Other Satellites Proliferate, Astronomers Learn to Manage Interference

Swarms of satellites launched by SpaceX and other companies are disrupting astronomical observations. Here's how scientists are coping

In the next few months, from its perch atop a mountain in Chile, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will begin surveying the cosmos with the largest camera ever built. Every three nights, it will produce a map of the entire southern sky filled with stars, galaxies, asteroids and supernovae — and swarms of bright satellites ruining some of the view.Astronomers didn’t worry much about satellites photobombing Rubin’s images when they started drawing up plans for the observatory more than two decades ago. But as the space around Earth becomes increasingly congested, researchers are having to find fresh ways to cope — or else lose precious data from Rubin and hundreds of other observatories.The number of working satellites has soared in the past five years to around 11,000, mostly because of constellations of orbiters that provide Internet connectivity around the globe (see ‘Satellite surge’). Just one company, SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, has more than 7,000 operational Starlink satellites, all launched since 2019; OneWeb, a space communications company in London, has more than 630 satellites in its constellation. On paper, tens to hundreds of thousands more are planned from a variety of companies and nations, although probably not all of these will be launched.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Satellites play a crucial part in connecting people, including bringing Internet to remote communities and emergency responders. But the rising number can be a problem for scientists because the satellites interfere with ground-based astronomical observations, by creating bright streaks on images and electromagnetic interference with radio telescopes. The satellite boom also poses other threats, including adding pollution to the atmosphere.When the first Starlinks launched, some astronomers warned of existential threats to their discipline. Now, researchers in astronomy and other fields are working with satellite companies to help quantify and mitigate the impacts on science — and society. “There is growing interest in collaborating and finding solutions together,” says Giuliana Rotola, a space-policy researcher at the Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa, Italy.Timing things rightThe first step to reduce satellite interference is knowing when and where a satellite will pass above an observatory. “The aim is to minimize the surprise,” says Mike Peel, an astronomer at Imperial College London.Before the launch of Starlinks, astronomers had no centralized reference for tracking satellites. Now, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) has a virtual Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky from Satellite Constellation Interference (CPS), which serves as an information hub and to which researchers, including Peel and Rotola, volunteer their time.One of the centre’s tools, called SatChecker, draws on a public database of satellite orbits, fed by information from observers and companies that track objects in space. Astronomers can use SatChecker to confirm what satellite is passing overhead during their observations. The tool isn’t perfect; atmospheric drag and intentional manoeuvring can affect a satellite’s position, and the public database doesn’t always reflect the latest information. For instance, the BlueWalker 3 satellite from telecommunications firm AST SpaceMobile in Midland, Texas, launched in 2022 and was sometimes brighter than most stars; yet uncertainty of its position was so great at times that astronomers had difficulty predicting whether it would be in their field of view for their night-time observations.Starlink satellites leave streaks in a 2019 image taken by a 4-meter telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.Tools such as SatChecker help telescope operators to avoid problems by allowing them to target a different part of the sky when a satellite passes overhead or by simply pausing observations as it flies by. It would aid astronomers if SatChecker had even more accurate information about satellite positions, but there are constraints on improving the system. SatChecker data come from the US Space Force, which draws on a global network of sensors that tracks objects in orbit and issues updates on satellite locations as often as several times a day. The frequency of these updates is limited by factors such as how often a sensor can observe an object and whether the sensor can distinguish what it’s looking at.Currently, satellite streaks are a relatively minor issue for telescope operators. But the problem will grow as satellite numbers continue to increase drastically, meaning more observation time will be lost, and this issue will be magnified for Rubin.Fixing the streaksRubin, which cost US$810 million to build, is a unique case because it scans large swathes of the sky frequently — meaning it can detect rapidly changing phenomena such as incoming asteroids or cosmic explosions. Astronomers don’t want to be fooled by passing satellites, as happened in 2017 when researchers spotted what they thought was a γ-ray burst — high-energy flashes of light — from a distant galaxy but turned out to be sunlight reflecting off a piece of space junk.Rubin’s powerful camera, coupled with its 8.4-metre telescope, will take about 1,000 nightly exposures of the sky, each about 45 times the area of the full Moon. That’s more wide-field pictures of the sky than any optical observatory has ever taken. Simulations suggest that if satellite numbers in low Earth orbit rise to around 40,000 over the 10 years of Rubin’s survey — a not-impossible forecast — then at least 10% of its images, and the majority of those taken during twilight, will contain a satellite trail3.SpaceX took early steps to try to mitigate the problem. Working with Rubin astronomers, the company tested changes to the design and positions of Starlinks to try to keep their brightness beneath a target threshold. Amazon, the retail and technology giant based in Seattle, Washington, is also testing mitigations on prototype satellites for its planned Kuiper constellation. Such changes reduce, but don’t eliminate, the problem.To limit satellite interference, Rubin astronomers are creating observation schedules to help researchers avoid certain parts of the sky (for example, near the horizon) and at certain times (such as around twilight)4. For when they can’t avoid the satellites, Rubin researchers have incorporated steps into their data-processing pipeline to detect and remove satellite streaks. All these changes mean less time doing science and more time processing data, but they need to be done, astronomers say. “We are really looking forward to getting data from Rubin and seeing how it turns out,” Peel says.For other observatories, the IAU CPS is working on tools to help astronomers identify and correct satellite streaks in their data. One is a new database of crowdsourced observations of satellite brightnesses called SCORE, which is currently being beta tested and is planned for wider release in the coming months. This will help scientists to work backwards — they might see something puzzling in their past observations and be able to work it out, Peel says.The database “is definitely a very valuable tool” because it’s one of few that have data freely available, says Marco Langbroek, a space-tracking specialist at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. As a beta tester, Langbroek has added a number of entries to SCORE, including measurements of a NASA solar sail that changes in brightness as it tumbles through space. Going forwards, he says, SCORE will be most useful if a lot of astronomers contribute high-quality observations to the database, thereby building up a resource over time.Tuning things outAstronomers who work in the radio portion of the electromagnetic spectrum face extra challenges when it comes to satellites.Big radio telescopes are typically located in remote regions, to be as far as possible from mobile-phone masts and other technological infrastructure that leak radio emissions. But satellites can’t be avoided. “If signals are coming from the sky, they’re always there,” says Federico Di Vruno, an astronomer at the Square Kilometre Array Observatory in Jodrell Bank, UK, and co-director of the IAU CPS.When satellites transmit signals, the electromagnetic interference can overwhelm faint radio signals coming from the cosmos. One solution is to re-direct or temporarily turn off satellite transmissions. The US National Radio Astronomy Observatory and SpaceX have been working on ways to accomplish this, and the company now momentarily redirects or disables transmissions when Starlinks pass above sensitive telescopes including the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia5. The method requires voluntary buy-in by all partners, plus a lot of data sharing and intensive programming by the companies and by the astronomers, but it does reduce interference. It has been successful enough that small group of radio astronomers visited China last month to discuss the strategy with satellite operators and scientists there.An image made from multiple exposures shows streaks from Starlink satellites, the International Space Station and other satellites over a site in Wales.But as soon as one solution is found, fresh challenges appear. One is the rise of ‘direct-to-cell’ satellites, which function like mobile-phone towers in space and can transmit to areas on the ground that otherwise don’t have coverage. Optical astronomers worry about these because they are physically large and therefore bright6, and they are a big problem for radio astronomers because direct-to-cell transmissions are extremely powerful. If one of those hits a radio observatory, “the telescope might be blind for a little bit”, Di Vruno says. So astronomers and satellite operators are discussing how they can share information about these as well, to avoid each other when a satellite passes over an observatory.Another emerging challenge is ‘unintended’ emissions — which happen when satellites ‘leak’ radiation in wavelengths far outside the bands typically used for transmissions and other tasks. Early tests for the Square Kilometre Array radio telescopes, which are under construction in Australia and South Africa, discovered such leakage coming from Starlinks and other satellites7.Many of these unintended emissions are at the low frequencies that are used in some studies including those of the early Universe. So far, astronomers haven’t come up with a good solution, other than scheduling telescopes to not record data when a satellite passes through the part of the sky being observed. In the future, it is possible that authorities such as the International Telecommunication Union might be able to issue regulations on this, as it already does for other shared uses of the electromagnetic spectrum.Cleaning up the atmosphereAstronomers aren’t the only researchers concerned about the impacts of satellite constellations. In the past few years, a growing number of atmospheric scientists have been warning that these fleets will pollute Earth’s upper atmosphere during launches and then when their orbits decline and they burn up. Researchers are just starting to get to grips with the scope of this pollution, says Connor Barker, an atmospheric chemist at University College London (UCL).The point of satellite constellations is to have lots of satellites in orbit, but refreshing them when new technology comes along means that the pace of launches and re-entries will accelerate. In February alone, an average of four Starlink satellites a day re-entered the atmosphere and burned up.Each re-entry adds chemicals to the upper atmosphere. In a 2023 study, researchers reported that measurements made during high-altitude aeroplane flights detected more than 20 chemical elements in Earth’s upper atmosphere that probably came from satellite re-entries, including aluminium, copper and lead8. Other work has found that satellite constellations contributed around 40% of many types of carbon emission from the space industry in 2022, including black carbon particles and carbon dioxide9 that could contribute to warming the atmosphere. It’s not yet clear how much this warms the planet or contributes to other environmental problems. Some early analyses suggest that satellite launches could contribute a small but measurable amount of ozone destruction.There are no regulations on satellite atmospheric pollution. Barker and his colleagues at UCL say a good first step towards a solution is to get better estimates of the scope of the problem. They have been building an emissions inventory for rocket launches and satellite re-entries, carefully tallying up the contaminants involved and estimating the altitudes at which they enter the atmosphere. “Even though this is currently a relatively small industry that’s having a relatively small impact on the atmosphere, we should still be aware of it,” says Eloise Marais, an atmospheric chemist at UCL.Researchers are trying to raise the profile of these and other concerns linked to satellite fleets. Some of these issues were discussed in February in Vienna, at a meeting of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. It was the first time that the committee formally discussed the impacts of satellite constellations on astronomy.No major actions were taken, as expected for these early discussions. But “now all of the member states know of dark and quiet skies”, Di Vruno says. That in itself, he says, is a success.This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on March 18, 2025.

Urban Wildfire Smoke Sensors Miss Harmful Chemicals

As fires burned in Los Angeles this year, newer toxin monitors found contaminants that aren’t measured by standard methods. Now scientists and officials are pushing for better detection

When the catastrophic Los Angeles fires broke out in January of 2025, John Volckens suspected firefighters and residents were breathing toxic air from the burning homes, buildings, and cars, but it was unclear how much risk the public faced. So, the professor of environmental health at Colorado State University devised a plan to get answers.Volckens shipped 10 air pollution detectors to Los Angeles to measure the amounts of heavy metals, benzene, and other chemicals released by the flames, which burned more than 16,000 homes, businesses, and other structures, making it one of the country’s costliest natural disasters.“These disaster events keep happening. They release pollution into the environment and to the surrounding community,” said Volckens, who shared his results with local air regulators. “We have this kind of traumatic experience, and then we’re left with: Well, what did we just breathe in?”On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Scientists and public health officials have long tracked the pollutants that cause smog, acid rain, and other environmental health hazards and shared them with the public through the local Air Quality Index. But the monitoring system misses hundreds of harmful chemicals released in urban fires, and the Los Angeles fires have led to a renewed push for state and federal regulators to do more as climate change drives up the frequency of these natural disasters.It’s questionable whether the Trump administration will act, however. Earlier this month, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced what he described as the “biggest deregulatory” action in history, which critics warn will lead to a rollback of environmental health regulations.While Air Quality Index values are a good starting place for knowing what’s in the air, they don’t provide a full picture of pollutants, especially during disasters, said Yifang Zhu, a professor of environmental health sciences at UCLA. In fact, the AQI could be in a healthy range, “but you could still be exposed to higher air toxins from the fires,” she added.Heavy smoke from the Eaton fire in Los Angeles.Josh EdelsonAFP via Getty ImagesIn February, nearly a dozen lawmakers from California called on the EPA to create a task force of local and federal authorities to better monitor what’s in the air and inform the public. Locals are “unsure of the actual risks they face and confused by conflicting reports about how safe it is to breathe the air outside, which may lead to families not taking adequate protective measures,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to James Payne, who was then the acting EPA administrator. The EPA press office declined to comment in an e-mail to KFF Health News.Lawmakers have also introduced bills in Congress and in the California legislature to address the gap. A measure by U.S. Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) and U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) would direct the EPA to allocate grant money to local air pollution agencies to communicate the risks of wildfire smoke, including deploying air monitors. Meanwhile, a bill by Democratic state Assembly member Lisa Calderon would create a “Wildfire Smoke Research and Education Fund” to study the health impacts of wildfire smoke, especially on firefighters and residents affected by fires.The South Coast Air Quality Management District, a regional air pollution control agency, operates about 35 air monitoring stations across nearly 11,000 square miles of the Los Angeles region to measure pollutants like ozone and carbon monoxide.During the fires, the agency, which is responsible for the air quality of 16.8 million residents, relied on its network of stations to monitor five common pollutants, including PM2.5, the fine particles that make up smoke and can travel deep inside the body. After the fires, the South Coast AQMD deployed two mobile monitoring vans to assess air quality in cleanup areas and expanded neighborhood-level monitoring during debris removal, said Jason Low, head of the agency’s monitoring and analysis division.Local officials also received the data collected by Volcken’s devices, which arrived on-site four days after the fires broke out. The monitors — about the size of a television remote control and housed in a plastic cover the size of a bread loaf — were placed at air monitoring stations around the fires’ perimeters, as well as at other sites, including in West Los Angeles and Santa Clarita. The devices, called AirPens, monitored dozens of air contaminants in real time and collected precise chemical measurements of smoke composition.Researchers replaced the sensors every week, sending the filters to a lab that analyzed them for measurements of volatile organic compounds like benzene, lead, and black carbon, along with other carcinogens. Volcken’s devices provided public health officials with data for a month as cleanup started. The hope is that the information provided can help guide future health policies in fire-prone areas.“There’s not one device that can measure everything in real time,” Low said. “So, we have to rely on different tools for each different type of purpose of monitoring.”ASCENT, a national monitoring network funded by the National Science Foundation, registered big changes after the fires. One monitor, about 11 miles south of the Eaton fire in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, detected 40 times the normal amount of chlorine in the air and 110 times the typical amount of lead in the days following the fires. It was clear the chemical spikes came from urban wildfire smoke, which is more dangerous than what would be emitted when trees and bushes burn in rural areas, said Richard Flagan, the co-principal investigator at the network’s site in Los Angeles.“Ultimately, the purpose is to get the data out there in real time, both for the public to see but also for people who are doing other aspects of research,” said Flagan, adding that chemical measurements are critical for epidemiologists who are developing health statistics or doing long-term studies of the impact of air pollution on peoples’ health.Small, low-cost sensors could fill in gaps as government networks age or fail to adequately capture the full picture of what’s in the air. Such sensors can identify pollution hot spots and improve wildfire smoke warnings, according to a March 2024 U.S. Government Accountability Office report.Although the devices have become smaller and more accurate in the past decade, some pollutants require analysis with X-ray scans and other costly high-level equipment, said J. Alfredo Gómez, director of the Natural Resources and Environment team at the GAO. And Gómez cautioned that the quality of the data can vary depending on what the devices monitor.“Low-cost sensors do a good job of measuring PM2.5 but not such a good job for some of these other air toxins, where they still need to do more work,” Gómez said.UCLA’s Zhu said the emerging technology of portable pollution monitors means residents — not just government and scientists — might be able to install equipment in their backyards and broaden the picture of what’s happening in the air at the most local level.“If the fires are predicted to be worse in the future, it might be a worthwhile investment to have some ability to capture specific types of pollutants that are not routinely measured by government stations,” Zhu said.KFF Health News, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

New Mexico set to become third state to implement full PFAS product ban

New Mexico is poised to become the third state to institute a full-fledged ban on products that contain toxic "forever chemicals," as two key bills head to the governor's desk. The concurrent pieces of legislation, which have both passed through the state Legislature, would prohibit most items that contain these compounds, while also deeming specific...

New Mexico is poised to become the third state to institute a full-fledged ban on products that contain toxic "forever chemicals," as two key bills head to the governor's desk. The concurrent pieces of legislation, which have both passed through the state Legislature, would prohibit most items that contain these compounds, while also deeming specific types of discarded firefighting foam as hazardous waste. The chemicals in question, called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are notorious for their propensity to linger in the human body and in the environment. Linked to various types of cancers and other serious illnesses, PFAS are found in numerous household products, as well as in certain kinds of firefighting foam. The first bill, H.B. 212, would ban products that contain intentionally added PFAS and would authorize the state's Environmental Improvement Board to adopt relevant rules. Starting on Jan. 1, 2027, manufacturers would not be able to sell or distribute cookware, food packaging, dental floss and juvenile products that have intentionally added PFAS. The same would apply to carpets, cleaning fluids, cosmetics, fabric treatments, menstrual products, textiles, ski wax and upholstered furniture on Jan. 1, 2028. With respect to pesticides, fertilizers and other agricultural materials — many of which contain PFAS — the Environmental Improvement Board would consult with the New Mexico Department of Agriculture before setting rules on these subjects.  There would be some exceptions to the prospective ban, such as those items that the board has determined "to be essential for health, safety or the functioning of society and for which alternatives are not reasonably available." The accompanying piece of legislation, H.B. 140, focuses on a range of chemicals, including PFAS, and provides new clarity on the meaning of the term "hazardous waste." The bill would redefine hazardous waste as "any solid waste or combination of solid wastes" that because of its amount, concentration or characteristics could "cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness." Among the specific hazardous waste items mentioned is "discarded aqueous film-forming foam containing intentionally added [PFAS]." If Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) signs the two bills as anticipated, New Mexico would become the third state to implement a near-complete prohibition on PFAS-containing products. The state would follow in the footsteps of Maine and Minnesota, which passed their respective laws in 2021 and 2023. Numerous other states have approved legislation forbidding PFAS in certain product categories, rather than instituting bans across the board. While the three-year price of preventing PFAS pollution via such a ban would climb to about $2.8 million, the cost of removing and destroying just one pound of PFAS from water could be up to $18 million, according to an analysis of the legislation from the New Mexico Environment Department. "With approximately 1,100 public drinking water systems in New Mexico serving 94 percent of our residents, preventing contamination is the only affordable means of securing our drinking water supply," the analysis concluded.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.