Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

A Hungarian Company Is Linked to the Pagers That Exploded in Lebanon and Syria

News Feed
Wednesday, September 18, 2024

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — In a duplex in a quiet neighborhood of the Hungarian capital is the headquarters of a company that is linked to the manufacture of the pagers that exploded in Lebanon and Syria as part of an apparent Israeli operation against the Hezbollah militant group.BAC Consulting shares the ground floor of the modest building in Budapest with other enterprises. On Wednesday morning, Associated Press journalists saw the names of multiple companies, including BAC, posted on pieces of printer paper and taped in a window.In a corporate registry, the company listed 118 official functions, including sugar and oil production, retail jewelry sales and natural gas extraction.BAC reportedly supplied the thousands of devices that killed at least 12 people, including two children, and wounded about 2,800 on Tuesday in a coordinated attack that Hezbollah and the Lebanese government blamed on Israel.More attacks were reported Wednesday, when walkie-talkies and solar equipment exploded in multiple parts of Lebanon. The second wave of attacks killed at least nine people and wounded more than 300, the Health Ministry said.The Taiwanese company whose brand appears on the pagers, Gold Apollo, said Wednesday that it had authorized the use of its name on the devices.BAC was authorized “to use our brand trademark for product sales in designated regions, but the design and manufacturing of the products are solely the responsibility of BAC,” Gold Apollo said in a statement.A Hungarian government spokesman said the pagers were never in Hungary and that BAC Consultants merely acted as an intermediary.“Authorities have confirmed that the company in question is a trading intermediary, with no manufacturing or operational site in Hungary. It has one manager registered at its declared address, and the referenced devices have never been in Hungary,” Zoltán Kovács posted Wednesday on X.Hungarian national security services were cooperating with international partners, and the matter posed no national security risk to Hungary, he added.BAC Consulting, which was registered as an limited liability company in May 2022, brought in $725,000 in revenue in 2022 and $593,000 in 2023, according to the company registry.Its CEO is Cristiana Bársony-Arcidiacono, who describes herself on LinkedIn as a strategic adviser and business developer with a doctorate.BAC could be an acronym, in the Eastern name order that is used in Hungary, for Bársony-Arcidiacono Cristiana.The AP attempted to reach Bársony-Arcidiacono by email and social media sites but received no response. It was not clear what connection, if any, she or BAC had to the attack.She describes herself as a physicist and a consultant for projects to solve environmental and political issues. She co-authored a paper in 2022 for a UNESCO conference on underground water management.Among other positions, Bársony-Arcidiacono's LinkedIn page said she serves on the board of directors of the Earth Child Institute, a sustainability group. But the group does not list Bársony-Arcidiacono among its board members on its website.She also writes that she is a strategic adviser for major international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and the CARE humanitarian agency, as well as for venture capital firms.The IAEA confirmed that a person named Cristiana Arcidiacino was an intern with the agency for nine months in 2008 and 2009. The other relationships could not be immediately confirmed.In an article featuring her on an online expert site, Bársony-Arcidiacono said: “A good understanding of local issues and a network of collaborators in various areas are important to succeed.”The BAC Consulting website, which became unavailable Wednesday, describes the company's fields of expertise as “environment, development and international affairs.”Phone calls to the number listed for BAC went unanswered. A woman who emerged Wednesday from the Budapest building housing the company's headquarters said the location is used as a service that provides addresses to companies. She would not give her name.Social media accounts indicate Bársony-Arcidiacono studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science and the School of Oriental and African Studies. She has also posted published scientific papers on water ionization, climate change and other topics in the natural sciences.An Instagram account features many of her “photos and sketches from around the world.” “Sicily, Budapest, Paris, Africa, etc.,” it reads.Associated Press Writer Sarah El Deeb in Beirut contributed to this report.Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See - July 2024

The company linked to the manufacture of the pagers that exploded in Lebanon and Syria is based in a duplex in a quiet neighborhood of the Hungarian capital

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — In a duplex in a quiet neighborhood of the Hungarian capital is the headquarters of a company that is linked to the manufacture of the pagers that exploded in Lebanon and Syria as part of an apparent Israeli operation against the Hezbollah militant group.

BAC Consulting shares the ground floor of the modest building in Budapest with other enterprises. On Wednesday morning, Associated Press journalists saw the names of multiple companies, including BAC, posted on pieces of printer paper and taped in a window.

In a corporate registry, the company listed 118 official functions, including sugar and oil production, retail jewelry sales and natural gas extraction.

BAC reportedly supplied the thousands of devices that killed at least 12 people, including two children, and wounded about 2,800 on Tuesday in a coordinated attack that Hezbollah and the Lebanese government blamed on Israel.

More attacks were reported Wednesday, when walkie-talkies and solar equipment exploded in multiple parts of Lebanon. The second wave of attacks killed at least nine people and wounded more than 300, the Health Ministry said.

The Taiwanese company whose brand appears on the pagers, Gold Apollo, said Wednesday that it had authorized the use of its name on the devices.

BAC was authorized “to use our brand trademark for product sales in designated regions, but the design and manufacturing of the products are solely the responsibility of BAC,” Gold Apollo said in a statement.

A Hungarian government spokesman said the pagers were never in Hungary and that BAC Consultants merely acted as an intermediary.

“Authorities have confirmed that the company in question is a trading intermediary, with no manufacturing or operational site in Hungary. It has one manager registered at its declared address, and the referenced devices have never been in Hungary,” Zoltán Kovács posted Wednesday on X.

Hungarian national security services were cooperating with international partners, and the matter posed no national security risk to Hungary, he added.

BAC Consulting, which was registered as an limited liability company in May 2022, brought in $725,000 in revenue in 2022 and $593,000 in 2023, according to the company registry.

Its CEO is Cristiana Bársony-Arcidiacono, who describes herself on LinkedIn as a strategic adviser and business developer with a doctorate.

BAC could be an acronym, in the Eastern name order that is used in Hungary, for Bársony-Arcidiacono Cristiana.

The AP attempted to reach Bársony-Arcidiacono by email and social media sites but received no response. It was not clear what connection, if any, she or BAC had to the attack.

She describes herself as a physicist and a consultant for projects to solve environmental and political issues. She co-authored a paper in 2022 for a UNESCO conference on underground water management.

Among other positions, Bársony-Arcidiacono's LinkedIn page said she serves on the board of directors of the Earth Child Institute, a sustainability group. But the group does not list Bársony-Arcidiacono among its board members on its website.

She also writes that she is a strategic adviser for major international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and the CARE humanitarian agency, as well as for venture capital firms.

The IAEA confirmed that a person named Cristiana Arcidiacino was an intern with the agency for nine months in 2008 and 2009. The other relationships could not be immediately confirmed.

In an article featuring her on an online expert site, Bársony-Arcidiacono said: “A good understanding of local issues and a network of collaborators in various areas are important to succeed.”

The BAC Consulting website, which became unavailable Wednesday, describes the company's fields of expertise as “environment, development and international affairs.”

Phone calls to the number listed for BAC went unanswered. A woman who emerged Wednesday from the Budapest building housing the company's headquarters said the location is used as a service that provides addresses to companies. She would not give her name.

Social media accounts indicate Bársony-Arcidiacono studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science and the School of Oriental and African Studies. She has also posted published scientific papers on water ionization, climate change and other topics in the natural sciences.

An Instagram account features many of her “photos and sketches from around the world.”

“Sicily, Budapest, Paris, Africa, etc.,” it reads.

Associated Press Writer Sarah El Deeb in Beirut contributed to this report.

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Photos You Should See - July 2024

Read the full story here.
Photos courtesy of

Hurricanes cost more than you think. Here’s why that matters.

Damage estimates for Hurricane Francine are rolling in. The true costs could be much higher.

Blowing 100 mile-per-hour winds, Hurricane Francine ripped into Southern Louisiana on September 11, knocking out power for hundreds of thousands of people. Its most dangerous and damaging effect, though, was the storm surge of seawater that it bulldozed ashore, inundating coastal parishes like Terrebonne and Lafourche. A preliminary estimate by AccuWeather puts the damage at $9 billion, which will likely be revised as scientists, insurance companies, and government officials gather more data.  In the days, weeks, and months after a hurricane like Francine makes landfall, a horde of public agencies and insurance companies try to figure out roughly how much they think the disaster will cost. That’s far more than just a number on the books: These estimates help state governments prioritize where to send aid and help kickstart insurance claims, allowing people and local economies to recover faster from disaster. You’ll often see dramatically different estimates of hurricane damage, because each is done with its own purpose: Preliminary assessments made by, for instance, the Federal Emergency Management Agency are used in the first 30 days after landfall to help determine if a major disaster declaration is warranted, and also helps officials figure out which public assistance programs might be needed in an area struck by a calamity.  Initial damage estimates can also raise public awareness, potentially boosting the amount of donated aid. “We saw this during Harvey in Texas back in 2017,” said Jon Porter, AccuWeather’s chief meteorologist. “Many people across the country did not realize the magnitude and severity of the damage and suffering during the storm. Once AccuWeather issued our preliminary estimate of the total damage and economic loss from Harvey at $190 billion, we saw a surge of additional help and relief flood into Texas from across the country.” Insurance companies can do a quick estimate of the damage, since they already have data on property values. “But really, to get an accurate picture, you need to do a careful case study,” said Adam Rose, who studies the economics of disasters at the University of Southern California. “These usually aren’t completed for another year or two, but it’s useful to have sort of a quick and dirty estimate right up front.” AccuWeather’s preliminary estimates collect a range of costs like property and infrastructure damage, lost jobs and wages, airport closures, and much else. “Our estimates also account for the cost of evacuations, temporary relocation and the long-term impacts on transportation, tourism and business logistics,” Porter said.  Tallying up how much a disaster costs also matters in the long-run because it signals to people the economic importance of disasters, and serves as an indicator on whether progress is being made on recovering from such events. On a national scale, one of the most frequently cited sources is the Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters dataset, a monthly report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Centers for Environmental Information. It records U.S. disasters that overtake the billion-dollar benchmark, gleaned from mining a mix of public federal and state statistics, as well as private sector data such as insurance claims, according to Adam Smith, an applied climatologist at the agency who leads the dataset.  Those billion-dollar price tags include losses racked up by a number of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, severe storm events, tornados, floods, winter storms, wildfires, droughts and heat waves. Not all monetary damages are included in that count, though — just what NOAA deems “direct total losses.”  Their definition of direct total losses spans 16 different categories, including damage to homes, vehicles, businesses, government buildings — as well as what’s in them — business interruptions and the loss of living quarters when you’re out of your home as it’s repaired or rebuilt. The assessment also incorporates damage to roads, bridges, levy systems, electric grids, as well as crops. It is, as Smith describes it “a comprehensive yet still conservative estimate of what is truly lost.” Read Next The Gulf Coast is sinking, making hurricanes like Francine even more dangerous  Matt Simon There’s still a lot it doesn’t cover, like health-related costs that stem from a  disaster, or the environmental degradation that can happen when a hurricane hits, Smith said. Not only does the billion-dollar dataset estimate omit physical healthcare costs, but it also fails to count mental health crises left in the wake of natural disasters. And then there’s nature. Say a cluster of coral reefs or mangroves, two well-established natural buffers against storm surges, are damaged during a hurricane, effectively reducing the area’s resilience against future storms. Those associated costs also aren’t considered in the billion-dollar disaster damage assessment.  By not accounting for all these consequences, in addition to other expenses that tend to emerge post-disaster like supply chain interruptions, the dataset captures just a portion of a major disaster’s total price tag, and therefore only provides a snapshot of what losses look like as a warming planet makes disasters more frequent and severe.  And when something like the damage to mental and physical health isn’t accounted for, this can contribute to the exclusion of the very people who tend to lose the most in a disaster and what can be done to alleviate that historic burden.  “If all we focus on is the cost to the economy, disaster losses are bearable, right? Within our economy, the GDP tends to go up after disasters in the United States,” said Andrew Rumbach, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute. “That doesn’t mean they’re a good thing.”  After a storm hits, the loss of power and water, and the destruction of bridges and roads can make it difficult or impossible for businesses to start up again. These are their own forms of widespread economic losses. If a hurricane strikes New Orleans and Louisiana’s economic productivity dips in the following years, it takes a lot of number-crunching to determine how much the storm itself contributed, and how much productivity would have declined anyway.  The very nature of hurricanes means the economic damage can spread far beyond the coastlines they directly hit. Atlantic hurricanes form out at sea, using warm waters as fuel then might slam into ports along the Gulf and East coasts, like when Katrina caused $1.7 billion in damage to Louisiana’s ports. Even ports that don’t get hit can still cause economic ripple effects by  shutting down as a precaution as a storm approaches. Goods don’t get where they need to be on time, and the costs stack up. So in the longer term, the economic tallies of hurricane losses will often be much higher than initial estimates. But those first rough calculations are critical to avoid even bigger losses later. “Having insurance companies pay their premiums sooner,” Rose said, “having government assistance implemented sooner and more effectively, you can sort of kickstart the recovery and reduce those business interruption losses.” When talking about disaster damages, it’s mainly in the language of business and economics, punctuated with staggering dollar-signs. But there’s a risk that accompanies focusing too much on price tags, warns Rumbach, and that risk has to do with how disasters expose and exacerbate existing social divides. “There’s also just that bigger question that we should always ask: Is monetary value the right metric?”  The way Rumbach sees it, a hurricane can destroy a mansion and a dozen less expensive mobile homes. Although the damages to the mansion and the collective damages to the mobile homes as they are crunched by governments and insurance agencies might end up comparable, the scale of the impact just isn’t the same.  “Focusing too much on economic numbers, that really runs the risk of underestimating the impacts that disasters have for marginalized populations,” Rumbach said. “Everything involved costs less. They make less income. Their homes are worth less, their infrastructure is less of a cost. Does that mean that the disasters are less important because they cost less money?”  This story was originally published by Grist with the headline Hurricanes cost more than you think. Here’s why that matters. on Sep 19, 2024.

Superyacht and private jet tax could raise £2bn a year, say campaigners

Oxfam says ‘commonsense solution’ would reduce emissions and raise urgently needed climate financeFair taxes on superyachts and private jets in the UK could have brought in £2bn last year to provide vital funds for communities suffering the worst effects of climate breakdown, campaigners say.Private jet use in the UK is soaring. It was home to the second highest number of private flights in Europe last year, behind only France, according to figures from the European Business Aviation Association. Continue reading...

Fair taxes on superyachts and private jets in the UK could have brought in £2bn last year to provide vital funds for communities suffering the worst effects of climate breakdown, campaigners say.Private jet use in the UK is soaring. It was home to the second highest number of private flights in Europe last year, behind only France, according to figures from the European Business Aviation Association.The UK is also home to a 450-strong fleet of superyachts, which contribute to an immense carbon footprint created by the ultra-wealthy far beyond that of the average citizen.Analysis by Oxfam and US researchers of the luxury purchases and financial investments of 12 billionaires revealed recently that they account for almost 17m tons of CO2 and equivalent greenhouse gas emissions annually.This is equivalent to the emissions from powering 2.1m homes or from 4.6 coal-fired power plants over a year, according to conversion data from the US Environmental Protection Agency.Oxfam is calling on the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to increase taxes on extreme wealth starting with a levy on private jets and superyachts. The charity said this could provide a fairer system to raise money to tackle the climate crisis and avoid the burden falling on lower-income families.Natalie Shortall, a climate justice policy adviser for Oxfam UK, said: “While the super-rich continue to pollute at excessive rates, it is people living in poverty – in the UK and around the world – who have done the least to cause the climate crisis, who are suffering the most from its devastating impacts.“Further steps to better tax extreme wealth are needed to accelerate climate action and fight inequality – increasing taxes on highly polluting luxuries such as private jets and superyachts is an obvious place for the government to start. These are the kind of commonsense solutions that are urgently needed to quickly and fairly reduce emissions and raise crucial climate finance – by making the biggest and richest polluters pay.”Private planes are up to 14 times more polluting, for each passenger, than commercial planes and 50 times more polluting than trains, according to a report by Transport & Environment, a European clean transport campaign organisation.Oxfam’s research suggests up to £830m could have been raised last year by introducing a higher rate of air passenger duty for private jets and introducing a superyacht ownership tax.The research also highlighted up to a further £1.2bn of additional revenue possible from taxing private jet fuel, charging VAT on private aviation, as well as taxing private jet landing and departure slots.A study last year by Green Alliance showed private jets release 10 times more carbon for each passenger on average than commercial flights, but often incur less tax than a car driver making the same journey.The Guardian revealed last year that the richest 1% of the world’s population is responsible for more carbon emissions than the poorest 66%, with dire consequences for vulnerable communities and global efforts to tackle the climate emergency.A Treasury spokesperson said: “We do not recognise these calculations. The Chancellor has been clear that difficult decisions lie ahead on spending, welfare and tax to fix the foundations of our economy and address the £22 billion hole the government has inherited. Decisions on how to do that will be taken at the Budget in the round.”

Read Portland City Council candidates’ answers on street improvement

Read the candidate’s responses to a question about street improvement.

All candidates for Portland City Council were asked the following question related to street improvement: Which would you prioritize: Creation of more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes or improved surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes?Here are their responses:District 1Joe Allen: This is a tough one for me, as I love riding my bike throughout the city and support creating more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes to encourage sustainable transit. However, our district’s urgent need is for road repairs and paved roads to ensure safety for drivers and residents.Candace Avalos: East Portland has some of the most dangerous streets in Portland and lacks paved roads, never mind bike lanes, sidewalks or bus lanes. It’s not one or the other — we need to look at our transportation system holistically, and we need to center this community’s needs.Doug Clove: Improving our degrading streets. They are long overdue for maintenance. Especially in East Portland. It’s time for the bike people to share the wealth.Jamie Dunphy: In East Portland, I would prioritize fixing potholes in existing streets, paving new sidewalks and unpaved roads, and installing enough street lights to ensure that my daughter and her classmates can walk to school as safely in Parkrose as their counterparts in Laurelhurst or Irvington.Timur Ender: I would support both. I don’t see it as either/or. In some ways, pairing paving with protected bike lanes on a project can achieve multiple wins as it reduces construction costs, provides smooth surface for residents regardless of transportation mode, and improves safety.Noah Ernst: Improved surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes. That is what I’m hearing voters in District 1 want. I support bike infrastructure but don’t support removing lanes, increasing congestion and making life harder for the vast majority of Portlanders who commute, take their kids to school and go shopping by car.Joe Furi: Did not respondTerrence Hayes: Improved surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes. This would obviously extend to any existing bike lanes, and we all benefit from better roads. Most of the cyclists I speak to want to see increased traffic enforcement, less potholes, and clean, well-marked bike lanes.David Linn: Portlanders deserve more than a false dichotomy between bikes and potholes. We can and must do both. We cannot let important infrastructure be targeted to just one mode of moving around. Many of our families in East Portland use roads, buses, and bike lanes all in a single day.Peggy Sue Owens: Did not respondSteph Routh: Maintaining and repairing existing infrastructure is a basic level of service for all road users, as is improving dangerous intersections. These can happen at the same time, and often do. The question I wish you would have asked is, “How are we going to fund sidewalks in long-forgotten East Portland?”Deian Salazar: We need to improve the surfacing of degrading driving lanes most. East Portland looks like Youngstown, Ohio -- if I wanted to live with U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, I’d move there! This is not Portland quality. It’s time to make driving lanes clean and safe again. I still like bike infrastructure.Michael (Mike) Sands: I would prioritize fixing degraded driving lanes; poor lanes cause accidents, resulting in death and/or injuries to drivers and passengers, pedestrians and bicyclists.Thomas Shervey: Climate Change is real, and nowhere feels that change more than the east side. The Clean Energy Fund is well intentioned, but got off to a rocky start. I would argue to continue it and for more oversight to stop waste and corruption.Loretta Smith: East Portland deserves improved surfacing of existing driving lanes and improved sidewalks. In some places in East Portland we do not have sidewalks and it is unsafe for families to walk because of all the unsanctioned camping.Cayle Tern: It is more detrimental for families and community members of East Portland to have a public transportation system that can’t get them where they need to be timely. I support protected bus lanes in streets that can accommodate them. The city manager should have flexibility to determine what that looks like.District 2James Armstrong: My priority for transportation is safety. Protected bike lanes reduce collisions and injuries by 30-50%, including for cars. We also need to pair investments in priority bus lanes with improved transit safety measures to get ridership back up. These investments will also reduce wear and tear on existing driving lanes.Reuben Berlin: Neither option alone offers a long-term solution. I suggest preparing for a mass public driverless system to reduce city traffic, enhance mobility and develop local business centers. This approach focuses on decreasing traffic through public driverless transportation, promoting economic growth and improving urban mobility.Michelle DePass: We need to do both; it’s an equity issue. We need to engage stakeholders and businesses in every district to determine the immediate needs of those communities in an equitable way while ensuring lower income, inaccessible neighborhoods, and areas with high traffic accidents are prioritized to ensure people’s safety.Marnie Glickman: This is not an either/or question. We need to do both. I have a strong, savvy vision to make this city safe for cycling, walking and transiting. I will always be a voice for proper public services that serve everyone, especially my constituents in North and Northeast Portland.Mariah Hudson: As chair of the Portland Bureau of Transportation budget committee I’ve led the committee in recommending the city to maintain current assets before establishing new projects without maintenance plans. As a bike commuter and runner, I know that unsafe pavement endangers cyclists and pedestrians the most.Sameer Kanal: We can and must do both. I am a sworn enemy of potholes, and I will prioritize those not only in driving lanes but across the entire width of the right of way. Neither is very expensive if done efficiently, compared to other parts of the city budget.Debbie Kitchin: Safe streets are a top priority for me. There are places where investments in bike and pedestrian infrastructure make the most sense. There are places where degraded driving lanes are a safety and structural hazard for all modes. I prioritize safety and not all or nothing approaches.Michael (Mike) Marshall: Given the threat of climate change we always need to prioritize alternative forms of transportation over automobiles. It’s painful but necessary. At the same time I also support converting the gasoline from a flat tax to a % of sales tax in order to generate more income for transportation needs.Will Mespelt: Depends on the neighborhood and need. I would prefer protected bike lanes and bus lanes. However, as a bike rider potholes are more dangerous if it forces a rider in the street or a car to swerve.Chris Olson: This is a false dichotomy — we can do both by appropriately taxing corporations. I support creating more protected bike and bus lanes while improving degraded driving lanes, ensuring safe, efficient transportation options for all Portlanders.Jennifer Park: In this binary, I would prioritize protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes. We can still address driving infrastructure through small-scale fixes like more aggressive pothole servicing. When we address full resurfacing, we should be looking into new innovations, like permeable pavement.Tiffani Penson: These efforts can take place at the same time. I want to prioritize maintaining an active, diverse multi-modal transportation systems that is safe, efficient and works for us all.Antonio Jamal PettyJohnBlue: I would prioritize creating more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes. Investing in these will promote sustainable transportation and improve public transit efficiency, addressing long-term city growth and environmental goals. Improved surfacing of existing lanes is also important but can be addressed subsequently with available resources.Elana Pirtle-Guiney: We need safe roads for everyone and resurfacing is about safety. But making biking and transit easier takes cars off the road and lowers resurfacing costs well into the future. A short delay in improved driving lanes lowers costs and creates better conditions for all users, including drivers, for decades.Dan Ryan: I would prioritize repaving streets and fixing potholes while enhancing safety for cyclists with extensive greenways. Regardless of bus or bike lanes, our streets must be repaired to ensure efficient movement of people, goods and services across the city. Let’s make our infrastructure work for everyone.Sam Sachs: Candidate did not respond.Bob Simril: My top priority is safe, clean, secure and accessible transportation for bikers, motorist and pedestrians. I will prioritize community infrastructure needs in underserved communities first, then expand as needed.Laura Streib: Ideally, I would do both. If we improve driving surfaces, cars won’t veer into bike spaces. If we create protected bike areas, we can work towards Vision Zero. It’s a both/and situation to build a strong network of safe multi-modal transportation layers, especially around school zones.Jonathan Tasini: Because of the decline in transportation-related revenues (for example, the rise in the number of electric vehicles which, in turn, reduces gas tax revenue), in order to fully fund our transportation needs, we have to be fully engaged in the 2025 debate in Salem over the long-term transportation packages.Liz Taylor: Candidate did not respond.Nat West: Thankfully this binary choice isn’t a part of our process. I’ll work to increase TriMet’s financial participation in PBOT projects for more bus lanes and propose adjustments to our budget process to work down our maintenance backlog citywide. Last year’s DHM community polling indicates that Portlanders favor maintenance first.Nabil Zaghloul: I would prioritize improved surfacing of existing degraded lanes for all users. We need more bike lanes and priority transit lanes, but the potholes are safety hazards for all users as drivers swerve out of their lanes to avoid them or risk damaging their vehicles leading to repair costs.District 3Matthew (Matt) Anderson: Candidate did not respond.Sandeep Bali: We need balance, but Portland’s Transportation Bureau has overly prioritized bike and bus lanes, aiming for a climate utopia without cars. This is misguided, as most commuters, especially the elderly and disabled, rely on driving. With many lanes underused, fixing potholes and degraded driving lanes should now be the priority.Melodie Beirwagen: I would prioritize the improved surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes. The lifeline of Portland’s business and workers involves moving goods and services throughout our City. Portland needs much better transportation infrastructure to thrive for all Portlanders.Christopher Brummer: Candidate did not respond.Rex Burkholder: I think this is a false choice. We can and must do both. I would add that the city should also maintain sidewalks as everyone uses these critical transportation facilities yet we deliberately ignore them.Brian Conley: Portland doesn’t have the luxury to choose between the two. Our climate crisis demands that we reduce traffic and cars on the road, yet we must make public transport of all kinds safer and more reliable. I reject the premise of this question. We can improve Portland transit together.Jesse Cornett: These efforts complement each other and are not in competition. In fact, when the time comes to improve existing lanes, cost savings can be found in prioritizing those streets for protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes.Daniel DeMelo: Bike and bus lanes. We need to focus more on upgrading our existing bike infrastructure to better separate and protect cyclists. That said, I’ve put more than 500 miles on my bike over the course of this campaign – I know firsthand that even small potholes pose significant risks to cyclists!Chris Flanary: I would prioritize bike and bus lanes, and protected pedestrian walkways. We have prioritized cars for too long, resulting in unsafe roads, insufficient bike paths and traffic that interferes with reliable public transit. It is time to prioritize people over cars.Dan Gilk: Increased density requires more scalable transit solutions. To that end, we need to focus more on alternative transit like bus lanes, bike paths and pedestrian walks.Theo Hathaway Saner: I‘d prioritize creating more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes to promote sustainable transportation, reduce congestion, and improve safety for all road users.Clifford Higgins: Candidate did not respond.Patrick Hilton: Candidate did not respond.Kelly Janes (KJ): Road safety is important for everyone. Resurfacing existing degraded driving lanes is good for bicyclists and buses as well as drivers. I fully support more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes in conjunction with improved surfacing of driving lanes.Harrison Kass: As much as I want more bike/bus lanes, the priority is improved surfacing. PDX is already a premier bike/bus city. Our degraded driving lanes, however, are unacceptable; the cost is diffused amongst our citizens in the form of maintenance/repairs – an indirect increase in our already-too-high cost of living. Also unsafe.Philippe Knab: It can’t be one or the other. We need to invest in maintaining our existing infrastructure while supporting multimodal transportation. I support prioritizing the creation of more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes to ensure a balanced, efficient transport system for everyone.Tiffany Koyama Lane: I come from the labor movement and I recognize a false binary when I see one. A functioning city with appropriately funded transportation and road infrastructure does not need to choose between roads and transit; bikes and buses use roads too! I support changing our funding mechanism before insisting on that choice.Kenneth (Kent) R Landgraver III: Candidate did not respond.Angelita Morillo: The creation of priority bus lanes would be my top priority to serve the most people possible. The creation of bike lanes would be my next priority, with surfacing of driving lanes being my lowest priority. Obligate transit users like myself deserve better and safer infrastructure than we currently have.Steve Novick: Respectfully, the question falsely implies that we could repave all the streets – which will cost billions of dollars – by avoiding spending on bus and bike lanes, which are relatively very cheap. A high priority is to keep streets that are in decent shape in good repair, before repairs become prohibitively expensive.David O’Connor: Candidate did not respond.Ahlam K Osman: Candidate did not respond.Cristal Azul Otero: I would prioritize protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes, but I recognize the need for street maintenance, especially where people use wheelchairs and mobility aids. I support creating a dedicated process for residents to request urgent repairs, ensuring timely responses to improve accessibility and safety while advancing sustainable transportation.Terry Parker: Maintaining our roadway surfaces and infrastructure must be the top priority. More congestion, fuel consumption and emissions are being created due to road diets that remove full service traffic lanes and/or have narrowed lanes that can not safely accommodate large trucks and vehicles towing wide trailers.Heart Free Pham: The truth is, biking to work is a privilege of the wealthy; most people that work in Portland don’t even live here! We need to prioritize practicality for the majority over convenience of the few, therefore I’d support the latter in this situation.Jaclyn Smith-Moore: Candidate did not respond.John Sweeney: We have enough bike and bus lanes. It is way past time to fix our streets. Our cars and trucks are taking a real beating, and we are very tired of it.Jonathan (Jon) Walker: I think this is a false choice since when you replace a road you work on the whole project, but I think finally dealing with decades of deferred maintenance which previous city councils have left to only become more expensive needs to be a priority. We need to put our financial house in order.Kezia Wanner: All are vitally important to our city’s health and I support a multi-modal transportation system. But having to choose, it would be improving our streets because they impact people’s lives broadly from bus travel to supporting economic vitality through moving commerce to arterials for emergency vehicles.Luke Zak: We can prioritize expanding multi modal transit while continuing necessary routine maintenance by incorporating infrastructural improvements like traffic separated lanes while existing driving lanes are being resurfaced. It doesn’t need to be a zero-sum game.District 4Joseph (Joe) Alfone: I support bike lanes being converted into pedestrian lanes. Bike lanes are not being used. There are too many cars and too few bikes, in between there are people that walk everywhere like myself that bring life to a city. I propose Tokyo Shibuya Crossing pedestrian changes to the city.Eli Arnold: Bikes and public transit run on roads, and degraded roads are a safety hazard to everyone. Our backlog of Infrastructure maintenance is the largest of these issues and deserves the lion’s share of effort.Bob Callahan: While many of us enjoy riding bikes, there are others of us who, out of choice or necessity, remain vehicle drivers. We all live here together and deserve equal treatment. I favor repair of existing lanes. Delay of road maintenance makes it more costly in the future.Patrick Cashman: Candidate did not respond.Olivia Clark: As a cyclist, I’ve come into direct contact with potholes all over Portland. They are a danger for cyclists, pedestrians and motorists. We must stop the deterioration of our streets before they become further damaged and more expensive to repair. I would prioritize maintaining our streets at this time.Raquel Coyote: Candidate did not respond.Mike DiNapoli: Candidate did not respond.Kelly Doyle: Candidate did not respond.Brandon Farley: Candidate did not respond.Lisa Freeman: When we look at world class cities, they are often walkable, Candidate did not respond. and have efficient transit systems. This infrastructure is good for the climate, makes the city more affordable and attracts visitors who want to explore the city, dine and shop. These investments pay for themselves.John J Goldsmith: Candidate did not respond.Kevin Goldsmith: Candidate did not respond.Mitch Green: Portland should prioritize creation of protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes in order to make it it safe and easy to avoid driving. Doing so will reduce traffic and lower ongoing maintenance costs for driving lanes. This is not an exclusionary tradeoff: prioritizing the former funds the latter.Chris Henry: These go hand-in-hand - we need more bus and bike lanes for our climate goals, but what’s the point if their quality is degraded? Road improvement should also include more eco-friendly methods of repairing degraded lanes, like using biochar in asphalt and concrete.Ben Hufford: Portland needs to redouble our efforts to create quality options to the dominance of the single occupant car by pursuing alternative transportation options. Both systems need attention, and we shouldn’t have to choose, but even as a committed cyclist I believe well-functioning roads must still be the priority.Chad Lykins: My priority is safety and cost-effectiveness. Making it safer for cyclists and transit-users leads to fewer automobiles on the road, which leads to less deterioration of driving lanes, which leads to happier people all around.Chloe Mason: Upgrading our deteriorating driving lanes should be a top priority, as it is a longstanding concern of our constituents. The condition of our roads is causing hundreds of dollars in car damage, placing a financial burden on our community. I have personally experienced this.Tony Morse: Improved surfaces of existing degraded driving lanes. The fact is that driving is the most common form of transportation that Portlanders use. Priority bike and bus lanes play an important part of Portland’s transportation systems, but by prioritizing driving lanes, we deliver critical value to more people in need.Lee Odell: Candidate did not respond.Stanley Penkin: I support bike lanes and priority bus lanes; however, I would prioritize filling potholes and improving degraded streets. It’s imperative that we maintain our infrastructure, or it will continue to deteriorate, and we will never catch up. Our $4 billion backlog on road maintenance is an example of that.L Christopher Regis: Candidate did not respond.Moses Ross: We need to fill the potholes! It’s a fundamental city service and this failing (the deference of street maintenance) is the most obvious failing to residents.Tony Schwartz: We need to fix what we already have. Let’s improve surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes particularly in parts of the City that have roads cratered with enormous potholes. It is shameful to live in Portland – a first world city – and see our communities suffer from terrible roads and sidewalks.Sarah Silkie: I will prioritize all modes of transportation over other expenditures. Roads for buses and small business deliveries, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, and curb-ramps. These are an interconnected system.Ciatta R Thompson: I would prioritize protecting bike lanes and priority bus lanes. If Portland wants to be an environmental leader, we need to expand and strengthen our city’s multimodal transportation.John Toran: We need to prioritize improved surfacing. Our city can’t recover unless we have a functioning transportation network, and surfacing affects everyone. Potholes are a regressive stealth tax that causes significant, avoidable financial burdens for Portland’s working class that the city is responsible for preventing.Michael Trimble: I will prioritize the creation of more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes to further discourage vehicular usage as we fight to protect our environment.Andra Vltavín: I will prioritize more protected bike lanes and priority bus lines. We need to shift away from being a car-dependent culture, especially as Portland grows. The safer and more enjoyable we make biking and public transit, the more people will use those methods of transportation.Bob Weinstein: My priority would be to first address the existing degraded driving lanes to ensure basic safety and functionality for all road users.Eric Zimmerman: I do not support any more specialized bus lanes. They made our city streets more dangerous for drivers, riders and walkers. I think protected bike lanes are great! Every street should achieve a certain level of pavement maintenance before we do any more special projects in the central city.Read answers from other Portland City Council and mayoral candidates

California's Farm to School program is bringing business and climate-friendly practices to farms: Report

Food producers who have participated in California's state-funded "Farm to School" grant program are benefiting from significant growth in their business revenues, a new progress report has found. About 57 percent of the program's farmers made sales to schools from April to September 2023 — with those sales representing around 33 percent of their total...

Food producers who have participated in California's state-funded "Farm to School" grant program are benefiting from significant growth in their business revenues, a new progress report has found. About 57 percent of the program's farmers made sales to schools from April to September 2023 — with those sales representing around 33 percent of their total farm revenues, on average, according to the report. Meanwhile, schools benefited from an influx of fresh, local and organic fruits and vegetables, meat and dairy products, per the report, an independent publication from researchers at University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, UC Berkeley, Food Insight Group and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The California Farm to School Incubator Grant Program, which receives funding through the state budget, operates with the California Department of Food and Agriculture Office's Farm to Fork division. The program, championed by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom, connects local producers and school food buyers, encourages education about food in classrooms, gardens and on farms and involves students and their schools in the agricultural community. The latest grant round — which awarded $52.8 million for 195 projects, serving 1.65 million students — included funding tracks and opportunities for K-12 school districts, technical assistance providers, early education centers and farmers, according to a recent announcement. The new report focuses on the outcome of the 2023 cultivation season, with a particular look at the farmers who received their grants and how partnerships with schools helped bolster their businesses. Of the 50 producers evaluated in the report, about 42 percent identified as Black, Indigenous or people of color, while 62 percent of businesses were owned by women and 94 percent were small-to-midsize operations. All farmers whose projects received funding from the program confirmed their attention to adopt more efficient agricultural practices throughout the duration of their grant period. Tim Bowles, a coauthor of the report and leader of the program evaluation team, praised the initiative for supporting farmers who expand or adopt environmentally beneficial practices. "It’s essential these farmers have a market for what they grow to see durable environmental benefits,” Bowles, an assistant professor in environmental science, policy and management at UC Berkeley, said in a statement. “We’re also seeing farms actually expand their acreage in order to sell to schools, suggesting this is a desirable market," he continued. About 16 percent of producers reported adopting new climate-smart agricultural innovations within the first six months of receiving their grant, while 24 percent said they expanded existing practices while cultivating crops for schools. Also within that first six-month window, 11 farmers said they added acreage to their properties as a direct result of the program — relying mostly on composting practices instead of pesticides. Despite these successes, the evaluators also flagged certain difficulties, such as years of delays in infrastructure build-out and other complexities associated with improving school food systems. “Decades of research shows the value to children from fresh, locally sourced food," said Gail Feenstra, co-lead on the project and a researcher from UC Agriculture and Natural Resources. "However, what is becoming more clear from this research is that long-term investments in the full farm to school system are crucial," she added. Without the establishment of regional-level infrastructure, staffing, product consolidation and distribution, participants will "have challenges moving the needle," according to Feenstra. Nonetheless, she credited the state's "investments in the entire farm to school supply chain" for beginning to address these challenges.

Kelly Janes (KJ): Portland City Council District 3

Read the candidate’s responses to questions about homelessness, police accountability, Portland’s budget and taxes.

Name: Kelly Janes (KJ)Neighborhood: Foster-PowellRenter/homeowner: HomeownerEducation: U.C. Berkeley, B.A. Anthropology (focus: social anthropology and Native American studies)Occupation: Business owner -- Web design and development agencyHow long you’ve lived in the city of Portland: 8 yearsAge: 50, will turn 51 before Election DayPronouns: she/herPortland is facing an historic election involving a new voting system and an unusually high number of candidates. Journalists at The Oregonian/OregonLive and Oregon Public Broadcasting share a goal of ensuring that Portland voters have the information they need to make informed choices, and we also know candidates’ time is valuable and limited.That’s why the two news organizations teamed up this cycle to solicit Portland City Council candidates’ perspectives on the big issues in this election. Here’s what they had to say:For each of the following questions, we asked candidates to limit their answers to 150 words.Name two existing city policies or budget items you’d make it a priority to change. Why did you select those and how do you plan to line up at least 7 votes on the council to make them happen? Please avoid broad, sweeping statements and instead provide details.Did not answer.What previous accomplishments show that you are the best pick in your district? Please be specific.I first joined the Foster-Powell Neighborhood Association (FPNA) as communications chair to grow our shelter meal volunteer list. Due to our online promotion, our volunteer list grew sufficiently that we have not had to cancel a meal in two years due to low volunteer sign-ups. After being elected as chair/president of FPNA, I guided the program through various iterations due to changing requirements from our neighborhood shelter partners. As chair, I have collaborated with Foster Southeast PDX, our local business association, to promote foot traffic to brick & mortar businesses along Foster Road.I am the President of Benson TechBoosters, the 501(c)(3) fundraising organization for Benson Polytechnic High School. Go Astros!I have owned and operated a small business for fourteen years, moving it across the country from Brooklyn, New York to Portland and certifying the business as a Woman-Owned Emerging Small Business in the state of Oregon.Portland is on track to permit the fewest number of multifamily units in 15 years and remains thousands of units below what’s needed to meet demand. What steps would you take to dramatically and quickly increase the availability of housing?Portland needs to attract investors for multifamily units by lowering costs and improving expected return on investment.To lower costs, I’d streamline the permitting process. There should be an online portal where property owners, developers and contractors can see all permitting requirements for their project. I frequently hear that the current process is complicated and unclear. This portal would enable stakeholders to see the current status of each permit application, along with next steps in the process.Improving expected return on investment is an equation with several parts, including:Ensuring Portland is a safe city to live, work, and play,compassionately sheltering our unhoused population,promoting Portland nationally as a premier destination on the West Coast,supporting restaurants, food carts, and retail businesses from the central business district to the furthest neighborhoods,investing in improved transportation, andaligning city policy with our deserved reputation as a city of nature lovers.The next City Council is going to have to make some very difficult decisions regarding what to fund and how. What essential services must the city provide and how should the city sustainably fund them?The city is required by charter to provide many essential services. Public safety, utilities, and infrastructure maintenance and investment are among these core obligations. The new City Council will need to work creatively and collaboratively to determine what to fund and how.Portlanders have approved many tax measures in the past decade – supporting affordable housing, free preschool programs and green energy initiatives. Are there specific taxes or levies you want eliminated or would choose to not renew? Are there specific taxes or levies you would support creating? Why?If I had to cancel one tax, it would be the Arts Tax. I do support funding arts and art education, but roughly 25% of eligible Portland residents refuse to pay voluntarily, and administrative costs are higher than projected. Intended recipients are not receiving the money expected. This needs to be redone.Do you have any concerns with the changes coming to city elections and city governance? If so, what would you like to see change?I am very excited by the possibility presented by the coming changes to city elections and governance. That said, I do have a few concerns.I am concerned that there has not been sufficient training on ranked-choice voting (our Foster-Powell Neighborhood Association is providing training at our Sept. 9 meeting), and there are many ways a ballot can be invalidated.The first few months of the new city governance structure will be challenging. My primary motivation for running is to help form a successful new government. It is essential that those elected work collectively and collaboratively to determine priorities and then work together to create effective policy in alignment with those priorities. I want to expand communications so that Portlanders are aware of what City Council is doing and have transparent access to provide input and feedback.For the five remaining questions, we asked candidates to answer in 50 words or fewer:Do you favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland who refuse repeated offers of shelter, such as the option to sleep in a city-designated tiny home cluster?I do not favor arresting and jailing people who camp on public property in Portland and refuse offers of shelter. I favor providing shelter options that are flexible and address the needs of various sub-populations.Would you vote yes on a proposal to fund hundreds more police officers than the City Council has already authorized? Why or why not? How would the city pay for it?Portland needs more police officers to handle our current call rate. Sheltering unhoused residents and providing deflection options may help reduce the need.Do you support putting the Clean Energy Fund measure back on the ballot? What, if any changes, would you support?PCEF has generated seven times the projected revenue. There is work to do to ensure environmental safety, like creating a risk mitigation plan for potential hazards at the Critical Energy Infrastructure hub. I support expanding financial allocation to include environmental work provided by other city bureaus.Which would you prioritize: Creation of more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes or improved surfacing of existing degraded driving lanes?Road safety is important for everyone. Resurfacing existing degraded driving lanes is good for bicyclists and buses as well as drivers. I fully support more protected bike lanes and priority bus lanes in conjunction with improved surfacing of driving lanes.Have the problems impacting downtown Portland received too much or too little attention from current city leaders? Why?The problems impacting downtown Portland are a key aspect of making Portland a safer, more livable city, which will, in turn, lead to economic growth for the city.Read answers from other Portland City Council and mayoral candidates

Suggested Viewing

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.