Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Europe saved its predators from the brink of extinction. So why is it killing thousands of bears, wolves and lynx?

News Feed
Thursday, September 12, 2024

The forest was unnaturally still when Soňa Chovanová Supeková first picked up the bear’s scent. It was roe deer rutting season in southern Slovakia, and the hills below the Carpathian mountains were busy with tourists biking and foraging for mushrooms. Fellow hunters who had come face to face with bears had told Supeková the fear had been so great they could not lift their rifles. Sitting with her father, a hunter in his 80s who had killed a few bears, she found herself in a similar state of dread – she was out on that trip expecting to kill deer, and did not want to come on a bear unexpectedly.“Fear permeated me … the smell penetrated to the tip of my bones,” says Supeková, the founder of the Club of Slovak Lady Hunters. But the bear never appeared. The next morning, the daughter-and-father hunting duo saw its droppings. “We breathed a sigh of relief only in the car.”A 124kg male bear was one of 19 shot during the first day of hunting in Ljusdal, central Sweden, on 21 August 2020. Photograph: Adam Ihse/TT News Agency/AlamyEurope’s brown bears are a protected species. But they – alongside wolves and lynxes – are increasingly crossing paths with farmers, forestry officials and hunters such as Supeková. The appetite for killing big carnivores has shot up as wolf and bear populations have grown, several bear attacks have made headlines, and politicians have taken aim at laws that brought back them back from the brink of extinction.Sweden has issued permits to kill 486 of its brown bears, about 20%, this hunting season, which runs until mid-October. In 2023, the country conducted record-breaking culls of lynxes and wolves. Romania’s MPs voted in July to double its hunting quota from 220 brown bears to 481. In Slovakia, where a bear was recently filmed rampaging through a village, lawmakers voted in June to allow hunting near villages under certain conditions. In July, the European court of justice ruled that recent wolf culls in Austria and Spain were unlawful. Earlier in the year, Switzerland also faced legal challenges for its proposal to kill 70% of its wolf population.The wolf is no longer an animal with two ears, four legs and one tail; it is a political subjectThe debate around shooting protected species has provoked such fury among farmers, hunters and conservationists that it has bubbled up to the highest levels of bureaucrats in Brussels. The European Commission, whose president, Ursula von der Leyen, had a pony killed by a wolf two years ago, is seeking to downgrade the animal’s protection status.“The wolf is no longer an animal with two ears, four legs and one tail; it is a political subject,” says Luigi Boitani, a zoologist at the Sapienza University of Rome and chairman of the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe, a conservation group. “There’s a lot of polarisation. When you speak about wolves and bears, the world is not a variety of greys, it’s black or white.”Wolves were killed off across much of Europe in the 19th and 20th century, but began to bounce back in the 1970s as people moved from villages to cities, and governments later protected the animals and their habitats. A similar shift happened with brown bears and lynxes, with conservationists resettling them in regions from which they had been wiped out.Wolves shot in a hunt on 1 January 2020, as filmed in the Guardian documentary The Wolf Dividing Norway. Photograph: Kyrre Lien/The GuardianThe continent is now home to six species of large carnivore, and the EU bans killing them, with some exceptions – for example if they pose a danger to the public. Perched at the top of their food chain, the animals help ecosystems thrive by regulating prey populations. There is also some evidence they can limit the spread of disease.But the scale and speed of their return – there are thought to be more than 20,000 wolves and 17,000 bears in Europe – has increasingly led to conflicts with humans. Farmer and hunting lobbies have pushed to reduce the number of hurdles needed to kill them as the animals have expanded their territory and attacked people and livestock.A week after Supeková found the bear’s tracks in the forest, she says: “A farmer’s son met a bear on a forest road when he was mushroom picking in a place only about 2km away. Luckily, the bear ran away.”Footage of a bear barrelling down the streets of a small Slovakian town captured international attention in March, with five injured in the attack. So too did the death of a Belarusian hiker who died when fleeing from a bear the day before. The attacks prompted a change in law to let Slovak security services shoot brown bears that come within half a kilometre of a human settlement. A few months later in Romania, the death of a 19-year-old hiker at the hands of a bear led to the prime minister calling lawmakers back from their summer break for an emergency session in which they voted to cull more bears.A bear ran amok in the Slovakian town of Liptovský Mikuláš in March this year, leading to a change in the law on shooting bears. Photograph: undefined/Courtesy of Trnkova BizubovaPeople from villages and the countryside want to reduce the numbers of bears because attacks are increasing, says Supeková. “What’s very tragic is that one bear in the town of Liptovský Mikuláš injured five people, running across the town where children were outside playing games.”The issue has become fodder for populist parties courting rural votes, with politicians blasting Brussels for putting their children at risk and abandoning villages out of elitist environmental concerns.skip past newsletter promotionThe planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essentialPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionCritics say the deaths are tragic but have been blown out of proportion. In Romania, which is home to the most brown bears in Europe, the animals killed 26 people and injured 276 over 20 years, according to the environment ministry. Data from Eurostat shows that motorised vehicles killed 45,000 people in the country in that time.Cultural associations are a problem for the wolf, which has long been portrayed as the villain of fairytales. Helmut Dammann-Tamke, president of the German hunting association and politician with the centre-right Christian Democrats, says the threat of wolf attacks on sheep is “like something on a serving platter” for the far right because it reaches people on an emotional level. “This issue is an incendiary force in the hands of populists.”A 2022 study of German municipalities found that wolf attacks on livestock predict far-right support. After controlling for factors such as immigration and jobs, the researchers found wolf attacks were associated with far-right gains in municipal elections of between one and two percentage points. “The evidence points to wolf attacks as one potential driver of electoral radicalisation,” the authors wrote.Environmental activists question whether blanket policies to cull animals will do much to avoid conflicts with humans and have called for measures to promote peaceful coexistence that range from fences and guard dogs to awareness campaigns for visitors.Scientists are not yet troubled by the wolf’s population across the continent, but have warned that killing wolves in countries with small populations could prove catastrophic. Large-scale culls could put populations of these predators below local survival levels, they warn. Culls can even increase predation of livestock, as packs are disrupted, sending lone, vulnerable wolves venturing on to farms to hunt. The same “backfire” effect has also been documented with cougars and coyotes.Spanish farmers protest against the protection of wolves and bears in Madrid in 2021, ahead of the country’s ban on wolf hunting later that year. Photograph: Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty ImagesCiprian Gal from the Romanian branch of Greenpeace said the Europe-wide trend of weakening protection for big carnivores was “a step backwards” that echoed times when humans felt a strong sense of competition with wildlife.“European governments, influenced by dominant populist rhetoric and powerful hunting and agricultural lobbies, seem to be choosing solutions based on fear and rapid economic return,” he says. “In a way, this is a backlash against the ambitious green policies of recent years and a valve for those still struggling to cope with the climate reality we’re facing.”

With Sweden issuing permits to kill a fifth of its bears, and Romanian MPs voting to double its quota, and the debate over hunting season has become a political issueThe forest was unnaturally still when Soňa Chovanová Supeková first picked up the bear’s scent. It was roe deer rutting season in southern Slovakia, and the hills below the Carpathian mountains were busy with tourists biking and foraging for mushrooms. Fellow hunters who had come face to face with bears had told Supeková the fear had been so great they could not lift their rifles. Sitting with her father, a hunter in his 80s who had killed a few bears, she found herself in a similar state of dread – she was out on that trip expecting to kill deer, and did not want to come on a bear unexpectedly.“Fear permeated me … the smell penetrated to the tip of my bones,” says Supeková, the founder of the Club of Slovak Lady Hunters. But the bear never appeared. The next morning, the daughter-and-father hunting duo saw its droppings. “We breathed a sigh of relief only in the car.” Continue reading...

The forest was unnaturally still when Soňa Chovanová Supeková first picked up the bear’s scent. It was roe deer rutting season in southern Slovakia, and the hills below the Carpathian mountains were busy with tourists biking and foraging for mushrooms. Fellow hunters who had come face to face with bears had told Supeková the fear had been so great they could not lift their rifles. Sitting with her father, a hunter in his 80s who had killed a few bears, she found herself in a similar state of dread – she was out on that trip expecting to kill deer, and did not want to come on a bear unexpectedly.

“Fear permeated me … the smell penetrated to the tip of my bones,” says Supeková, the founder of the Club of Slovak Lady Hunters. But the bear never appeared. The next morning, the daughter-and-father hunting duo saw its droppings. “We breathed a sigh of relief only in the car.”

A 124kg male bear was one of 19 shot during the first day of hunting in Ljusdal, central Sweden, on 21 August 2020. Photograph: Adam Ihse/TT News Agency/Alamy

Europe’s brown bears are a protected species. But they – alongside wolves and lynxes – are increasingly crossing paths with farmers, forestry officials and hunters such as Supeková. The appetite for killing big carnivores has shot up as wolf and bear populations have grown, several bear attacks have made headlines, and politicians have taken aim at laws that brought back them back from the brink of extinction.

Sweden has issued permits to kill 486 of its brown bears, about 20%, this hunting season, which runs until mid-October. In 2023, the country conducted record-breaking culls of lynxes and wolves. Romania’s MPs voted in July to double its hunting quota from 220 brown bears to 481. In Slovakia, where a bear was recently filmed rampaging through a village, lawmakers voted in June to allow hunting near villages under certain conditions. In July, the European court of justice ruled that recent wolf culls in Austria and Spain were unlawful. Earlier in the year, Switzerland also faced legal challenges for its proposal to kill 70% of its wolf population.

The debate around shooting protected species has provoked such fury among farmers, hunters and conservationists that it has bubbled up to the highest levels of bureaucrats in Brussels. The European Commission, whose president, Ursula von der Leyen, had a pony killed by a wolf two years ago, is seeking to downgrade the animal’s protection status.

“The wolf is no longer an animal with two ears, four legs and one tail; it is a political subject,” says Luigi Boitani, a zoologist at the Sapienza University of Rome and chairman of the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe, a conservation group. “There’s a lot of polarisation. When you speak about wolves and bears, the world is not a variety of greys, it’s black or white.”

Wolves were killed off across much of Europe in the 19th and 20th century, but began to bounce back in the 1970s as people moved from villages to cities, and governments later protected the animals and their habitats. A similar shift happened with brown bears and lynxes, with conservationists resettling them in regions from which they had been wiped out.

Wolves shot in a hunt on 1 January 2020, as filmed in the Guardian documentary The Wolf Dividing Norway. Photograph: Kyrre Lien/The Guardian

The continent is now home to six species of large carnivore, and the EU bans killing them, with some exceptions – for example if they pose a danger to the public. Perched at the top of their food chain, the animals help ecosystems thrive by regulating prey populations. There is also some evidence they can limit the spread of disease.

But the scale and speed of their return – there are thought to be more than 20,000 wolves and 17,000 bears in Europe – has increasingly led to conflicts with humans. Farmer and hunting lobbies have pushed to reduce the number of hurdles needed to kill them as the animals have expanded their territory and attacked people and livestock.

A week after Supeková found the bear’s tracks in the forest, she says: “A farmer’s son met a bear on a forest road when he was mushroom picking in a place only about 2km away. Luckily, the bear ran away.”

Footage of a bear barrelling down the streets of a small Slovakian town captured international attention in March, with five injured in the attack. So too did the death of a Belarusian hiker who died when fleeing from a bear the day before. The attacks prompted a change in law to let Slovak security services shoot brown bears that come within half a kilometre of a human settlement. A few months later in Romania, the death of a 19-year-old hiker at the hands of a bear led to the prime minister calling lawmakers back from their summer break for an emergency session in which they voted to cull more bears.

A bear ran amok in the Slovakian town of Liptovský Mikuláš in March this year, leading to a change in the law on shooting bears. Photograph: undefined/Courtesy of Trnkova Bizubova

People from villages and the countryside want to reduce the numbers of bears because attacks are increasing, says Supeková. “What’s very tragic is that one bear in the town of Liptovský Mikuláš injured five people, running across the town where children were outside playing games.”

The issue has become fodder for populist parties courting rural votes, with politicians blasting Brussels for putting their children at risk and abandoning villages out of elitist environmental concerns.

skip past newsletter promotion

after newsletter promotion

Critics say the deaths are tragic but have been blown out of proportion. In Romania, which is home to the most brown bears in Europe, the animals killed 26 people and injured 276 over 20 years, according to the environment ministry. Data from Eurostat shows that motorised vehicles killed 45,000 people in the country in that time.

Cultural associations are a problem for the wolf, which has long been portrayed as the villain of fairytales. Helmut Dammann-Tamke, president of the German hunting association and politician with the centre-right Christian Democrats, says the threat of wolf attacks on sheep is “like something on a serving platter” for the far right because it reaches people on an emotional level. “This issue is an incendiary force in the hands of populists.”

A 2022 study of German municipalities found that wolf attacks on livestock predict far-right support. After controlling for factors such as immigration and jobs, the researchers found wolf attacks were associated with far-right gains in municipal elections of between one and two percentage points. “The evidence points to wolf attacks as one potential driver of electoral radicalisation,” the authors wrote.

Environmental activists question whether blanket policies to cull animals will do much to avoid conflicts with humans and have called for measures to promote peaceful coexistence that range from fences and guard dogs to awareness campaigns for visitors.

Scientists are not yet troubled by the wolf’s population across the continent, but have warned that killing wolves in countries with small populations could prove catastrophic. Large-scale culls could put populations of these predators below local survival levels, they warn. Culls can even increase predation of livestock, as packs are disrupted, sending lone, vulnerable wolves venturing on to farms to hunt. The same “backfire” effect has also been documented with cougars and coyotes.

Spanish farmers protest against the protection of wolves and bears in Madrid in 2021, ahead of the country’s ban on wolf hunting later that year. Photograph: Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images

Ciprian Gal from the Romanian branch of Greenpeace said the Europe-wide trend of weakening protection for big carnivores was “a step backwards” that echoed times when humans felt a strong sense of competition with wildlife.

“European governments, influenced by dominant populist rhetoric and powerful hunting and agricultural lobbies, seem to be choosing solutions based on fear and rapid economic return,” he says. “In a way, this is a backlash against the ambitious green policies of recent years and a valve for those still struggling to cope with the climate reality we’re facing.”

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Albanese to rush through new laws to protect Tasmania’s salmon industry from legal challenge

Labor will push the contentious bill through parliament next week despite concerns about the extinction of the Maugean skateFollow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastAnthony Albanese plans to rush through contentious legislation next week to protect Tasmania’s salmon industry from a legal challenge over the industry’s impact on an endangered fish species.The future of the salmon industry on the state’s west coast has become a sharp political issue centred on whether it can coexist with the Maugean skate, a ray-like species found only in Macquarie Harbour’s brackish estuarine waters.Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email Continue reading...

Anthony Albanese plans to rush through contentious legislation next week to protect Tasmania’s salmon industry from a legal challenge over the industry’s impact on an endangered fish species.The future of the salmon industry on the state’s west coast has become a sharp political issue centred on whether it can coexist with the Maugean skate, a ray-like species found only in Macquarie Harbour’s brackish estuarine waters.After lobbying by industry leaders and Tasmanian MPs, Albanese wrote to the state’s three salmon companies last month promising the government would change the law to ensure there were “appropriate environmental laws” to “continue sustainable salmon farming” in the harbour.He had expected that would be a commitment for the next term of parliament. But with the election campaign delayed by Tropical Cyclone Alfred, the prime minister plans to introduce a bill on Tuesday that could abruptly end a long-running legal review by the environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, into whether an expansion of the industry in the harbour in 2012 was properly approved.The bill – an amendment to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act – has been listed to be introduced in the lower house next Tuesday, 25 March, when parliament will largely be focused on the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, delivering the federal budget. It is expected in the Senate the following day.With the Greens and several crossbench senators opposed, it will need the support of the Coalition to pass. Peter Dutton has previously told the industry he would guarantee its future and legislate if elected prime minister.It is understood the legislation will be broader than the salmon industry and will be intended to limit conservation groups’ powers to challenge past decisions that have allowed developments to go ahead.A spokesperson for Albanese said the government would legislate next week “to amend the flawed EPBC Act to secure jobs and local industries… We call on the Coalition to give this legislation bipartisan support to give communities certainty”, the spokesperson said.The proposal has been criticised by environment organisations. Eight conservation councils led by Environment Tasmania wrote to Albanese last month saying they had “grave concern” about his pledge. They said it would undermine Plibersek’s reconsideration of whether a salmon industry expansion 13 years ago should have been allowed without a full federal environmental assessment. The reconsideration process was triggered in 2023 by a legal request by three conservation groups.An environment department document from November 2023, released recently under freedom of information laws, showed officials considered it was “likely” the reconsideration process would lead to the expansion being declared a “controlled action”, a step that would require a full environmental impact assessment. The officials suggested salmon farming in the harbour, a third of which lies in Tasmania’s world heritage wilderness area, would need to stop while that assessment took place.The Australia Institute’s Eloise Carr said the government appeared to be stopping that legal process by “smashing through” legislation while parliamentarians were focused on the budget. “This is not how law reform should happen,” she said. “The situation in Macquarie Harbour … is a perfect example of why Australia needs stronger environment laws, not to water down already inadequate protections.”The Greens’ Sarah Hanson-Young said she was “staggered” the government had adopted and planned to “ram through” through Liberal Party policy and legislation. “This shows Labor cannot be trusted to do the right thing when it comes to the environment,” she said. “Gutting environmental laws, stopping community from being able to raise concerns about what’s going on in their local environment, and ignoring the scientific advice is absolutely shameful.”A government scientific committee last year found that fish farming in the harbour had substantially reduced dissolved oxygen levels and should be scaled back or removed to save the Maugean skate – a species that marine scientists have called the “thylacine of the sea” – from extinction.In his letter to salmon bosses last month, Albanese referred to a new report by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies that said recent surveys suggested skate numbers, which crashed last decade, were likely to have recovered to 2014 levels. The report stressed the need for continued monitoring.The salmon industry has been under pressure across the state in recent weeks as more than a million fish have died during an bacterium outbreak in the south-east and been dumped at landfill and rendering plants. Fatty chunks of fish have washed up on beaches in the Huon Valley and on Bruny Island, prompting public protests.Both major parties believe the salmon industry may be a crucial election issue in the seat of Braddon, in Tasmania’s north-west, which the Liberal party holds with an 8% margin.Bob Brown, a former Greens leader, said Albanese would be legislating a “death warrant” on the Maugean skate. “Albanese cannot expect thoughtful Tasmanians to vote or preference Labor if he condemns our natural wildlife on the altar of the foreign corporations who run the rotten Atlantic salmon industry,” he said.The chief executive of industry group Salmon Tasmania, Luke Martin, said he had not yet been briefed on the legislation but hoped the issue would be resolved next week.

Digital Movement Saves Colombian Rare Fruits From Extinction

In front of thousands of internet followers, the so-called “lord of native fruits” describes flavors, textures, and possible uses of rare specimens. Gian Paolo Daguer leads a volunteer network to save these delicacies from extinction in Colombia, one of the world’s most biodiverse countries. From his home in Bogotá, the environmental engineer records with a […] The post Digital Movement Saves Colombian Rare Fruits From Extinction appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

In front of thousands of internet followers, the so-called “lord of native fruits” describes flavors, textures, and possible uses of rare specimens. Gian Paolo Daguer leads a volunteer network to save these delicacies from extinction in Colombia, one of the world’s most biodiverse countries. From his home in Bogotá, the environmental engineer records with a cell phone camera a review of a lucuma, a little-known tropical fruit whose external appearance is similar to a coconut. Inside, it resembles a yellowish avocado and has a slightly sweet taste. Daguer, 47, has become a reference for a growing circle of lovers of fruits native to Colombia but uncommon in the diet of its inhabitants. Some of them are in danger of extinction due to ignorance about their properties and other factors such as deforestation. On his social networks, the “Fruits of Colombia” project has more than 108,000 followers. Without profit motives, Daguer also leads a network of WhatsApp chats where biologists, farmers, and chefs, among others, share their knowledge and arrange seed exchanges. It is a “holistic vision where all these different kinds of knowledge converge with an intention to conserve and recover biodiversity and fruits (…) that grow in Colombia,” he says. According to Carolina Castellanos, a biologist at the Humboldt Institute, “Colombia is one of the richest countries in the number of plant species.” The most recent study by that entity linked to the Ministry of Environment and other organizations determined that there are at least 3,000 “food” species in Colombia, from which humans consume stems, leaves, fruits, or seeds. But at least 10% of them are at risk of disappearing. Citizen Science In the framework of COP16 on biodiversity that began in 2024 in the Colombian city of Cali and ended this February in Rome, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) warned that 38% of the world’s trees are threatened with extinction. In 2024, the country lost a forest area similar to the surface of Hong Kong (107,000 hectares), mainly due to land grabbing for livestock, coca leaf cultivation, and monocultures such as oil palm. In small home gardens, plants grow from some of the seeds that Daguer obtains and then distributes. Interested parties request them through social media, he makes arrangements to find them at any geographic point and sends them in envelopes via courier. The intention is to “conserve,” “recover,” “inform and disseminate,” he assures. The taste was born when he was a child and enjoyed eating fruits during family trips to rural areas. Daguer has an extensive collection of botany books stacked alongside rare specimens of piñuelas, cocorillas, lontar, and pandanus: all fruits with atypical shapes, textures, and flavors. Although spontaneous, his work reached scientific spheres and was decisive in cataloging a new species: the Quinguejo, a dark berry similar to a blueberry that grows in Nuquí, a paradisiacal town in the department of Chocó (northwest). Until 2024, the small fruit was not “botanically classified.” Daguer saw it for the first time on social media, found a knowledgeable farmer, and then participated in the National University study that named it in honor of the hamlet where it was found. It is a process of “citizen science” in which “knowledge converges,” he adds. Eating to Conserve For biologist Castellanos, these fruits have taken a “back seat” due to imported food or diets outside Colombian ecosystems. In gastronomy, for example, “we all eat the same thing anywhere in the world,” so the diet has become homogenized, she says. The six-decade armed conflict also isolated traditional recipes from places bled by war. Chef Antonuela Ariza, Daguer’s accomplice, included fruits usually unknown to the palate of Bogotá residents in her restaurant Mini-Mal’s menu. Enthusiastic about the value of Colombia’s natural wealth, in her kitchen she prepares a sauce with sour guava to accompany breaded fish, mayonnaise with camu-camu (similar to grape), Amazonian black chili for shrimp, and a cocktail with copoazú, a whitish fruit related to cocoa, among others. The idea is to “promote biodiversity, to be able to tell a diner who comes here about a fruit, give them a taste of a new flavor but also to be able to tell them everything that happens around that fruit, the forest where it comes from, the people who take care of it,” she says. Because “what we don’t eat is lost,” she concludes. The post Digital Movement Saves Colombian Rare Fruits From Extinction appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Albanese sparks anger with pledge over controversial salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour

Prime minister tells Salmon Tasmania of promise to change legislation and allow ‘sustainable’ farming to continueGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastAnthony Albanese has promised to introduce legislation that will allow “sustainable salmon farming” to continue in Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour, sparking anger from conversationists and researchers who urged for the local industry to be scaled back.The promise, made in a letter to industry group Salmon Tasmania, came after years of lobbying for action in Macquarie Harbour to save the threatened Maugean skate from extinction.Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email Continue reading...

Anthony Albanese has promised to introduce legislation that will allow “sustainable salmon farming” to continue in Tasmania’s Macquarie Harbour, sparking anger from conversationists and researchers who urged for the local industry to be scaled back.The promise, made in a letter to industry group Salmon Tasmania, came after years of lobbying for action in Macquarie Harbour to save the threatened Maugean skate from extinction.The environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, had also been reconsidering the future of salmon farm licences in Macquarie Harbour after environment groups made a legal case that an industry expansion in 2012 had not been properly approved.In the letter, the prime minister referenced a new report from the University of Tasmania’s Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (Imas) which shows the Maugean skate population is “consistent with the long term average as at 2014”.Albanese said the report noted positive signs with oxygenation efforts – with reduced levels of dissolved oxygen across the harbour posing the main threats to the species.“But even with this new and positive data, it is clear to me the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act – introduced 25 years ago – does not allow for a commonsense solution on an acceptable timeline,” the prime minister said in the letter, seen by Guardian Australia.“I can confirm that the Australian government will introduce legislation to ensure appropriate environmental laws are in place to continue sustainable salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour.”The Imas report notes that Maugean skate numbers seem to be improving, but also highlights a “critical need for continued monitoring” of the ancient ray-like species.“A recent environmental DNA study … has demonstrated that the vast majority, if not all, of the current population of Maugean skate live only in Macquarie Harbour,” the report reads.Maugean skates have been hatched in a captive breeding program in Tasmania. Photograph: University of TasmaniaThe prime minister’s promise has been welcomed by the industry and the Tasmanian Liberal and Labor parties, who both back the $1.3bn industry.But the Australian Marine Conservation Society (AMCS) said that – in response to the Imas report – that a slight improvement in the Maugean skate population would not save it from extinction. It said it was especially true if there was another extreme weather event in Macquarie Harbour in the next 10 years.AMCS shark expert Dr Leonardo Guida said the new report shows a “strong correlation between increased salmon farming intensity and a drop in estimated Maugean skate numbers”.“The fate of the skate literally rises and falls alongside salmon production,” he said.“The skates caught in 2024 were mostly old adults that will not be around much longer given they live to around 10-12 years, and there hasn’t been enough time to show that the uptick is solely from juveniles surviving to breeding age.“The scientists acknowledge huge uncertainty in the data from animals caught in 2023 and 2024 that shows something has happened that’s making the skates easier to catch. Without knowing exactly what happened, we’re unfortunately no longer comparing apples with apples from previous years.”Tasmanian Greens senator Nick McKim said Australia’s environmental laws were already too weak and to “water them down even further to underpin corporate profits is an outrage and a betrayal”.The director of The Australia Institute in Tasmania, Eloise Carr, said special legislation to protect farming operations in the harbour is “likely to condemn the Maugean skate to extinction should not be rushed through”.The Tasmanian premier, Jeremy Rockliff, welcomed the announcement and said he “won’t rest until salmon jobs are protected by law”.“While today is an important step, this could have been achieved long ago, and we will continue to do all we can to support our workers across all industries,” he said.The state’s Labor leader, Dean Winter, said Albanese’s letter demonstrates “an irrefutable case that salmon farming and the Maugean skate can coexist”.Macquarie Harbour produces only about 13% of Tasmanian salmon, but industry supporters argue it is an important hub and employer on the state’s remote west coast.Prof Jayson Semmens, a co-author of the Imas report, said researchers were “cautiously optimistic” about the Maugean skate population but that “there is still a long way to go”.“Only continued monitoring of the Maugean skate population in Macquarie Harbour will allow us to know the long-term trajectory of recovery of this endangered species,” he said.A conservation report by the government’s threatened species scientific committee last year said the skate should be considered critically endangered, estimating there were between 40 and 120 adult skates remaining in the wild.The move comes after Albanese last year vetoed a deal Plibersek had struck to support her nature positive legislation.

Once Feared Extinct, 1,329 Pea-Sized Snails Have Been Released on an Atlantic Island After Captive Breeding Effort

Goats, rodents and habitat loss threatened the snails on Deserta Grande Island, so the mollusks were reintroduced on a neighboring island that’s free of invasive species

More than 1,300 tiny snails were released into the wild after a captive breeding effort. One baby snail is shown here on a British five pence coin. Chester Zoo / Cover Images via AP Just a few years ago, the outlook for island snails on the Portuguese Madeira archipelago appeared grim, at best. These animals were buckling under extinction pressures, and several species hadn’t been observed for more than a century. Biologists thought those snails had all but disappeared, with only empty shells and fossils left as evidence that they ever slid across the Earth. Now, the fates of those snails have taken a positive turn: In the last decade or so, scientists found live members of species long thought to be extinct on the islands, kicking off a flurry of rescue initiatives for these floundering mollusks. In the latest page of their story, a massive rewilding effort has released more than 1,300 captive-bred snails onto wild ground. It marks a new chapter of survival—and a second lease at life—for the rare, endangered snails. Scientists have a term for animals found alive after their kind was thought to have gone extinct: Lazarus species, named after the biblical figure from the New Testament who was resurrected. The discovery of some Madeira snails to be alive and breathing, in a way, felt similarly miraculous to conservationists. The Desertas Islands lie off the coast of Morocco and make up part of Madeira, like a row of jagged teeth sprouting up from the Atlantic Ocean. With steep cliffs and scant tree cover, the mountainous and windswept terrain might seem hostile to the tiny, shell-toting inhabitants there, but nature’s challenges are nothing compared to the threats that humans have introduced. Invasive species such as goats have annihilated local vegetation. Mice and rats have also feasted on the snails, tanking their population. Despite these hurdles, the snails somehow managed to cling to survival. Researchers at the Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests (IFCN) in Madeira led expeditions between 2012 and 2017 and discovered a trove of 200 snails representing two endangered species on Deserta Grande, the largest of the Desertas Islands. Worried the snails were the last of their kind, the researchers brought the shell-toting creatures into captivity in several zoos across the United Kingdom and France. One of the sanctuaries was Chester Zoo in England. From a pool of 60 of the snails, the staff embarked on a mighty journey to parse their biological secrets, including how to multiply their numbers. “It was a huge responsibility to begin caring for them,” says Gerardo Garcia, Chester Zoo’s head of ectotherms, per the Guardian’s Mattha Busby. “As a zoo conservation community, we knew nothing about them. They’d never been in human care before, and we had to start from a blank piece of paper and try to figure out what makes them tick.” The zookeepers spent “countless” hours caring for each individual, he adds, and now, all that effort has paid off. A total of 1,329 of the snails’ offspring were released onto Bugio, another of the Desertas Islands. Unlike Deserta Grande, Bugio is free of goats and rodents, thanks to eradication interventions. Before the snails’ release, the researchers dotted their shells with an ultraviolet marker for easier tracking later on. “For 100 years we thought they’d gone forever, but now there’s new hope,” says IFCN conservationist Dinarte Teixeira, who was involved in the first discovery of the snails, per the Agence France-Presse. “We’re striving to do everything we can to give them the best possible chance for the future.” These dull-colored snails, no bigger than a pea, might not be much to look at, but they constitute important members of a healthy ecosystem. They’re a key food source for the native fauna, and they feed on dead plants, thus helping with nutrient cycling and soil fertility for other plants to grow robustly. As some students once described, snails “poop out fertilizer packets,” reported Joshua Rapp Learn for the Wildlife Society in 2021. “All of that is dependent on the little guys—the insects and the snails that so often get overlooked,” Heather Prince, an invertebrate specialist at Chester Zoo, tells Victoria Gill of BBC News. Snails are particularly vulnerable to environmental threats. Their slow-moving lifestyle means they are limited to narrow geographic areas, leaving them susceptible to the dangers of habitat loss. Island snails also evolved when their homes were free of predators, so they typically have few defenses against new invaders. But, given their relative insulation from the outside world, islands have become biodiversity hotspots for snails. Half of all documented land snail species live on islands, and among these roughly 11,000 species, another half dwell on only seven islands. The Madeira archipelago harbors more than 320 land snail species, with most of them found nowhere else in the world. But worldwide, land snails constitute some 40 percent of all animal extinctions since 1500. The Madeiran snails may yet escape this dire fate. Four additional snail reintroduction projects in the Desertas Islands are slated for this year and 2026. In the meantime, the researchers will monitor the snails’ survival rate to gauge the success of the current rewilding effort. “If it goes as well as we hope, more snails will follow them next spring,” says Garcia, per BBC News. “It’s a huge team effort, which shows that it is possible to turn things around for highly threatened species.” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Costa Rica Sharks Face Extinction as Scientists Race Against Time

Costa Rica is home to 93 species of sharks and rays, representing 8% of the global diversity of these marine animals. However, over half of these species (56%) are endangered. Locally, they face challenges such as high fishing pressure, lack of information, illegal fishing, and limited resources for monitoring and control. On Tuesday, December 3, […] The post Costa Rica Sharks Face Extinction as Scientists Race Against Time appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Costa Rica is home to 93 species of sharks and rays, representing 8% of the global diversity of these marine animals. However, over half of these species (56%) are endangered. Locally, they face challenges such as high fishing pressure, lack of information, illegal fishing, and limited resources for monitoring and control. On Tuesday, December 3, 2024, LCI Veritas University, in collaboration with its BIOMOL Laboratory, hosted a scientific event to address shark conservation in Costa Rica. The event brought together leading experts, students, and the public, highlighting the urgent need to protect endangered shark species and safeguard marine biodiversity. Mario Espinoza, a biologist and researcher at the Center for Marine Sciences and Limnology Research of the University of Costa Rica (CIMAR UCR), presented an updated overview of the threats facing sharks in the region. He underscored the importance of sharks in maintaining healthy marine ecosystems and the critical need for regional cooperation to conserve migratory species that transcend borders. “It is essential to improve the conservation status of migratory species that transcend borders,” Espinoza emphasized, urging a shift from identifying problems to finding comprehensive solutions. He also stressed the importance of education, research, environmental awareness campaigns, and engaging decision-makers to influence policies effectively. Mariana Elizondo Sancho, a researcher at BIOMOL Laboratory, presented her study: “Population Structure and Genetic Connectivity of Hammerhead Sharks (Sphyrna lewini) in Breeding Areas of the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP).” Her findings reveal that hammerhead sharks have low genetic diversity, with pups in nursery areas more closely related than expected. This suggests that females may return to specific areas to reproduce, making the species more vulnerable to fishing activities. Similarly, marine biologist Allison Centeno, a master’s student at Florida Atlantic University, analyzed shark landing data from longline fishing in the Pacific between 2015 and 2021. She discovered that silky sharks were the most commonly caught species, and over 50% of the landings involved bycatch—species not targeted by fisheries. These findings highlight the need for collaboration among government agencies, fishing communities, and conservation organizations to ensure sustainable fishing practices. Juan Carlos Delgado, director of BIOMOL Laboratory, concluded the event with his research on “Identification of Species Composition from Shark Products in Costa Rica.” He demonstrated how molecular tools, such as DNA analysis, are revolutionizing marine research. “In our project to identify species from shark products marketed in Costa Rica, we have been able to use DNA to determine the species we consume when buying products labeled as bolillo, dogfish, or simply shark,” Delgado Carazo explained. The study revealed that 2.5% of fillets and chops sampled across the country were from hammerhead sharks, a species with special protection under a recent decree prohibiting its capture and commercialization. “Any incidental capture must be released and cannot be sold,” Delgado Carazo reminded attendees. The post Costa Rica Sharks Face Extinction as Scientists Race Against Time appeared first on The Tico Times | Costa Rica News | Travel | Real Estate.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.