Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Discover Why Thomas Jefferson Meticulously Monitored the Weather Wherever He Went

News Feed
Friday, January 3, 2025

Between July 1776 and June 1826, Jefferson recorded weather conditions in 19,000 observations across nearly 100 locations. Illustration by Meilan Solly / Images via Wikimedia Commons under public domain and the Jefferson Weather and Climate Records The Declaration of Independence was off to the press, so Thomas Jefferson spent July 4, 1776, in search of a decent thermometer. By lunchtime, a breeze ruffled the red brick of Philadelphia’s Independence Hall. Rain clouds tumbled in. A southwest wind swung through the streets, setting tavern signs to wheel and squeak, but the skies held. The city’s brutal summer melted into mild. Jefferson, a citizen scientist who tracked the weather wherever he went, grew eager to get a reliable read. On Second Street, Jefferson nipped into John Sparhawk’s busy London Book-Store. Crowned with a unicorn and mortar logo, the emporium boasted new medicines, literature and “an assortment of curious hardware.” Out sprawled a wild sea of glass eyes, silver spurs and mystery elixirs locked into filmy jars. Jefferson waded in. He scooped up a brass, glass and mercury thermometer for the modern equivalent of more than $500. He also bought gloves and made a charitable donation that day. Yet his prized thermometer—a scarce luxury in young America—stands out. This page from Thomas Jefferson's memorandum book describes how the third president “pd Sparhawk for a thermometer” on July 4, 1776. Collection of the Massachusetts Historical Society Jefferson was a gadget guy at heart. Gifted at math and natural science, the United States’ third president “gave time and energy to particular problems that interested him,” says James P. McClure, general editor of the Papers of Thomas Jefferson project at Princeton University. His exquisite geekery knew no bounds. “Nature intended me for the tranquil pursuits of science, by rendering them my supreme delight,” Jefferson reflected in 1809, as he prepared for post-presidential life. “But the enormities of the times in which I have lived have forced me to take a part in resisting them, and to commit myself on the boisterous ocean of political passions.” Jefferson’s tinkering began with his father’s toolkit. Peter Jefferson left him an expert surveyor’s know-how. His son bought up the tools of the trade and put them to use, running chain lines late into his life. Jefferson kept a 66-foot “Gunter’s chain” to measure acres, a surveying compass or “circumferentor,” and a telescope-equipped theodolite that covered every angle as he tallied elevations. He stuffed his private papers with delicate designs for lamps, canal plans, pasta machines and plows. No matter the politics of the day, Jefferson tethered his gaze to earth, soil and sky. Revolutions roiled America and Europe for a half-century, but Jefferson held fast to noting weather’s daily whirl. He was curious to see where it carried the animals, plants and people that only “nature and nature’s God” might govern. His was a small and steady habit, vital for a politician who saw America’s future spelled out in farmers’ success. “Cultivators of the earth are the most valuable citizens,” Jefferson wrote. “They are the most vigorous, the most independent, the most virtuous, and they are tied to their country and wedded to its liberty and interests by the most lasting bands.” A bronze theodolite, 1800 © Jorge Royan via Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0 Between July 1776 and June 1826, Jefferson recorded conditions in 19,000 observations across nearly 100 locations. All of this data is now available in a special digital edition of his climate and weather records, thanks to the Papers of Thomas Jefferson project and the Center for Digital Editing at the University of Virginia. The president left a meticulous interpretation of how the world, from Monticello to Paris, met with meteorology. Hunching over details, Jefferson took daily readings at sunrise and in the late afternoon. He tried to get a good fix on low and high temperatures. He logged barometric pressure, air moisture (hygrometer readings), wind direction and force, precipitation, and the ebb and flow of natural phenomena. He saved this data in ledger books, memorandum books, almanac sheets or loose folios. Weather gossip filled his incoming mail with friends, like James Madison and Ezra Stiles, who sent diligent reports. “Adieu my dear papa,” daughter Martha Jefferson Randolph wrote in a July 2, 1792, missive. “The heat is incredible here. The thermometer has been at 96 in Richmond, and even at this place, we have not been able to sleep comfortably with every door and window open. I don’t recollect ever to have suffered as much from heat as we have done this summer.” Fierce weather could wilt fall crops, scorch voter turnout in winter, or sink spring ships bearing news and mail. Jefferson saw that better record-keeping was key. He harvested data and spun through scenarios, weighing agricultural needs against new innovations. Where and when could American farmers grow the best strawberries, olives and grapes? Which bird calls signaled a change of season? Armed with a pencil and his reusable ivory notebook—wiped clean weekly as he transferred data, spreadsheet-style, to his papers—Jefferson struggled to make useful links between climate and geography. “For example, no one had yet worked out empirically what the differences might be in the weather of Philadelphia and Virginia, or between lower and higher elevations of land,” McClure says. “His motivation seems to have been to fill out parts of that big picture.” Jefferson clocked winds, listed temperatures, ranked rainfalls. He made sure his at-home weather lab was well stocked and ready for chance discovery. Jim McClure, "The Jefferson Weather and Climate Records Digital Resource" “What impresses me about Jefferson and other colonial scientists is how attuned they were to the natural world around them, and, specifically with Jefferson, how he was at a forefront in quantifying these weather observations over time and across geography,” says Daniel L. Druckenbrod, an environmental scientist at Rider University. Jefferson not only invested in thermometers, hygrometers and barometers, but he also kept up with theoretical trends and shuffled around his tech to refine readings. He sought out clues to decipher how and why, exactly, the natural world worked the way it did. Constant travel spurred his progress. “His interest in seemingly everything around him is really fascinating—noting when the rye harvest began in Paris in 1787, a cherry tree losing leaves at Monticello in 1778—I imagine that not much escaped his attention,” says Jennifer Stertzer, director of the Center for Digital Editing. She finds Jefferson’s handwritten format akin to an analog database. The Native peoples of the American South also tracked changes in waterways and landscapes, guided by the belief that “there existed no line between the human and natural worlds,” says Gregory D. Smithers, a historian at Virginia Commonwealth University. “Indigenous people didn’t view the environment as a thing; it wasn’t chattel that you could fence off, divide into neat little grids on a map, and buy or sell. Indigenous people sought to balance their need for sustenance with the local environment’s ability to provide that sustenance. It was a balancing act, a spiritual and physical quest for harmony.” Jefferson’s take was one of many worldviews in an America growing vaster by the day. Jefferson's daily weather observations for July 1-14, 1776 The Jefferson Weather and Climate Records Early America buzzed with weather watchers. Scholarly elites traded reports in international societies like the one Jefferson led, the American Philosophical Society (APS). Madison, the nation’s fourth president, was one of many who echoed Jefferson’s scientific style. His journals capture conditions at his Montpelier estate between 1784 and 1793, now available via the Historic Meteorological Records project at the APS. Madison’s handiwork—sometimes aided by assistants—offers new vistas on plantation life. Take, for example, his record of a 1791 drought. The extreme heat “threatened Madison’s corn, as well as the private and communal gardens of the people he enslaved,” says Bayard Miller, associate director of digital initiatives and technology at the APS. Madison’s data harvest swept up the dates and times when peaches or strawberries were “first at table” or a “barbacue” drew guests. A walk through Madison’s weather notes widens the archival view to reframe the enslaved people who did that labor. What these founders knew about the weather ruled their daily paths as farmers, politicians and enslavers. “While Jefferson probably was recording the ebbing of the Little Ice Age, Monticello’s microclimate might have been changing even more as Jefferson ordered woodlands and forests cleared for wheat,” says Emily Pawley, a historian at Dickinson College. “More and more of Monticello would have been exposed to harsh sunlight and wind.” A 1788 portrait of Jefferson by John Trumbull Public domain via Wikimedia Commons With his local world in flux, Jefferson welcomed a new generation of colleagues. By the 1820s, Americans enjoyed another scientific revolution. Cheaper, steadier thermometers meant wider use. Jefferson happily watched networks of weather observers spring up across state lines, forming a prequel to Smithsonian Secretary Joseph Henry’s mid-19th-century crowdsourcing campaign to create the National Weather Service. Weather, Jefferson thought, had a history worth keeping. His insights now help us imagine past climates with greater precision and reveal how people dealt with extreme events. Weather records supply more than background scenery for the historian’s quill. “As global warming takes us into a different world, climatically speaking, it will take some careful reconstruction and imagination to grasp the differences between Jefferson’s time and ours,” says Sam White, a historian at Ohio State University. “Just as we preserve the archives, architecture and artifacts of that era, we will have to preserve records of its weather and climate to understand what it was like to be there.” Get the latest History stories in your inbox?

The third president knew that the whims of nature shaped Americans' daily lives as farmers and enslavers

Illustration of Thomas Jefferson in front of a stormy sky
Between July 1776 and June 1826, Jefferson recorded weather conditions in 19,000 observations across nearly 100 locations. Illustration by Meilan Solly / Images via Wikimedia Commons under public domain and the Jefferson Weather and Climate Records

The Declaration of Independence was off to the press, so Thomas Jefferson spent July 4, 1776, in search of a decent thermometer. By lunchtime, a breeze ruffled the red brick of Philadelphia’s Independence Hall. Rain clouds tumbled in. A southwest wind swung through the streets, setting tavern signs to wheel and squeak, but the skies held. The city’s brutal summer melted into mild. Jefferson, a citizen scientist who tracked the weather wherever he went, grew eager to get a reliable read.

On Second Street, Jefferson nipped into John Sparhawk’s busy London Book-Store. Crowned with a unicorn and mortar logo, the emporium boasted new medicines, literature and “an assortment of curious hardware.” Out sprawled a wild sea of glass eyes, silver spurs and mystery elixirs locked into filmy jars. Jefferson waded in. He scooped up a brass, glass and mercury thermometer for the modern equivalent of more than $500. He also bought gloves and made a charitable donation that day. Yet his prized thermometer—a scarce luxury in young America—stands out.

A page from Thomas Jefferson's papers
This page from Thomas Jefferson's memorandum book describes how the third president “pd Sparhawk for a thermometer” on July 4, 1776. Collection of the Massachusetts Historical Society

Jefferson was a gadget guy at heart. Gifted at math and natural science, the United States’ third president “gave time and energy to particular problems that interested him,” says James P. McClure, general editor of the Papers of Thomas Jefferson project at Princeton University. His exquisite geekery knew no bounds. “Nature intended me for the tranquil pursuits of science, by rendering them my supreme delight,” Jefferson reflected in 1809, as he prepared for post-presidential life. “But the enormities of the times in which I have lived have forced me to take a part in resisting them, and to commit myself on the boisterous ocean of political passions.”

Jefferson’s tinkering began with his father’s toolkit. Peter Jefferson left him an expert surveyor’s know-how. His son bought up the tools of the trade and put them to use, running chain lines late into his life. Jefferson kept a 66-foot “Gunter’s chain” to measure acres, a surveying compass or “circumferentor,” and a telescope-equipped theodolite that covered every angle as he tallied elevations. He stuffed his private papers with delicate designs for lamps, canal plans, pasta machines and plows.

No matter the politics of the day, Jefferson tethered his gaze to earth, soil and sky. Revolutions roiled America and Europe for a half-century, but Jefferson held fast to noting weather’s daily whirl. He was curious to see where it carried the animals, plants and people that only “nature and nature’s God” might govern. His was a small and steady habit, vital for a politician who saw America’s future spelled out in farmers’ success. “Cultivators of the earth are the most valuable citizens,” Jefferson wrote. “They are the most vigorous, the most independent, the most virtuous, and they are tied to their country and wedded to its liberty and interests by the most lasting bands.”

A bronze theodolite, 1800
A bronze theodolite, 1800 © Jorge Royan via Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 3.0

Between July 1776 and June 1826, Jefferson recorded conditions in 19,000 observations across nearly 100 locations. All of this data is now available in a special digital edition of his climate and weather records, thanks to the Papers of Thomas Jefferson project and the Center for Digital Editing at the University of Virginia. The president left a meticulous interpretation of how the world, from Monticello to Paris, met with meteorology. Hunching over details, Jefferson took daily readings at sunrise and in the late afternoon. He tried to get a good fix on low and high temperatures. He logged barometric pressure, air moisture (hygrometer readings), wind direction and force, precipitation, and the ebb and flow of natural phenomena. He saved this data in ledger books, memorandum books, almanac sheets or loose folios.

Weather gossip filled his incoming mail with friends, like James Madison and Ezra Stiles, who sent diligent reports. “Adieu my dear papa,” daughter Martha Jefferson Randolph wrote in a July 2, 1792, missive. “The heat is incredible here. The thermometer has been at 96 in Richmond, and even at this place, we have not been able to sleep comfortably with every door and window open. I don’t recollect ever to have suffered as much from heat as we have done this summer.” Fierce weather could wilt fall crops, scorch voter turnout in winter, or sink spring ships bearing news and mail. Jefferson saw that better record-keeping was key. He harvested data and spun through scenarios, weighing agricultural needs against new innovations.

Where and when could American farmers grow the best strawberries, olives and grapes? Which bird calls signaled a change of season? Armed with a pencil and his reusable ivory notebook—wiped clean weekly as he transferred data, spreadsheet-style, to his papers—Jefferson struggled to make useful links between climate and geography. “For example, no one had yet worked out empirically what the differences might be in the weather of Philadelphia and Virginia, or between lower and higher elevations of land,” McClure says. “His motivation seems to have been to fill out parts of that big picture.” Jefferson clocked winds, listed temperatures, ranked rainfalls. He made sure his at-home weather lab was well stocked and ready for chance discovery.

Jim McClure, "The Jefferson Weather and Climate Records Digital Resource"

“What impresses me about Jefferson and other colonial scientists is how attuned they were to the natural world around them, and, specifically with Jefferson, how he was at a forefront in quantifying these weather observations over time and across geography,” says Daniel L. Druckenbrod, an environmental scientist at Rider University. Jefferson not only invested in thermometers, hygrometers and barometers, but he also kept up with theoretical trends and shuffled around his tech to refine readings. He sought out clues to decipher how and why, exactly, the natural world worked the way it did. Constant travel spurred his progress. “His interest in seemingly everything around him is really fascinating—noting when the rye harvest began in Paris in 1787, a cherry tree losing leaves at Monticello in 1778—I imagine that not much escaped his attention,” says Jennifer Stertzer, director of the Center for Digital Editing. She finds Jefferson’s handwritten format akin to an analog database.

The Native peoples of the American South also tracked changes in waterways and landscapes, guided by the belief that “there existed no line between the human and natural worlds,” says Gregory D. Smithers, a historian at Virginia Commonwealth University. “Indigenous people didn’t view the environment as a thing; it wasn’t chattel that you could fence off, divide into neat little grids on a map, and buy or sell. Indigenous people sought to balance their need for sustenance with the local environment’s ability to provide that sustenance. It was a balancing act, a spiritual and physical quest for harmony.” Jefferson’s take was one of many worldviews in an America growing vaster by the day.

Jefferson's daily weather observations for July 1, 1776, through July 14, 1776
Jefferson's daily weather observations for July 1-14, 1776 The Jefferson Weather and Climate Records

Early America buzzed with weather watchers. Scholarly elites traded reports in international societies like the one Jefferson led, the American Philosophical Society (APS). Madison, the nation’s fourth president, was one of many who echoed Jefferson’s scientific style. His journals capture conditions at his Montpelier estate between 1784 and 1793, now available via the Historic Meteorological Records project at the APS.

Madison’s handiwork—sometimes aided by assistants—offers new vistas on plantation life. Take, for example, his record of a 1791 drought. The extreme heat “threatened Madison’s corn, as well as the private and communal gardens of the people he enslaved,” says Bayard Miller, associate director of digital initiatives and technology at the APS. Madison’s data harvest swept up the dates and times when peaches or strawberries were “first at table” or a “barbacue” drew guests. A walk through Madison’s weather notes widens the archival view to reframe the enslaved people who did that labor.

What these founders knew about the weather ruled their daily paths as farmers, politicians and enslavers. “While Jefferson probably was recording the ebbing of the Little Ice Age, Monticello’s microclimate might have been changing even more as Jefferson ordered woodlands and forests cleared for wheat,” says Emily Pawley, a historian at Dickinson College. “More and more of Monticello would have been exposed to harsh sunlight and wind.”

A 1788 portrait of Jefferson by John Trumbull
A 1788 portrait of Jefferson by John Trumbull Public domain via Wikimedia Commons

With his local world in flux, Jefferson welcomed a new generation of colleagues. By the 1820s, Americans enjoyed another scientific revolution. Cheaper, steadier thermometers meant wider use. Jefferson happily watched networks of weather observers spring up across state lines, forming a prequel to Smithsonian Secretary Joseph Henry’s mid-19th-century crowdsourcing campaign to create the National Weather Service.

Weather, Jefferson thought, had a history worth keeping. His insights now help us imagine past climates with greater precision and reveal how people dealt with extreme events. Weather records supply more than background scenery for the historian’s quill. “As global warming takes us into a different world, climatically speaking, it will take some careful reconstruction and imagination to grasp the differences between Jefferson’s time and ours,” says Sam White, a historian at Ohio State University. “Just as we preserve the archives, architecture and artifacts of that era, we will have to preserve records of its weather and climate to understand what it was like to be there.”

Get the latest History stories in your inbox?

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

In Surprising Turn, Crabbers Take to Whale-Safe Crab Pots

Yet again this winter, Dungeness season was delayed to keep whales safe. In a surprising turn after years of adamant resistance, more Dungeness crabbers are trying out—and pretty darn happy with—new pots designed to keep humpbacks from getting entangled. The post In Surprising Turn, Crabbers Take to Whale-Safe Crab Pots appeared first on Bay Nature.

Crab season aboard Khevin Mellegers’ boat, the Areona. This spring was his second time trying out experimental “pop-up” crab pots. (Courtesy of Khevin Mellegers)The first time Half Moon Bay crabber Khevin Mellegers heard about the whale-safe, ropeless crabbing gear commonly called pop-up pots, he was intrigued. It was about a decade ago, not long after humpback whales started showing up in Northern California waters during Dungeness crabbing season—and inevitably getting tangled in crab pot lines. Crabbers like Mellegers had weathered shortened seasons and gear restrictions meant to protect the whales. Coupled with the multi-year closure of the salmon fishery, his financial outlook was grim, and he was emotionally drained by all the closures. The choice was to get out of crabbing—or put his money on this newfangled gear, which promised to keep crabbers crabbing. But he got cold feet. The idea of pop-ups had first popped up in a working group to devise whale-safe gear that Mellegers was part of—a collaboration among crabbers, conservationists, engineers, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). But the close-knit crabbing community has been slow to warm to new pots, as Bay Nature found in speaking with more than a dozen NorCal crabbers. The vocal majority of the fleet opposed them in recent years, with worries about high cost and injuries, and skepticism that they’d even work. Open antagonism from many fleet members dissuaded crabbers like Mellegers who were more pop-up-curious. Only one crabber tried out the first prototype in 2021. In 2023, two crabbers braved their community’s ire. Some who did trial the gear say their boats and gear were damaged in retaliatory acts by disgruntled fellow crabbers.  At last the idea is gaining steam. In 2024, Mellegers and 18 other commercial Dungeness crabbers working from Point Concepcion to the California–Oregon border tried out pop-up pots during the spring Dungeness season, which runs April to May. Now the results from the state’s experimental gear trial are in—and they look promising. Crabbers report a steep but short learning curve. In 2023, Mellegers’ first go-around with the gear, he was crabbing alone and unsure he’d be able to manage the line with multiple pots on his own. Most challenging were the logistics of handling all the new gear, which he describes as a game of Tetris on a tightly packed boat: “You’re dealing with buckets of line traps, traps with retrofit[ters], buoys, how to store them, how to set them up [in relation] to where you’re going to be sitting,” he says.  But after a few tries—and getting a few more hands on deck—he says: “It was a breeze.”  Many a Bay Area holiday Dungeness feast has been in the past decade delayed or shortened commercial crab seasons, triggered by heightened risks to whales and domoic acid in the meat. Both problems have been linked with warmer ocean waters. (Kate Golden)New pots are a response to a new problem California fishing communities suffer from the effects of climate change: rising seas, extreme weather, and a warming ocean directly impact their lives and livelihoods. The infamously warm Pacific ocean waters of 2015–2016 (often called “the Blob”), triggered algal blooms along West Coast shores. Crabs’ ingestion of the algal neurotoxin domoic acid has triggered season delays since then. The Blob also led to exploding populations of anchovies near West Coast shores—which in turn enticed whales into coastal waters, just when and where crabbers traditionally lowered their pots. Whales got entangled. The CDFW was forced to restrict the type of gear crabbers used, the number of pots, and the length of the seasons. Crabbers have reported losing up to 80 percent of their annual income. And the whales keep arriving earlier, delaying the crab fishery—this year is no exception—possibly because of changing climate cues, though researchers are still working out why. In 2023, Dungeness crab pot lines ensnared at least 10 of the 27 whales that were documented as entangled off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. By the end of 2024, the CDFW had documented 14 entangled humpback whales in California, four of which were confirmed Dungeness crab pot lines. Traditional crab traps are stacked up in Noyo Harbor, Fort Bragg, in March 2024. (Amy Elisabeth Moore)Traditional crab pots have lines that extend from the pot on the seafloor up to a buoy at the surface. With pop-ups, the line remains coiled on the pot. To retrieve the pot, the crabber signals a transducer to release the line. The line pops up to the surface and the crabber reels the pot to the boat. Bart Chadwick, co-owner of Sub Sea Sonics, one of several companies that is trialing pop-up pots, says he initially treated the task as a technical problem. Which it is, in part. But it is also a human problem: finding a solution that’s “commensurate with all the requirements for fishing—and (then) getting people to accept that, and then getting the state to accept it,” he said. How it went: pretty well! The technology seems to have worked in the spring trial. Gear makers Sub Sea Sonic and Guardian Ropeless Systems reported that 98 percent of the 23,048 deployed pots were retrieved. That’s actually better than traditional pots’ annual loss rate of 5–10 percent, according to CDFW data. And crabbers BN spoke with were happy with their haul and profit for the spring season.   This year, costs have come down, putting pop-ups in range of traditional gear, according to Chadwick. “We’ve got the gear at a price point now where it’s not uneconomical [for] fishermen. [It] adds about $100 or so, and should last many years,” he said. Crabbers who used the pop-up gear find the outlay for the upgrade (about $1000 per sled, which can hold up to fifty pots) canceled out other costs (such as buoys and vertical lines for the fifty pots).  Crew member Jonathan Tim, holding a pallet, prepares pop-up pots aboard Pale Horse, captained by Brand Little, in April 2024. (Brand Little)Crucially, crabbers using the pop-up pots reported no injuries, said Geoff Shester, senior scientist for Oceana, an environmental advocacy organization, which has collaborated on the project since 2015. This spring, the CDFW is expanding the gear trial to 40 vessels, says Ryan Bartling, CDFW senior environmental scientist. The agency also is endorsing an additional ten pots per line (for a total of 20 pots), and more pots per boat. While the agency isn’t likely to make everyone use the pots, officials hope to find a solution which will allow crabbers to harvest through the end of the spring season. Agency officials feel “stuck in the middle” between the two camps, Bartling says. “There’s this tug of war between those that want to fish pop-up, and those that want to have a traditional fishery only.” He says the agency is working toward authorizing pop-up pots for widespread use as an “alternative gear” in future spring seasons.  Meanwhile, the nearly tenfold increase in trial participants this year suggests the fleet’s growing acceptance of the new gear. “Having 19 people go out and actually try the gear has been really phenomenal,” Chadwick says. The working group received “a tremendous amount of feedback” from the crabbers with pointers on how to improve the gear. Left, crew members prepare pop-up pots on Jacqueline, Stephen Melz’s 58-foot vessel; right, in April 2024, Jacqueline’s crew reel in pop-up pots. (Courtesy of Stephen Melz) Stephen Melz, of Half Moon Bay, participated in the experimental gear pilot for a second time this spring. It took him and his crew a couple of tries. “We did it the wrong way twice,” he admitted ruefully, “setting it off the boats the wrong way” and not knowing how to disconnect the crab pots from the groundline. But after that, Melz caught a lot of crabs with the pop-ups—and he didn’t lose a single pot. “It’s amazing,” he said. “We started the season with 150 pots. We brought 150 pots back in.” When the season wrapped up, “I was so sad to sack out,” Melz says. “We caught a whole bunch of crabs. And it was exciting to do it.”Bay Nature spoke to plenty of crabbers who didn’t try the experimental gear and don’t plan to—they’re still skeptical. “We can solve the [entanglement] problem without increased costs,” says longtime commercial crabber Tony Anello. “And that’s because we know what we’re doing. Basically, we’ve been in the game long enough.” But Melz hopes pop-up pots will keep the spring season open, effectively doubling crabbers’ time on the ocean. “I was completely impressed with this. It was amazing. Given the opportunity to fish either pop-up gear or traditional gear in the spring, I would take up the pop-up any day of the week.”

How the Outdoors Affects Our Nervous System and Changes Our Microbiome

Nature can affect our nervous system and diversify our microbiome—and you don’t need to go on a hike to reap the benefits.

Rachel Feltman: Happy new year, listeners! For Scientific American’s Science Quickly, this is Rachel Feltman.Whether you’re an avid backpacker, an occasional park stroller or someone whose relationship with the great outdoors falls somewhere in the middle, you probably already know that spending time in nature is a great way to de-stress. But what if leaf peeping could do more than just help you unwind? Well, according to a recent book, the sights, sounds and smells of plant life can have serious impacts on our bodies.My guest today is Kathy Willis, a professor of biodiversity at the University of Oxford, where she also serves as principal of St Edmund Hall. She’s the author of Good Nature: Why Seeing, Smelling, Hearing, and Touching Plants is Good for Our Health.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Thank you so much for joining us today.Kathy Willis: It’s a pleasure, absolute pleasure.Feltman: So you’re a professor of biodiversity, and a lot of your work focuses on the well-being of plants and their ecosystems. How did you become interested in how plant life impacts human health and wellness as well?Willis: So that’s right: I’m very much someone who’s always worked at the sort of interface between looking at vegetation and climate change and—very academic. But then I was working on a big international project and they asked me to—part of my role was to pull together the information about the relationship between nature and human health.And as I was trawling through the literature I kept coming across this study published in 1984 in this journal, the top scientific journal, showing that people who looked out of hospital window beds onto trees recovered from gallbladder operations much faster and took less pain relief than those who didn’t. And I thought, “This is really strange.” So people looking on brick walls—how does that work? They’re in a chamber. They’re in a sort of a, you know, a hospital room, so it’s not anything to do with the environment of the room; it was to do with them looking on to something. Was it influencing their health?And so that started me on a very different pathway because I started to look at this paper and realizing that, very clearly, the action of looking at nature was triggering not just mental changes but physiological changes in the body that was improving these recovery rates and effects for human health. And that’s how I started the whole journey of really saying, “Well, what else is there out there? What are the senses, when you interact with nature, [that] have an impact on our health and well-being?”Feltman: That’s fascinating, and your new book, you know, examines how those senses connect us with nature. Can you tell us a little bit about what you found when you went exploring? What does the research say about how we connect to plants and the outdoors?Willis: So it’s both outdoors and indoors, but I’ll start—I can certainly start with outdoors. I mean, so the way I looked at it and the way I started to pull the literature together was looking at the different senses: so our sight, our sound, our smell, our touch, and then there’s a hidden sense, but we’ll talk about that later.But what I found, actually, is that—very much that each of these triggers these different actions in our body, and there are three sort of mechanisms that get triggered when we interact with nature: the three direct ones.But the first one is: it affects our nervous system. So it triggers changes in things like our breathing rate, our heartbeat goes down, our blood pressure goes down, our heart rate variability: it changes to a parasympathetic variability, which is—induces much more physiological calming. But it also affects our hormone system. So you can think about—I mean, I think, for me, it’s more obvious about the heart rate and the breathing, but for example, your adrenaline goes down.Feltman: Mm.Willis: Salivary amylase, which is a hormone that you get in your saliva, which is elevated when you’re stressed, that reduces. And then the—all these psychological experiments show that your psychological state is better when your senses interact with certain aspects of nature.And then there are two other aspects of nature. The first is that when we breathe in the scents, those scents that you get are molecules—they are volatile organic molecules—and they basically become, they become a gas when they come out into the air from the plant. Those molecules pass into our blood. And once across our lung membrane and once in our blood, they interact with certain biochemical pathways in the same way as if you’re taking a prescription drug.And then finally, the other things—and our body takes on those aspects of nature, and it comes inside our body. And actually, we shouldn’t be surprised about that; we know pollution gets into our blood—pollution in the air gets into our blood. But so, so do the good aspects of nature. And finally, what I also found out from looking at this research is that when you’re in a more biodiverse environment, that environment has a much more biodiverse bacterial assembly—the good microbes that we all need—and your body adopts and takes on the signature of that environmental microbiome, which I find, again, fascinating. And as a result of that it triggers all sorts of metabolic processes that are good for us.Feltman: Very cool. And I would love to hear more about that hidden sense you mentioned.Willis: So with the hidden sense, I mean, you know, with—we’re constantly being bombarded—I don’t know [if it’s] the same for you [laughs], but I, every time I open the newspaper here, I see another thing about how we must eat 30 plants a week and we should eat pickled vegetables and everything else to increase your gut microbiome. And that is true. I think there’s a lot of real very, very important science in there. But what I learnt from looking at this is, first of all, that up to 93 percent of our gut microbiome is not inherited; it’s to do with our environment and what we eat. Now, we think about what we eat, but we don’t think about our environment. But a lot of work started about 10 years ago where they started to show that people that live in a more biodiverse environment—where you’ve got greater diversity of plants, different heights of plants, etcetera, etcetera—and more organic environments, so not using whole loads of fertilizers, that those environments, if you measure the air in those environments, they’re full of all these bacteria that we’re busily [laughs] chomping our way on, you know, food to try and get into our gut. And once we’re in those environments or we’re touching that organic soil, we adopt the signature, so we adopt all those good microbes, and it gets into our guts.Now why is that important? Because then there’s a very—some beautiful study’s been carried out on kindergarten-age—so, you know, children go to nursery school, or play school, in Finland where they, basically, they, for 28 days, they—one group played in a sandpit [where] they poured in soil from the, the local pine forest, and the other group had sterile sand. And they measured their skin microbiota, they measured their gut—so through their poop—but then they also measured their bloods. And what they found was that after 28 days those that had played in the soil had this hugely elevated microbiome in their gut.But the really critical thing in there is they measured their inflammatory markers in their bloods, and their inflammatory markers were right down. And they found the same with adults, adults playing with soil or adults even sitting in a room with a green wall: after 28 days they’d adopted that microbiome. But also, it’s affecting their bloods in a really good way. In the same way as we’re being told our diet—we ought to, with our diet, you know, eat more plants because it will do this—you can do that with your environment as well.And I find that really, really fascinating. So as well as eating 30 plants a week we should be interacting with the plants daily in order to build up good bacteria in our gut.Feltman: That’s really striking research, and I think it’s a great segue to—you know, many of our listeners might not have easy access to soil to play in or lush green spaces. What does the research say about harnessing those positive powers of plants in the outdoors when we’re stuck indoors or in urban environments?Willis: You can absolutely do it indoors. And I—it’s transformed the way I—my offices and where I work and even my home because what it’s shown [is] if you have plants in your office, you get all the benefits. For example, having a, a vase of roses on your desk.But on top of that plants in the room will seed the air with the good microbiota. And so something as simple as a spider plant—it doesn’t have to be something exotic and large; it can be a—something that reproduces rapidly like the spider plants. They’ve shown that those actively seed the air with this good microbiome.But then again, indoors, there’s some beautiful studies showing that when you smell certain plant scents it affects how you are. So lavender makes you more relaxed because it—once it’s in your blood it interacts with the biochemical pathways as if you’re taking an antianxiety drug. So if you want to be more relaxed or want to go to sleep, you can diffuse lavender in your bedroom. If you want to be more awake, you should have rosemary.And if you want to really do something that’s good for you, what they’ve shown is that the Cupressaceae family, when you smell that, not only does it decrease your adrenaline hormone, but it also elevates the natural killer cells in your blood. And the natural killer cells are those cells that attack the cancers and viruses cells, so we all want elevated natural killer cells in our blood. And so in my study at home I have Japanese cypress oil in a diffuser. I just—few drops in there, and I, every couple of days, I just push it on for 20 minutes. It does me no harm, but it probably does a lot more good.So there’s so much you can do indoors, but the number of times I go into offices or houses and there’s—the only plant you see there is plastic, if you’re lucky. And so it’s really thinking, “What can I bring into the—my house or my office or where I live in order to bring about these well-being benefits?”Feltman: Yeah, you mentioned your own personal experiences with changing your environment and habits; could you tell us more about those changes? You know, which did you find most impactful?Willis: One of the things I’ve found most impactful is just changing my route to work. So up until now—up until, you know, I started writing this book I went the quickest route, and, you know, I’m on my bike, and I’m just going down the streets. And then I started looking, and there’s some beautiful studies that have been carried out, particularly, actually, in the U.S. and actually in Japan as well, where they had—and the Japanese experiment was beautiful—they had a group of participants: Japanese males all [around] the same age, didn’t smoke, hadn’t taken any alcohol or anything. And they walked for 15 minutes [on] the streets, and they did 15 minutes going through the local urban park. And they measured their physiological and psychological markers and there was a significant difference. So walking through the park they were much more physiologically and psychologically calmer than if they walked for 15 minutes, the same pace, on the streets.And that really got me thinking about: “Actually, can you tweak your route so that you spend more time on the way to work and back by going via the park?” which is what I now do. And it does make a difference. You just feel calmer. Now, part of me thinks, “Oh, well, I’m feeling calm because I know it should make me calmer,” but even if you’re stressed, what they’ve shown is that when you look on to green vegetation, you recover faster from stress—if you look on to nature and particularly on to green vegetation—then if you don’t.And as we know, huge percentage of global diseases now are not the communicatable ones; they’re ones that actually follow on from high levels of stress, so that, you know, we really, really need to think about this very, very seriously because all that high level of stress in the longer run is really bad for us and for our, our health.But the other thing, and maybe this is important for your listeners: you don’t have to be pounding the pavements running to get the benefits. There’s a lovely study where they measured the salivary amylase of people over an eight-week period and they could choose the exercise they did in the park. And what they found was that, actually, those people that went and walked to the park and sat down [laughs] had a greater reduction in the salivary amylase—i.e., less stressed—than those doing all the other things. I think that’s always worth remembering: you don’t have to be running to get these benefits; you just have to be looking and enjoying.And then the other thing that I do now—when I worked on the chapter on sound and the sounds of nature, it’s really clear that certain sounds, like tuneful birdsong or the wind rustling in the trees or trickling of a stream, those have a really significant health benefit; all sorts of things are reduced. But even pain: they found in hospitals that people are having sort of surgery where they’re still awake, like with an epidural, that they have much, much lower stress levels if they can hear the sounds of birds and trees. So when I walk now I don’t wear my headphones—unless I’m near traffic, and then I do.Feltman: That’s great advice.Now that you’ve finished this book and it’s out in the world, what do you see as some of the most important areas for future research in this field?Willis: So I think one of the big areas where the evidence is with nature is very much [that] we know that there are all these benefits that are triggered, but we need to be—now give the medical profession the details that they need to be able to prescribe properly. And we’re not there yet.So for example, if you think about a practitioner, a [general practitioner] or, you know, someone that you go to with ailments, and they’ll normally prescribe you a prescription drug because all those clinical trials have been done on that prescription drug to tell you what drug to take for the condition. So we sort of know that: we know anxiety, etcetera, etcetera, can be relieved by interacting with nature.But the second thing is: How much do you take? We also then need to set, you know, what the dosage iso for how long do you need to interact with nature in order to get the benefit?And finally, which is really important for governments, certainly in the U.K. for the National Health Service, is: What’s the cost-benefit? So how efficient is that drug—what’s [the] efficacy of being in nature compared to, let’s say, cognitive-behavioral therapy to deal with clinical levels of anxiety?But there are some really interesting studies coming out. There was one in Copenhagen where they took people who’d been off work because of anxiety, and they split them into two groups. And the first group did cognitive-behavioral therapy with a trained psychiatrist over 10 weeks, and they did two sessions a week. The other group did three sessions a week in the university gardens, and they could be doing stuff with the gardeners or they could be doing activities or just sitting. And after 10 weeks they looked at the number of visits back to the, the medical doctor and what they found was: actually, both were very successful.Feltman: Mm.Willis: But one of those—being in the garden—was much, much cheaper to deliver than the other.But the really interesting thing about this study was that a year later, they went back and resurveyed these people to see how many were still at work. Now I had assumed, cognitive-behavioral therapy, they would be the ones more at work because they’d been given the—trained with the techniques to cope. But it was the other way around: that you had a much higher percentage of people who’d spent the time in the garden than those doing the cognitive-behavioral therapy.So from that you can then start to work out what the cost-benefits are, and it’s that sort of experiment we need to be doing, along with these much bigger clinical trials. But even in Oxford, what we’ve been doing is: Instead of giving you this drug, how about going for a walk for 20 minutes three times a week? But where do you tell them to go walking? And so—especially in the winter. It’s all well and good in the summer—the birds are singing; it’s all sort of green and lush—but what about in the winter? So we’ve been looking in the botanic gardens and the glasshouses here. It’s that sort of approach that we need to be moving.And then the other thing I would say—and I sit in the second chamber of the government, the House of Lords, and the thing that we really need to be doing is making sure that nature doesn’t always come so far down the priority list, that the first thing when you’re building in a city is you get rid of the nature. Because the most important thing that comes through from all of this is that people need to be near nature. And we’ve all signed up to that internationally, but trying to persuade governments, when they’re looking at city plans, to ensure that nature is part of the infrastructure and not just an add-on is quite hard work.Feltman: Mm. Well, thank you so much for joining us. This has been a really interesting chat, and I know I’m definitely feeling extremely motivated to go spend more time in my local park, so I really appreciate your time.Willis: Oh, thank you very much. It’s been really nice to talk to you.Feltman: That’s all for today’s episode. We’ll be back with another one on Friday. And if you’ve been missing our weekly science news roundup, your wait is almost over: we’ll be rolling back into our regular publishing schedule on Monday.Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper, Madison Goldberg and Jeff DelViscio. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news.For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. See you next time!

It's good to be a California beaver. Again.

California has by law acknowledged beavers, nature's preeminent water and environmental engineers, as partners in environmental restoration.

For the first time in 200 years it’s great to be a beaver in California. In a show of unanimous bipartisan support, the state Legislature voted this summer to pass Assembly Bill 2196, which codifies the state’s Beaver Restoration Program at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The law gives the program, which implements beaver-assisted environmental projects, protection from state budget cuts and political upheaval, and it stands as a rebuke to the Supreme Court’s devastating ruling in 2023 that removed up to 70% of the nation’s waterways and wetlands from Clean Water Act protections.California environmental activists, biologists and Indian tribes have been advocating for beavers for more than two decades, launching an extensive education campaign that included having to convince authorities that beavers are a native species throughout the state. Now the restoration effort will add to California’s “30x30” goals — the national effort to set aside and protect 30% of U.S. lands and coastal waters by 2030.A beaver management plan is underway, and $2 million has been allocated to develop statewide coexistence strategies and help relocate beavers from where they cause problems to where they can solve them. Finally Castor canadensis, long maligned as a pest, is getting a rebrand as an ecological hero.“I’m really proud of the transition we’ve made from laggard to leader on beavers,” said Wade Crowfoot, California’s secretary for natural resources. “While there’s no silver bullet solutions to environmental restoration, beavers are a keystone species, and an important part of the puzzle to restore our ecosystems in California.”Beavers, once plentiful, were wiped out of most of their range in California by 1900, hunted by fur traders and chased out by development. Those that were left often annoyed landowners who didn’t want their trees gnawed down to the ground and carted off to build dams, or who found their farmland or roadways inundated when a beaver colony moved in nearby. “Nuisance” beavers were killed. And yet California needs beavers — they are nature’s superlative ecosystem and water engineers.Climate change has fundamentally altered California’s hydrology, delivering more rainwater and less snowmelt, exacerbating wildfire, drought and the depletion of groundwater and aquifers. When beavers move into a stream or creek and begin building their damming complexes, the ponds and wetlands they create are an antidote to all these problems.The water swelling out of a beaver pond is just the beginning. Beaver ponds slow rivers and streams, storing an average of three times the water that’s visible by creating what are essentially huge underground sponges that can keep things flowing in dry summers and during drought. In times of flood, those same sponges soak up some of the excess, creating resiliency.Studies have shown in stark terms how beavers fight fire. Satellite photos of the aftermath of the massive Manter fire in 2000 in Tulare County show a charred landscape except for a line of healthy green where beavers had built dams. Before and after data convinced the researchers that “Smokey the Beaver” was a low-cost creator of “ribbons” of fire-resistant habitat.Beavers are critical to healthy rivers and our future water supply. The wetlands ringing a beaver pond sequester carbon and clean the water, filtering out pollutants like nitrogen and phosphorus. Beaver “engineers” build dams and canals that create connectivity between land and water; these beaver wetlands function as vital biodiversity hubs for plant and animal species, including many that are endangered. River wetland systems with beavers have 30% more animal and plant species than those without.In recent years, studies have established the dollar value of having beavers in the landscape. The University of Helsinki, for instance, estimated the savings at $500 million annually for the Northern Hemisphere alone.Molly Alves, a senior environmental scientist who joined the California Department of Fish and Wildlife this past summer as the Beaver Restoration Program supervisor, is mapping watersheds and collecting data so she can move nuisance beavers to where they can do the most good.“We are looking at the landscape as a whole,” she said. “Where is the greatest wildfire risk? What areas are most impacted by drought? Where is erosion?” She is also working on a progress report of current translocations.Last year, beavers were returned to two sites on the traditional lands of Indigenous Californians, the Mountain Maidu and the Tule River Indians.On land the Maidu call Tásmam Koyóm, 2,000 acres near the headwaters of the Feather River, seven beavers joined a single resident in October 2023. In June of 2024, the Fish and Wildlife department announced that another group of beavers was translocated to the south fork of the Tule River, in Sequoia National Forest east of Porterville, Calif.In both cases, the releases were true homecomings. Researchers found remnant beaver dams in the mountain meadow Tásmam Koyóm streams, and in the southern Sierra, as Kenneth McDarment, the range manager for the Tule River Tribe, puts it, “There are beaver in our [ancient] pictographs.”Tribal leaders worked with scientists, nonprofits and the state to prepare beaver-friendly habitat, planting willows and other plants beavers eat and installing human-made beaver dam analogs to bring enough water to the area that beavers could survive to establish colonies.The Maidu want Tásmam Koyóm to be a showcase for traditional ecological knowledge. “Bringing the beaver back,” said Lorena Gorbert, a spokesperson for the Maidu Consortium, “was bringing back more balance to the area, putting it back … the way it should be.”As for the Tule River site, as McDarment explains, “We were in a drought in 2014 and the river was drying up. We said, ‘Why not bring beaver home?’ When the Supreme Court narrowed the definition of waterways covered by the Clean Water Act, it denied protection from development, pollution and destruction to “noncontinuous” rivers and streams — these include tributaries and wetlands, the exact waterways that beavers help construct, maintain and keep healthy. We’ve already destroyed more than 50% of our national wetlands, even more in California. With pilot beaver relocations and the codification of the restoration project, California is pushing back against that history and the Supreme Court’s dangerous shortsightedness. It’s showing the nation how political engagement with nature-based solutions can create environmental and economic resiliency. All eyes are on California now … and its beavers.Leila Philip is the author of “Beaverland: How One Weird Rodent Made America.” She is a professor at the College of the Holy Cross, where she holds a chair in the humanities.

New York City Is Getting Rid of Its Iconic Orange and Yellow Subway Cars

Many New Yorkers feel attached to the instantly recognizable R46s, which debuted in the summer of 1975. Officials say their replacements will arrive by 2027

The R46 trains started running in the subway system during the 1970s. Tdorante10 via Wikimedia Commons under CC BY-SA 4.0 After half a century, New York City is retiring its iconic orange and yellow subway cars. This year, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) will begin phasing out the R46 trains and replacing them with newer, sleeker models already running on some of the city’s lines. “Old train cars break down six times as frequently as new cars, so replacing them is more than just a matter of aesthetics,” says MTA chair and CEO Janno Lieber in a statement. The decision will help “[make] the system more reliable and dramatically upgrade the passenger experience.” The MTA recently bought 435 R211 trains—including 80 “open gangway” trains, which allow passengers to move between cars—to replace the older models, which many New Yorkers have grown attached to. The first R46 trains hit the tracks in the summer of 1975. The 75-foot-long subway cars (marketed as “the finest in the world”) were equipped with rubber floors, fluorescent lights and plastic seating—a departure from older subway cars, which featured rattan seats. The R46 interiors were designed in a “conversational” style, with seats arranged both in long rows and two-person benches. The MTA recently purchased 435 R211 trains, which feature longer benches and cooler colors. MTA “The change that’s happening now with this new sort of move away from the kind of conversational to the long-bench seats, and actually more standing room, feels a little bit seismic for people because it is,” Concetta Bencivenga, director of the New York Transit Museum, tells the Washington Post’s Karla Marie Sanford. As of October, 696 of the original 754 R46 cars were still in service, per the Washington Post. Some commuters are lamenting the model’s coming retirement, saying they’ll miss the cramped two-seater benches. “Riding the train with girlfriends and sitting smushed together in the back-to-back ‘love seats’ will always have a place in my heart,” Timmhotep Aku, a 45-year-old New Yorker, tells the Washington Post. Other riders are mourning the loss of the distinctive warm colors of the R46 cars. “One of the things that is interesting about the orange and yellow seating is that it was a departure for our system,” as earlier models had been decorated in cooler colors, Jodi Shapiro, curator of the New York Transit Museum, tells Hyperallergic’s Isa Farfan. The warm tones of the R46 reflected the “environmentalism and a return to nature” in the early ’70s. The R46s are the oldest cars in the MTA’s fleet, and they’ve “reached the end of their useful life,” according to a recent MTA report. The R211 cars will be equipped with more accessible seating, brighter lights, security cameras and better signage. Most of the newer cars won’t actually arrive until 2027, so the R46s won’t disappear right away. As Bencivenga tells the Washington Post, the older trains have become icons of the city. “If you came on this [train] with no other identifying information, … you would very likely be able to surmise that you were in New York,” Bencivenga says. “In the real world, there are very few experiences nowadays that will kind of invoke that sort of visceral reaction, right? When you step on board, you’re like, ‘Yep, got it.’” Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

To Improve Your Gut Microbiome, Spend More Time in Nature

Microbes found in green spaces can transfer into your body, increasing bacterial diversity and potentially boosting the strength of the immune system.

Microbes in our gut can have a profound impact on our health, but research is showing that those surrounding us in our environment—what’s known as the natural environmental microbiome—can have a big impact too. This suggests that we should all spend a lot more time interacting with nature, both outdoors and indoors.I was first introduced to this emerging area of science by Professor Gretchen Daily from Stanford University. She mentioned a Finnish research project that showed how letting kindergarten-aged children play in a yard that contained “dirt” from the forest floor resulted in a significant positive impact on their gut microbiome. Seventy-nine young children took part, all living in urban environments and spending the majority of their days at different daycare centers around Finland. The only difference between them was that these daycare centers had three different types of outdoor spaces.The first type was a fairly standard outdoor play area, comprised of concrete, gravel, and some plastic matting. The second was the type typically found in daycare environments that are already nature-orientated, with grass, soil, and planted areas for the children to play in. These two acted as a control against which to compare the third experimental space, where the concrete and gravel were covered with segments of forest floor and soil from the local coniferous forest.The children were encouraged to play in only one of the three types of yard each day over the 28 days of the experiment (note that some kindergartens have multiple play areas). Before and after periods of play, the children’s skin and gut microbiota were measured using genetic sequencing of bacteria taken from skin swabs and stool samples, along with changes to T cells and cytokines in their blood. These cells and proteins play a critical role in preventing autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases; their levels are often used as an indication of how well the immune system is functioning.Science NewsletterYour weekly roundup of the best stories on health care, the climate crisis, new scientific discoveries, and more. Delivered on Wednesdays.Remarkable results emerged. The children who played in the experimental yard showed a large increase in the diversity of microbiota on their skin and in their gut in comparison to the children playing in the urban and nature-orientated areas. Importantly, these were the “good” types of microbiota—those associated with health benefits. There was also a significant increase in the children’s immunity markers, indicative of them having gained enhanced immunoregulatory pathways—which is indicative of a reduced risk of immune-mediated diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis.The importance of this study cannot be overstated. It implies that even short-term exposure to nature’s microbial diversity has the potential to radically alter the diversity of microbiota on our skin and in our gut. In addition, it suggests that the altered gut microbiota can modulate the function of our immune system.A Healthy Microbiome Is Made, Not BornEveryone has a distinctive community of microbes in their gut—a person’s ethnicity, the food they consume, antibiotic use, body size, and the amount they exercise all leave a clear signature on their gut microbial diversity. The role of these microbiota communities is significant. Our organs can only synthesize 11 of the 20 essential amino acids that we need, so the rest, along with 13 essential vitamins, are retrieved and synthesized by our gut microbes.And these microbial communities don’t just help our gut extract nutrients from food. Microbes also produce some of the most important compounds for our health, including immuno-suppressants, anti-cancer, and anti-inflammatory compounds. They appear to be associated with the functioning of our immune system, central nervous system, and associated health outcomes, so much so that clear correlations have been found between particular gut microbiota—so called “sick” microbiomes—and certain illnesses. Those with a distinctive gut microbial signature include irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and colorectal cancer as well as nonintestinal disorders such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.