Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

From Giant Tortoises to Immortal Jellyfish, These Impressive Animals Are Eight of the Longest-Living Species on Earth

News Feed
Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Life is short, the old saying goes, but in the world of animals, we humans are pretty fortunate: Our species is quite long-lived. With 122 being the oldest documented age, humans can enjoy decades more life than most fish, birds and mammals—including our primate relatives. But we’re not alone in experiencing longevity. Other rare species reach ages marked in centuries, and each class of animals boasts individuals that are unusually long-lived compared to their peers. Aging wild animals isn’t always easy—they don’t have birth certificates. But we’ve searched the scientific record to identify some of the world’s oldest species and revealed their secrets to staying alive. Giant tortoises are the longest-living reptiles Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise at 185 years old Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images The world’s oldest living land animal, Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise, celebrates his unofficial 192nd birthday this December 4. His estimated birth year is 1832, the year Andrew Jackson won re-election. He was fully mature, thus at least 50, when he was gifted to the governor of Saint Helena island in 1882. But nobody knows his real age, and some experts suspect Jonathan was probably born even earlier. And this ancient individual isn’t an outlier among his kind. Seychelles giant tortoises average a 150-year life span, and related species can be similarly long-lived. How? Genetic studies of Galápagos giant tortoises revealed variants that aid cancer suppression, anti-inflammatory immune responses and DNA repair. When some tortoise cells are subjected to age-related stresses, they tend to self-destruct before they are damaged in ways that could produce cancer or other fatal illnesses. Other research suggests that part of the tortoise’s secret lies in its shell. A study of 77 species of reptiles and amphibians showed that species with protective shells aged five times more slowly than those without the coverings. One theory holds that since shells frequently prevent tortoises from being eaten by predators, shelled species tend to live longer, and over time that may have helped to produce evolutionary pressures to age more slowly. Olms, the cave-dwelling salamanders, are the longest-living amphibians A young olm is released into an aquarium in a cave in Slovenia. Ure Makovec / AFP via Getty Images In the lightless caves of Croatia and Slovenia, the olm cave salamander has adapted superpowers to thrive in an isolated environment across generations over some 20 million years. Olms enjoy extreme senses of smell and hearing, and the ability to hunt by detecting faint electrical fields of other animals in the water nearby. They have also become very long-lived among amphibians, averaging 69 years and reaching ages of 100 or perhaps more. Those estimates come from research out of a cave laboratory in Moulis, France, where scientist have tracked olm births and deaths for some 70 years. Adult olms retain characteristics of their larval youth, like external gills, and show few signs of aging even as the decades pile up. But the reasons why they live so long aren’t clear. These salamanders go through life slowly with a low metabolism. They can go for years without eating and even spend years without moving much from a single location. But their metabolisms aren’t significantly lower than those of relatives that don’t live nearly as long. The olm’s caves are largely free from predators and external threats, so it’s possible that the environment encourages very high survival rates that in turn have somehow enabled olms to evolve extreme life spans. Greenland sharks are the longest-living fish A Greenland shark off the coast of Nunavut Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0 Could a contemporary of William Shakespeare still be swimming in the sea? Greenland sharks inhabit the deep, dark, frigid waters of the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans—and they do so for an astoundingly long time. Radiocarbon dating techniques on the fish’s eye lenses have found living sharks that are around 400 years old, according to a 2016 study, which means they could have been alive during the Bard’s days. In the frigid depths, the cold-blooded animals’ movements and metabolism slow dramatically. Greenland sharks’ metabolic rate is “just above a rock,” Chris Lowe, a shark biologist at the California State University at Long Beach, told Smithsonian magazine in 2016. Greenland sharks are slow-growing, less than half an inch per year, but live so long that mature specimens reach more than 19 feet in length. These sharks may not reach reproductive age until they are 150 years old—longer than any human has ever survived. Based on their growth rates and the size of some sharks, their maximum age could be as much as 500 years. In September 2024, an international team sequenced the shark’s very large genome—a genetic code of 6.5 billion base pairs, twice as long as the human genome. Greenland sharks boast high numbers of repetitive or duplicate genes. That’s often considered detrimental to a genome, but in this case it may be beneficial for longevity because many of the duplicated genes help to repair DNA damage in cells. Termite queens are the longest-living insects A termite queen in captivity China Photos / Getty Images Life is fleeting for most insects. “Generally insect life spans are measured in weeks to months,” says Floyd Shockley, an entomologist at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. These species tend to reproduce at a tender age, having many young as quickly as possible, because their days are numbered. But some social insects, like termites, employ a different strategy, and it enables their queens to defy death for 50 years or more. Among these insects, most individuals—the workers—are largely sterile and live just a few months. They spend that time supporting the queen’s efforts as an egg-laying machine—in some cases she’ll produce thousands a day for many years on end. “The queens reproduce nonstop upon reaching adulthood, and the reproductive cycle has many aspects to it that result in enhanced cellular regeneration,” Shockley explains. This genetic ability to regenerate cells keeps some queens going for decades, arresting their aging until they literally give out and run out of eggs. “At that point,” Shockley says, “they rapidly decline and die.” Laysan albatrosses are the longest-living wild birds An older albatross named Wisdom covers a recently hatched chick in 2011 at Midway Atoll. John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain Birds are relatively long-lived in the animal kingdom, averaging two to three times the life span of mammals of the same size, studies show. This longevity might be related to birds’ ability to fly. As evolution fine-tuned bird biology to engineer flight, building systems like strong muscles and efficient ways to process oxygen, it may have helped them to stay healthier longer—as well as enable them to fly away from potentially lethal situations. Most adult birds don’t show many obvious physical signs of aging, which makes it difficult to know just how long they have been alive in the wild. But one unusual example, a Laysan albatross named Wisdom, is at least 74 years old and has just laid another egg. The oldest-known wild bird in the world, Wisdom was banded in 1956. During her annual wanderings she returns to Midway Atoll each year, usually in December. Scientists estimate that Wisdom has flown over three million miles in her long life, and fledged as many as 30 chicks. Sponges are the longest-living invertebrates The glass sponge Euplectella aspergillum NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain Sponges aren’t the most dynamic animals; rooted to a spot on the seafloor, these filter feeders may appear more similar to plants than animals. But they have at least one jaw-dropping ability—survival. Glass sponge reefs found off British Columbia’s north coast are among the oldest in the entire ocean and have survived for more than 9,000 years. In the East China Sea, scientists discovered the skeleton of a glass sponge that had lived for some 11,000 years. The sponge is so ancient that its remains constitute an archive of ancient climate in the sea. Under chemical analysis, scientists were able to reconstruct past environmental changes like ocean temperature shifts and the eruptions of underwater seamounts, which left their marks on the ancient sponge. Fossils show that these sponges aren’t just long-lived individuals. As a group they are some of the earliest animals to appear on Earth. They may have been around as long as 890 million years ago—more than 600 million years before the dinosaurs emerged. Elephants are some of the longest-living land mammals An elephant mother walks with her baby in Kenya. Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images Elephant memories are long, and so are their lives. African elephants can live up to 70 years, while their slightly smaller Asian elephant relatives may reach 60 years of age. Big mammals like whales and elephants, which are less likely to die from predators or other accidents, tend to live longer lives. This in turn can spur evolutionary genetic and metabolic investments that protect against, or repair, the damage life exerts on cells. Elephants copy tumor-suppressing genes, for example, so that one can function if the other is damaged. That kind of anti-cancer adaptation is unlikely to arise in a short-lived small mammal, like a field mouse, that’s soon to become something’s dinner. And while many species strive to reproduce before they die but don’t have a huge role once their reproductive days have passed, elephants are different. These giants have a social structure that values elders for many years after their peak reproductive period is over. Studies show that elderly female elephants are leaders, valued for their roles as caregivers for the young and for their experience and knowledge to evaluate predatory threats and make good decisions for the group. Immortal jellyfish are the longest-living invertebrates The immortal jellyfish: is it possible to live forever? These tiny jellyfish have been drifting around the oceans since before the days of the dinosaurs—but how long has a single jellyfish lived? It appears to be biologically possible that, if not swallowed up by predators or killed by other factors, an immortal jellyfish could live indefinitely. Like other jellyfish, the species’ fertilized eggs develop into a larva form, which then drops to the seafloor and grows into a colony of polyps. The polyps later morph into the recognizable, free-floating jellyfish forms known as medusas. But incredibly, when faced with threats from injury to starvation, the immortal jellyfish can reverse the process, turning the clock backward. First the gelatinous layer thins out and the jellyfish settles on the bottom, where it becomes a cyst-like mass of cells. All features of the familiar “medusa” shape disappear. But within a few days it starts to show polyp features, and it begins the life cycle anew. “The process is a true metamorphosis, albeit in opposite direction to the normal developmental cycle,” says Maria Pia Miglietta, who studies the evolution and ecology of the immortal jellyfish at Texas A&M University. Miglietta adds that the transformation from jellyfish to polyp may involve transdifferentiation—a process in which mature cells transform from one type to another entirely different type of cell. Miglietta says that while the jellyfish life cycle has been reversed many times in the lab, nobody knows how often it happens or how long the jellyfish might survive in the wild. “Studying these animals in the ocean is hard,” she says, “and we haven’t figured out how to follow a two-millimeter jellyfish and see what happens to it.”Full Credit for Main Image: Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0; John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain; Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images; China Photos / Getty Images; Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images; NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Aging gracefully comes naturally to these creatures, which can live for hundreds, and sometimes even thousands, of years

Life is short, the old saying goes, but in the world of animals, we humans are pretty fortunate: Our species is quite long-lived. With 122 being the oldest documented age, humans can enjoy decades more life than most fish, birds and mammals—including our primate relatives.

But we’re not alone in experiencing longevity. Other rare species reach ages marked in centuries, and each class of animals boasts individuals that are unusually long-lived compared to their peers. Aging wild animals isn’t always easy—they don’t have birth certificates. But we’ve searched the scientific record to identify some of the world’s oldest species and revealed their secrets to staying alive.

Giant tortoises are the longest-living reptiles

Jonathan the Seychelles Giant Tortoise
Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise at 185 years old Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images

The world’s oldest living land animal, Jonathan the Seychelles giant tortoise, celebrates his unofficial 192nd birthday this December 4. His estimated birth year is 1832, the year Andrew Jackson won re-election. He was fully mature, thus at least 50, when he was gifted to the governor of Saint Helena island in 1882. But nobody knows his real age, and some experts suspect Jonathan was probably born even earlier. And this ancient individual isn’t an outlier among his kind. Seychelles giant tortoises average a 150-year life span, and related species can be similarly long-lived. How?

Genetic studies of Galápagos giant tortoises revealed variants that aid cancer suppression, anti-inflammatory immune responses and DNA repair. When some tortoise cells are subjected to age-related stresses, they tend to self-destruct before they are damaged in ways that could produce cancer or other fatal illnesses. Other research suggests that part of the tortoise’s secret lies in its shell. A study of 77 species of reptiles and amphibians showed that species with protective shells aged five times more slowly than those without the coverings. One theory holds that since shells frequently prevent tortoises from being eaten by predators, shelled species tend to live longer, and over time that may have helped to produce evolutionary pressures to age more slowly.

Olms, the cave-dwelling salamanders, are the longest-living amphibians

Olm
A young olm is released into an aquarium in a cave in Slovenia. Ure Makovec / AFP via Getty Images

In the lightless caves of Croatia and Slovenia, the olm cave salamander has adapted superpowers to thrive in an isolated environment across generations over some 20 million years. Olms enjoy extreme senses of smell and hearing, and the ability to hunt by detecting faint electrical fields of other animals in the water nearby. They have also become very long-lived among amphibians, averaging 69 years and reaching ages of 100 or perhaps more. Those estimates come from research out of a cave laboratory in Moulis, France, where scientist have tracked olm births and deaths for some 70 years.

Adult olms retain characteristics of their larval youth, like external gills, and show few signs of aging even as the decades pile up. But the reasons why they live so long aren’t clear. These salamanders go through life slowly with a low metabolism. They can go for years without eating and even spend years without moving much from a single location. But their metabolisms aren’t significantly lower than those of relatives that don’t live nearly as long. The olm’s caves are largely free from predators and external threats, so it’s possible that the environment encourages very high survival rates that in turn have somehow enabled olms to evolve extreme life spans.

Greenland sharks are the longest-living fish

Greenland Shark
A Greenland shark off the coast of Nunavut Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0

Could a contemporary of William Shakespeare still be swimming in the sea? Greenland sharks inhabit the deep, dark, frigid waters of the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans—and they do so for an astoundingly long time. Radiocarbon dating techniques on the fish’s eye lenses have found living sharks that are around 400 years old, according to a 2016 study, which means they could have been alive during the Bard’s days.

In the frigid depths, the cold-blooded animals’ movements and metabolism slow dramatically. Greenland sharks’ metabolic rate is “just above a rock,” Chris Lowe, a shark biologist at the California State University at Long Beach, told Smithsonian magazine in 2016. Greenland sharks are slow-growing, less than half an inch per year, but live so long that mature specimens reach more than 19 feet in length. These sharks may not reach reproductive age until they are 150 years old—longer than any human has ever survived. Based on their growth rates and the size of some sharks, their maximum age could be as much as 500 years.

In September 2024, an international team sequenced the shark’s very large genome—a genetic code of 6.5 billion base pairs, twice as long as the human genome. Greenland sharks boast high numbers of repetitive or duplicate genes. That’s often considered detrimental to a genome, but in this case it may be beneficial for longevity because many of the duplicated genes help to repair DNA damage in cells.

Termite queens are the longest-living insects

Termite Queen
A termite queen in captivity China Photos / Getty Images

Life is fleeting for most insects. “Generally insect life spans are measured in weeks to months,” says Floyd Shockley, an entomologist at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. These species tend to reproduce at a tender age, having many young as quickly as possible, because their days are numbered.

But some social insects, like termites, employ a different strategy, and it enables their queens to defy death for 50 years or more. Among these insects, most individuals—the workers—are largely sterile and live just a few months. They spend that time supporting the queen’s efforts as an egg-laying machine—in some cases she’ll produce thousands a day for many years on end. “The queens reproduce nonstop upon reaching adulthood, and the reproductive cycle has many aspects to it that result in enhanced cellular regeneration,” Shockley explains. This genetic ability to regenerate cells keeps some queens going for decades, arresting their aging until they literally give out and run out of eggs. “At that point,” Shockley says, “they rapidly decline and die.”

Laysan albatrosses are the longest-living wild birds

Wisdom the Laysan Albatross
An older albatross named Wisdom covers a recently hatched chick in 2011 at Midway Atoll. John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain

Birds are relatively long-lived in the animal kingdom, averaging two to three times the life span of mammals of the same size, studies show. This longevity might be related to birds’ ability to fly. As evolution fine-tuned bird biology to engineer flight, building systems like strong muscles and efficient ways to process oxygen, it may have helped them to stay healthier longer—as well as enable them to fly away from potentially lethal situations.

Most adult birds don’t show many obvious physical signs of aging, which makes it difficult to know just how long they have been alive in the wild. But one unusual example, a Laysan albatross named Wisdom, is at least 74 years old and has just laid another egg. The oldest-known wild bird in the world, Wisdom was banded in 1956. During her annual wanderings she returns to Midway Atoll each year, usually in December. Scientists estimate that Wisdom has flown over three million miles in her long life, and fledged as many as 30 chicks.

Sponges are the longest-living invertebrates

Glass Sponge
The glass sponge Euplectella aspergillum NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain

Sponges aren’t the most dynamic animals; rooted to a spot on the seafloor, these filter feeders may appear more similar to plants than animals. But they have at least one jaw-dropping ability—survival. Glass sponge reefs found off British Columbia’s north coast are among the oldest in the entire ocean and have survived for more than 9,000 years.

In the East China Sea, scientists discovered the skeleton of a glass sponge that had lived for some 11,000 years. The sponge is so ancient that its remains constitute an archive of ancient climate in the sea. Under chemical analysis, scientists were able to reconstruct past environmental changes like ocean temperature shifts and the eruptions of underwater seamounts, which left their marks on the ancient sponge.

Fossils show that these sponges aren’t just long-lived individuals. As a group they are some of the earliest animals to appear on Earth. They may have been around as long as 890 million years ago—more than 600 million years before the dinosaurs emerged.

Elephants are some of the longest-living land mammals

Elephants
An elephant mother walks with her baby in Kenya. Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images

Elephant memories are long, and so are their lives. African elephants can live up to 70 years, while their slightly smaller Asian elephant relatives may reach 60 years of age.

Big mammals like whales and elephants, which are less likely to die from predators or other accidents, tend to live longer lives. This in turn can spur evolutionary genetic and metabolic investments that protect against, or repair, the damage life exerts on cells. Elephants copy tumor-suppressing genes, for example, so that one can function if the other is damaged. That kind of anti-cancer adaptation is unlikely to arise in a short-lived small mammal, like a field mouse, that’s soon to become something’s dinner.

And while many species strive to reproduce before they die but don’t have a huge role once their reproductive days have passed, elephants are different. These giants have a social structure that values elders for many years after their peak reproductive period is over. Studies show that elderly female elephants are leaders, valued for their roles as caregivers for the young and for their experience and knowledge to evaluate predatory threats and make good decisions for the group.

Immortal jellyfish are the longest-living invertebrates

The immortal jellyfish: is it possible to live forever?

These tiny jellyfish have been drifting around the oceans since before the days of the dinosaurs—but how long has a single jellyfish lived? It appears to be biologically possible that, if not swallowed up by predators or killed by other factors, an immortal jellyfish could live indefinitely.

Like other jellyfish, the species’ fertilized eggs develop into a larva form, which then drops to the seafloor and grows into a colony of polyps. The polyps later morph into the recognizable, free-floating jellyfish forms known as medusas.

But incredibly, when faced with threats from injury to starvation, the immortal jellyfish can reverse the process, turning the clock backward. First the gelatinous layer thins out and the jellyfish settles on the bottom, where it becomes a cyst-like mass of cells. All features of the familiar “medusa” shape disappear. But within a few days it starts to show polyp features, and it begins the life cycle anew.

“The process is a true metamorphosis, albeit in opposite direction to the normal developmental cycle,” says Maria Pia Miglietta, who studies the evolution and ecology of the immortal jellyfish at Texas A&M University. Miglietta adds that the transformation from jellyfish to polyp may involve transdifferentiation—a process in which mature cells transform from one type to another entirely different type of cell.

Miglietta says that while the jellyfish life cycle has been reversed many times in the lab, nobody knows how often it happens or how long the jellyfish might survive in the wild. “Studying these animals in the ocean is hard,” she says, “and we haven’t figured out how to follow a two-millimeter jellyfish and see what happens to it.”

Full Credit for Main Image: Hemming1952 via Wikipedia under CC By-SA 4.0; John Klavitter / U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via Wikipedia / Public Domain; Eric Lafforgue / Art in All of Us / Corbis via Getty Images; China Photos / Getty Images; Gianluigi Guercia / AFP via Getty Images; NOAA via Wikipedia / Public Domain

Get the latest Science stories in your inbox.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Are you a hellraiser mite or a knobbled weevil? Take the quiz and vote for NZ’s Bug of the Year

Take the personality quiz to match with one of NZ’s larger-than-life little creatures, then cast your vote.

The black tunnelweb spider. Samuel Purdie, CC BY-NCThe New Zealand velvet worm’s reign as Bug of the Year is coming to an end, with voting now open for the 2026 competition. This year, 21 nominees are vying for the crown in the competition’s fourth year. Nearly 100 bugs have so far featured, representing an incredible range of rich invertebrate diversity – from insects and arachnids to crustaceans, worms and molluscs. The term “bug” was chosen deliberately. While not scientifically precise, it acts as an easily understood umbrella definition of Aotearoa New Zealand’s sometimes overlooked littlest animals. As relatively large organisms ourselves, we humans tend to notice and celebrate larger and more charismatic fauna and flora, such as birds and trees. But they comprise only about 5% of New Zealand’s estimated 70,000 native land species. The rest are small and often unseen, but absolutely vital. Aotearoa is home to over 20,000 insect species – and those are just the ones we’ve identified. Around 6,000 beetle species alone crawl, burrow and fly across our landscape. Bugs are the tiny critters that run the world. Forming the base of many food webs and ecological interactions, they underpin much of our freshwater and terrestrial biodiversity. They pollinate food crops, decompose waste and recycle nutrients. Owing to their fast response to environmental changes, they also serve as key indicators of environmental health. Master of camouflage: the double-spined stick insect. Dougal Townsend, CC BY-NC And the nominees are … This year’s nominees are the most diverse in the competition’s history. There are repeat candidates, such as the endangered Canterbury knobbled weevil (Hadramphus tuberculatus), as well as new contenders such as the tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus apus viridis) which reproduces without males, or the double-spined stick insect (Micrarchus hystriculeus), which is an incredible master of camouflage. Some nominees, such as the sapphire spider fly (Apsona muscaria) – a fly that eats spiders – are relatively unknown. And there are more familiar species such as the impressively large black tunnelweb spider (Porrhothele antipodiana). Others are known for their outstanding features or behaviour, including the hellraiser mite (Neotrichozetes spinulosa), which looks like a walking pin-cushion, and a critically threatened avatar moth (Arctesthes avatar), named for the movie series with its themes of environmental destruction. We even have the ancient and gigantic glow-in-the-dark North Auckland worm, and the Otago alpine cockroach (Celatoblatta quinquemaculata) that can survive being frozen solid. There is also one of the world’s only marine insects, the intertidal caddisfly (Philanisus plebeius), whose nymph lives on the rocky shore. Like a walking pin-cushion: the hellraiser mite. Shou Saito, CC BY-NC Many are endemic and found only here. But like bugs and insect populations around the planet, they face mounting threats – described in one study as “death by a thousand cuts” – from climate change, agrichemical use and habitat loss or modification. Aotearoa is not exempt from these threats, but many of our bugs are data-deficient, understudied, underappreciated and often out-competed for attention by other wildlife. This summer, keep an eye out for the tiny things around you: the bugs that soar in our skies, scamper in our forests, settle in our rivers and lakes or even hide underground. As humans continue to expand urban landscapes into natural ones, the Entomological Society of New Zealand hopes its Bug of the Year contest will help build public support and appreciation for more research into these unsung heroes of the natural world. How to vote Not sure what to vote for? Take the personality quiz to see which bug you most align with. Voting closes on February 16 2026, with results announced on February 18. Nominees are suggested by the public, so if your top pick isn’t featured this year, you can make recommendations by July 1 for the 2027 contest and beyond. Connal McLean is affiliated with The Entomological Society of New Zealand and The Moths and Butterflies of New Zealand Trust. Jacqueline Theis receives funding from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (grant number UOWX2101). She is affiliated with the Entomological Society of New Zealand.

The Top Human Evolution Discoveries of 2025, From the Intriguing Neanderthal Diet to the Oldest Western European Face Fossil

Smithsonian paleoanthropologists examine the year’s most fascinating revelations

The Top Human Evolution Discoveries of 2025, From the Intriguing Neanderthal Diet to the Oldest Western European Face Fossil Smithsonian paleoanthropologists examine the year’s most fascinating revelations Paranthropus boisei composite hand Courtesy of Carrie Mongle This has been quite the wild year in human evolution stories. Our relatives, living and extinct, got a lot of attention—from new developments in ape cognition to an expanded perspective of a big-toothed hominin cousin. A new view on a famous foot also revealed more about a lesser-known hominin species, Australopithecus deyiremeda. New tool and technology finds, coupled with dietary studies, showed us more than ever about the behavior of our ancestors and ourselves. New fossils gave us a glimpse at the earliest Europeans, predating both our own species and the Neanderthals. Finally, we dove deeper into the blockbuster story of the year, looking at some of the biggest Denisovan studies which give us a clearer than ever picture of these enigmatic human relatives.Human traits of chimps and bonobos Portrait of a bonobo Fiona Rogers / Getty Images A February study investigated theory of mind, or the uniquely human trait of recognizing the cognitive sapience of others, which allows modern humans to communicate and coordinate to an extent not seen in other animals. Study co-author Luke Townrow and colleagues set up an experiment where bonobos would receive a food reward hidden under cups, but only if they cooperated with their human partner and showed them where the food was first. Sometimes the bonobo could tell the human knew where the food was, and sometimes the animal could tell the human didn’t know where the food was. Bonobos pointed to the location of the hidden food more frequently and quicker when they knew the human was ignorant of the food’s location, indicating that they could interpret the human’s mental state and act accordingly, a hallmark of theory of mind. In addition to cooperating, an April study shows that apes also share, especially when it comes to fermented fruit. Anna Bowland and colleagues documented the first recorded instance of fermented food sharing in chimpanzees, observed in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. At least 17 chimps of all ages shared fermented breadfruits, ranging between 0.01 percent and 0.61 percent alcohol by volume. While this may not be enough ethanol to result in the sort of intoxication levels desired by many humans, this demonstrates that food sharing, and fermented food consumption, have deep evolutionary roots, supported by the evolution of ethanol metabolism among all African apes. On top of all that monkey business, an October study shows that chimps even have complex decision-making processes. Hanna Schleihauf and colleagues presented to chimps two boxes, one that contained food and one that was either empty or contained a non-food item. The chimps were allowed to choose a box twice, after receiving either weak or strong evidence about which box contains the food. The team found that chimps were able to revise their beliefs about the food’s location in response to more convincing evidence: When they picked the wrong box after the weak hint, they switched to the correct box after the following strong hint. Also, when they picked the correct box after a strong hint, they kept their selection after a weak hint. The study highlights the chimpanzees’ ability to make rational decisions, and even change decisions, in response to learning new information. Fun fact: Chimps may use medicinal herbs In a study last year, researchers collected extracts of plants that they saw chimpanzees eating outside of their normal diets in Uganda’s Budongo Central Forest Reserve. The researchers discovered that “88 percent of the plant extracts inhibited bacterial growth, while 33 percent had anti-inflammatory properties.” A holistic picture of Paranthropus The reconstructed left hand of the Paranthropus boisei Mongle, Carrie et al., Nature, 2025 Besides learning more about our ape relatives, we also learned a lot more about some of our hominin cousins this year. Paranthropus is a genus of hominins consisting of three species, mostly known for their large teeth and massive chewing muscles that they likely used to break down tough plant fibers. However, not much was known about them outside of their mouths and skulls. A Paranthropus study from April helps to close this gap, describing an articulated lower limb from the Swartkrans site in South Africa. Travis Pickering and colleagues described a partial pelvis, femur and tibia of an adult Paranthropus robustus dating back 2.3 million to 1.7 million years ago. The anatomy of the hip, femur and knee indicate that this individual was fully bipedal. This hominin would probably have been only about three feet tall, one of the tiniest hominins on record. Due to a lack of other fossil material for comparison and the pelvis fossil being very incomplete, estimating the sex of this individual is more difficult. However, another study from May pioneered the use of different methods to estimate the sex of Paranthropus fossils. Analyzing proteins preserved in fossil tooth enamel, Palesa Madupe and colleagues were able to determine sex and begin to investigate genetic variability in Paranthropus fossils from South Africa. Using these proteins, the team was able to identify two male and two female individuals, allowing for more accurate hypotheses about sexual dimorphism (sex-based body size and shape differences). The team also found that one of the individuals appeared to be more distantly related, hinting at microevolution within this species. Lastly, a study published in October described a Paranthropus boisei hand from the Koobi Fora site in Kenya, which allowed scientists to learn if Paranthropus could have made stone tools. Carrie Mongle and colleagues looked at the nearly complete Paranthropus hand, which reveals a mostly hominin-looking morphology. Yet with strong musculature and wide bones, the grasping capabilities of Paranthropus seem to converge with that of gorillas, although they likely used this powerful grip to strip vegetation and process food rather than for climbing. Additionally, with a long thumb and precision grasping capabilities, the authors hypothesize that nothing in their hand morphology would have prevented Paranthropus boisei from making and using stone tools. This builds on other recent finds suggesting that the ability to make and use complex tools was not limited to the genus Homo.The family of a famous footThe Burtele foot, a fossil from Ethiopia that was described in 2012 and originally not given a species designation, dates to about 3.4 million years ago. Despite being contemporaneous with Australopithecus afarensis, Lucy’s species, the fossil looked almost nothing like it. The locomotor adaptations were completely different, and the foot still had an opposable big toe, like modern apes and the earlier genus Ardipithecus. In November, Yohannes Haile-Selassie and colleagues published research on other fossils from the same site where the Burtele foot was found. A new mandible with teeth links the hominin fossils at Burtele to a less well-known species, Australopithecus deyiremeda. This species had primitive teeth and grasping feet, with isotopic evidence pointing to a plant-based diet more similar to that of earlier species like Ardipithecus ramidus and Australopithecus anamensis. These new finds show that primitive traits persisted more recently into the timeline of human evolution and that our family tree is even bushier than previously thought.Ancient tool technologies An ancient ochre fragment that shows signs of re-use  d’Errico, Francesco et al., Science Advances, 2025 Archaeological sites, by definition, are evidence of past human behavior. But it’s not often a find is unearthed that turns out to be evidence of just one past human’s behavior. A study in August by Dominik Chlachula and colleagues reports on a small cluster of 29 stone artifacts from the Milovice IV site in the Czech Republic that were probably bundled together in a container or pouch made of perishable material: basically, a Stone Age hunter-gatherer’s personal toolkit. The 30,000-year-old blade and bladelet tools were made from different kinds of stone (flint, radiolarite, chert and opal). Use-wear analysis showed they were used for cutting, scraping and drilling, and the kit also included projectiles used for hunting. Now we move farther back in time, to when some of the earliest members of our lineage were making tools. In November, David Braun and colleagues reported on stone toolmaking in the Turkana Basin of Kenya that started about 2.75 million years ago at the new site of Namorotukunan, which contains one of the oldest and longest intervals of the making of Oldowan tools. This simple core-and-flake technology was, as revealed by this new evidence, nevertheless undertaken with enough skill—and the tools useful enough for various activities—to be made consistently for almost 300,000 years, through dramatic environmental changes, highlighting our ancestors’ resilience. However, not all ancient tools were made for practical purposes. In October, Francesco d’Errico and colleagues described three pieces of ochre, an iron-rich mineral pigment, from archaeological sites in Crimea, Ukraine. These artifacts were deliberately collected, shaped, engraved, polished, resharpened and deposited there by Neanderthals up to 70,000 years ago. Although it’s impossible to know what the Neanderthals did with these yellow and red pigments, the fact that they seemed to be kept sharpened suggests that their tips were used to produce linear marks. This suggests that they had a symbolic or artistic function, rather than a utilitarian one, perhaps playing a role in identity expression, communication and transmitting knowledge across generations.Neanderthal eating habitsWhen they weren’t busy coloring with paleo-crayons, our Neanderthal cousins are known for being skilled hunters of large animals, and two studies in July shed new light on their diets. First, Lutz Kindler and colleagues documented that 125,000 years ago, at the site of Neumark-Nord in Germany, Neanderthals processed at least 172 animals at the edge of a lake, most likely to extract bone grease. This “fat factory,” as the researchers called it, is much older than previously documented grease extraction sites, and this extreme bone-bashing behavior had not been seen before at Neanderthal sites. The team documented how Neanderthals transported the bones of these animals, mostly antelope, deer and horses, but even some forest elephants, to the site to crush, chop up and boil to get at the nutritious, calorie-rich fat inside. (Speaking of Neanderthals cooking things, a December study by Rob Davis, Nick Ashton and colleagues documented the earliest evidence of deliberate fire-making from the 400,000-year-old site of Barnham in England, where they found heated sediments, fire-cracked flint handaxes and fragments of iron pyrite—a mineral used to strike sparks with flint—likely brought to the site from far away.) Later in July, Melanie Beasley and colleagues made an intriguing suggestion about the Neanderthal diet. Humans and our earlier relatives can only eat a certain proportion of protein in our diets without getting protein poisoning, but chemical signatures (specifically, nitrogen isotope values) in Neanderthal bones indicate that they ate as much protein as other ancient hyper-carnivores. So, what was causing this? Maybe it was maggots, fat-rich fly larvae. When an animal dies, maggots feed on the decaying flesh, which has higher nitrogen values as it decomposes. Many Indigenous forager groups regard putrid meat as a tasty treat. If Neanderthals were eating nitrogen-enriched maggots feeding on rotting muscle tissue in dried, frozen or cached (deliberately stored) dead animals, that might at least partly explain their unusually high nitrogen values. While our later evolutionary cousins may have munched on maggots, a study in January by Tina Lüdecke and colleagues looked at carbon and nitrogen isotopes in the teeth of Australopithecus and other animal species dating back more than three million years ago from South Africa’s Sterkfontein site. The isotope ratios of the seven Australopithecus teeth were variable but consistently low, and more similar to the contemporaneous herbivores than the carnivores, suggesting they were not consuming much meat. This follows with other recent studies suggesting, contrary to common belief, that carnivory was not a major factor shaping our evolution.The earliest EuropeansTwo studies this year focused on early evidence for hominins in Europe. In January, Sabrina Curran and colleagues reported cut marks on several animal bones from the Graunceanu site in Romania, dating to at least 1.95 million years ago—now among the earliest evidence that hominins had spread to Eurasia by that time. To verify that these were cut marks made by stone tools, they compared 3D shape data from impressions of the marks to a reference set of almost 900 modern marks made by stone tool butchery, carnivore feeding and sedimentary abrasion. They concluded that the marks on eight Graunceanu fossils, mainly hoofed animals like deer, were stone tool cut marks. In March, Rosa Huguet and colleagues reported on the earliest hominin face fossil from Western Europe, dated to 1.4 million-1.1 million years ago, found in Spain. The shape of the left half of the face fossil is more similar to Homo erectus (which had not been documented in Europe), rather than resembling later and more modern looking Homo antecessor fossils found almost 1,000 feet away and dated to between 900,000-800,000 years ago. The scientific name of the new fossil is ATE7-1, but its nickname is “Pink.” This is a nod to Pink Floyd’s album The Dark Side of the Moon, which in Spanish is La cara oculta de la luna (cara oculta means hidden face). Also, Huguet’s first name, Rosa, is Spanish for pink.New Denisovan discoveries A reconstruction of the Harbin cranium by paleoartist John Gurche Courtesy of John Gurche Denisovan fossils have been found in Siberia and throughout East Asia, although they are few and far between. Denisovans may be our most enigmatic cousins, because we’ve learned more about them through DNA, including DNA we got from interbreeding with them, than from their fossils. Until this year, that is. A study from April described a new Denisovan mandible. Takumi Tsutaya and colleagues analyzed the Penghu 1 mandible, dredged up from the coast of Taiwan, and discovered that the morphology and protein sequences both matched it with Denisovans. Proteomics also allowed the team to determine this was a male individual, and this find expands the known range of Denisovans into warmer, wetter regions of Asia. Next, two stories from this summer took a second look at the Harbin cranium, termed “Dragon Man” and given the species name Homo longi in 2021. The first study, in June, looked at the proteome of the Harbin cranium, while the second study, in July, looked at the mitochondrial DNA; both studies were led by Qiaomei Fu. While no DNA was able to be retrieved from the fossil itself, proteomics and the DNA from dental calculus both suggested that this fossil was part of the Denisovan group. Together, these studies give the first look at the face of a Denisovan, lining up morphology with molecules. While more work needs to be done to build the body of evidence and give scientists a more complete view of Denisovan anatomy, habitat and behavior, being able to link complete fossils with the molecular evidence is a huge step forward. While it is unclear what this means for the name “Denisovan” itself, we hypothesize that it will persist as a popular or common name, much like how we call Homo neanderthalensis “Neanderthals” today. Lastly, in September, Xiaobo Feng and colleagues reconstructed and described the Yunxian 2 cranium from China, dating to one million years ago. The skull was meticulously reconstructed from crushed and warped fragments and appears to have a mix of primitive and derived traits, and it is also closely aligned with the Homo longi group. The phylogenetic analysis conducted by the team changes the perspective of late hominin divergence, with Homo longi and Homo sapiens being sister taxa to the exclusion of Neanderthals, and all three groups having evolutionary origins two to three times older than previously thought: at least 1.2 million years ago. While more finds will support or refute these phylogenetic claims, new fossil evidence continues to help refine our understanding of our lineage—and never stops surprising us.This story originally appeared in PLOS SciComm, a blog from PLOS, a nonprofit that publishes open-access scientific studies. Get the latest on what's happening At the Smithsonian in your inbox.

Montana Judge Allows 2025-26 Wolf Hunting and Trapping Regulations to Stand While Lawsuit Proceeds

A Montana judge is allowing the wolf hunting and trapping regulations the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted earlier this year to stand, saying it's doubtful hunters and trappers will meet the record-high quota of 458 wolves this season

A Helena judge has allowed the wolf hunting and trapping regulations the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted earlier this year to stand, despite flagging “serious concerns” about the state’s ability to accurately estimate Montana’s wolf population.In a 43-page opinion, District Court Judge Christopher Abbott wrote that leaving the 2025-2026 hunting and trapping regulations in place while he considers an underlying lawsuit will not “push wolf populations to an unsustainable level.”In its lawsuit, first filed in 2022, WildEarth Guardians, Project Coyote, Footloose Montana and Gallatin Wildlife Association challenged four laws adopted by the 2021 Montana Legislature aimed at driving wolf numbers down. Earlier this year, the environmental groups added new claims to their lawsuit and asked the court to stop the 2025-2026 regulations from taking effect. The groups argued that a record-high wolf hunting and trapping quota of 458 wolves, paired with the potential for another 100 wolves to be killed for preying on livestock or otherwise getting into conflict with humans, would push the state’s wolf population “toward long-term decline and irreparable harm.” According to the state’s population estimates — figures that the environmental groups dispute — there are approximately 1,100 wolves across the state.In a Dec. 19 press release about the decision, Connie Poten with Footloose Montana described the ruling as a “severe setback,” but argued that the “resulting slaughter will only strengthen our ongoing case for the protection of this vital species.”“The fight for wolves is deep and broad, based in science, connection, humaneness and necessity. Wolves will not die in vain,” Poten said.Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks declined to comment on the order, citing the ongoing litigation. Montana Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition, nonprofit groups that backed the state’s position in the litigation, could not be reached for comment on the order by publication time Monday afternoon.The order comes more than a month after a two-hour hearing on the request for an injunction, and about three weeks after the trapping season opened across the majority of the state. The trapping season is set to close no later than March 15, 2026.During the Nov. 14 hearing at the Lewis and Clark County courthouse, Alexander Scolavino argued on behalf of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission that hunters, trappers and wildlife managers won’t come close to killing 558 wolves this season. Scolavino added that the highest number shot or trapped in a single season was 350 wolves in 2020 — well shy of the 458-wolf quota the commission, the governor-appointed board that sets hunting seasons for game species and furbearers, adopted in August.Abbott agreed with Scolavino’s argument, writing in his order that it’s unlikely that hunters and trappers will “achieve anything near the quota established by the commission.” To reinforce his claim, he noted that hunters and trappers have not killed 334 wolves — the quota commissioners adopted for the 2024-2025 season — in any of the past five seasons. “In short, nothing suggests that the 2025/2026 season is likely to push wolf populations to an unsustainable level or cause them irreparable injury,” he concluded.Abbott seemed to suggest that livestock-oriented conflicts are waning and that it’s unlikely that the state will authorize the killing of 100 “conflict” wolves. He noted that livestock depredations dropped from “a high of 233 in 2009 to 100 per year or less today.” On other issues — namely the Constitutional environmental rights asserted by the plaintiffs and the reliability of the state’s wolf population-estimation model — Abbott appeared to side with the plaintiffs. Those issues remain unresolved in the ongoing litigation before the court.Abbott wrote that the plaintiffs “are likely to show that a sustainable wolf population in Montana forms part of the ‘environmental life support system’ of the state.” The environmental groups had argued in their filings that the existing wolf-management framework “will deplete and degrade Montana’s wolf population,” running afoul of the state’s duty to “preserve the right to a clean and healthful environment.”In his order, Abbott incorporated material from the plaintiffs’ filings regarding the economic and ecological benefits of wolves, including “the suppression of overabundant elk, deer and coyote populations,” “restoring vegetation that aids water quality, songbirds and insect pollinators,” and “generating income and jobs” by contributing to the wildlife-watching economy anchored by Yellowstone National Park.Abbott also expressed “serious concerns” about the way the state estimates wolf numbers — a model that relies, among other things, on wolf sightings reported by elk hunters — but ultimately concluded that the court is currently “unequipped” to referee “the palace intrigues of academia” in the wildlife population-modeling arena. In the press release about the decision, the environmental groups described these pieces of Abbott’s order as “serious and valid questions” that the court must still address.Another lawsuit relating to the 2025-2026 wolf regulations is ongoing. On Sept. 30, Rep. Paul Fielder, R-Thompson Falls, and Sen. Shannon Maness, R-Dillon, joined an outfitter from Gallatin County and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition (which intervened in the environmental groups’ litigation) to push the state to loosen regulations by, for example, lengthening the trapping season and expanding the tools hunters or trappers can use to pursue and kill wolves. The plaintiffs in that lawsuit argue that liberalizing the hunting and trapping season would reaffirm the “opportunity to harvest wild fish and wild game animals enshrined in the Montana Constitution,” and bring the state into alignment with a 2021 law directing the commission to adopt regulations with an “intent to reduce the wolf population.”According to the state’s wolf management dashboard, 83 wolves have been shot or trapped as of Dec. 22. The department closed the two wolf management units closest to Yellowstone National Park to further hunting and trapping earlier this year after three wolves were killed in each of those units. This story was originally published by Montana Free Press and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – December 2025

Pink platypus spotted in Gippsland is cute – but don’t get too excited

Biologist says monotreme a Victorian fisher has nicknamed Pinky is ‘unusual but not exceptional’Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastCody Stylianou thought he saw a huge trout. But, skimming just below the surface, it was moving differently than a fish would.The creature surfaced and, amazed, the Victorian fisher reached for his phone. Swimming in front of him was a pink platypus. Continue reading...

Cody Stylianou thought he saw a huge trout. But, skimming just below the surface, it was moving differently than a fish would.The creature surfaced and, amazed, the Victorian fisher reached for his phone. Swimming in front of him was a pink platypus.Stylianou regularly fishes in the Gippsland spot, which he is keeping secret to protect the rare animal. He thinks it could be the same one he saw years ago, just older and bigger.“The bill and feet are super obviously pink,” he says. “When he did go a bit further into sunlit areas, he was easy to follow underwater, which is how I got so many videos of him surfacing.”Stylianou had been on his first trout fishing trip of the season in September when he saw the platypus, which he has nicknamed “Pinky”. He watched it feed at the top of the tannin-stained river for about 15 minutes.Sign up: AU Breaking News email“I’ve seen other platypus in the same river system, just regular coloured ones,” he says. “Probably about five to eight of them over the years, from memory. Normally, they just pop up at the top of the water and then disappear once they see me.”After Stylinaou shared footage of the monotreme, commenters online speculated that it could have been a rare albino platypus. But the biologist Jeff Williams says it is just lighter in colour than what most would expect.“Platypus do vary a lot in colour,” the director of the Australian Platypus Conservancy says. “And this one’s at the extreme end of the light ones. It’s not one that we consider should be added to the list of albino and leucistic ones.”Just as humans have different coloured hair or skin pigment, platypus also come in different variations, Williams says. He said the platypus captured on video was “unusual but not exceptional”.“What I’ve seen and what every other leading platypus person has looked at, it says, is that it’s well within the sort of variation in colour that one would expect,” he says.“Let’s put it this way, it’s cute, but it’s not a breakthrough … We think this is just one of the extreme ends. Every so often, you will get a genetic anomaly that just throws up things, just as it does with some humans, who have more freckles and so on.“It’s somewhat unusual, but it’s nothing to get particularly excited about, we’re afraid.”Sniffer dogs are being trained to track down threatened platypus populations – videoThe platypus is listed as near-threatened on the International Union for Conservation of Nature. There has also been a decline in Victorian populations, making them more vulnerable, Williams says.“Platypus were in significant decline up until about the 1990s when all the impact of European settlement on our waterways was becoming apparent,” he says.“We messed up pretty much the flow of every river we’ve got. We cleared native vegetation along most of our waterways, and, not surprisingly, that put a lot of pressure on the platypus population.”Replanting programs along the waterways, and consideration of environmental impacts near rivers, have started to help the population come back.“We’ve still got a way to go, and we can’t be complacent,” Williams says.“But the good news at the moment is most of the survey work that’s being done around the place is suggesting numbers that are coming back, certainly the number of sightings in some places where there was concern.”

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.