Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

If You're Wondering How Microplastics Even Get In Your Food, Read This

News Feed
Tuesday, February 25, 2025

LauriPatterson via Getty ImagesMany of the animals we eat, like tuna, have microplastics in their flesh.Food contaminants are always a hot topic, as we consumers have a natural desire to know exactly what we’re putting in our bodies when we purchase, prepare and eat our groceries. Social media broadens the audience for these conversations and debates, and over the course of the past year, we saw one food safety subject rise to the top of the algorithm: microplastics.TikTok couldn’t stop talking about microplastics and why they should be avoided … but what, exactly, are microplastics? How do they get into our food, and what potential health consequences can arise as a result?We turned to a group of food scientists, physicians and food safety experts to get some answers, and they provided a full tutorial on these much-discussed particles.What are microplastics?“Microplastics are tiny plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size, often invisible to the naked eye,” explained Dr. John La Puma, founder of ChefMD and Chef Clinic. To give some context for that size, Jessica Gavin, a certified food scientist located in Orange County, California, told us that microplastics are generally “about as small as a pencil eraser.”Gavin went on to say that microplastics are “solid particles made from synthetic polymers [that] do not dissolve or degrade naturally, persisting in the environment for a long time. They can either be manufactured to be small, such as the resin pellets found in various consumer products, or [can] result from the breakdown of larger plastic items.”An even smaller and sneakier version of these particles comes in the form of “nanoplastics, [which are] less than one micron wide, much thinner than human hair, and too tiny to be seen with the naked eye. These plastics vary in size, shape, and color and include different synthetic materials and chemical additives,” Gavin said.How do microplastics make their way into our food?So where do microplastics come from and how do they weasel their way into our food and water? La Puma said that microplastics “enter our food through various routes, including contamination of water sources, soil and air.”Gavin said that “microplastics primarily enter our food through environmental contamination, as plastics break down in places like landfills and leach into the soil and water where food is grown or caught. These particles can be found in various foods, including seafood, fish, crustaceans, salt, sugar, honey, bottled water and drinking water.”When environmental pollution gets into the food supply for animals, microplastics can be transferred to the humans who ultimately eat those animals. “Seafood can contain microplastics due to plastic that ends up in the ocean and gets ingested by sea life, often magnifying as larger sea animals consume smaller organisms. Some animals that humans consume, such as chickens and cows, may consume feed containing microplastics; other animals may ingest microplastics by ingesting smaller prey,” said Matt Allen, senior director of food advisory at the National Science Foundation.Allen also points out that plastic food packaging may contribute to microplastics entering the body. “Microplastics may also be present in ingredients used in food production and in food packaging, such as plastic wrappers or containers that can transfer microplastics into the food as they degrade or come into contact with food,” Allen said. However, according to Gavin, there’s a slight caveat to that concern: “Plastic is commonly used for packaging meat, fish, dairy and beverages, and there’s a potential for microplastics to be transferred to the food inside. However, the FDA states that there is insufficient evidence to confirm whether microplastics migrate from packaging into food and beverage.”Buena Vista Images via Getty Images"Beware of plastic-wrapped produce: plastic packaging often contains harmful chemicals,” said Dr. Amy Myers.What are the possible health consequences of consuming microplastics?When it comes to the question of whether microplastics can negatively affect our health after consumption, the simplest answer is that we just don’t know. “Consuming microplastics may cause health issues, although the full effects on humans are not completely understood. We still need more detailed studies and established safety guidelines to fully assess their impact,” Gavin told us. From La Puma’s perspective, the possible consequences involve the fact that microplastics are “active disruptors of our endocrine system, silent inflammation triggers, and potential long-term organ destroyers. They act as Trojan horses, carrying toxins and pathogens into our system.” The risks of microplastics may not be fully understood or documented, but Allen suspects that nanoplastics (the even smaller pieces of plastic) could be more harmful.Allen explained that even though your body can’t absorb the larger microplastic particles, they may carry chemicals that can be harmful to be exposed to. Worse yet, particles in the nano-size range can be absorbed by the body.“Current evidence suggests that these particles may be distributed throughout the body and have been found in the brain, placenta, veins and arteries and other organs,” Allen said. “The presence of these particles may cause inflammation and stress to the body leading to effects on the gut, immune system, nervous system, reproduction and cardiovascular system. Overall, the health effects associated with exposure to nano-sized plastic particles are not currently clear, but current evidence suggests significant concern.”How can we reduce the amount of microplastics that we ingest?While avoiding microplastics altogether may not be a realistic goal in this day and age, our experts insist that certain steps can be taken to limit the amount that you consume and to cut back on microplastics’ negative impact on the environment. “Embrace whole, unprocessed foods with a passion. Ultraprocessed, packaged items are not just nutritionally inferior; they’re potential microplastic delivery systems,” La Puma said.If you need to get fruits and vegetables at the grocery store and can’t swing by a CSA or farmers market, “beware of plastic-wrapped produce: plastic packaging often contains harmful chemicals. Bring cloth or mesh reusable produce bags to the store to avoid unnecessary plastic contamination,” recommended Dr. Amy Myers, a functional medicine physician, author and podcast host.Go Ad-Free — And Protect The Free PressThe next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won't back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism.For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us.You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.Getting rid of plastic storage containers and kitchen tools can also help reduce the presence of microplastics in your body. “Switch to reusable bags, bottles, and containers instead of plastic ones. Use wood or silicone cutting boards to prevent microplastics from releasing while chopping. Store food in glass or steel containers to avoid chemical leaching from plastics, especially when dealing with hot foods. For drinking, choose glass or steel bottles over plastic,” Gavin said.Allen said that the growing awareness of microplastics could lead to legislation and regulations that make these tiny problematic specks less of a concern in the future: “In the coming years, new standards and government regulations related to microplastics will likely be developed and introduced that will force manufacturers, packagers and supply chains to consider the fate and risk of such contaminants from the factory to the dump.”In the meantime, follow Allen’s advice and “[abide] by the manufacturer’s directions when using plastic food equipment such as cutting boards, utensils and nonstick pans. Check the product label for specific end uses, temperature or food restrictions, and whether it has been reviewed and/or tested by an independent third party.” Allen advised not using items like takeout containers or plastic utensils with very hot foods or in a microwave or dishwasher since “the plastic may break down and migrate into food.”

Experts reveal what to look out for, from our water sources to the plastic that our food is wrapped in.

LauriPatterson via Getty Images

Many of the animals we eat, like tuna, have microplastics in their flesh.

Food contaminants are always a hot topic, as we consumers have a natural desire to know exactly what we’re putting in our bodies when we purchase, prepare and eat our groceries. Social media broadens the audience for these conversations and debates, and over the course of the past year, we saw one food safety subject rise to the top of the algorithm: microplastics.

TikTok couldn’t stop talking about microplastics and why they should be avoided … but what, exactly, are microplastics? How do they get into our food, and what potential health consequences can arise as a result?

We turned to a group of food scientists, physicians and food safety experts to get some answers, and they provided a full tutorial on these much-discussed particles.

What are microplastics?

Microplastics are tiny plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size, often invisible to the naked eye,” explained Dr. John La Puma, founder of ChefMD and Chef Clinic. To give some context for that size, Jessica Gavin, a certified food scientist located in Orange County, California, told us that microplastics are generally “about as small as a pencil eraser.”

Gavin went on to say that microplastics are “solid particles made from synthetic polymers [that] do not dissolve or degrade naturally, persisting in the environment for a long time. They can either be manufactured to be small, such as the resin pellets found in various consumer products, or [can] result from the breakdown of larger plastic items.”

An even smaller and sneakier version of these particles comes in the form of “nanoplastics, [which are] less than one micron wide, much thinner than human hair, and too tiny to be seen with the naked eye. These plastics vary in size, shape, and color and include different synthetic materials and chemical additives,” Gavin said.

How do microplastics make their way into our food?

So where do microplastics come from and how do they weasel their way into our food and water? La Puma said that microplastics “enter our food through various routes, including contamination of water sources, soil and air.”

Gavin said that “microplastics primarily enter our food through environmental contamination, as plastics break down in places like landfills and leach into the soil and water where food is grown or caught. These particles can be found in various foods, including seafood, fish, crustaceans, salt, sugar, honey, bottled water and drinking water.”

When environmental pollution gets into the food supply for animals, microplastics can be transferred to the humans who ultimately eat those animals. “Seafood can contain microplastics due to plastic that ends up in the ocean and gets ingested by sea life, often magnifying as larger sea animals consume smaller organisms. Some animals that humans consume, such as chickens and cows, may consume feed containing microplastics; other animals may ingest microplastics by ingesting smaller prey,” said Matt Allen, senior director of food advisory at the National Science Foundation.

Allen also points out that plastic food packaging may contribute to microplastics entering the body. “Microplastics may also be present in ingredients used in food production and in food packaging, such as plastic wrappers or containers that can transfer microplastics into the food as they degrade or come into contact with food,” Allen said. However, according to Gavin, there’s a slight caveat to that concern: “Plastic is commonly used for packaging meat, fish, dairy and beverages, and there’s a potential for microplastics to be transferred to the food inside. However, the FDA states that there is insufficient evidence to confirm whether microplastics migrate from packaging into food and beverage.”

Buena Vista Images via Getty Images

"Beware of plastic-wrapped produce: plastic packaging often contains harmful chemicals,” said Dr. Amy Myers.

What are the possible health consequences of consuming microplastics?

When it comes to the question of whether microplastics can negatively affect our health after consumption, the simplest answer is that we just don’t know. “Consuming microplastics may cause health issues, although the full effects on humans are not completely understood. We still need more detailed studies and established safety guidelines to fully assess their impact,” Gavin told us.

From La Puma’s perspective, the possible consequences involve the fact that microplastics are “active disruptors of our endocrine system, silent inflammation triggers, and potential long-term organ destroyers. They act as Trojan horses, carrying toxins and pathogens into our system.”

The risks of microplastics may not be fully understood or documented, but Allen suspects that nanoplastics (the even smaller pieces of plastic) could be more harmful.

Allen explained that even though your body can’t absorb the larger microplastic particles, they may carry chemicals that can be harmful to be exposed to. Worse yet, particles in the nano-size range can be absorbed by the body.

“Current evidence suggests that these particles may be distributed throughout the body and have been found in the brain, placenta, veins and arteries and other organs,” Allen said. “The presence of these particles may cause inflammation and stress to the body leading to effects on the gut, immune system, nervous system, reproduction and cardiovascular system. Overall, the health effects associated with exposure to nano-sized plastic particles are not currently clear, but current evidence suggests significant concern.”

How can we reduce the amount of microplastics that we ingest?

While avoiding microplastics altogether may not be a realistic goal in this day and age, our experts insist that certain steps can be taken to limit the amount that you consume and to cut back on microplastics’ negative impact on the environment. “Embrace whole, unprocessed foods with a passion. Ultraprocessed, packaged items are not just nutritionally inferior; they’re potential microplastic delivery systems,” La Puma said.

If you need to get fruits and vegetables at the grocery store and can’t swing by a CSA or farmers market, “beware of plastic-wrapped produce: plastic packaging often contains harmful chemicals. Bring cloth or mesh reusable produce bags to the store to avoid unnecessary plastic contamination,” recommended Dr. Amy Myers, a functional medicine physician, author and podcast host.

Go Ad-Free — And Protect The Free Press

The next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won't back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

Support HuffPost

Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.

Getting rid of plastic storage containers and kitchen tools can also help reduce the presence of microplastics in your body. “Switch to reusable bags, bottles, and containers instead of plastic ones. Use wood or silicone cutting boards to prevent microplastics from releasing while chopping. Store food in glass or steel containers to avoid chemical leaching from plastics, especially when dealing with hot foods. For drinking, choose glass or steel bottles over plastic,” Gavin said.

Allen said that the growing awareness of microplastics could lead to legislation and regulations that make these tiny problematic specks less of a concern in the future: “In the coming years, new standards and government regulations related to microplastics will likely be developed and introduced that will force manufacturers, packagers and supply chains to consider the fate and risk of such contaminants from the factory to the dump.”

In the meantime, follow Allen’s advice and “[abide] by the manufacturer’s directions when using plastic food equipment such as cutting boards, utensils and nonstick pans. Check the product label for specific end uses, temperature or food restrictions, and whether it has been reviewed and/or tested by an independent third party.” Allen advised not using items like takeout containers or plastic utensils with very hot foods or in a microwave or dishwasher since “the plastic may break down and migrate into food.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Ashland Earth Day celebrants find ways to help the planet, say ‘hang in there’

Ashland is a year-round Earth Day with "people who are creating organic, local, sustainable food, drink and music," said A Street Block Party participant Emily Simon.

Joe Bianculli participated in the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970, and 55 years later, he was handing out environmental-action information to throngs of people attending Ashland’s first Earth Day A Street Block Party. Biancelli, who lives in Ashland and volunteers for Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands (“KS Wild”), said on Tuesday, “We had high hopes for saving the planet and we still have high hopes. It’s getting tougher and tougher every year, but we all have to hang in there.”The ecologically focused event in the historic Railroad District stretched for blocks along A Street, past the Ashland Food Co-op and Masala Bistro to the KS Wild open house, where Biancelli handed out stickers that read “Love where you live, defend what you love” in the front yard as the bluegrass band Eight Dollar Mountain performed in the backyard.About 1,000 people attended the free outdoor event organized by Karolina Lavagnino of Wild Thyme Productions.People chatted in line to order from the Tacos Libertad food truck in the parking lot used year round by customers of Get ‘N Gear second-hand outdoor equipment and clothing stores. Near an outdoor display of used kayaks and bikes for sale, volunteers of Ashland Devo explained the group’s mission: to cultivate grit, resilience and camaraderie in youth through the sport of mountain biking. Board member Moneeka Settles said Earth Day is simple: It’s a chance to “gather together and celebrate Earth.”Across A Street, in a lot next to the Ashland Yoga Center, Suzee Grilley was leading Elbow Room Taiko drummers, who captivated a large crowd with their rhythmic sound and dramatic movements around barrel-shaped drums.“We always celebrate Earth Day,” said Grilley. “We feel a lot of our music expresses a communing with nature, and the sprits that animate nature, from the trees, to the sky, to the water, to the earth itself, to human beings and animals.”She said the drums the group play reflect nature. “Every one of our drums is made of wood, skin and metal, and crafted with love and prayer by an artisan,” she said.Vince DiFrancesco of the Siskiyou Mountain Club, which works to maintain more than 400 miles of backcountry trails, welcomed people to his booth set up between the Grange Co-op and Ace Hardware.DiFrancesco sees Earth Day as a time for public service. “It’s about getting out and doing work on public lands to keep them open for recreation for everybody,” he said. Nearby, musician Gatore Mukarhinda drummed a heartbeat and sang a love song to Mother Earth. “She says, ‘take care of me,’” he said.Aubrey Laughlin of Talent, who had recently volunteered for Siskiyou Mountain Club trail work, said the idea for Earth Day was about “looking out for the next generation and connecting with each other, the place we live and our community.” Marie DeGregorio of Medford, who also attended the street party, said the day reminds people that “the planet needs help and we are stewards.”Party goer Susan Cox of Ashland agreed. To her, the day means “taking care of the planet, and each one of us doing our part as best we can and keeping it happy.” Yu Kuwabara of Ashland, who rode his bike to the event, said “Earth Day is a celebration of getting outside and enjoying the community.” Plenty of people rolled into the event on bikes, and Piccadilly Cycles provided free bike valet parking in front of its store.People gathered around booths displaying handmade jewelry and vendors selling treats like vegan- and gluten-free Plant Baked cookies, donuts, blueberry limoncello squares and cinnamon swirl loaves.Bloomsbury Books, a landmark independent bookstore on Ashland’s East Main Street, had a pop-up shop with nature-focused books. Earth Day is a day to learn about the environment, said bookstore co-owner Megan Isser. “Come read,” she said, gesturing to a table with copies of books, including “Garden Guide for the Rogue Valley,” published by the Jackson County Master Gardener Association with support from the Oregon State University Extension Service. Adults tasted small-batch wines from Circadian Cellars at the Ashland Recycled Furniture store, and mocktails by Hummingbird Heart Co. in a lot near Fourth Street.Creekside Strings fiddlers kicked off the event around 4 p.m. with traditional tunes in front of La Baguette Music Cafe, well known for its weekly jazz sessions. The event ended there too at 7:30 p.m. after a performance by folk duo Jenika Smith and Simon Chrisman.To block party participant Emily Simon, the best place to be on Earth Day was in Ashland, where she lives and supports sustainable businesses year round. “It’s such a wonderful event to be out here with our neighbors,” she said, “and celebrating the Earth with people who are creating organic, local, sustainable food, drink and music.”Upcoming Earth Day events:ScienceWorks Hands-on Museum hosts its annual Earth Day celebration 3:30-7 p.m. Friday, April 25, with activities highlighting the science of sustainability at 1500 E. Main St. in Ashland (541-482-6767). Parking is limited and people are encouraged to walk, bike, carpool or use public transit.Pollinator Project Rogue Valley holds its spring native plant sale 10 a.m.-2 p.m. Sunday, April 27, with five growers offering a large selection of plants (listed here) native to the southern Oregon bioregion in the parking lot behind The Pollination Place at 312 N. Main St., Phoenix.See more events statewide at oregonlive.com.Here is Oregon: Southern Oregon— Janet Eastman covers design and trends. Reach her at 503-294-4072, jeastman@oregonian.com and follow her on X @janeteastman.

Trump Administration Plans Ban on More Synthetic Food Dyes

By I. Edwards HealthDay ReporterTUESDAY, April 22, 2025 (HealthDay News) — The Trump administration is expected to take new steps to remove...

TUESDAY, April 22, 2025 (HealthDay News) — The Trump administration is expected to take new steps to remove artificial food dyes from the U.S. food supply, officials say.This follows a major move by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in January, under former President Joe Biden, to ban red dye No. 3 in food, drinks and some drugs. That action came more than 30 years after research linked the dye to cancer in animals.Now, federal officials appear ready to go even farther. Kennedy has been an outspoken critic of petroleum-based synthetic dyes, which are used to make foods and drinks look more appealing to consumers.In March, Kennedy supported a new West Virginia law banning some of these dyes. It made West Virginia the first state to take such broad action. Studies have linked some food dyes to behavior and learning issues in children, CNN reported.More than half of U.S. states, including both Republican- and Democrat-led ones, are pushing to restrict these ingredients, according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG).In a March email to CNN, the National Confectioners Association said while states have a role to play in the nation's food system, "the FDA is the rightful national regulatory decision maker and leader in food safety." Some of the association's members sell products that contain artificial dyes.John Hewitt of the Consumer Brands Association also urged the FDA to take the lead, saying the agency should “aggressively acknowledge its responsibility as the nation’s food safety regulator.”Artificial dyes such as red No. 3, red No. 40, green No. 3 and blue No. 2 have been linked to cancer or tumors in animals. Others, like yellow No. 5 and yellow No. 6, may contain cancer-causing chemicals. Even tiny amounts of yellow No. 5 can cause restlessness or sleep problems in sensitive children, CNN reported.Marion Nestle, a well-known food policy expert, welcomed the plan.“Non-petroleum substitute dyes are available and used widely in other countries by the same companies that sell products here," she said. "Companies have been promising to get rid of the petroleum dyes for years. The time has come.”In public health terms, “this is low-hanging fruit," Nestle added. "I want to see RFK Jr. take on ultra-processed foods, a much tougher problem and a far more important one.”Most of these dyes are used in low-nutrition foods like candy and soda, but they may also appear in less colorful products, the Center for Science in the Public Interest says.People who want to avoid these dyes can check ingredient labels on food and drink packaging, CNN said.SOURCE: CNN, April 22, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Mission to boldly grow food in space labs blasts off

The mission will explore new ways of reducing the cost of feeding an astronaut.

Mission to boldly grow food in space labs blasts offBBC NewsArtwork: The experiment will orbit the Earth for three hours before returning to Earth and splashing down off the coast of PortugalSteak, mashed potatoes and deserts for astronauts could soon be grown from individual cells in space if an experiment launched into orbit today is successful.A European Space Agency (ESA) project is assessing the viability of growing so-called lab-grown food in the low gravity and higher radiation in orbit and on other worlds.ESA is funding the research to explore new ways of reducing the cost of feeding an astronaut, which can cost up to £20,000 per day.The team involved say the experiment is a first step to developing a small pilot food production plant on the International Space Station in two years' time.Lab-grown food will be essential if Nasa's objective of making humanity a multi-planetary species were to be realised, claims Dr Aqeel Shamsul, CEO and founder of Bedford-based Frontier Space, which is developing the concept with researchers at Imperial College, London."Our dream is to have factories in orbit and on the Moon," he told BBC News."We need to build manufacturing facilities off world if we are to provide the infrastructure to enable humans to live and work in space".NASAAstronauts enjoy eating in zero gravity, but the freeze-dried food itself is not much fun to eatLab-grown food involves growing food ingredients, such as protein, fat and carbohydrates in test tubes and vats and then processing them to make them look and taste like normal food.Lab-grown chicken is already on sale in the US and Singapore and lab grown steak is awaiting approval in the UK and Israel. On Earth, there are claimed environmental benefits for the technology over traditional agricultural food production methods, such as less land use and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. But in space the primary driver of is to reduce costs.The researchers are doing the experiment because it costs so much to send astronauts food on the ISS - up to £20,000 per astronaut per day, they estimate. Nasa, other space agencies and private sector firms plan to have a long-term presence on the Moon, in orbiting space stations and maybe one day on Mars. That will mean sending up food for tens and eventually hundreds of astronauts living and working in space – something that would be prohibitively expensive if it were sent up by rockets, according to Dr Shamsul.Growing food in space would make much more sense, he suggests."We could start off simply with protein-enhanced mashed potatoes on to more complex foods which we could put together in space," he tells me."But in the longer term we could put the lab-grown ingredients into a 3D printer and print off whatever you want on the space station, such as a steak!"Lab-grown steak can be produced on Earth, but can it be created in space?This sounds like the replicator machines on Star Trek, which are able to produce food and drink from pure energy. But it is no longer the stuff of science fiction, says Dr Shamsul.He showed me a set-up, called a bioreactor, at Imperial College's Bezos Centre for Sustainable Proteins in west London. It comprised a brick-coloured concoction bubbling away in a test tube. The process is known as precision fermentation, which is like the fermentation used to make beer, but different: "precision" is a rebranding word for genetically engineered.In this case a gene has been added to yeast to produce extra vitamins, but all sorts of ingredients can be produced in this way, according to Dr Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro, Director of the Bezos Centre."We can make all the elements to make food," says Dr Ledesma-Amaro proudly."We can make proteins, fats, carbohydrates, fibres and they can be combined to make different dishes."The brick-coloured "food" is grown in a small biorector, a mini-version of which has been sent into space A much smaller, simpler version of the biorector has been sent into space on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket as part of the ESA mission. There is plenty of evidence that that foods can be successfully grown from cells on Earth, but can the process be repeated in the weightlessness and higher radiation of space?Drs Ledesma-Amaro and Shamsul have sent small amounts of the yeast concoction to orbit the Earth in a small cube satellite on board Europe's first commercial returnable spacecraft, Phoenix. If all goes to plan, it will orbit the Earth for around three hours before falling back to Earth off the coast of Portugal. The experiment will be retrieved by a recovery vessel and sent back to the lab in London to be examined.The data they gather will inform the construction of a larger, better bioreactor which the scientists will send into space next year, according to Dr Ledesma-Amaro.The problem, though, is that the brick-coloured goo, which is dried into a powder, looks distinctly unappetising – even less appetising than the freeze-dried fare that astronauts currently have to put up with.That is where Imperial College's master chef comes in. Jakub Radzikowski is the culinary education designer tasked with turning chemistry into cuisine.Kevin ChurchImperial College's master chef has the job of making lab-grown chemicals into delicious dishesHe isn't allowed to use lab grown ingredients to make dishes for people just yet, because regulatory approval is still pending. But he's getting a head start. For now, instead of lab-grown ingredients, Jakub is using starches and proteins from naturally occurring fungi to develop his recipes. He tells me all sorts of dishes will be possible, once he gets the go-ahead to use lab-grown ingredients."We want to create food that is familiar to astronauts who are from different parts of the world so that it can provide comfort."We can create anything from French, Chinese, Indian. It will be possible to replicate any kind of cuisine in space."Today, Jakub is trying out a new recipe of spicy dumplings and dipping sauce. He tells me that I am allowed to try it them out, but taster-in-chief is someone far more qualified: Helen Sharman, the UK's first astronaut, who also has a PhD in chemistry.Kevin Church/BBC NewsBritain's first astronaut, Helen Sharman and I taste test what might be the space food of the futureWe tasted the steaming dumplings together. My view: "They are absolutely gorgeous!"Dr Sharman's expert view, not dissimilar: "You get a really strong blast from the flavour. It is really delicious and very moreish," she beamed."I would love to have had something like this. When I was in space, I had really long-life stuff: tins, freeze dried packets, tubes of stuff. It was fine, but not tasty."Dr Sharman's more important observation was about the science. Lab-grown food, she said, could potentially be better for astronauts, as well as reduce costs to the levels required to make long-term off-world habitation viable.Research on the ISS has shown that the biochemistry of astronauts' bodies changes during long duration space missions: their hormone balance and iron levels alter, and they we lose calcium from their bones. Astronauts take supplements to compensate, but lab-grown food could in principle be tweaked with the extra ingredients already built in, says Dr Sharman."Astronauts tend to lose weight because they are not eating as much because they don't have the variety and interest in their diet," she told me."So, astronauts might be more open to having something that has been cooked from scratch and a feeling that you are really eating wholesome food."

Microplastics Make It into Your Food through Plant Leaves

New evidence shows plant leaves absorb airborne microplastics, a previously overlooked route for the particles to enter crops that has implications for ecology and human health

Plant Leaves Absorb Microplastics—And They End Up in Our FoodNew evidence shows plant leaves absorb airborne microplastics, a previously overlooked route for the particles to enter crops that has implications for ecology and human healthBy Willie Peijnenburg & Nature magazine Plants can absorb plastic particles directly from the air. Ruben Bonilla Gonzalo/Getty ImagesPlastic production is increasing sharply. This has raised concerns about the effects of microplastics (typically defined as plastic particles smaller than 5 millimetres in diameter) and nanoplastics (smaller plastic particles that are less than 1,000 nanometres in diameter) on human health. These concerns are partly influenced by alarming findings of the presence of microplastics in various human tissues, including the brain and placenta. Continuing research is examining pathways of human exposure to microplastics, including through food sources. Most attention is focused on soil and water as common sources of plastics that enter the food chain. However, writing in Nature, Li et al. provide strong evidence supporting the air as being a major route for plastics to enter plants.Plants can absorb plastic particles directly from the air. Particles in the air can enter leaves through various pathways, such as through structures on the leaf surface called the stomata and through the cuticle. Stomata are small openings made of cells, and the cuticle is a membrane, covered in insoluble wax, that is well suited for absorbing microplastics.Once inside the leaf (Fig. 1), microplastics move through spaces between plant cells and can also accumulate inside tiny hair-like structures, called trichomes, on the surface of leaves. Microplastics can also travel to and enter the plant’s water- and nutrient-transporting system (called the vascular bundle) and from there reach other tissues. Trichomes are ‘sinks’ for external particles and they therefore reduce the efficiency of microplastic transport from leaves to roots. Given that leaves are a key part of the food chain, microplastic particles that accumulate here can easily pass to herbivores and crop leaves, both of which can be directly consumed by humans.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Microplastics can also travel to and enter the plant’s water- and nutrient-transporting system (called the vascular bundle). From there, microplastics can reach other tissues.Li and colleagues’ study demonstrates that the absorption and accumulation of atmospheric microplastics by plant leaves occurs widely in the environment, with the concentrations of these particles in plants being consistent with their concentrations in air at the sampling sites. The authors report that the concentrations of the microplastics polyethylene terephthalate and polystyrene were 10–100 times higher in open-air planted vegetables than in greenhouse-grown vegetables. Leaves with a longer growth duration and the outer leaves of vegetables contained higher microplastic concentrations than did younger leaves and inner leaves. Microplastic concentration in plants increased with the duration of exposure to these particles.Although the efficiency of leaf uptake of microplastics is extremely low (around 0.05%), Li and colleagues’ findings provide evidence from fieldwork of accumulation of atmospheric microplastics in leaves. The relative importance of this airborne exposure to microplastics in plants compared with that of other uptake routes is difficult to assess, because information available on microplastic uptake through soil and water is sparse. Li et al. report concentrations of polystyrene nanoplastics of about 7–10 nanograms per gram of the dry plant weight for lettuce leaves after outdoor exposure in Tianjin, China.In the case of exposure to microplastics in the water, plastic concentrations similar to those found in plants by Li and colleagues after airborne deposition could only be obtained previously by exposing lettuce roots to polystyrene nanoplastics in water, at exposure levels as high as 5 milligrams of plastic per litre of water. Another study examining plant exposure to microplastics in water reported that there was no plant uptake of these plastics from water entering a wastewater treatment site. In soil cultivation experiments reported by Li and colleagues, the root absorption of polystyrene nanoparticles that ended up in the shoot was less efficient than the absorption of airborne nanoplastics. Li and colleagues found that the level of the plastics that reached leaves from roots were well below the 7–10 nanograms per gram of dry plant weight that is associated with airborne deposition of nanoplastics. Li et al. report that levels of microplastics in air-exposed plants at highly microplastic-contaminated sites increased mostly tenfold compared with levels at non-contaminated sites.Researchers have found that microplastics in the air can enter plants, including crops, through the outer layer of cuticle and epidermal cells. They can then move through spaces between plant cells to enter tiny hair-like structures on the leaf surface called trichomes. Alternatively, after entering the leaf, microplastics can move to cells in a system called the vascular bundle that transports water and nutrients to tissues elsewhere in the plant.These findings illustrate the potential implications of airborne microplastics and nanoplastics accumulating in leaves and being transferred to herbivores and humans. This highlights a possible yet understudied pathway of plastic exposure that might have ecological and health implications. However, key gaps remain in scientists’ understanding of the various factors that influence the uptake, accumulation and biological effects of microplastics in humans. These knowledge gaps include: the composition of the average human diet and its role in determining exposure levels; the efficiency with which plastics accumulate in the gut; and the extent to which these particles reach key organs. Furthermore, there is a major lack of data on the threshold levels at which microplastics and nanoplastics might begin to exert harmful effects on human health.The combination of these uncertainties severely hinders efforts to accurately quantify the potential risks posed by airborne microplastics. Without a comprehensive and systematic approach to studying plastic fate and toxicity, our understanding remains incomplete. The current body of knowledge about the environmental and physiological effects of plastics is full of gaps, with no consistent data available on plastics of well-defined compositions, sizes, shapes or densities.A conclusion to draw from Li and co-authors’ work is that, although there is no widely supported consensus on the risks to humans from exposure to plastics, the deposition of these substances from the air into human food is an exposure pathway not to ignore. Combining these concerns with considerations of direct exposure of humans to airborne plastics might suffice to prompt the adoption of precautionary measures. Although research on the long-term health effects of plastics is still continuing, preliminary research suggests possible links to problems with breathing, inflammation and other adverse health outcomes. Given these uncertainties, integrating precautionary approaches — such as reducing plastic use and increasing public awareness — might help to lessen potential risks. Proactive measures might also encourage further scientific investigation into the extent of microplastic exposure and its health implications, ensuring better protection for individuals and for the environment.This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on April 9, 2025.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.