Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

Are octopuses smarter than pigs? Should we eat them? Oregon bill to ban octopus farms stirs controversy

News Feed
Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Octopuses have nine brains, use tools, have the ability to recognize people and are so bright and brilliant it’d be cruel to farm them for human consumption.So said a stream of octopus enthusiasts, who extolled the many astonishing traits of the beloved, eight-legged cephalopod to a committee of the Oregon Legislature earlier this month. Nearly 70 offered spoken or written testimony in support of a bill that would forbid the farming of octopuses in the state before a single octopus production facility is even proposed.“I urge you to stand on the right side of history by voting in favor of this bill,” wrote Natalia Neal, a Damascus resident, summing up a common sentiment of the group.Many of those impassioned pleas, however, have drawn the skepticism of committee member Rep. Anna Scharf, R-Amity, who said some arguments for the bill — including that farming octopuses would put too much strain on natural resources — were “misleading” and driven by out-of-state organizations and individuals that seek to ban all large-scale farming of meat.“And then I won’t get into a debate about the intellectual ability of an octopus and some of the other things that we kill in our state that have high intellectual capability,” said Scharf, who works on a fourth-generation family farm growing wheat, hazelnuts and other crops.The bill, too, has drawn the ire of the Oregon Farm Bureau, which says it’d set “a concerning precedent” of prohibiting the farming of an entire genus of animal without “clear, science-based justification.” And so the bill has launched a wide-ranging discussion that has stirred deeper and sometimes uncomfortable questions about the intellectual abilities of the animals Oregonians eat and the industrial production of meat in a society in which many are resolving to up their daily protein intake.Is an octopus really as smart as a pig or a cow, two of the country’s most popular sources of meat, but which have the ability to play games, single out their favorite humans or understand human hand gestures?And how resource intensive is it to produce a pound of octopus versus chicken, pork, beef or fish?HB 2557 also has sparked conversations about cultural bias against the octopus as a food source, given that it’s a valued part of many world cuisines, including Asian, Mediterranean and Pacific Islander. Environmental worriesRep. Zach Hudson, D-Troutdale, said his motivations for sponsoring the bill don’t have anything to do with all of that.“This bill isn’t about whether we should eat octopus,” Hudson said. “It’s about whether they should be farmed in captivity.”Rep. Zach Hudson, D-Troutdale, said when he first heard of the idea of banning octopus farming, he thought it “sounded like a joke.” Hudson said the bill wouldn't prohibit the buying or selling of wild octopuses or keeping them as pets or for research. (File photo/January 2025) Mark Graves/The OregonianHudson said he was primarily drawn to signing on as a chief sponsor out of concern that farmed octopus isn’t a sustainable food source because of the large amount of fish and crab they eat and that they might be carriers of parasites or disease that could be spread through wastewater to the Oregon coast. But he said he also imagines that if such facilities were allowed, octopuses would be raised in small plexiglass aquariums stacked one on top of another, in conditions that are downright cruel.“A farming operation, designed to maximize profit, would presumably pack as many octopuses as possible into small barren tanks,” Hudson told the House Committee on Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources and Water. There are currently no food-producing octopus farms in the world, though a company in Spain has said it is close to perfecting the necessary technology. Oregon’s bill would make the state the third state in the nation, behind Washington and California, to forbid this emerging form of aquaculture.“It’s about stopping inhumane practices before they start in Oregon and sending a clear message to other regions who might be considering allowing this practice that the west coastline is unified,” said Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, chief co-sponsor of the bill.Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, is seen here in January 2025. She said during a February hearing that octopuses "are without a doubt one of my favorite animals to learn about."Mark Graves/The OregonianAnimal welfare advocates say they don’t want to argue whether long-established forms of U.S. meat production, such as farming cattle, pigs and chicken for food, may be more taxing on the environment or ethically questionable, given the intelligence of octopuses. The goal of this bill isn’t to squash already established meat production industries, but to protect the octopus, they said.“What it boils down to is it’s not really the job of legislators to put people out of business,” said Amanda Fox, executive director of Animal Rights Initiative, a national nonprofit that is a major driving force behind the bill in Oregon and bills in at least six other states.“This is a preventative issue,” Fox continued. “And most people really support not expanding farming to another type of intelligent species since we’re having trouble regulating the current types of farming.”A similar bill before the U.S. Congress fizzled last year. So did one in Hawaii, though backers this year refiled two bills, which both sailed through their first committee meetings last week. An octopus ‘moment’It’s clear octopuses are having a moment, brought on in part by “My Octopus Teacher,” which won an Oscar for best documentary in 2021, and the best-selling 2022 book “Remarkably Bright Creatures” about a giant Pacific octopus that starts a friendship with a nighttime janitor at a fictional aquarium.In 2022, the United Kingdom’s Parliament passed an act declaring octopuses sentient forms of life with feelings and individual personalities. The act also found this to be the case for a host of other living beings, including crabs, lobsters and every animal with a backbone, including chickens, pigs, cows, fish, frogs and mice.Observational reports also have documented octopuses squirting jets of water at people they didn’t like or one stealthy octopus who crept into another tank to eat live fish and covered its tracks by closing the lid when it was done. Studies have relayed multiple instances where octopuses have wielded jellyfish tentacles as a possible form of defense.But as the public’s understanding of the octopus’ cognitive ability grows, so has researchers’ caution about anthropomorphizing them and our understanding of how their brains work. According to various studies, octopuses have about 500 million neurons among their nine so-called brains, while dogs have about that many in their cerebral cortex alone. Domestic pigs have about 430 million. Humans, as a point of comparison, have 86 billion. The Octopus vulgaris has been proposed as a farmed source of food. Their life span is one to two years. (File photo)Lori M. Nichols | NJ Advance Media for NJ.comEven so, unlike other mammalian brains, a 2022 study found a significant number of the octopuses’ neuron power is decentralized in the mini-brains in each of its arms, which control their independent movement. That’s led to speculation about whether they’re capable of possessing consciousness as we know it.Much also remains unknown about how a commercial farming operation in Oregon would look, if one ever got off the ground.The world’s closest one into being is under development by the Spanish company, Nueva Pescanova, which is working to open a facility in the Canary Islands. News that broke of the planned facility in 2022 created an uproar, including over what’s seen as a slow and painful way of bringing on their deaths through submerging them in ice baths.There’s also disagreement about how much strain octopus farming would place on the environment. Animal advocates say it takes three pounds of fish or crab to produce one pound of octopus meat. Nueva Pescanova told NPR in 2024 that it planned to thoughtfully source its feed, like from discards from fishing or other sustainable sources.The Oregon Farm Bureau’s lobbyist, Ryan Krabill, said his organization objects to the movement to stop an entire food producing industry before it begins. He argues that as long as public health and safety rules are followed, the Legislature shouldn’t open “a Pandora’s box” into forbidding the farming of certain food sources because of an animal’s intellectual abilities.’Appreciate all animals’ But the bill has received a tidal wave of support. Of the more than 70 people who spoke at the early February hearing or sent written testimony, only four were opposed to the bill. That included Krabill and a woman who thinks octopus farming could be a boon to Oregon’s economy.Much more frequent were people who urged the Legislature to consider octopuses’ potential future. “These are intelligent creatures that don’t deserve this torture,” wrote Milwaukie resident Sarah Vostal.Added Brenda Hess of Forest Grove: “Stop hurting all animals. …Please love and appreciate all animals.”The Octopus vulgaris has been proposed as a farmed source of food. (File photo)Lori M. Nichols | NJ Advance MedSome of the testimony was disputed by knowledgeable sources.Fox, the executive director of Animal Rights Initiative, told the legislative committee earlier this month that “because of their exceptional cognitive abilities, octopuses are known for escaping — making them more likely than any other aquacultured species to spread disease, parasites, and genetic mutations on farms and to wild populations. For example, multiple sources report frequent escape attempts at the Seaside Aquarium, where octopuses are willing to sustain injuries in their pursuits.”When The Oregonian/OregonLive asked Fox for her source, she referenced a 2013 Trip Advisor comment in which someone who said they visited the aquarium said they saw an octopus “constantly swimming itself in to the rock wall trying to escape or trying to swim.” Fox also cited a 2015 online travel magazine article about the Seaside Aquarium that alluded to some octopuses trying “to escape their tanks more than others.” Keith Chandler, manager of the Seaside Aquarium, said on rare occasions an octopus has crawled out of its tank out of curiosity or confusion in his 44 years there.“They’re not scheming and plotting and trying to come up with ways to hotwire the car and drive back to the ocean,” Chandler said.Assistant manager Tiffany Boothe said the aquarium keeps its three octopuses well-fed, so they don’t have a reason to want to leave. “We feed them fresh razor clams and Dungeness crabs on a regular basis.” In 2016, however, “Inky” the octopus made worldwide headlines when he escaped his tank at a New Zealand aquarium, squeezed through a 50-meter drain pipe and made it to the ocean. The public debated Inky’s intentions, however — unsure whether the aging creature was curious, hungry or experiencing what experts call “senescence,” a dementia-like stage of odd behavior and confusion that octopuses go through before they die. Fox also said commercial octopus farms in Oregon could decimate the state’s crabbing industry by consuming more crab than it could produce. The Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission, however, hasn’t taken a stand on the bill. And its executive director, Crystal Adams, told The Oregonian/OregonLive that her initial impression is that commercial octopus farming is “not necessarily something that would be an endangerment so far.”Rep. Anna Scharf R-Amity. Beth NakamuraScharf’s skepticism about a need to ban octopus farming appears in the minority. No other lawmaker on the committee expressed an opinion during the bill’s hearing and its co-chairs either didn’t respond to Oregonian/OregonLive queries or said they had no comment. Scharf, however, told the news organization she’s willing to take a stand.“Those things are red flags for me,” she said. “I feel the Legislature has better things to work on than banning an industry that does not even exist in Oregon and that very little is known about.”— Aimee Green is covering the Oregon Legislature this session. Reach her at 503-294-5119, agreen@oregonian.com or @o_aimee.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

The bill has drawn enormous public support but also raised fundamental questions about the intelligence of all the animals Oregonians eat.

Octopuses have nine brains, use tools, have the ability to recognize people and are so bright and brilliant it’d be cruel to farm them for human consumption.

So said a stream of octopus enthusiasts, who extolled the many astonishing traits of the beloved, eight-legged cephalopod to a committee of the Oregon Legislature earlier this month. Nearly 70 offered spoken or written testimony in support of a bill that would forbid the farming of octopuses in the state before a single octopus production facility is even proposed.

“I urge you to stand on the right side of history by voting in favor of this bill,” wrote Natalia Neal, a Damascus resident, summing up a common sentiment of the group.

Many of those impassioned pleas, however, have drawn the skepticism of committee member Rep. Anna Scharf, R-Amity, who said some arguments for the bill — including that farming octopuses would put too much strain on natural resources — were “misleading” and driven by out-of-state organizations and individuals that seek to ban all large-scale farming of meat.

“And then I won’t get into a debate about the intellectual ability of an octopus and some of the other things that we kill in our state that have high intellectual capability,” said Scharf, who works on a fourth-generation family farm growing wheat, hazelnuts and other crops.

The bill, too, has drawn the ire of the Oregon Farm Bureau, which says it’d set “a concerning precedent” of prohibiting the farming of an entire genus of animal without “clear, science-based justification.”

And so the bill has launched a wide-ranging discussion that has stirred deeper and sometimes uncomfortable questions about the intellectual abilities of the animals Oregonians eat and the industrial production of meat in a society in which many are resolving to up their daily protein intake.

Is an octopus really as smart as a pig or a cow, two of the country’s most popular sources of meat, but which have the ability to play games, single out their favorite humans or understand human hand gestures?

And how resource intensive is it to produce a pound of octopus versus chicken, pork, beef or fish?

HB 2557 also has sparked conversations about cultural bias against the octopus as a food source, given that it’s a valued part of many world cuisines, including Asian, Mediterranean and Pacific Islander.

Environmental worries

Rep. Zach Hudson, D-Troutdale, said his motivations for sponsoring the bill don’t have anything to do with all of that.

“This bill isn’t about whether we should eat octopus,” Hudson said. “It’s about whether they should be farmed in captivity.”

Octopus bill co-sponsor

Rep. Zach Hudson, D-Troutdale, said when he first heard of the idea of banning octopus farming, he thought it “sounded like a joke.” Hudson said the bill wouldn't prohibit the buying or selling of wild octopuses or keeping them as pets or for research. (File photo/January 2025) Mark Graves/The Oregonian

Hudson said he was primarily drawn to signing on as a chief sponsor out of concern that farmed octopus isn’t a sustainable food source because of the large amount of fish and crab they eat and that they might be carriers of parasites or disease that could be spread through wastewater to the Oregon coast. But he said he also imagines that if such facilities were allowed, octopuses would be raised in small plexiglass aquariums stacked one on top of another, in conditions that are downright cruel.

“A farming operation, designed to maximize profit, would presumably pack as many octopuses as possible into small barren tanks,” Hudson told the House Committee on Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources and Water.

There are currently no food-producing octopus farms in the world, though a company in Spain has said it is close to perfecting the necessary technology. Oregon’s bill would make the state the third state in the nation, behind Washington and California, to forbid this emerging form of aquaculture.

“It’s about stopping inhumane practices before they start in Oregon and sending a clear message to other regions who might be considering allowing this practice that the west coastline is unified,” said Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, chief co-sponsor of the bill.

Octopus bill co-sponsor

Rep. Courtney Neron, D-Wilsonville, is seen here in January 2025. She said during a February hearing that octopuses "are without a doubt one of my favorite animals to learn about."Mark Graves/The Oregonian

Animal welfare advocates say they don’t want to argue whether long-established forms of U.S. meat production, such as farming cattle, pigs and chicken for food, may be more taxing on the environment or ethically questionable, given the intelligence of octopuses. The goal of this bill isn’t to squash already established meat production industries, but to protect the octopus, they said.

“What it boils down to is it’s not really the job of legislators to put people out of business,” said Amanda Fox, executive director of Animal Rights Initiative, a national nonprofit that is a major driving force behind the bill in Oregon and bills in at least six other states.

“This is a preventative issue,” Fox continued. “And most people really support not expanding farming to another type of intelligent species since we’re having trouble regulating the current types of farming.”

A similar bill before the U.S. Congress fizzled last year. So did one in Hawaii, though backers this year refiled two bills, which both sailed through their first committee meetings last week.

An octopus ‘moment’

It’s clear octopuses are having a moment, brought on in part by “My Octopus Teacher,” which won an Oscar for best documentary in 2021, and the best-selling 2022 book “Remarkably Bright Creatures” about a giant Pacific octopus that starts a friendship with a nighttime janitor at a fictional aquarium.

In 2022, the United Kingdom’s Parliament passed an act declaring octopuses sentient forms of life with feelings and individual personalities. The act also found this to be the case for a host of other living beings, including crabs, lobsters and every animal with a backbone, including chickens, pigs, cows, fish, frogs and mice.

Observational reports also have documented octopuses squirting jets of water at people they didn’t like or one stealthy octopus who crept into another tank to eat live fish and covered its tracks by closing the lid when it was done. Studies have relayed multiple instances where octopuses have wielded jellyfish tentacles as a possible form of defense.

But as the public’s understanding of the octopus’ cognitive ability grows, so has researchers’ caution about anthropomorphizing them and our understanding of how their brains work. According to various studies, octopuses have about 500 million neurons among their nine so-called brains, while dogs have about that many in their cerebral cortex alone. Domestic pigs have about 430 million. Humans, as a point of comparison, have 86 billion.

Common Atlantic octopus

The Octopus vulgaris has been proposed as a farmed source of food. Their life span is one to two years. (File photo)Lori M. Nichols | NJ Advance Media for NJ.com

Even so, unlike other mammalian brains, a 2022 study found a significant number of the octopuses’ neuron power is decentralized in the mini-brains in each of its arms, which control their independent movement. That’s led to speculation about whether they’re capable of possessing consciousness as we know it.

Much also remains unknown about how a commercial farming operation in Oregon would look, if one ever got off the ground.

The world’s closest one into being is under development by the Spanish company, Nueva Pescanova, which is working to open a facility in the Canary Islands. News that broke of the planned facility in 2022 created an uproar, including over what’s seen as a slow and painful way of bringing on their deaths through submerging them in ice baths.

There’s also disagreement about how much strain octopus farming would place on the environment. Animal advocates say it takes three pounds of fish or crab to produce one pound of octopus meat. Nueva Pescanova told NPR in 2024 that it planned to thoughtfully source its feed, like from discards from fishing or other sustainable sources.

The Oregon Farm Bureau’s lobbyist, Ryan Krabill, said his organization objects to the movement to stop an entire food producing industry before it begins. He argues that as long as public health and safety rules are followed, the Legislature shouldn’t open “a Pandora’s box” into forbidding the farming of certain food sources because of an animal’s intellectual abilities.

’Appreciate all animals’

But the bill has received a tidal wave of support. Of the more than 70 people who spoke at the early February hearing or sent written testimony, only four were opposed to the bill. That included Krabill and a woman who thinks octopus farming could be a boon to Oregon’s economy.

Much more frequent were people who urged the Legislature to consider octopuses’ potential future.

“These are intelligent creatures that don’t deserve this torture,” wrote Milwaukie resident Sarah Vostal.

Added Brenda Hess of Forest Grove: “Stop hurting all animals. …Please love and appreciate all animals.”

Common Atlantic octopus

The Octopus vulgaris has been proposed as a farmed source of food. (File photo)Lori M. Nichols | NJ Advance Med

Some of the testimony was disputed by knowledgeable sources.

Fox, the executive director of Animal Rights Initiative, told the legislative committee earlier this month that “because of their exceptional cognitive abilities, octopuses are known for escaping — making them more likely than any other aquacultured species to spread disease, parasites, and genetic mutations on farms and to wild populations. For example, multiple sources report frequent escape attempts at the Seaside Aquarium, where octopuses are willing to sustain injuries in their pursuits.”

When The Oregonian/OregonLive asked Fox for her source, she referenced a 2013 Trip Advisor comment in which someone who said they visited the aquarium said they saw an octopus “constantly swimming itself in to the rock wall trying to escape or trying to swim.” Fox also cited a 2015 online travel magazine article about the Seaside Aquarium that alluded to some octopuses trying “to escape their tanks more than others.”

Keith Chandler, manager of the Seaside Aquarium, said on rare occasions an octopus has crawled out of its tank out of curiosity or confusion in his 44 years there.

“They’re not scheming and plotting and trying to come up with ways to hotwire the car and drive back to the ocean,” Chandler said.

Assistant manager Tiffany Boothe said the aquarium keeps its three octopuses well-fed, so they don’t have a reason to want to leave. “We feed them fresh razor clams and Dungeness crabs on a regular basis.”

In 2016, however, “Inky” the octopus made worldwide headlines when he escaped his tank at a New Zealand aquarium, squeezed through a 50-meter drain pipe and made it to the ocean. The public debated Inky’s intentions, however — unsure whether the aging creature was curious, hungry or experiencing what experts call “senescence,” a dementia-like stage of odd behavior and confusion that octopuses go through before they die.

Fox also said commercial octopus farms in Oregon could decimate the state’s crabbing industry by consuming more crab than it could produce. The Oregon Dungeness Crab Commission, however, hasn’t taken a stand on the bill. And its executive director, Crystal Adams, told The Oregonian/OregonLive that her initial impression is that commercial octopus farming is “not necessarily something that would be an endangerment so far.”

A vocal opponent

Rep. Anna Scharf R-Amity. Beth Nakamura

Scharf’s skepticism about a need to ban octopus farming appears in the minority. No other lawmaker on the committee expressed an opinion during the bill’s hearing and its co-chairs either didn’t respond to Oregonian/OregonLive queries or said they had no comment. Scharf, however, told the news organization she’s willing to take a stand.

“Those things are red flags for me,” she said. “I feel the Legislature has better things to work on than banning an industry that does not even exist in Oregon and that very little is known about.”

— Aimee Green is covering the Oregon Legislature this session. Reach her at 503-294-5119, agreen@oregonian.com or @o_aimee.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Dead, sick pelicans turning up along Oregon coast

So far, no signs of bird flu but wildlife officials continue to test the birds.

Sick and dead pelicans are turning up on Oregon’s coast and state wildlife officials say they don’t yet know why. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife says it has collected several dead brown pelican carcasses for testing. Lab results from two pelicans found in Newport have come back negative for highly pathogenic avian influenza, also known as bird flu, the agency said. Avian influenza was detected in Oregon last fall and earlier this year in both domestic animals and wildlife – but not brown pelicans. Additional test results are pending to determine if another disease or domoic acid toxicity caused by harmful algal blooms may be involved, officials said. In recent months, domoic acid toxicity has sickened or killed dozens of brown pelicans and numerous other wildlife in California. The sport harvest for razor clams is currently closed in Oregon – from Cascade Head to the California border – due to high levels of domoic acid detected last fall.Brown pelicans – easily recognized by their large size, massive bill and brownish plumage – breed in Southern California and migrate north along the Oregon coast in spring. Younger birds sometimes rest on the journey and may just be tired, not sick, officials said. If you find a sick, resting or dead pelican, leave it alone and keep dogs leashed and away from wildlife. State wildlife biologists along the coast are aware of the situation and the public doesn’t need to report sick, resting or dead pelicans. — Gosia Wozniacka covers environmental justice, climate change, the clean energy transition and other environmental issues. Reach her at gwozniacka@oregonian.com or 971-421-3154.Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

50-Million-Year-Old Footprints Open a 'Rare Window' Into the Behaviors of Extinct Animals That Once Roamed in Oregon

Scientists revisited tracks made by a shorebird, a lizard, a cat-like predator and some sort of large herbivore at what is now John Day Fossil Beds National Monument

50-Million-Year-Old Footprints Open a ‘Rare Window’ Into the Behaviors of Extinct Animals That Once Roamed in Oregon Scientists revisited tracks made by a shorebird, a lizard, a cat-like predator and some sort of large herbivore at what is now John Day Fossil Beds National Monument Sarah Kuta - Daily Correspondent April 24, 2025 4:59 p.m. Researchers took a closer look at fossilized footprints—including these cat-like tracks—found at John Day Fossil Beds National Monument in Oregon. National Park Service Between 29 million and 50 million years ago, Oregon was teeming with life. Shorebirds searched for food in shallow water, lizards dashed along lake beds and saber-toothed predators prowled the landscape. Now, scientists are learning more about these prehistoric creatures by studying their fossilized footprints. They describe some of these tracks, discovered at John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, in a paper published earlier this year in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica. John Day Fossil Beds National Monument is a nearly 14,000-acre, federally protected area in central and eastern Oregon. It’s a well-known site for “body fossils,” like teeth and bones. But, more recently, paleontologists have been focusing their attention on “trace fossils”—indirect evidence of animals, like worm burrows, footprints, beak marks and impressions of claws. Both are useful for understanding the extinct creatures that once roamed the environment, though they provide different kinds of information about the past. “Body fossils tell us a lot about the structure of an organism, but a trace fossil … tells us a lot about behaviors,” says lead author Conner Bennett, an Earth and environmental scientist at Utah Tech University, to Crystal Ligori, host of Oregon Public Broadcasting’s “All Things Considered.” Oregon's prehistoric shorebirds probed for food the same way modern shorebirds do, according to the researchers. Bennett et al., Palaeontologia Electronica, 2025 For the study, scientists revisited fossilized footprints discovered at the national monument decades ago. Some specimens had sat in museum storage since the 1980s. They analyzed the tracks using a technique known as photogrammetry, which involved taking thousands of photographs to produce 3D models. These models allowed researchers to piece together some long-gone scenes. Small footprints and beak marks were discovered near invertebrate trails, suggesting that ancient shorebirds were pecking around in search of a meal between 39 million and 50 million years ago. This prehistoric behavior is “strikingly similar” to that of today’s shorebirds, according to a statement from the National Park Service. “It’s fascinating,” says Bennett in the statement. “That is an incredibly long time for a species to exhibit the same foraging patterns as its ancestors.” Photogrammetry techniques allowed the researchers to make 3D models of the tracks. Bennett et al., Palaeontologia Electronica, 2025 Researchers also analyzed a footprint with splayed toes and claws. This rare fossil was likely made by a running lizard around 50 million years ago, according to the team. It’s one of the few known reptile tracks in North America from that period. An illustration of a nimravid, an extinct, cat-like predator NPS / Mural by Roger Witter They also found evidence of a cat-like predator dating to roughly 29 million years ago. A set of paw prints, discovered in a layer of volcanic ash, likely belonged to a bobcat-sized, saber-toothed predator resembling a cat—possibly a nimravid of the genus Hoplophoneus. Since researchers didn’t find any claw marks on the paw prints, they suspect the creature had retractable claws, just like modern cats do. A set of three-toed, rounded hoofprints indicate some sort of large herbivore was roaming around 29 million years ago, probably an ancient tapir or rhinoceros ancestor. Together, the fossil tracks open “a rare window into ancient ecosystems,” says study co-author Nicholas Famoso, paleontology program manager at the national monument, in the statement. “They add behavioral context to the body fossils we’ve collected over the years and help us better understand the climate and environmental conditions of prehistoric Oregon,” he adds. Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Two teens and 5,000 ants: how a smuggling bust shed new light on a booming trade

Two Belgian 19-year-olds have pleaded guilty to wildlife piracy – part of a growing trend of trafficking ‘less conspicuous’ creatures for sale as exotic petsPoaching busts are familiar territory for the officers of Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), an armed force tasked with protecting the country’s iconic creatures. But what awaited guards when they descended in early April on a guesthouse in the west of the country was both larger and smaller in scale than the smuggling operations they typically encounter. There were more than 5,000 smuggled animals, caged in their own enclosures. Each one, however, was about the size of a little fingernail: 18-25mm.The cargo, which two Belgian teenagers had apparently intended to ship to exotic pet markets in Europe and Asia, was ants. Their enclosures were a mixture of test tubes and syringes containing cotton wool – environments that authorities say would keep the insects alive for weeks. Continue reading...

Poaching busts are familiar territory for the officers of Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), an armed force tasked with protecting the country’s iconic creatures. But what awaited guards when they descended in early April on a guesthouse in the west of the country was both larger and smaller in scale than the smuggling operations they typically encounter. There were more than 5,000 smuggled animals, caged in their own enclosures. Each one, however, was about the size of a little fingernail: 18-25mm.The samples of garden ants presented to the court. Photograph: Monicah Mwangi/ReutersThe cargo, which two Belgian teenagers had apparently intended to ship to exotic pet markets in Europe and Asia, was ants. Their enclosures were a mixture of test tubes and syringes containing cotton wool – environments that authorities say would keep the insects alive for weeks.“We did not come here to break any laws. By accident and stupidity we did,” says Lornoy David, one of the Belgian smugglers.David and Seppe Lodewijckx, both 19 years old, pleaded guilty after being charged last week with wildlife piracy, alongside two other men in a separate case who were caught smuggling 400 ants. The cases have shed new light on booming global ant trade – and what authorities say is a growing trend of trafficking “less conspicuous” creatures.These crimes represent “a shift in trafficking trends – from iconic large mammals to lesser-known yet ecologically critical species”, says a KWS statement.The unusual case has also trained a spotlight on the niche world of ant-keeping and collecting – a hobby that has boomed over the past decade. The seized species include Messor cephalotes, a large red harvester ant native to east Africa. Queens of the species grow to about 20-24mm long, and the ant sales website Ants R Us describes them as “many people’s dream species”, selling them for £99 per colony. The ants are prized by collectors for their unique behaviours and complex colony-building skills, “traits that make them popular in exotic pet circles, where they are kept in specialised habitats known as formicariums”, KWS says.Lornoy David and Seppe Lodewijckx during the hearing. Photograph: Monicah Mwangi/ReutersOne online ant vendor, who asked not to be named, says the market is thriving, and there has been a growth in ant-keeping shows, where enthusiasts meet to compare housing and species details. “Sales volumes have grown almost every year. There are more ant vendors than before, and prices have become more competitive,” he says. “In today’s world, where most people live fast-paced, tech-driven lives, many are disconnected from themselves and their environment. Watching ants in a formicarium can be surprisingly therapeutic,” he says.David and Lodewijckx will remain in custody until the court considers a pre-sentencing report on 23 April. The ant seller says theirs is a “landmark case in the field”. “People travelling to other countries specifically to collect ants and then returning with them is virtually unheard of,” he says.A formicarium at a pet shop in Singapore. Photograph: Roslan Rahman/AFP/Getty ImagesScientists have raised concerns that the burgeoning trade in exotic ants could pose a significant biodiversity risk. “Ants are traded as pets across the globe, but if introduced outside of their native ranges they could become invasive with dire environmental and economic consequences,” researchers conclude in a 2023 paper tracking the ant trade across China. “The most sought-after ants have higher invasive potential,” they write.Removing ants from their ecosystems could also be damaging. Illegal exportation “not only undermines Kenya’s sovereign rights over its biodiversity but also deprives local communities and research institutions of potential ecological and economic benefits”, says KWS. Dino Martins, an entomologist and evolutionary biologist in Kenya, says harvester ants are among the most important insects on the African savannah, and any trade in them is bound to have negative consequences for the ecology of the grasslands.A Kenyan official arranges the containers of ants at the court. Photograph: Kenya Wildlife Service/AP“Harvester ants are seed collectors, and they gather [the seeds] as food for themselves, storing these in their nests. A single large harvester ant colony can collect several kilos of seeds of various grasses a year. In the process of collecting grass seeds, the ants ‘drop’ a number … dispersing them through the grasslands,” says Martins.The insects also serve as food for various other species including aardvarks, pangolins and aardwolves.Martins says he is surprised to see that smugglers feeding the global “pet” trade are training their sights on Kenya, since “ants are among the most common and widespread of insects”.“Insect trade can actually be done more sustainably, through controlled rearing of the insects. This can support livelihoods in rural communities such as the Kipepeo Project which rears butterflies in Kenya,” he says. Locally, the main threats to ants come not from the illegal trade but poisoning from pesticides, habitat destruction and invasive species, says Martins.Philip Muruthi, a vice-president for conservation at the African Wildlife Foundation in Nairobi, says ants enrich soils, enabling germination and providing food for other species.“When you see a healthy forest … you don’t think about what is making it healthy. It is the relationships all the way from the bacteria to the ants to the bigger things,” he says.

Belgian Teenagers Found With 5,000 Ants to Be Sentenced in 2 Weeks

Two Belgian teenagers who were found with thousands of ants valued at $9,200 and allegedly destined for European and Asian markets will be sentenced in two weeks

NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Two Belgian teenagers who were found with thousands of ants valued at $9,200 and allegedly destined for European and Asian markets will be sentenced in two weeks, a Kenyan magistrate said Wednesday.Magistrate Njeri Thuku, sitting at the court in Kenya’s main airport, said she would not rush the case but would take time to review environmental impact and psychological reports filed in court before passing sentence on May 7.Belgian nationals Lornoy David and Seppe Lodewijckx, both 19 years old, were arrested on April 5 with 5,000 ants at a guest house. They were charged on April 15 with violating wildlife conservation laws.The teens have told the magistrate that they didn’t know that keeping the ants was illegal and were just having fun.The Kenya Wildlife Service had said the case represented “a shift in trafficking trends — from iconic large mammals to lesser-known yet ecologically critical species.”Kenya has in the past fought against the trafficking of body parts of larger wild animals such as elephants, rhinos and pangolins among others.The Belgian teens had entered the country on a tourist visa and were staying in a guest house in the western town of Naivasha, popular among tourists for its animal parks and lakes.Their lawyer, Halima Nyakinyua Magairo, told The Associated Press on Wednesday that her clients did not know what they were doing was illegal. She said she hoped the Belgian embassy in Kenya could “support them more in this judicial process.”In a separate but related case, Kenyan Dennis Ng’ang’a and Vietnamese Duh Hung Nguyen were charged after they were found in possession of 400 ants in their apartment in the capital, Nairobi.KWS had said all four suspects were involved in trafficking the ants to markets in Europe and Asia, and that the species included messor cephalotes, a distinctive, large and red-colored harvester ant native to East Africa.The ants are bought by people who keep them as pets and observe them in their colonies. Several websites in Europe have listed different species of ants for sale at varied prices.The 5,400 ants found with the four men are valued at 1.2 million Kenyan shillings ($9,200), according to KWS.Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - Feb. 2025

Slither, by Stephen S. Hall, Explores Our Fear and Fascination around Snakes

 In a new book called Slither, Stephen S. Hall takes a deep dive into the biology and history of one of the most reviled animals.

Rachel Feltman: For Scientific American’s Science Quickly, I’m Rachel Feltman. People are funny about snakes. I remember being taught the rhyme, “Red touches black, you’re okay, Jack; red touches yellow, you’re a dead fellow,” in elementary school—never mind the fact that we did not have coral snakes in New Jersey. My guest today has spent a lot of time exploring our cultural aversion to—and fascination with—snakes. Stephen S. Hall is a science writer and the author of seven books. He’s also a teacher of science communication at New York University, Rockefeller University and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. His latest book, Slither: How Nature’s Most Maligned Creatures Illuminate Our World, is on sale now.On supporting science journalismIf you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.Thank you so much for coming in to chat. I’m really looking forward to it.Stephen S. Hall: My pleasure to be here. Thank you.Feltman: First question: Why snakes?Hall: There’s several answers to that question. One of them is that as a kid, like many kids, I caught snakes, brought them home, put them in terrariums in the garage until my mother screamed when they would get loose, and that sort of ended that experiment. I was always fascinated by them because they were so different from other animals—and also so beautiful. There was a real fascination and attraction there. But I wasn’t a herper; I didn’t go out and continue to collect snakes.What I did do is become a science writer, and probably in the 2000s and 2010s, when I was reading science journals like Science and Nature, I occasionally would run across these really interesting major research articles based on snakes, and I always sort of set them aside, thinking, “This is kind of interesting. I should gather a little pile on this.”The third piece of this explanation is that my agent suggested at one point, “Why don’t you do a book about an animal?” which I had never done before. And my first reaction was, “I’d only do a book about an animal that most people don’t like,” because I thought it’d be a really interesting challenge to try to change people’s minds. And as most people know snakes are not very popular. People do not like them—they’re afraid of them; they loathe them; there’re all these surveys that children detest snakes and adults detest snakes—and I thought it would be an interesting challenge to try to change people’s minds about a really interesting creature. Feltman: Very cool. Given your research for the book, how have our feelings about snakes evolved over time?Hall: One of the things that surprised me is: this deeply embedded loathing of snakes was not always the case. In fact, that was the later evolution from earlier cultures, and part of the fun of doing Slither was going back and seeing how ancient cultures perceive snakes, and they perceived them very differently.They were respected. They were venerated in some cultures. In, in early ancient Greek culture the snake was associated with healing. In Mesoamerican cultures the snake was associated with a kind of messenger that would go back and forth between humans and nature but also humans and the afterworld—the world of the nonliving, as it were. There was a great respect for these creatures. This was also true in ancient Egypt. And then [laughs] with the Garden of Eden story the snake got demonized and was blamed for human fallibility, human sin, and I think that changed a lot of perceptions.One of the goals that I was trying to accomplish here was to get people to rethink what snakes represent: Why did ancient people venerate them, and is there a way to reclaim that sense of respect for these otherwise disliked creatures?Feltman: Well, and what do you think it is about snakes that made them venerated, and what do you think it is about them that makes people feel so negatively towards them?Hall: In terms of the negative part they are so different from so many other creatures: They don’t have legs. They’re secretive. You can’t see them. They’re [laughs] extremely good at hiding. In fact, you know, there—it’s sort of a Darwinian badge of honor that they make themselves hard to see, with their camouflage skin, and coloration, and so on. So they represent a kind of extreme version of the other. And people also associate threat and danger with them, certainly with venomous snakes.One of the interesting things that came up in the research—it’s a really interesting theory called the snake-detection theory. This is advanced by a researcher at the University of California, Davis, named Lynne Isbell. Isbell argues that the necessity of spotting snakes in the wild as a self-preservation mechanism led to the creation of a much larger primate brain, which we humans have inherited as well. So she attributes human acuity in vision to spotting snakes in [an] evolutionary sense that was developed a long time ago.Feltman: Yeah, I’ve also seen that as an explanation for why cats are freaked out by cucumbers; I’ll have to fact-check that. But that’s not [laughs] anything I’ve—I’ve heard that theory brought up before in the context of cats running away from cucumbers [laughs], so.Hall: There’s some ingrained perception.Charles Darwin read a report by a German scientist—this is in the middle of the 19th century—that he had taken snakes to the monkey house in a zoo in Germany, and the monkeys went crazy just seeing that there was a snake in it when he revealed it. So Darwin puts a stuffed snake in a bag and goes to the London Zoo, and then he takes off the top, and all the monkeys go crazy, and he’d never seen a reaction like that. Then he went back with a live snake, and the same thing happened, and it was this sort of instantaneous reaction to the appearance of a snake, so there’s definitely an alarm system ...Feltman: Mm.Hall: We don’t need to say that it was fear, necessarily, although some people call it a “fear module,” but there’s an alarm system in spotting a snake that I think is connected to the alarm that many humans feel when they see a snake.Feltman: Sure, and speaking of Darwin’s kind of crude research, how has our scientific understanding of snakes changed over time?Hall: Scientists are belatedly using snakes as a nontraditional model organism.Feltman: Mm.Hall: You would think that there was not much you could learn from a snake, but they’ve actually discovered some remarkable qualities in snakes because they finally started paying attention to them with the advent of molecular biology. What used to be observed naturalistically—okay, a snake eats a large prey and digests it—and they would take x-rays of it, like, in the 1970s; that was how metabolism was explained. After genomics emerged and they did the genome of the snake after the Human Genome Project, they discovered that snakes, pythons, as a model organism activate a huge suite of genes from the moment that they have a meal. And they were particularly interesting organisms to study because—I facetiously kinda say they invented intermittent fasting [laughs]—but, but they could go for a year at a time without eating a single meal. And then they eat these enormous meals. So the equivalence was, like, a 150-pound human, for example, roughly, eating a 220-pound hamburger ...Feltman: Mm [laughs].Hall: “In one gulp.” That’s kind of what the meal of a python was like. How does an animal handle the digestion and processing of that? It turns out they activate all these genes that regenerate tissues in the body—a bigger heart, a bigger intestine—just to handle the [laughs] massive processing of this meal. And then they carve away all the regenerated tissue that they’ve created and go back to normal. So they have this ability to regenerate tissue, which, of course, is something we can’t do, except in a couple of isolated cases, and it became a really interesting thing to study.Another thing that’s really interesting is convergent evolution: this idea that animals can evolve the same traits, although they’re completely unrelated. So there was a study that came out a couple years ago on spitting cobras. The researchers established that three different lineages of cobras that were completely independent of each other each evolved the anatomical mechanism to spit venom—a physiological change. They evolved the behavior to aim the spit at the eyes of whatever it was that was threatening them.Feltman: Wow.Hall: And they independently evolved a change in their venom that produced excruciating pain in eyes. So independently all three of those different qualities were evolved in three different species of snakes that were completely unrelated to each other, in a sense. You couldn’t have found that out until you had genomics and very sophisticated molecular analysis of venom and all that stuff.Feltman: Yeah. What were some of the most surprising things that you learned in this project as someone who already really had a fondness for snakes?Hall: The thing that really impressed me is how adaptive snakes are, how rapidly they adjust to their environment; it’s one of their signal traits. They’re very diverse—it’s amazing that they can live on every continent except Antarctica, which means temperate, cold weather, tropical weather, jungle, seawater. If there’s a threat in the environment, they have these remarkably ingenious evolutionary adaptations to it. There’s a story of these sea snakes in, in the Pacific off New Caledonia that, in response to the pollution in the waters there, have developed melanistic characteristics—a darker coloration in their skin—because that sequesters all these toxic chemicals that are in the water and prevents it from harming the animal, and then they slough off their skin and they get rid of the chemicals. And it’s only in those snakes that are inhabiting that particular niche.This idea of being able to adapt to environmental challenge really struck me, not just because of the cleverness of the evolution or the selective process, but also, it’s a warning to us in terms of climate change and changes in the global meteorological systems. Snakes have a way of adapting to this that we don’t have, and maybe we can learn something from them. It’s really interesting that in the Mesoamerican cultures in particular, snakes were traditionally associated with meteorological events ...Feltman: Mm.Hall: So rain, lightning, thunderstorms, droughts, floods, and all of that being attached to agricultural fertility. And these are all issues that are front and center now because of climate change, and I think the ancients realized that snakes were symbols of coming to terms with both the unpredictability of nature and perhaps suggesting ways to adapt to it.I spoke to a very well-known Australian herpetologist named Rick Shine. He did fieldwork in [the mountains of] Tasmania, which has horrible weather, and there are snakes there, and, you know, he said there’s only 20 or 30 really nice sunny days there. And humans go there, and they think, “This is the most god-awful environment. How could anything live here?” And the snakes live under the rocks for all but those 20 or 30 days, and then they come out, and they think they’re living in the villa by the sea [laughs], and it’s just, it’s a sunny day for them; they don’t have the sense that it’s a bad environment because they adjust to it. And he had this wonderful observation—he just wondered what it felt like for a snake to emerge into the sunlight, warm up, have all its organ systems click on, its consciousness click on. He said, “That must be an amazing feeling.” And I thought that was a wonderful way of kind of capturing the uniqueness of these creatures.Feltman: Yeah, well, and speaking of that adaptation, what dangers are snakes facing these days?Hall: I would say the biggest danger’s habitat destruction. And there are a couple of anecdotes in the book—so I talk about when I caught snakes as a kid, and this was in a sort of exurban area of Michigan, outside Detroit. I went back to that area 50 years later to see how the habitat had changed, and all the places where you would catch turtles or you catch snakes or you would see them, it’s all changed: It’s been developed residentially. Population spread has confined the habitat.Thomas Cole, who’s a pretty famous Hudson River School painter, had made the point that a habitat destruction was something that needed to be addressed or, as he put it, we would lose Eden and wouldn’t be able to recover it again.Feltman: Why do you think people should care about snakes?Hall: I think it’s really important, when we talk about conservation, preservation of species, prevention of extinction, that we don’t only think about cute animals that everybody likes. It’s really important to globally embrace all creatures—including, in this case, that animal that is so different and so repulsive and historically so loathed by so many people—because if we pick and choose, we’re really not saving anything in terms of habitat or anything else.And it’s an acknowledgement that ecologies are complicated, that there are these very fragile webs, and it’s not just birds or mammals or snakes, but it’s the combination and interaction of these creatures that creates a vibrant and sustainable ecology. It’s really important to include everyone in our conservation arc, if you will.Feltman: Absolutely. Steve, thank you so much for coming on to talk to us, and I’m sure our listeners are really gonna love your book.Hall: Thank you very much for having me.Feltman: That’s all for today’s episode. Don’t forget to check out Slither wherever you buy books. We’ll be back on Friday to learn how you can explore your urban or suburban neighborhood with all of the enthusiasm of a seasoned naturalist out in the wild.Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Kelso Harper, Naeem Amarsy and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news.For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. See you next time!

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.