Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Accept Deny

GoGreenNation news

Here’s why Europe’s had disastrous flooding

News Feed
Monday, September 16, 2024

An extreme storm named Boris slammed central Europe over the weekend with record rainfall, deadly flooding and up to 10 feet of mountain snow. At least 12 people have died — six in Romania, two in Poland, three in Austria and one in the Czech Republic — since the rains began Friday, according to officials.The storm — which unleashed several months’ worth of rain in just a few days — was spawned by a rare combination of meteorological factors, starting with an unusually powerful outbreak of cold air in western Europe that clashed with exceptionally warm weather to the east. Human-caused climate change probably intensified the ensuing deluge by warming the air and the water that fed into the storm.How did the storm come together?The beginnings of Boris came as a large dip in the jet stream plunged Arctic air southward into Europe. Several stations in Austria saw record cold for the time of year as temperatures remained below 50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius) for three days, while Hochfilzen in western Austria recorded its lowest September high temperature of 33 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius). Switzerland, Italy and Germany also saw historic cold.The cold-air outbreak has a connection to usual warmth and unusually high pressure in the polar stratosphere, according to Judah Cohen, a long-range forecaster at Verisk Atmospheric and Environmental Research.As the Arctic air swept southward through western and Central Europe, it clashed with unusually warm, moist air to the east and south. Numerous heat records were set in Russia, with temperatures soaring into the low 80s (upper 20s Celsius) according to weather historian Maximiliano Herrera. Moscow set a record for its hottest September night when the temperature only dropped to 67 degrees (19.2 Celsius).Follow Climate & environmentLow pressure forming near the intersection of the clashing cold and warm air masses then became cut off from the jet stream and trapped by areas of high pressure to its west and east. That caused the storm to stall over central Europe, allowing it to draw moisture-filled air from a historically warm Mediterranean Sea, which in August recorded its warmest average sea surface temperature for any month on record.The moisture surging north and west from the Mediterranean was — in many cases — forced up mountain slopes. The rising air helped to squeeze out even more rainfall as it cooled and condensed out moisture, intensifying the downpours on the steep terrain and adjacent valleys.Humidity that reached record levels across the planet this summer may have contributed to the heavy rainfall as well. Scientists say that warm air brought about by climate change is prone to holding more moisture and producing more intense rainfall. The nonprofit Climate Central says the atmosphere holds 4 percent more moisture for every one degree Fahrenheit of climate warming, which “supercharges” the water cycle.How much rain and snow fell?The result was repeated rounds of heavy rain over the same locations, triggering catastrophic flooding in the Czech Republic, Austria and Romania. The storm also dumped historic amounts of snow in the Alps. Some rain and snow totals included:Jesenik, Czech Republic, received 14.2 inches (460 millimeters) in four days, as much as would typically fall in about six months. 18.3 inches (464 millimeters) fell in nearby Serak.St. Polten, Austria, received 14.2 inches (361 millimeters) in four days, exceeding the total rainfall for the previous wettest autumn (September through November) on record, and making September the city’s wettest month in 130 years.In Austria, Lilenfeld and Tulin recorded four-day record rainfalls of 14.6 and 14.1 inches (371 and 358 millimeters), respectively.Parts of Poland saw two-thirds of its average annual rainfall in three days.Bratislava, Koliba, Slovakia, recorded 9.9 inches (251 millimeters), making September the wettest month since at least 1961.Up to 10 feet of snow fell in the Austrian Alps, where some locations reported their first September snow on record. Heavy snow also fell in the Swiss Alps.How has the storm impacted central Europe?Six deaths in Romania were in Galati County, Dan Cristian Ionascu, a spokesperson for the Galati Emergency Situations Inspectorate, told The Washington Post in a text message Monday. One person was missing, Ionascu added.After visiting Pechea in Galati County, Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu said that more than 5,000 homes were affected by the floods. “Nothing can ease the suffering of the people of Pechea,” Ciolacu wrote on Facebook.Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, who said Saturday that almost everywhere in the country had been affected by heavy rainfall or snowfall, said Sunday afternoon that the “situation remains serious.”Thousands of firefighters and emergency workers have been deployed to tackle the floods, he said, and schools were closed Monday. Campaigning for the Sept. 29 legislative election was also paused Sunday.“All our energy and attention is focused on disaster management and helping those affected by the storms,” Nehammer wrote on X.Austrian public broadcaster ORF reported Monday that two men age 70 and 80 had died in the floodwaters in their homes in the Lower Austria villages of Untergrafendorf and Höbersdorf, respectively. A firefighter also died over the weekend after “slipping on stairs” while pumping out a flooded basement in the Austrian town of Tulln.Infrastructure Minister Dariusz Klimczak confirmed on Polish broadcaster TVN24 that two people had died in the floods: one in the rural municipality of Kłodzko, southwestern Poland, and a second in the south.Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote on X on Sunday that he had issued a disaster declaration, a step toward requesting European Union aid.On Monday afternoon, the Polish government also announced a state of natural disaster for 30 days across several flood-affected areas.In the Czech Republic, Prime Minister Petr Fiala spoke of a “once-in-a-century flood.” One person drowned in the Krasovka River in the Czech district of Bruntal, police confirmed Monday. At least seven people were missing.What’s happening with the storm now?By Monday, the severe rainfall showed little signs of easing. In the state of Upper Austria, emergency services said that new, intense rainfall was causing water levels to rise again. “We are currently monitoring the situation and waiting for a possible second wave,” Markus Voglhuber, spokesman for the state fire brigade command, told Austria’s ORF. Authorities in the state of Lower Austria warned of a high risk of dams breaking.Flood advisories remained in place across the whole of the Czech Republic and parts of Slovakia as of Monday morning, according to Meteoalarm, a weather tool created by the European Network of National Meteorological Services.Jason Samenow contributed to this report.

Read more

An extreme storm named Boris slammed central Europe over the weekend with record rainfall, deadly flooding and up to 10 feet of mountain snow. At least 12 people have died — six in Romania, two in Poland, three in Austria and one in the Czech Republic — since the rains began Friday, according to officials.

The storm — which unleashed several months’ worth of rain in just a few days — was spawned by a rare combination of meteorological factors, starting with an unusually powerful outbreak of cold air in western Europe that clashed with exceptionally warm weather to the east. Human-caused climate change probably intensified the ensuing deluge by warming the air and the water that fed into the storm.

How did the storm come together?

The beginnings of Boris came as a large dip in the jet stream plunged Arctic air southward into Europe. Several stations in Austria saw record cold for the time of year as temperatures remained below 50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius) for three days, while Hochfilzen in western Austria recorded its lowest September high temperature of 33 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius). Switzerland, Italy and Germany also saw historic cold.

The cold-air outbreak has a connection to usual warmth and unusually high pressure in the polar stratosphere, according to Judah Cohen, a long-range forecaster at Verisk Atmospheric and Environmental Research.

As the Arctic air swept southward through western and Central Europe, it clashed with unusually warm, moist air to the east and south. Numerous heat records were set in Russia, with temperatures soaring into the low 80s (upper 20s Celsius) according to weather historian Maximiliano Herrera. Moscow set a record for its hottest September night when the temperature only dropped to 67 degrees (19.2 Celsius).

Follow Climate & environment

Low pressure forming near the intersection of the clashing cold and warm air masses then became cut off from the jet stream and trapped by areas of high pressure to its west and east. That caused the storm to stall over central Europe, allowing it to draw moisture-filled air from a historically warm Mediterranean Sea, which in August recorded its warmest average sea surface temperature for any month on record.

The moisture surging north and west from the Mediterranean was — in many cases — forced up mountain slopes. The rising air helped to squeeze out even more rainfall as it cooled and condensed out moisture, intensifying the downpours on the steep terrain and adjacent valleys.

Humidity that reached record levels across the planet this summer may have contributed to the heavy rainfall as well. Scientists say that warm air brought about by climate change is prone to holding more moisture and producing more intense rainfall. The nonprofit Climate Central says the atmosphere holds 4 percent more moisture for every one degree Fahrenheit of climate warming, which “supercharges” the water cycle.

How much rain and snow fell?

The result was repeated rounds of heavy rain over the same locations, triggering catastrophic flooding in the Czech Republic, Austria and Romania. The storm also dumped historic amounts of snow in the Alps. Some rain and snow totals included:

  • Jesenik, Czech Republic, received 14.2 inches (460 millimeters) in four days, as much as would typically fall in about six months. 18.3 inches (464 millimeters) fell in nearby Serak.
  • St. Polten, Austria, received 14.2 inches (361 millimeters) in four days, exceeding the total rainfall for the previous wettest autumn (September through November) on record, and making September the city’s wettest month in 130 years.
  • In Austria, Lilenfeld and Tulin recorded four-day record rainfalls of 14.6 and 14.1 inches (371 and 358 millimeters), respectively.
  • Parts of Poland saw two-thirds of its average annual rainfall in three days.
  • Bratislava, Koliba, Slovakia, recorded 9.9 inches (251 millimeters), making September the wettest month since at least 1961.
  • Up to 10 feet of snow fell in the Austrian Alps, where some locations reported their first September snow on record. Heavy snow also fell in the Swiss Alps.

How has the storm impacted central Europe?

Six deaths in Romania were in Galati County, Dan Cristian Ionascu, a spokesperson for the Galati Emergency Situations Inspectorate, told The Washington Post in a text message Monday. One person was missing, Ionascu added.

After visiting Pechea in Galati County, Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu said that more than 5,000 homes were affected by the floods. “Nothing can ease the suffering of the people of Pechea,” Ciolacu wrote on Facebook.

Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer, who said Saturday that almost everywhere in the country had been affected by heavy rainfall or snowfall, said Sunday afternoon that the “situation remains serious.”

Thousands of firefighters and emergency workers have been deployed to tackle the floods, he said, and schools were closed Monday. Campaigning for the Sept. 29 legislative election was also paused Sunday.

“All our energy and attention is focused on disaster management and helping those affected by the storms,” Nehammer wrote on X.

Austrian public broadcaster ORF reported Monday that two men age 70 and 80 had died in the floodwaters in their homes in the Lower Austria villages of Untergrafendorf and Höbersdorf, respectively. A firefighter also died over the weekend after “slipping on stairs” while pumping out a flooded basement in the Austrian town of Tulln.

Infrastructure Minister Dariusz Klimczak confirmed on Polish broadcaster TVN24 that two people had died in the floods: one in the rural municipality of Kłodzko, southwestern Poland, and a second in the south.

Prime Minister Donald Tusk wrote on X on Sunday that he had issued a disaster declaration, a step toward requesting European Union aid.

On Monday afternoon, the Polish government also announced a state of natural disaster for 30 days across several flood-affected areas.

In the Czech Republic, Prime Minister Petr Fiala spoke of a “once-in-a-century flood.” One person drowned in the Krasovka River in the Czech district of Bruntal, police confirmed Monday. At least seven people were missing.

What’s happening with the storm now?

By Monday, the severe rainfall showed little signs of easing. In the state of Upper Austria, emergency services said that new, intense rainfall was causing water levels to rise again. “We are currently monitoring the situation and waiting for a possible second wave,” Markus Voglhuber, spokesman for the state fire brigade command, told Austria’s ORF. Authorities in the state of Lower Austria warned of a high risk of dams breaking.

Flood advisories remained in place across the whole of the Czech Republic and parts of Slovakia as of Monday morning, according to Meteoalarm, a weather tool created by the European Network of National Meteorological Services.

Jason Samenow contributed to this report.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Related News

Tyson Is Sued Over Labeling of ‘Climate-Smart’ Beef

An environmental group said the company, a major food producer, was misleading shoppers with its claims about eco-friendly practices.

A consumer-protection lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges that Tyson Foods is misleading consumers with claims about its efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions.Environmental Working Group, an advocacy group, accused the company of taking advantage of the “well-intentioned preferences” of shoppers by making false statements in marketing materials, like saying it was working toward “net-zero” emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 and by advertising “climate-smart” beef.Industrialized beef production, the lawsuit contends, will never be “climate-smart” because of the sheer volume of emissions produced in the process of raising cows on an industrial scale. It also argued that the company had shown no evidence of an effort to get to net-zero emissions, a term used by governments and companies to signal their climate goals.“We are taking a stand to protect consumers and to demand transparency in an industry that significantly affects climate change,” Caroline Leary of EWG said in a call with reporters on Wednesday.Tyson, based in Springdale, Ark., declined to comment on the specifics of the lawsuit. A company statement pointed to its “long history of sustainable practices that embrace good stewardship of our environmental resources.”According to its website, Tyson produces about 20 percent of the beef, pork and chicken in the United States, as well as other foods under brands like Jimmy Dean and Hillshire Farm, and is one of the world’s largest food companies. The company detailed its plans to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 in a 2022 sustainability report.Subscribe to The Times to read as many articles as you like.

Climate
Food
Sustainable

Liftoff: The Climate Project at MIT takes flight

The major effort to accelerate practical climate change solutions launches as its mission directors meet the Institute community.

The leaders of The Climate Project at MIT met with community members at a campus forum on Monday, helping to kick off the Institute’s major new effort to accelerate and scale up climate change solutions.“The Climate Project is a whole-of-MIT mobilization,” MIT President Sally Kornbluth said in her opening remarks. “It’s designed to focus the Institute’s talent and resources so that we can achieve much more, faster, in terms of real-world impact, from mitigation to adaptation.”The event, “Climate Project at MIT: Launching the Missions,” drew a capacity crowd to MIT’s Samberg Center.While the Climate Project has a number of facets, a central component of the effort consists of its six “missions,” broad areas where MIT researchers will seek to identify gaps in the global climate response that MIT can help fill, and then launch and execute research and innovation projects aimed at those areas. Each mission is led by campus faculty, and Monday’s event represented the first public conversation between the mission directors and the larger campus community.“Today’s event is an important milestone,” said Richard Lester, MIT’s interim vice president for climate and the Japan Steel Industry Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering, who led the Climate Project’s formation. He praised Kornbluth’s sustained focus on climate change as a leading priority for MIT.“The reason we’re all here is because of her leadership and vision for MIT,” Lester said. “We’re also here because the MIT community — our faculty, our staff, our students — has made it abundantly clear that it wants to do more, much more, to help solve this great problem.”The mission directors themselves emphasized the need for deep community involvement in the project — and that the Climate Project is designed to facilitate researcher-driven enterprise across campus.“There’s a tremendous amount of urgency,” said Elsa Olivetti PhD ’07, director of the Decarbonizing Energy and Industry mission, during an onstage discussion. “We all need to do everything we can, and roll up our sleeves and get it done.” Olivetti, the Jerry McAfee Professor in Engineering, has been a professor of materials science and engineering at the Institute since 2014.“What’s exciting about this is the chance of MIT really meeting its potential,” said Jesse Kroll, co-director of the mission for Restoring the Atmosphere, Protecting the Land and Oceans. Kroll is the Peter de Florez Professor in MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, a professor of chemical engineering, and the director of the Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory.MIT, Kroll noted, features “so much amazing work going on in all these different aspects of the problem. Science, engineering, social science … we put it all together and there is huge potential, a huge opportunity for us to make a difference.”MIT has pledged an initial $75 million to the Climate Project, including $25 million from the MIT Sloan School of Management for a complementary effort, the MIT Climate Policy Center. However, the Institute is anticipating that it will also build new connections with outside partners, whose role in implementing and scaling Climate Project solutions will be critical.Monday’s event included a keynote talk from Brian Deese, currently the MIT Innovation and Climate Impact Fellow and the former director of the White House National Economic Council in the Biden administration.“The magnitude of the risks associated with climate change are extraordinary,” Deese said. However, he added, “these are solvable issues. In fact, the energy transition globally will be the greatest economic opportunity in human history. … It has the potential to actually lift people out of poverty, it has the potential to drive international cooperation, it has the potential to drive innovation and improve lives — if we get this right.”Deese’s remarks centered on a call for the U.S. to develop a current-day climate equivalent of the Marshall Plan, the U.S. initiative to provide aid to Western Europe after World War II. He also suggested three characteristics of successful climate projects, noting that many would be interdisciplinary in nature and would “engage with policy early in the design process” to become feasible.In addition to those features, Deese said, people need to “start and end with very high ambition” when working on climate solutions. He added: “The good thing about MIT and our community is that we, you, have done this before. We’ve got examples where MIT has taken something that seemed completely improbable and made it possible, and I believe that part of what is required of this collective effort is to keep that kind of audacious thinking at the top of our mind.” The MIT mission directors all participated in an onstage discussion moderated by Somini Sengupta, the international climate reporter on the climate team of The New York Times. Sengupta asked the group about a wide range of topics, from their roles and motivations to the political constraints on global climate progress, and more.Andrew Babbin, co-director of the mission for Restoring the Atmosphere, Protecting the Land and Oceans, defined part of the task of the MIT missions as “identifying where those gaps of knowledge are and filling them rapidly,” something he believes is “largely not doable in the conventional way,” based on small-scale research projects. Instead, suggested Babbin, who is the Cecil and Ida Green Career Development Professor in MIT’s Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate, the collective input of research and innovation communities could help zero in on undervalued approaches to climate action.Some innovative concepts, the mission directors noted, can be tried out on the MIT campus, in an effort to demonstrate how a more sustainable infrastructure and systems can operate at scale.“That is absolutely crucial,” said Christoph Reinhart, director of the Building and Adapting Healthy, Resilient Cities mission, expressing the need to have the campus reach net-zero emissions. Reinhart is the Alan and Terri Spoon Professor of Architecture and Climate and director of MIT’s Building Technology Program in the School of Architecture and Planning.In response to queries from Sengupta, the mission directors affirmed that the Climate Project needs to develop solutions that can work in different societies around the world, while acknowledging that there are many political hurdles to worldwide climate action.“Any kind of quality engaged projects that we’ve done with communities, it’s taken years to build trust. … How you scale that without compromising is the challenge I’m faced with,” said Miho Mazereeuw, director of the Empowering Frontline Communities mission, an associate professor of architecture and urbanism, and director of MIT’s Urban Risk Lab.“I think we will impact different communities in different parts of the world in different ways,” said Benedetto Marelli, an associate professor in MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, adding that it would be important to “work with local communities [and] engage stakeholders, and at the same time, use local brains to solve the problem.” The mission he directs, Wild Cards, is centered on identifying unconventional solutions that are high risk and also high reward.Any climate program “has to be politically feasible, it has to be in separate nations’ self-interest,” said Christopher Knittel, mission director for Inventing New Policy Approaches. In an ever-shifting political world, he added, that means people must “think about not just the policy but the resiliency of the policy.” Knittel is the George P. Shultz Professor and professor of applied economics at the MIT Sloan School of Management, director of the MIT Climate Policy Center, and associate dean for Climate and Sustainability.In all, MIT has more than 300 faculty and senior researchers who, along with their students and staff, are already working on climate issues.Kornbluth, for her part, referred to MIT’s first-year students while discussing the larger motivations for taking concerted action to address the challenges of climate change. It might be easy for younger people to despair over the world’s climate trajectory, she noted, but the best response to that includes seeking new avenues for climate progress.“I understand their anxiety and concern,” Kornbluth said. “But I have no doubt at all that together, we can make a difference. I believe that we have a special obligation to the new students and their entire generation to do everything we can to create a positive change. The most powerful antidote to defeat and despair is collection action.”

Climate
Chemicals
Health

EU Issues 'Climate Breakdown' Warning Amid Record Flooding And Deadly Wildfires

The worst flooding in years has hit a broad swath of Central Europe. At the other end of the 27-nation bloc, raging fires through Portugal have killed at least six.

BRUSSELS (AP) — Devastating floods through much of Central Europe and deadly wildfires in Portugal are joint proof of a “climate breakdown” that will become the norm unless drastic action is taken, the European Union’s head office said Wednesday.“Make no mistake. This tragedy is not an anomaly. This is fast becoming the norm for our shared future,” said EU Crisis Management Commissioner Janez Lenarcic.The worst flooding in years moved Tuesday across a broad swath of Central Europe, taking lives and destroying homes. At the other end of the 27-nation EU, raging fires through northern Portugal have killed at least six people.“Europe is the fastest warming continent globally and is particularly vulnerable to extreme weather events like the one we are discussing today. We could not return to a safer past,” Lenarcic told EU lawmakers in Strasbourg, France.He warned that beyond the human cost, nations are also struggling to cope with mounting bills for repairing the damage from emergencies and the lengthy recovery from disaster.“The average cost of disasters in the 1980s was 8 billion euros per year. More recently in 2021 and in 2022, the damage is surpassed 50 billion euros per year, meaning the cost of inaction is far greater than the cost of action,” he said.Terry Reintke, president of the Greens group in the European Parliament, said the cost for the EU since the 1980s was estimated at 650 billion euros.The EU is struggling to move quickly with measures to counter climate change and has run into political opposition in many member states, where the political climate is turning against environmental issues and measures ranging from home heating to farm pollution.“Our success will depend on how determined we are to combat climate change together in order to reduce emissions,” Reintke said, adding that EU members must back its Green Deal. Support Free JournalismConsider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.Can't afford to contribute? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.The vast EU plan to become climate neutral by 2050 has come under increasing pressure from critics who call it unrealistic and too expensive. Populist and far-right parties have made it a key point of attack on the bloc’s institutions.Lenarcic said people only needed to follow the daily news to understand the urgency of the issue.“We face a Europe that is simultaneously flooding and burning. These extreme weather events ... are now an almost annual occurrence,” he said. “The global reality of the climate breakdown has moved into the everyday lives of Europeans.”Support Free JournalismConsider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.Can't afford to contribute? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.

Climate
Crisis
Pollution

EU Warns Deadly Flooding and Wildfires Show Climate Breakdown Is Fast Becoming the Norm

The European Union's head office is warning that devastating floods through much of Central Europe and deadly wildfires in Portugal are joint proof of a “climate breakdown” that will become the norm unless drastic action is taken

“Make no mistake. This tragedy is not an anomaly. This is fast becoming the norm for our shared future,” said EU Crisis Management Commissioner Janez Lenarcic. The worst flooding in years moved Tuesday across a broad swath of Central Europe, taking lives and destroying homes. At the other end of the 27-nation EU, raging fires through northern Portugal have killed at last six people. “Europe is the fastest warming continent globally and is particularly vulnerable to extreme weather events like the one we are discussing today. We could not return to a safer past,” Lenarcic told EU lawmakers in Strasbourg, France. He warned that beyond the human cost, nations are also struggling to cope with mounting bills for repairing the damage from emergencies and the lengthy recovery from disaster.“The average cost of disasters in the 1980s was 8 billion euros per year. More recently in 2021 and in 2022, the damage is surpassed 50 billion euros per year, meaning the cost of inaction is far greater than the cost of action,” he said. Terry Reintke, president of the Greens group in the European Parliament, said the cost for the EU since the 1980s was estimated at 650 billion euros.The EU is struggling to move quickly with measures to counter climate change and has run into political opposition in many member states, where the political climate is turning against environmental issues and measures ranging from home heating to farm pollution.“Our success will depend on how determined we are to combat climate change together in order to reduce emissions,” Reintke said, adding that EU members must back its Green Deal. The vast EU plan to become climate neutral by 2050 has come under increasing pressure from critics who call it unrealistic and too expensive. Populist and far-right parties have made it a key point of attack on the bloc's institutions. Lenarcic said people only needed to follow the daily news to understand the urgency of the issue.“We face a Europe that is simultaneously flooding and burning. These extreme weather events ... are now an almost annual occurrence,” he said. “The global reality of the climate breakdown has moved into the everyday lives of Europeans.” Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - July 2024

Climate
Crisis
Pollution

More than £494bn subsidies a year are harmful to the climate, says report

ActionAid says ‘parasitic behaviour’ is fuelling the climate crisis and represents ‘corporate capture’ of public financeMore than $650bn (£494bn) a year in public subsidies goes to fossil fuel companies, intensive agriculture and other harmful industries in the developing world, new data has shown.The subsidies entrench high greenhouse gas emissions and are fuelling the destruction of the natural world, according to a report from the charity ActionAid. Continue reading...

More than $650bn (£494bn) a year in public subsidies goes to fossil fuel companies, intensive agriculture and other harmful industries in the developing world, new data has shown.The subsidies entrench high greenhouse gas emissions and are fuelling the destruction of the natural world, according to a report from the charity ActionAid.Developed countries are also actively subsidising such harmful activities. The UK, for instance, devotes about $7.3bn a year to effective subsidies for fossil fuels.Taken altogether, the sums involved in the developing world would be enough to pay for the education of all children in sub-Saharan Africa three and a half times over, each year.By contrast, developing countries are receiving only a fraction of those sums in climate finance, which would help them to move away from dirty and polluting industries towards a clean and low-carbon economy. Renewable energy projects in the developing world are receiving 40 times less than the fossil fuel sector, the analysis found.Subsidies for dirty industries and intensive agriculture have for decades been one of the most intractable obstacles to shifting the global economy to a low-carbon footing. The International Energy Agency, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organisation and other institutions have repeatedly called for a reduction in these subsidies.However, some of them are used to benefit the poor or to soften the blow of price rises or other shocks. That was the case in recent years in the UK when energy prices rose, prompting the government to help households with an energy price guarantee. Other countries made similar moves, which, ironically, along with the soaring prices helped fossil fuel companies to an unprecedented bonanza, much of which is being re-invested in new oil and gas exploration instead of clean and renewable energy.But in many countries, subsidies are directed towards industries regarded as politically important, or which have powerful lobbies.ActionAid analysts, describing their findings in a report entitled How the Finance Flows: Corporate capture of public finance fuelling the climate crisis in the global south, published on Wednesday, said many of the subsidies were owing to “corporate capture” of the government and public institutions.“This report exposes wealthy corporations’ parasitic behaviour,” said Arthur Larok, the secretary general of ActionAid International. “They are draining the life out of the global south by siphoning public funds and fuelling the climate crisis.”But he blamed governments in rich countries too. “Sadly the promises of climate finance by the global north are as hollow as the empty rhetoric they have been uttering for decades,” he said. “It is time for this circus to end. We need genuine commitments to ending the climate crisis.”ActionAid also found it was not necessary for developing countries to adopt the high-carbon and intensive agricultural practices that have destroyed nature and created the climate crisis, as developing countries could move swiftly to a low-carbon model that would still enable them to grow and prosper.The authors called for an end to destructive subsidies, more public finance from rich countries to be directed towards low-carbon efforts in the developing world, and for more stringent regulation of the banking sector that would require minimum standards for human rights, and social and environmental considerations, before finance is directed towards destructive industries.

Climate
Agriculture
Crisis

Suggested Viewing

The Invisible Mammal - The Bat Rescuer

Bats are struggling to survive, specifically in North America, where white nose syndrome is causing a sharp decline of certain species. Pertinent issues: climate change, habitat destruction, what can humans must do to prevent extinction.

Animals
Climate
Extinction

Sounding the Alarm ~ America's Climate Crisis

"It's really hard being a fire family. Every day it's getting worse." -Brett, wife of Marin County Battalion Chief in California.Every day, Americans who live close to the land and sea face the dangers of climate change—from a firefighter in California, to a beekeeper in Arizona, to a climate refugee losing her home in Florida. The changing climate affects our food systems, water and way of life. These American families are in the trenches sacrificing everything while facing depression, PTSD, and suicide—collateral damage of a crisis unchecked. Award-winning filmmaker, Peter Goetz, captures America's faces and voices, shot in 2020 leading up to the presidential election. Goetz and the Biden campaign made history, producing the first national climate spot to run during a presidential election. But this film dives deeper into the American climate crisis to explore the lives of the people who are sounding the alarm, worried about their grandchildren’s future, asking, "If not us, then who?" This is a story of the resilience, perseverance, and ingenuity of the American people. Ever hopeful, they collectively take on a common enemy. As the young, Navajo solar visionary Brett Issac insists, "We've got to turn this train around before it's too late."

Climate
Crisis
Government

Talking Trees

Yes, trees can talk. They communicate through their roots. Please listen to what they have to say in this short film.

Forests
Extinction
Climate

A Whale's Worth

The Canary Islands are a whale Paradise. Their waters hold more than a third of the world’s species, making it the most important enclave in the European Union, and one of the most relevant globally.Today, this paradise is being threatened by different human pressures, such as boat collisions, plastic consumption and climate change. This struggle aggravates their mortality each year and makes us face ourselves as the ones responsible for their survival, forcing us to rethink how much we value these animals currently.How much is a whale worth? Can you put a price on the life of such a majestic animal? How can we estimate that value? How has the value that human beings give to whales changed throughout history? What are whales used and needed for?To answer all these questions, Natacha Aguilar, an eminent Canarian scientist and whale expert, backed up by a group of scientists and non-profit organizations, will guide us in a spectacular journey through time and space to discover the never-told stories of the lives of these animals.

Animals
Culture
Climate

We Trees

Ever wonder what trees think of us now that we have created a climate disaster? This 2-minute film answers that question. As Bill McKibben recently tweeted about the film, “Who speaks for trees? In this short and elegant video, the trees themselves.” It has been screened at Green Fest (Serbia), The Colorado Environmental Film Festival, The Wildlife Conservation Film Festival and Winner of Merit at the Nature Without Borders Film Festival.

Forests
Chemicals
Climate

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.