Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

In Surprising Turn, Crabbers Take to Whale-Safe Crab Pots

News Feed
Thursday, January 9, 2025

Crab season aboard Khevin Mellegers’ boat, the Areona. This spring was his second time trying out experimental “pop-up” crab pots. (Courtesy of Khevin Mellegers)The first time Half Moon Bay crabber Khevin Mellegers heard about the whale-safe, ropeless crabbing gear commonly called pop-up pots, he was intrigued. It was about a decade ago, not long after humpback whales started showing up in Northern California waters during Dungeness crabbing season—and inevitably getting tangled in crab pot lines. Crabbers like Mellegers had weathered shortened seasons and gear restrictions meant to protect the whales. Coupled with the multi-year closure of the salmon fishery, his financial outlook was grim, and he was emotionally drained by all the closures. The choice was to get out of crabbing—or put his money on this newfangled gear, which promised to keep crabbers crabbing. But he got cold feet. The idea of pop-ups had first popped up in a working group to devise whale-safe gear that Mellegers was part of—a collaboration among crabbers, conservationists, engineers, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). But the close-knit crabbing community has been slow to warm to new pots, as Bay Nature found in speaking with more than a dozen NorCal crabbers. The vocal majority of the fleet opposed them in recent years, with worries about high cost and injuries, and skepticism that they’d even work. Open antagonism from many fleet members dissuaded crabbers like Mellegers who were more pop-up-curious. Only one crabber tried out the first prototype in 2021. In 2023, two crabbers braved their community’s ire. Some who did trial the gear say their boats and gear were damaged in retaliatory acts by disgruntled fellow crabbers.  At last the idea is gaining steam. In 2024, Mellegers and 18 other commercial Dungeness crabbers working from Point Concepcion to the California–Oregon border tried out pop-up pots during the spring Dungeness season, which runs April to May. Now the results from the state’s experimental gear trial are in—and they look promising. Crabbers report a steep but short learning curve. In 2023, Mellegers’ first go-around with the gear, he was crabbing alone and unsure he’d be able to manage the line with multiple pots on his own. Most challenging were the logistics of handling all the new gear, which he describes as a game of Tetris on a tightly packed boat: “You’re dealing with buckets of line traps, traps with retrofit[ters], buoys, how to store them, how to set them up [in relation] to where you’re going to be sitting,” he says.  But after a few tries—and getting a few more hands on deck—he says: “It was a breeze.”  Many a Bay Area holiday Dungeness feast has been in the past decade delayed or shortened commercial crab seasons, triggered by heightened risks to whales and domoic acid in the meat. Both problems have been linked with warmer ocean waters. (Kate Golden)New pots are a response to a new problem California fishing communities suffer from the effects of climate change: rising seas, extreme weather, and a warming ocean directly impact their lives and livelihoods. The infamously warm Pacific ocean waters of 2015–2016 (often called “the Blob”), triggered algal blooms along West Coast shores. Crabs’ ingestion of the algal neurotoxin domoic acid has triggered season delays since then. The Blob also led to exploding populations of anchovies near West Coast shores—which in turn enticed whales into coastal waters, just when and where crabbers traditionally lowered their pots. Whales got entangled. The CDFW was forced to restrict the type of gear crabbers used, the number of pots, and the length of the seasons. Crabbers have reported losing up to 80 percent of their annual income. And the whales keep arriving earlier, delaying the crab fishery—this year is no exception—possibly because of changing climate cues, though researchers are still working out why. In 2023, Dungeness crab pot lines ensnared at least 10 of the 27 whales that were documented as entangled off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. By the end of 2024, the CDFW had documented 14 entangled humpback whales in California, four of which were confirmed Dungeness crab pot lines. Traditional crab traps are stacked up in Noyo Harbor, Fort Bragg, in March 2024. (Amy Elisabeth Moore)Traditional crab pots have lines that extend from the pot on the seafloor up to a buoy at the surface. With pop-ups, the line remains coiled on the pot. To retrieve the pot, the crabber signals a transducer to release the line. The line pops up to the surface and the crabber reels the pot to the boat. Bart Chadwick, co-owner of Sub Sea Sonics, one of several companies that is trialing pop-up pots, says he initially treated the task as a technical problem. Which it is, in part. But it is also a human problem: finding a solution that’s “commensurate with all the requirements for fishing—and (then) getting people to accept that, and then getting the state to accept it,” he said. How it went: pretty well! The technology seems to have worked in the spring trial. Gear makers Sub Sea Sonic and Guardian Ropeless Systems reported that 98 percent of the 23,048 deployed pots were retrieved. That’s actually better than traditional pots’ annual loss rate of 5–10 percent, according to CDFW data. And crabbers BN spoke with were happy with their haul and profit for the spring season.   This year, costs have come down, putting pop-ups in range of traditional gear, according to Chadwick. “We’ve got the gear at a price point now where it’s not uneconomical [for] fishermen. [It] adds about $100 or so, and should last many years,” he said. Crabbers who used the pop-up gear find the outlay for the upgrade (about $1000 per sled, which can hold up to fifty pots) canceled out other costs (such as buoys and vertical lines for the fifty pots).  Crew member Jonathan Tim, holding a pallet, prepares pop-up pots aboard Pale Horse, captained by Brand Little, in April 2024. (Brand Little)Crucially, crabbers using the pop-up pots reported no injuries, said Geoff Shester, senior scientist for Oceana, an environmental advocacy organization, which has collaborated on the project since 2015. This spring, the CDFW is expanding the gear trial to 40 vessels, says Ryan Bartling, CDFW senior environmental scientist. The agency also is endorsing an additional ten pots per line (for a total of 20 pots), and more pots per boat. While the agency isn’t likely to make everyone use the pots, officials hope to find a solution which will allow crabbers to harvest through the end of the spring season. Agency officials feel “stuck in the middle” between the two camps, Bartling says. “There’s this tug of war between those that want to fish pop-up, and those that want to have a traditional fishery only.” He says the agency is working toward authorizing pop-up pots for widespread use as an “alternative gear” in future spring seasons.  Meanwhile, the nearly tenfold increase in trial participants this year suggests the fleet’s growing acceptance of the new gear. “Having 19 people go out and actually try the gear has been really phenomenal,” Chadwick says. The working group received “a tremendous amount of feedback” from the crabbers with pointers on how to improve the gear. Left, crew members prepare pop-up pots on Jacqueline, Stephen Melz’s 58-foot vessel; right, in April 2024, Jacqueline’s crew reel in pop-up pots. (Courtesy of Stephen Melz) Stephen Melz, of Half Moon Bay, participated in the experimental gear pilot for a second time this spring. It took him and his crew a couple of tries. “We did it the wrong way twice,” he admitted ruefully, “setting it off the boats the wrong way” and not knowing how to disconnect the crab pots from the groundline. But after that, Melz caught a lot of crabs with the pop-ups—and he didn’t lose a single pot. “It’s amazing,” he said. “We started the season with 150 pots. We brought 150 pots back in.” When the season wrapped up, “I was so sad to sack out,” Melz says. “We caught a whole bunch of crabs. And it was exciting to do it.”Bay Nature spoke to plenty of crabbers who didn’t try the experimental gear and don’t plan to—they’re still skeptical. “We can solve the [entanglement] problem without increased costs,” says longtime commercial crabber Tony Anello. “And that’s because we know what we’re doing. Basically, we’ve been in the game long enough.” But Melz hopes pop-up pots will keep the spring season open, effectively doubling crabbers’ time on the ocean. “I was completely impressed with this. It was amazing. Given the opportunity to fish either pop-up gear or traditional gear in the spring, I would take up the pop-up any day of the week.”

Yet again this winter, Dungeness season was delayed to keep whales safe. In a surprising turn after years of adamant resistance, more Dungeness crabbers are trying out—and pretty darn happy with—new pots designed to keep humpbacks from getting entangled. The post In Surprising Turn, Crabbers Take to Whale-Safe Crab Pots appeared first on Bay Nature.

Sunset over crab pots on a boat
Crab season aboard Khevin Mellegers’ boat, the Areona. This spring was his second time trying out experimental “pop-up” crab pots. (Courtesy of Khevin Mellegers)

The first time Half Moon Bay crabber Khevin Mellegers heard about the whale-safe, ropeless crabbing gear commonly called pop-up pots, he was intrigued. It was about a decade ago, not long after humpback whales started showing up in Northern California waters during Dungeness crabbing season—and inevitably getting tangled in crab pot lines. Crabbers like Mellegers had weathered shortened seasons and gear restrictions meant to protect the whales. Coupled with the multi-year closure of the salmon fishery, his financial outlook was grim, and he was emotionally drained by all the closures. The choice was to get out of crabbing—or put his money on this newfangled gear, which promised to keep crabbers crabbing. But he got cold feet.

The idea of pop-ups had first popped up in a working group to devise whale-safe gear that Mellegers was part of—a collaboration among crabbers, conservationists, engineers, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). But the close-knit crabbing community has been slow to warm to new pots, as Bay Nature found in speaking with more than a dozen NorCal crabbers. The vocal majority of the fleet opposed them in recent years, with worries about high cost and injuries, and skepticism that they’d even work. Open antagonism from many fleet members dissuaded crabbers like Mellegers who were more pop-up-curious. Only one crabber tried out the first prototype in 2021. In 2023, two crabbers braved their community’s ire. Some who did trial the gear say their boats and gear were damaged in retaliatory acts by disgruntled fellow crabbers. 

At last the idea is gaining steam. In 2024, Mellegers and 18 other commercial Dungeness crabbers working from Point Concepcion to the California–Oregon border tried out pop-up pots during the spring Dungeness season, which runs April to May. Now the results from the state’s experimental gear trial are in—and they look promising.

Crabbers report a steep but short learning curve. In 2023, Mellegers’ first go-around with the gear, he was crabbing alone and unsure he’d be able to manage the line with multiple pots on his own. Most challenging were the logistics of handling all the new gear, which he describes as a game of Tetris on a tightly packed boat: “You’re dealing with buckets of line traps, traps with retrofit[ters], buoys, how to store them, how to set them up [in relation] to where you’re going to be sitting,” he says. 

But after a few tries—and getting a few more hands on deck—he says: “It was a breeze.” 

A photograph of a Dungeness crab on shore
Many a Bay Area holiday Dungeness feast has been in the past decade delayed or shortened commercial crab seasons, triggered by heightened risks to whales and domoic acid in the meat. Both problems have been linked with warmer ocean waters. (Kate Golden)

New pots are a response to a new problem

California fishing communities suffer from the effects of climate change: rising seas, extreme weather, and a warming ocean directly impact their lives and livelihoods. The infamously warm Pacific ocean waters of 2015–2016 (often called “the Blob”), triggered algal blooms along West Coast shores. Crabs’ ingestion of the algal neurotoxin domoic acid has triggered season delays since then. The Blob also led to exploding populations of anchovies near West Coast shores—which in turn enticed whales into coastal waters, just when and where crabbers traditionally lowered their pots. Whales got entangled. The CDFW was forced to restrict the type of gear crabbers used, the number of pots, and the length of the seasons. Crabbers have reported losing up to 80 percent of their annual income. And the whales keep arriving earlier, delaying the crab fishery—this year is no exception—possibly because of changing climate cues, though researchers are still working out why. In 2023, Dungeness crab pot lines ensnared at least 10 of the 27 whales that were documented as entangled off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. By the end of 2024, the CDFW had documented 14 entangled humpback whales in California, four of which were confirmed Dungeness crab pot lines.

Unused traps in stacks
Traditional crab traps are stacked up in Noyo Harbor, Fort Bragg, in March 2024. (Amy Elisabeth Moore)

Traditional crab pots have lines that extend from the pot on the seafloor up to a buoy at the surface. With pop-ups, the line remains coiled on the pot. To retrieve the pot, the crabber signals a transducer to release the line. The line pops up to the surface and the crabber reels the pot to the boat. Bart Chadwick, co-owner of Sub Sea Sonics, one of several companies that is trialing pop-up pots, says he initially treated the task as a technical problem. Which it is, in part. But it is also a human problem: finding a solution that’s “commensurate with all the requirements for fishing—and (then) getting people to accept that, and then getting the state to accept it,” he said.

How it went: pretty well!

The technology seems to have worked in the spring trial. Gear makers Sub Sea Sonic and Guardian Ropeless Systems reported that 98 percent of the 23,048 deployed pots were retrieved. That’s actually better than traditional pots’ annual loss rate of 5–10 percent, according to CDFW data. And crabbers BN spoke with were happy with their haul and profit for the spring season.  

This year, costs have come down, putting pop-ups in range of traditional gear, according to Chadwick. “We’ve got the gear at a price point now where it’s not uneconomical [for] fishermen. [It] adds about $100 or so, and should last many years,” he said. Crabbers who used the pop-up gear find the outlay for the upgrade (about $1000 per sled, which can hold up to fifty pots) canceled out other costs (such as buoys and vertical lines for the fifty pots). 

A wide angle view of the back of a boat
Crew member Jonathan Tim, holding a pallet, prepares pop-up pots aboard Pale Horse, captained by Brand Little, in April 2024. (Brand Little)

Crucially, crabbers using the pop-up pots reported no injuries, said Geoff Shester, senior scientist for Oceana, an environmental advocacy organization, which has collaborated on the project since 2015. This spring, the CDFW is expanding the gear trial to 40 vessels, says Ryan Bartling, CDFW senior environmental scientist. The agency also is endorsing an additional ten pots per line (for a total of 20 pots), and more pots per boat. While the agency isn’t likely to make everyone use the pots, officials hope to find a solution which will allow crabbers to harvest through the end of the spring season. Agency officials feel “stuck in the middle” between the two camps, Bartling says. “There’s this tug of war between those that want to fish pop-up, and those that want to have a traditional fishery only.” He says the agency is working toward authorizing pop-up pots for widespread use as an “alternative gear” in future spring seasons. 

Meanwhile, the nearly tenfold increase in trial participants this year suggests the fleet’s growing acceptance of the new gear. “Having 19 people go out and actually try the gear has been really phenomenal,” Chadwick says. The working group received “a tremendous amount of feedback” from the crabbers with pointers on how to improve the gear.


Left, crew members prepare pop-up pots on Jacqueline, Stephen Melz’s 58-foot vessel; right, in April 2024, Jacqueline’s crew reel in pop-up pots. (Courtesy of Stephen Melz)

Stephen Melz, of Half Moon Bay, participated in the experimental gear pilot for a second time this spring. It took him and his crew a couple of tries. “We did it the wrong way twice,” he admitted ruefully, “setting it off the boats the wrong way” and not knowing how to disconnect the crab pots from the groundline. But after that, Melz caught a lot of crabs with the pop-ups—and he didn’t lose a single pot. “It’s amazing,” he said. “We started the season with 150 pots. We brought 150 pots back in.” When the season wrapped up, “I was so sad to sack out,” Melz says. “We caught a whole bunch of crabs. And it was exciting to do it.”Bay Nature spoke to plenty of crabbers who didn’t try the experimental gear and don’t plan to—they’re still skeptical. “We can solve the [entanglement] problem without increased costs,” says longtime commercial crabber Tony Anello. “And that’s because we know what we’re doing. Basically, we’ve been in the game long enough.” But Melz hopes pop-up pots will keep the spring season open, effectively doubling crabbers’ time on the ocean. “I was completely impressed with this. It was amazing. Given the opportunity to fish either pop-up gear or traditional gear in the spring, I would take up the pop-up any day of the week.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Time Spent in Nature is Good for Your Brain, but an Excess Can Negate These Benefits

A “Goldilocks” measure of green space might help stave off dementia, but an excess could lead to cognitive decline

Time Spent in Nature Can Be Good—and Sometimes Bad— for Your BrainA “Goldilocks” measure of green space might help stave off dementia, but an excess could lead to cognitive declineBy Teresa Schubert edited by Gary StixThere's nothing like a good walk through your local park to unwind and release stress from a busy day. Taking some time in nature is undeniably good for you, with well-documented benefits to physical and mental health. But new research suggests that when it comes to the risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, easy access to nature can sometimes help but, at other times, can be too much of a good thing.The causes of dementia—a broad category of conditions that can affect memory, language and other brain capacities—are multifaceted and complex. There is often a genetic component, but there are also contributions from health risk factors that arise throughout life. In 2024 the Lancet Commission on dementia identified 14 such factors that reliably increase the risk of developing dementia. These include physical health factors such as cardiovascular disease, high LDL cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity and traumatic brain injury, as well as psychological factors such as depression and social isolation.Thousands of studies provide solid evidence about the dangers of these risk factors, but researchers are far from having all the answers about dementia. In the past 10 or so years, researchers have begun looking beyond these established risks to the effect of an individual’s physical and social environment, which might be more under our control than factors such as genetic predisposition. You might not be able to change your genes, but in some cases, you can change where you live or your hobbies or habits. According to Marco Vinceti of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia in Italy, “there is growing and convincing evidence that risk of neurodegenerative disease, including cognitive impairment and dementia, can be substantially reduced by environmental and behavioral factors, and this may even be true in individuals having high genetic susceptibility.” Studying the role of environmental factors has led to the recent discovery that exposure to air pollution (such as from wildfire smoke or heavy traffic) increases your chances of developing dementia. This is also the line of questioning that led researchers to discover the positive effects of green space.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.The benefits of green space for mental and brain health are numerous. Living near and spending time in green space (including parks, wooded areas and even farmland) can decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes and is associated with a lower risk of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia later in life. According to Anjum Hajat, an epidemiologist at the University of Washington School of Public Health, access to green space “is important because it provides people with an easy, low-cost option to improve their health. Spending time in nature may have other benefits, too, like increasing physical activity or increasing time spent with friends and family; both of these things have many health benefits.”Based on this research, you might be ready to give up city life. You might presume that more green space is better, and that living on a few wooded acres with nothing but trees for miles around will lead to the lowest possible chance of dementia. It turns out this is not so simple. A 2022 research study led by Federico Zagnoli of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia revealed that more green space is not always better. The researchers found a U-shaped association between exposure to green space and dementia risk—low levels of green space were associated with a higher likelihood of developing dementia, and medium levels were linked to a lower risk. But the highest level of green space exposure didn’t reduce dementia risk relative to the medium level—and in some cases even increased it! In other words, too little green space has an adverse effect, but so might too much of it.Why might more of a good thing be bad? Living out in nature can mean lower access to medical and social services, fewer places to socialize and higher chances of social isolation—circumstances that would otherwise support brain health and reduce dementia risk. Although research on some of these factors is still ongoing and not yet certain, there is solid evidence for the risks of social isolation. As Vinceti puts it, “The higher risk of dementia associated with ‘extremely high’ green spaces around the place of residence is likely attributable to social isolation and socioeconomic disadvantage in certain rural areas. Rurality may also be correlated with other risk factors, such as lower socioeconomic status or high pesticide exposure.” So the conclusion is that green space itself is not bad for your brain health, but living on a few acres of land surrounded by forest and farmland might increase your risk of dementia in other ways. Although trees have a positive effect, they are no substitute for a nearby hospital, local community center and a walkable neighborhood with friendly neighbors. Aiming for the lowest possible dementia risk is all about a balance: enough neighborhood density to have easy access to services and social support but plenty of trees for a walk in the park..

Defra asks England’s biggest landowners to come up with plans to restore nature

Exclusive: Representatives of king, National Trust and others called on to work together to protect environmentUK politics live – latest updatesSteve Reed called in some of England’s biggest landowners for a meeting on Thursday, asking them to come up with meaningful plans to restore nature on their estates.Representatives for King Charles and Prince William were among those at the meeting, asked by the environment secretary to draft new land management plans to help meet the country’s legal Environment Act targets. Continue reading...

Steve Reed called in some of England’s biggest landowners for a meeting on Thursday, asking them to come up with meaningful plans to restore nature on their estates.Representatives for King Charles and Prince William were among those at the meeting, asked by the environment secretary to draft new land management plans to help meet the country’s legal Environment Act targets.The landowners also included third-sector organisations such as the National Trust, RSPB and the Wildlife Trusts, along with representatives from the government estate such as the Ministry of Defence and Natural England.Between them, the assembled “National Estate for Nature” group own 10% of England’s land, making their cooperation crucial if ministers are to meet legally binding environment targets and stop the decline of nature.Reed called them to action to collectively protect and restore nature on their estates across England, asking them to report back on potential new approaches for sustainable land use, land management, change, or investment. He said the group should set minimum standards for land management plans, with clear milestones for nature restoration and protections.He said: “Landowners must go further and faster to restore our natural world. The National Estate for Nature, who manage a tenth of the land in this country, have a responsibility to future generations to leave the environment in a better state. We have a unique opportunity to work together on common sense changes that create a win-win for nature, the economy, and make the best use of the land around us.”Just 8% of the land and sea in England is protected for nature. The government has a target to reach 30% by 2030, but wildlife groups say the proportion of land “effectively protected” for nature is even lower than the official statistic, at 2.93%. Nature across England continues to be in decline, with wild bird numbers decreasing each year. The 2023 state of nature report described the UK as one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world, based on declines since the 1970s.The Labour government hopes to accelerate efforts to meet these targetsand recently legalised the wild release of beavers and announced a land use framework that will provide guidance on how to best use land for food and nature.The environmental campaigner Guy Shrubsole said: “Major landowners in England like the Forestry Commission, crown estate and water companies own millions of acres of land – it’s only right that we expect them to repair the badly damaged habitats that they own.”He argued that large landowners should make their plans to protect nature public so that they can be scrutinised and held to account: “The government must mandate these landowners to publish their plans for nature restoration, so the public can see how the land is being looked after on our behalf – and change the outdated legal duties of public bodies to prioritise restoring ecosystems and fixing the climate crisis.”skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionHarry Bowell, the director of land and nature at the National Trust, said: “We are delighted to join the National Estate for Nature group, bringing the National Trust’s stewardship of 250,000 hectares to the table. As the government’s land use framework makes clear, a transformation in the use of land is needed if we are to meet our nature and climate targets. The biggest landowners – us included – have the power, and responsibility, to drive forward that transformation.”Further quarterly meetings are expected to focus on developing and implementing agreed on-the-ground plans to drive nature’s recovery.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.