Cookies help us run our site more efficiently.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information or to customize your cookie preferences.

GoGreenNation News

Learn more about the issues presented in our films
Show Filters

Colorado Finally Got Its Wolves Back. Why Are So Many Dying?

This story was originally published by Vox and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. On a sunny morning two years ago, a group of state officials stood in the mountains of northwestern Colorado in front of a handful of large metal crates. With a small crowd watching them, the officials began to unlatch the […]

This story was originally published by Vox and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. On a sunny morning two years ago, a group of state officials stood in the mountains of northwestern Colorado in front of a handful of large metal crates. With a small crowd watching them, the officials began to unlatch the crate doors one by one. Out of each came a gray wolf—arguably the nation’s most controversial endangered species. This was a massive moment for conservation. While gray wolves once ranged throughout much of the Lower 48, a government-backed extermination campaign wiped most of them out in the 19th and 20th centuries. By the 1940s, Colorado had lost all of its resident wolves. But, in the fall of 2020, Colorado voters did something unprecedented: They passed a ballot measure to reintroduce gray wolves to the state. This wasn’t just about having wolves on the landscape to admire, but about restoring the ecosystems that we’ve broken and the biodiversity we’ve lost. As apex predators, wolves help keep an entire ecosystem in balance, in part by limiting populations of deer and elk that can damage vegetation, spread disease, and cause car accidents. “This was not ever going to be easy.” In the winter of 2023, state officials released 10 gray wolves flown in from Oregon onto public land in northwestern Colorado. And in January of this year, they introduced another 15 that were brought in from Canada. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW)—the state wildlife agency leading the reintroduction program—plans to release 30 to 50 wolves over three to five years to establish a permanent breeding population that can eventually survive without intervention. “Today, history was made in Colorado,” Colorado Gov. Jared Polis said following the release. “For the first time since the 1940s, the howl of wolves will officially return to western Colorado.” Fast forward to today, and that program seems, at least on the surface, like a mess. Ten of the transplanted wolves are already dead, as is one of their offspring. And now, the state is struggling to find new wolves to ship to Colorado for the next phase of reintroduction. Meanwhile, the program has cost millions of dollars more than expected. The takeaway is not that releasing wolves in Colorado was, or is now, a bad idea. Rather, the challenges facing this first-of-its-kind reintroduction just show how extraordinarily difficult it is to restore top predators to a landscape dominated by humans. That’s true in the Western US and everywhere—especially when the animal in question has been vilified for generations. One harsh reality is that a lot of wolves die naturally, such as from disease, killing each other over territory, and other predators, said Joanna Lambert, a wildlife ecologist at the University of Colorado Boulder. Of Colorado’s new population, one of the released wolves was killed by another wolf, whereas two were likely killed by mountain lions, according to Colorado Parks and Wildlife. The changes that humans have made to the landscape only make it harder for these animals to survive. One of the animals, a male found dead in May, was likely killed by a car, state officials said. Another died after stepping into a coyote foothold trap. Two other wolves, meanwhile, were killed, ironically, by officials. Officials from CPW shot and killed one wolf—the offspring of a released individual—in Colorado, and the US Department of Agriculture killed another that traveled into Wyoming, after linking the wolves to livestock attacks. (An obscure USDA division called Wildlife Services kills hundreds of thousands, and sometimes millions, of wild animals a year that it deems dangerous to humans or industry, as my colleague Kenny Torella has reported.) Yet, another wolf was killed after trekking into Wyoming, a state where it’s largely legal to kill them. Colorado Parks and Wildlife has, to its credit, tried hard to stop wolves from harming farm animals. The agency has hired livestock patrols called “range riders,” for example, to protect herds. But these solutions are imperfect, especially when the landscape is blanketed in ranchland. Wolves still kill sheep and cattle. This same conflict—or the perception of it—is what has complicated other attempts to bring back predators, such as jaguars in Arizona and grizzly bears in Washington. And wolves are arguably even more contentious. “This was not ever going to be easy,” Lambert, who’s also the science adviser to the Rocky Mountain Wolf Project, an advocacy organization focused on returning wolves to Colorado, said of the reintroduction program. There’s another problem: Colorado doesn’t have access to more wolves. The state is planning to release another 10 to 15 animals early next year. And initially, those wolves were going to come from Canada. But in October, the Trump administration told CPW that it can only import wolves from certain regions of the United States. Brian Nesvik, director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, a federal agency that oversees endangered species, said that a federal regulation governing Colorado’s gray wolf population doesn’t explicitly allow CPW to source wolves from Canada. (Environmental legal groups disagree with his claim). So Colorado turned to Washington state for wolves instead. View this post on Instagram But that didn’t work either. Earlier this month, Washington state wildlife officials voted against exporting some of their wolves to Colorado. Washington has more than 200 gray wolves, but the most recent count showed a population decline. That’s one reason why officials were hesitant to support a plan that would further shrink the state’s wolf numbers, especially because there’s a chance they may die in Colorado. Some other states home to gray wolves, such as Montana and Wyoming, have previously said they won’t give Colorado any of their animals for reasons that are not entirely clear. Nonetheless, Colorado is still preparing to release wolves this winter as it looks for alternative sources, according to CPW spokesperson Luke Perkins. Ultimately, Lambert said, it’s going to take years to be able to say with any kind of certainty whether or not the reintroduction program was successful. “This is a long game,” she said. And despite the program’s challenges, there’s at least one reason to suspect it’s working: puppies. Over the summer, CPW shared footage from a trail camera of three wolf puppies stumbling over their giant paws, itching, and play-biting each other. CPW says there are now four litters in Colorado, a sign that the predators are settling in and making a home for themselves. “This reproduction is really key,” Eric Odell, wolf conservation program manager for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, said in a public meeting in July. “Despite some things that you may hear, not all aspects of wolf management have been a failure. We’re working towards success.”

These very hungry microbes devour a powerful pollutant

Microscopic organisms are being deployed to capture methane from sources such as farms and landfills, with the potential for reuse as fertilizer and fish food.

PETALUMA, Calif. — The cows had to be deterred from messing with the experiment.Researchers from a Bay Area technology company had come to the sprawling dairy farm north of San Francisco to test an emerging solution to planet-warming emissions: microscopic pink organisms that eat methane, a potent greenhouse gas.Kenny Correia, 35, of Correia Family Dairy, watched the team from Windfall Bio working near the lagoons used to store manure from the farm’s several hundred cows. The researchers erected a futuristic system of vats, pipes, tubes and shiny metal supports. Then, when everything was assembled, they poured pink liquid into one of the vats. “They were looking like mad scientists out there,” Correia recounted.He acknowledged initially thinking it was a “crazy idea” to integrate an outdoor laboratory into a working farm. There was the potential for the cows to “be all over it — licking it, pulling out wires and scratching on it,” he said.But livestock farms are a significant source of methane emissions, and Windfall wanted to see how much the microbes could help.Correia Family Dairy hosted a trial of a new way to control methane emissions. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Methane bubbles on a manure lagoon at the farm. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Fencing around the research equipment kept the cows out. And in June, Windfall reported that the roughly month-long trial had been a success. The microbes had absorbed more than 85 percent of the methane coming from one of the lagoons.“They know how to eat methane,” said Josh Silverman, the company’s CEO and founder. “We’re not creating something new. We’re not teaching them to do something they don’t normally do. They’ve evolved for a million years to do this.”Other varieties of microbes — including the tiny organisms in the gut of cows — are among the factors implicated in the increase of methane in the atmosphere, which is warming the Earth.The gas spews from livestock farms, landfills, wastewater treatment plants, natural gas operations, oil production, rice paddies, wetlands, thawing permafrost and even termite mounds. Although methane breaks down faster than carbon dioxide, its heat-trapping potential is 80 times as powerful in the first 20 years after it’s released.Methane-eating microbes could help disrupt that process.Bottles of microbes are kept in a refrigerator at Windfall Bio. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)They may be especially useful if deployed at the many scattered sites responsible for small methane emissions, which can collectively add up to a big problem in the atmosphere.Windfall estimates that if its microbe technology were scaled across the energy, waste and agriculture industries in the United States, it could annually slash up to 1.6 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent, an amount produced by driving more than 370 million gas-powered cars for one year.Another research team, at the University of Washington, says its microbes deployed broadly could capture about 420 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, or what could be generated from driving nearly 98 million gas-powered cars for a year.To develop a further benefit — and to help make their enterprises more commercially viable — the researchers are working to turn the methane-eating microbes into products such as fertilizer and animal feed, supporting a more sustainable food chain.“This waste methane is a huge resource,” said Mary Lidstrom, a chemical engineer and microbiologist who is leading the UW project. “Many of the technologies that address the climate really are only addressing climate, but this has a dual outcome.” Master stocks of microbes are stored in a Windfall Bio freezer. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Finding hungry microbesLidstrom’s favorite microbes come from the bottom of a lake in eastern Siberia. About 20 years ago, a Russian postdoctoral student brought a sample of Methylotuvimicrobium buryatense to the University of Washington, urging her to take a look.Lidstrom had by then been working for three decades with microbes that consume the gas, also known as methanotrophs. She’d never seen anything like this strain: The rod-shaped microbes could quickly grow in varying conditions and had an especially healthy appetite for methane — demonstrating an ability to process and use the gas for energy to reproduce even when there were only low levels in the air.It became the “workhorse” of the lab’s experiments. “It’s just better than all these other methanotrophs,” she said.The pink color is a sign of healthy microbes. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Windfall Bio CEO Josh Silverman. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Silverman stayed local in his search for methane-eating microbes, affectionately dubbed “mems.” From compost piles and dirt near where he lives in Palo Alto, California, he collected samples of microbes and other microorganisms that coexist with them and enable the consumption of methane in nature. “Friends and helpers,” he calls them. The samples were then incubated inside his backyard gas grill, fed by methane coming from the natural gas line.The contents of a jar labeled No. 6 emerged victorious. The “Jar 6” strain is the basis for about a dozen newer cultivations that Windfall has been experimenting with.At the company’s lab in San Mateo, California, a large refrigerator holds an assortment of jars, bottles and plastic petri dishes containing mems.“The pinker they are, usually the happier and healthier they are,” Silverman said, grabbing a small bottle about three-quarters full with a wet pink jelly.Lidstrom, who said she considers her microbes her babies, can also tell just from looking how the organisms are faring. The cells should be growing in a thick film that has the consistency of mucus, she said, and have a salmon pink hue.A hotdog roller is used to heat and mix samples in the lab. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Putting microbes to the testAs researchers continue to refine and breed strains of microbes, they are trying to figure out which combinations and methods work best to eliminate methane emissions in different contexts. Manure lagoons at dairy farms, for instance, may need a different approach than landfills.The goal is to remove as much of the polluting gas as possible. Silverman said Windfall’s microbes can — in theory — eat more than 99 percent of the methane that’s released. But conditions such as outside temperature can lower that number.“From a climate perspective, zero percent of the methane is being captured currently, so any reduction at all is still a net benefit,” he said. “The fact that we could achieve such a high conversion with a cheap, small-scale, farm-viable approach fills a niche that has been historically a very tough area to crack.”There are some established ways to capture large methane emissions. Landfills, for instance, typically extract methane using a system of wells and pipes. The gas can then be processed to generate electricity or turned into renewable biogas. Substantial quantities of methane can also be flared, or burned, which turns it into carbon dioxide.But at landfills and elsewhere, some of the gas can still escape into the air. And it’s been harder to find an affordable method to contain smaller releases.The Lidstrom Lab at the University of Washington tests how much methane can be captured by microbes at a decommissioned landfill. (Jovelle Tamayo/For The Washington Post)Mary Lidstrom, a chemical engineer and microbiologist. (Jovelle Tamayo/For The Washington Post)Windfall Bio and Lidstrom’s team are both experimenting with setups that funnel waste methane into a bioreactor — a fancy word for an enclosed system that could be as simple as a plastic container — where the microbes are held. Inside these containers, the minuscule organisms consume the gas and release carbon dioxide into the air.Although it may seem odd for a climate-friendly project to release CO2, scientists say the trade-off is worth it.“I’m in favor of any approach that destroys methane, even if it makes carbon dioxide, because that’s what happens to all the methane in the atmosphere,” said Rob Jackson, a climate scientist at Stanford University’s Woods Institute for the Environment, who is not involved in the microbe projects.Over time, methane naturally breaks down into CO2. By destroying methane, “you skip the most damaging part of the molecule’s lifetime, which is the 10 or 15 years it will spend as methane in the air before it turns into carbon dioxide,” Jackson said.Windfall Bio is also looking at applying microbes directly to the land where methane is seeping from. That sort of strategy could be deployed at landfills, the third-largest source of human-related methane emissions in the U.S., according to the Environmental Protection Agency.Windfall recently ran field tests of its microbes at a major landfill near Los Angeles.“We’re looking at all the different things that we can do to reduce methane and odors from landfills, and microbiology is one of the last frontiers,” said Eugene Tseng, a technical adviser for the local California enforcement agency that oversees environmental compliance at the landfill. “The implications are huge.”The soil room at Windfall Bio, where methane and carbon dioxide is measured by a flux meter. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)On the day The Washington Post visited the landfill, Carla Risso, Windfall Bio’s vice president of research and development, held a large white plastic watering can full of healthy mems. She leaned over and sprinkled the light pink liquid onto a plot of soil, trying to spread the solution evenly, as a light breeze carrying the faintest whiff of trash blew the droplets around.Researchers monitored how much methane was released from various plots treated with different applications of mems. A single application absorbed more than 75 percent of methane emissions, according to a Windfall report, and the microbes consumed at that rate for more than 30 days.Lian He, a researcher at the Lidstrom Lab, after collecting data from the landfill testing site. (Jovelle Tamayo/For The Washington Post)Condensation in a bioreactor with trays of microbe cultures. (Jovelle Tamayo/For The Washington Post)In Seattle, Lidstrom’s team launched its first field test in June, using a prototype bioreactor, made by colleagues at Auburn University, to capture methane emissions seeping from a decommissioned landfill on the UW campus.By the end of several rounds of testing, Lidstrom said the bioreactor was working as well in the field as it does in laboratory settings. Under certain conditions, the system achieved up to 90 percent reduction of methane, according to peer-reviewed results published in October.Although Lidstrom said there are still improvements to be made, her long-term vision is to deploy between 100,000 to 200,000 shipping-container-size treatment units that can be used to capture and process methane. The goal, she said, is to start putting units in the field by 2030.“It’ll take some years to ramp up,” she said.Some of the herd at Correia Family Dairy. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)The value of wasteMethane-eating microbes are natural recyclers. As they derive energy from methane, they grow and multiply, creating biomass, an organic material packed with protein and other nutrients.Researchers are trying to capitalize on this capability — to make their work even more beneficial, attract more customers and be profitable enough to reach scale.Lindstrom wants to repurpose the biomass as a protein-rich supplement for farmed fish. She anticipates that climate change and other factors leading to the decline of wild fish populations could increase the demand for aquaculture.“There’s already a market,” she said, noting that at least one cellular agriculture company is using microbes to produce protein for pet, fish and livestock feed. “It’s already been demonstrated, you don’t have to start from scratch, and it’s of reasonable value.”Windfall has begun producing fertilizer made from mems. The microbes are dried, turned into powder and pressed into chalky brown cylindrical pellets that carry a faint odor of dried meat. The company is also looking into developing a liquid fertilizer, Silverman said.The idea is that farms that use their microbes for containing methane can get fertilizer in return, which the farmers can either use themselves or sell.“If you are asking people to pay more for a climate solution, it doesn’t happen,” he said. “We need these things to be able to pay back for the operator itself.”A young bull calf rests in a barn. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Making compost out of manure, using a solid waste separator, can help reduce methane emissions. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Whether there will be large-scale demand for either a protein supplement or fertilizer produced through these methods is still something of an open question.Dairy farms don’t typically need fertilizer, since they use liquid manure, said Joseph Button, vice president of sustainability and strategic impact with Straus Family Creamery. But he said he could see some of the creamery’s suppliers, like Correia, interested in selling it to other agriculture operations.“There’s been a lot of — I’ll call them ‘biological solutions’ that have popped up that have not proven out at all,” Button said. “Part of my role is to safeguard the farmers from bad solutions.”But after reviewing lab data and seeing that Windfall had secured backing from major donors, such as Amazon’s Climate Pledge Fund, Button agreed to pitch farmers in his network on hosting a microbes pilot. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos owns The Post.)Correia Family Dairy is certified as an organic milk supplier. (Christie Hemm Klok/For The Washington Post)Correia said he would welcome more tests at his dairy farm.The farm already uses other approaches to reduce emissions, including processing solid manure into compost. But as he checked on new calves — each a source of methane — Correia said he hoped that with the right technology and methods, he could one day run a farm that has “no negative impact on the environment.”“It’s 100 percent possible,” he said.

Water shortages could derail UK’s net zero plans, study finds

Tensions grow after research in England finds there may not be enough water for planned carbon capture and hydrogen projectsRevealed: Europe’s water reserves drying up due to climate breakdownTensions are growing between the government, the water sector and its regulators over the management of England’s water supplies, as the Environment Agency warns of a potential widespread drought next year.Research commissioned by a water retailer has found water scarcity could hamper the UK’s ability to reach its net zero targets, and that industrial growth could push some areas of the country into water shortages. Continue reading...

Tensions are growing between the government, the water sector and its regulators over the management of England’s water supplies, as the Environment Agency warns of a potential widespread drought next year.Research commissioned by a water retailer has found water scarcity could hamper the UK’s ability to reach its net zero targets, and that industrial growth could push some areas of the country into water shortages.The government has a legally binding target to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and has committed to a clean power system by 2030 with at least 95% of electricity generated from low-carbon sources, but the study concludes there will not be enough water available to support all planned carbon capture and hydrogen projects.Development of these kinds of projects, which use significant amounts of water, could push some UK regions into water shortages, according to the analysis undertaken by Durham University and funded by the water retailer Wave – a joint venture between Anglian Venture Holdings, the investment and management vehicle responsible for Anglian Water Group’s commercial businesses, and the Northumbrian Water Group.Led by Prof Simon Mathias, an expert in hydraulics, hydrology and environmental engineering, researchers assessed plans across England’s five largest industrial clusters in Humberside, north-west England, the Tees Valley, the Solent and the Black Country, to determine how much water would be needed to reach net zero and whether the UK’s future water supply could meet this demand.“Decarbonisation efforts associated with carbon capture and hydrogen production could add up to 860m litres per day of water demand by 2050. In some regions, for example Anglian Water and United Utilities, deficits could emerge as early as 2030,” said Mathias.Decarbonisation within the Humberside industrial cluster could push Anglian Water into water deficit by 2030, leading to a shortage of 130m litres a day by 2050, while plans around the north-west cluster could push United Utilities into a deficit of around 70m litres a day by 2030, according to the research.However, a United Utilities spokesperson said the deficit figures were “overstated as regional water management plans already make allowances for the predicted hydrogen demand”, and added that the “drive to net zero is an important issue facing the water sector, with significant work already under way to drive sustainable solutions”.Anglian Water did recognise the deficit figures but said they were at the upper end of a range it had considered. It blamed Ofwat for not allowing water companies to spend more, hindering its ability to secure future supplies.Business demand is often excluded from strategic planning, according to Anglian Water, which it said prevented water companies from making the investments needed, weakening the system’s resilience to the climate crisis and limiting its capacity to support economic growth.A spokesperson for Water UK confirmed water companies’ plans to ensure there were enough water supplies in the future did not take into account the needs of some large planned projects, and blamed the Environment Agency for the omission.“After being blocked from building reservoirs for more than 30 years, we have finally been given approval to build 10. The problem is that the Environment Agency’s forecasts, on which the size, number and locations of these reservoirs are based, do not account for the government’s economic or low-carbon ambitions. Hydrogen energy needs a lot of water, so correcting these forecasts is increasingly urgent.”Nigel Corfield from Wave said he had commissioned the work because “water companies don’t have the same statutory obligations for businesses as they do for households, and we sensed that there was going to be a bit of a problem”.“Government and Ofwat are allowing businesses and these big projects to sort themselves out in terms of how they’re going to get their water,” said Corfield. “We generally don’t think that’s right, because this is about energy security so we think that the best people to provide that and supply that and support that are the water companies.”The government said the UK was “rolling out hydrogen at scale”, with 10 projects said to be shovel-ready. It said it expected all schemes to have sustainable water-sourcing plans and, where required, abstraction licences. Carbon capture schemes would get the green light only if they could prove they met strict legal standards and limits and offered “a high level of protection” for people and the environment, it said.“We face a growing water shortage in the next decade and that is one of the reasons we are driving long-term systemic change to tackle the impacts of climate change,” said a government spokesperson.“This includes £104bn of private investment to help reduce leakage and build nine reservoirs, as well as a record £10.5bn in government funding for new flood defences to protect nearly 900,000 properties by 2036.”But Dieter Helm, a professor of economic policy at the University of Oxford, said England’s water system was stuck in the past and that there was no lack of water, rather that it was badly managed.“It’s worse than an analogue industry,” he said. “Until recently, some water companies didn’t even know where their sewage works were, let alone whether they were discharging into rivers. The information set is extremely weak. But a data revolution now means we can map water systems in extraordinary detail, digitally, at a far finer resolution.”Helm said every drop of water should be measured and reported in real time, and that the data should sit with a new, independent catchment regulator, not the water companies.“You should never be able to have an abstraction without an abstraction meter,” he said. “And it should be a smart meter, automatically reporting. You can’t run a system without data, and you can’t rely on the water companies to hold the data for everyone in the system – they’re just one player.”In his model, the catchment regulator would hold live data on “all the catchment uses of water”, such as abstraction, runoff, water and river levels, sewage discharges, and publish everything on a public website. Anyone, he said, should be able to look up a catchment, see what was going on, and even model the impact of a new project, such as a hydrogen plant, on the system.“That’s how you run an electricity system,” Helm said. “Why don’t we have that in water? And why don’t we have a body responsible for it? There’s an information revolution required here, quite separate from the question of whether we actually run short of water.”The government and the Environment Agency have already warned of an England-wide water deficit of 6bn litres a day by 2055, and have said England faces widespread drought next year unless there is significant rainfall over the winter.

Brown Grass Cost a Famed Golf Course a Big Tournament and Highlighted Hawaii Water Problems

The Plantation Course at Kapalua Resort on Maui is famous for its ocean views and hosting The Sentry, a $20 million PGA Tour event

HONOLULU (AP) — High up on the slopes of the west Maui mountains, the Plantation Course at Kapalua Resort provides golfers with expansive ocean views. The course is so renowned that The Sentry, a $20 million signature event for the PGA Tour, had been held there nearly every year for more than a quarter-century. “You have to see it to believe it," said Ann Miller, a former longtime Honolulu newspaper golf writer. “You're looking at other islands, you're looking at whales. ... Every view is beautiful.”Its world-class status also depends on keeping the course green.Ultimately, as the Plantation's fairways and greens grew brown, the PGA Tour canceled the season opener, a blow that cost what officials estimate to be $50 million economic impact on the area.A two-month closure and some rain helped get the course in suitable condition to reopen 17 holes earlier this month to everyday golfers who pay upwards of $469 to play a round. The 18th hole is set to reopen Monday, but the debate is far from over about the source of the water used to keep the course green and what its future looks like amid climate change. Questions about Hawaii's golf future There’s concern that other high-profile tournaments will also bow out, taking with them economic benefits, such as money for charities, Miller said.“It could literally change the face of it,” she said, “and it could change the popularity, obviously, too.”The company that owns the courses, along with Kapalua homeowners and Hua Momona Farms, filed a lawsuit in August alleging Maui Land & Pineapple, which operates the century-old system of ditches that provides irrigation water to Kapalua and its residents, has not kept up repairs, affecting the amount of water getting down from the mountain.MLP has countersued and the two sides have exchanged accusations since then.As the water-delivery dispute plays out in court, Earthjustice, a nonprofit environmental legal group, is calling attention to a separate issue involving the use of drinking water for golf course irrigation, particularly irksome to residents contending with water restrictions amid drought, including Native Hawaiians who consider water a sacred resource.“Potable ground drinking water needs to be used for potable use,” Lauren Palakiko, a west Maui taro farmer, told the Hawaii Commission on Water Resource Management at a recent meeting. “I can’t stress enough that it should never be pumped, injuring our aquifer for the sake of golf grass or vacant mansion swimming pools.” ‘This is water that we can drink’ Kapalua's Plantation and Bay courses, owned by TY Management Corp., have historically been irrigated with surface water delivered under an agreement with Maui Land & Pineapple, but since at least the summer have been using millions of gallons of potable groundwater, according to Earthjustice attorneys who point to correspondence from commission Chairperson Dawn Chang to MLP and Hawaii Water Service they say confirms it. Chang said her letter didn't authorize anything, but merely acknowledged an “oral representation" that using groundwater is an an “existing use” at times when there’s not enough surface water. She is asking for supporting documentation from MLP and Hawaii Water Service to confirm that interpretation. In emails to The Associated Press, MLP said it did not believe groundwater could be used for golf course irrigation and Hawaii Water Service said it didn’t communicate to the commission that using groundwater to irrigate the courses was an existing use. MLP's two wells that service the course provide potable water. “This is water that we can drink. It’s an even more precious resource within the sacred resource of wai,” Dru Hara, an Earthjustice attorney said, using the Hawaiian word for water. TY, owned by Japanese billionaire and apparel brand Uniqlo’s founder Tadashi Yanai, doesn't have control over what kind of water is in the reservoir they draw upon for irrigation, TY General Manager Kenji Yui said in a statement. They're also researching ways to bring recycled water to Kapalua for irrigation. Kamanamaikalani Beamer, a former commissioner, said he's troubled by Earthjustice's allegations that proper procedures weren't followed. The wrangling over water for golf shows that courses in Hawaii need to change their relationship with water, Beamer said: “I think there needs to be a time very soon that all golf courses are utilizing at a minimum recycled water.” Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Photos You Should See – Nov. 2025

New England kicks off $450M plan to supercharge heat pump adoption

The program aims to use federal funds awarded under the Biden administration to deploy more than 500,000 heat pumps in the chilly region over the next few years.

New England winters can get wicked cold. This week, five of the region’s states launched a $450 million effort to warm more homes in the often-frigid region with energy-efficient, low-emission heat pumps instead of by burning fossil fuels. “It’s a big deal,” said Katie Dykes, commissioner of Connecticut’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. ​“It’s unprecedented to see five states aligning together on a transformational approach to deploying more affordable clean-heat options.” The New England Heat Pump Accelerator is a collaboration between Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. The initiative is funded by the federal Climate Pollution Reduction Grants program, which was created by President Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The accelerator’s launch marks a rare milestone for a Biden-era climate initiative amid the Trump administration’s relentless attempts to scrap federal clean energy and environmental programs. The goal: Get more heat pumps into more homes through a combination of financial incentives, educational outreach, and workforce development. New England is a rich target for such an effort because of its current dependence on fossil-fuel heating. Natural gas and propane are in wide use, and heating oil is still widespread throughout the region; more than half of Maine’s homes are heated by oil, and the other coalition states all use oil at rates much higher than the national average. The prevalence of oil in particular means there’s plenty of opportunity to grow heat-pump adoption, cut emissions, and lower residents’ energy bills. Read Next Installing heat pumps in factories could save $1.5 trillion and 77,000 lives Matt Simon At the same time, heat pumps have faced barriers in the region, including the upfront cost of equipment, New England’s high price of electricity, and misconceptions about heat pumps’ ability to work in cold weather. “There’s not a full awareness that these cold-temperature heat pumps can handle our winters, and do it at a cost that is lower than many of our delivered fuels,” said Joseph DeNicola, deputy commissioner of Connecticut’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. To some degree, the momentum is shifting. Maine has had notable success, hitting its aim of 100,000 new heat pump installations in 2023, two years ahead of its initial deadline. Massachusetts is on track to reach its 2025 target, but needs adoption rates to rise in order to make its 2030 goal. The accelerator aims to speed up adoption by supporting the installation of some 580,000 residential heat pumps, which would reduce carbon emissions by 2.5 million metric tons by 2030 — the equivalent of taking more than 540,000 gas-powered passenger vehicles off the road. The initiative is organized into three program areas, or ​“hubs,” as planners called them during a webinar kicking off the accelerator this week. The largest portion of money, some $270 million, will go to the ​“market hub.” Distributors will receive incentives for selling heat pumps. They will keep a small percentage of the money for themselves and pass most of the savings on to the contractors buying the equipment. The contractors, in turn, will pass the lower price on to the customers. In addition to reducing upfront costs for consumers, this approach is designed to shift the market by encouraging distributors to keep the equipment in stock, therefore making it an easier choice for contractors and their customers. Read Next 10 charts prove that clean energy is winning — even in the Trump era Umair Irfan, Vox, Benji Jones, Adam Clark Estes, & Sam Delgado, Vox These midstream incentives are expected to reduce the cost of cold-climate air-source heat pumps by $500 to $700 per unit and heat-pump water heaters by $200 to $300 per unit. When contractors buy the appliances, the incentive will be applied automatically — no extra paperwork or claims process required. “It should be very simple for contractors to access this funding,” said Ellen Pfeiffer, a senior manager with Energy Solutions, a clean energy consultancy that is helping implement the program. ​“It should be almost seamless.” Consumers will also remain eligible for any incentives available through state efficiency programs, such as rebates from Mass Save or Efficiency Maine, but will likely not be able to stack the accelerator benefits with federal incentives like the Home Efficiency Rebates and Home Electrification and Appliances Rebate programs. Program planners expect to be finalizing the incentive levels through the end of the year, enrolling and training distributors in the early months of 2026, and making the first participating products available in February 2026, said New England Heat Pump Accelerator program manager Jennifer Gottlieb Elazhari. The second program area is the innovation hub. Each state will receive $14.5 million to fund one or two pilot programs testing out new ways to overcome barriers to heat pump adoption by low- and moderate-income households and in disadvantaged communities. One state might, for example, create a lending library of window-mounted air-source heat pumps, allowing someone whose oil heating breaks down all the time to research replacement options rather than just installing new oil equipment. The innovation hub will also include workforce development and training. Organizers are talking with contractors and other partners to figure out where the gaps are in heat pump training. In the first few months of 2026, they will develop a program with a target start date in April. The goal will be not only to ensure that there are tradespeople with the needed skills to install the systems, but also to lay the groundwork for faster adoption by spreading knowledge about the capabilities of the technology and the available incentives. The third major area of the accelerator is a resource hub to aggregate information for contractors, distributors, program implementers, and other stakeholders. Overall, organizers hope to have all three hubs operational in spring 2026. Accelerator planners expect programs to boost adoption even as a federal tax credit of up to $2,000 on heat pumps and heat-pump water heaters is phased out at the end of the year, leaving states to lead the way on clean energy action. “At the state level, this is one example of a way we are helping to make progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but with a solution that can help people take control of their energy costs,” Dykes said. ​“That’s really what we’re focused on.” This story was originally published by Grist with the headline New England kicks off $450M plan to supercharge heat pump adoption on Nov 29, 2025.

Mapping the Exposome: Science Broadens Focus to Environmental Disease Triggers

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Nov. 29, 2025 (HealthDay News) — After decades of intense focus on genetics, the biomedical research...

By Deanna Neff HealthDay ReporterSATURDAY, Nov. 29, 2025 (HealthDay News) — After decades of intense focus on genetics, the biomedical research community is undergoing a major shift, focusing on a new framework called "exposomics."Similar to the way scientists work to map the human genome, this emerging field aims to map the chemical, physical, social and biological elements a person encounters throughout their life.Experts estimate that genetic mutations account for only about 10% of diseases like Parkinson’s for example. The remaining 90% are thought to be caused by environmental factors, prompting scientists to look beyond genes, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) reported.Some examples of exposomic data include light and temperature, biomarkers in the blood or other body fluids, dietary intake, environmental chemicals, physical activity, income and education.The ultimate goal? To turn this big bucket of individual knowledge points into practical, personalized health solutions.Researchers envision a future where a person's "exposomic profile" is included in their electronic medical records, according to the AAMC.Gary Miller, vice dean for research strategy and innovation at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health in New York City, who helped coin the term two decades ago, says the field is now gaining momentum.Exposomics is an enormous undertaking because it requires researchers from various disciplines — including genetics, environmental science and data science — to work together.The goal is to move beyond simply identifying a single cause of disease and instead capture the entire picture of a person’s unique lifetime of exposures.Driving this surge are new technologies that can handle the sheer volume of data involved to map all of the possible exposures.Geospatial data: Satellite images and social determinants of health data help to measure location-specific exposures like air pollution and water quality. Mass spectrometry: Advanced chemical analysis helps to detect thousands of markers in biological samples like blood and urine. Wearable devices: Devices, such as the "exposometer" developed at Stanford Medicine in California, can collect chemical and biological samples directly from the wearer. Chirag Patel, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and co-leader of NEXUS, explained that his lab uses computational models and artifical intelligence to systematically sort through huge amounts of data.“We’re moving away from looking at causes for disease in a targeted fashion... and moving toward what are non-targeted mass spectrometry approaches,” Patel told AAMC.Rima Habre, also co-leader of NEXUS and associate professor of environmental health and spatial sciences at the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, believes exposomics can help physicians move beyond educated guesswork.She says it's more "discovery-based." It allows researchers to scan everything and follow it up with hypothesis testing.As Miller notes, this new health assessment paradigm requires both sides of the coin: “The genomics and exposomics. They complement each other.”SOURCE: Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Nov. 12, 2025Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

The Mystery of the Missing Porcupines

This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Porcupines are easy to recognize but hard to find—so elusive, in fact, that few people have ever seen one in the wild. Emilio Tripp, a wildlife manager and citizen of the Karuk Tribe in Northern California, might have […]

This story was originally published by High Country News and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration. Porcupines are easy to recognize but hard to find—so elusive, in fact, that few people have ever seen one in the wild. Emilio Tripp, a wildlife manager and citizen of the Karuk Tribe in Northern California, might have been one of the lucky ones. On a nighttime drive with his father in the late 1990s, a ghostly silhouette flashed by the window. “That was my only time I’ve even thought I’ve seen one,” he recalled decades later. Tripp still can’t say for sure whether it was a kaschiip, the Karuk word for porcupine, but he holds on to the memory like a talisman. The 43-year-old hasn’t seen another porcupine since. Porcupine encounters are rare among his tribe, and the few witnesses seem to fit a pattern: Almost all of them are elders, and they fondly remember an abundance of porcupines until the turn of this century. Now, each new sighting rings like an echo from the past: a carcass on the road; a midnight run-in. The tribe can’t help wondering: Where did all the porcupines go? “It’s important for (porcupines) to be a part of our landscape. That’s part of why they’re chosen to be part of this ceremonial item.” “Everyone’s concerned,” Tripp said. “If there were more (observations), we’d hear about it.” The decline isn’t just in Northern California: Across the West, porcupines are vanishing. Wildlife scientists are racing to find where porcupines are still living, and why they’re disappearing. Others, including the Karuk Tribe, are already thinking ahead, charting ambitious plans to restore porcupines to their forests. Porcupines are walking pincushions. Their permanently unkempt hairdo is actually a protective fortress of some 30,000 quills. But their body armor can be a liability, too—porcupines are known to accidentally quill themselves. “They’re big and dopey and slow,” said Tim Bean, an ecologist at California Polytechnic State University who has collared porcupines as part of his research. They waddle from tree to tree, usually at night, to snack on foliage or the nutrient-rich inner layer of bark. But these large rodents are far from universally beloved. Their tree-gnawing habits damage lumber, and the timber industry has long regarded them as pests. Widespread poisoning and hunting campaigns took place throughout the 1900s in the US Between 1957 and 1959, Vermont alone massacred over 10,800 porcupines. Forest Service officials in California declared open season on porcupines in 1950, claiming that the species would ultimately destroy pine forests. Though state bounty programs had ended by 1979, porcupine numbers have not rebounded. Recent surveys by researchers in British Columbia, Arizona, western Montana and Northern California show that porcupines remain scarce in those regions today. Historically, porcupine populations haven’t been well-monitored, so scientists can’t say for sure whether they are still declining or simply haven’t recovered after decades of persecution. “We still don’t understand (why) they’re not reproducing and filling back in.” But anecdotal evidence from those who recall when sightings were common is enough to ring alarm bells. Similar patterns appear to be playing out across the West: Veterinarians are treating fewer quilled pets, for example, and longtime rural homeowners have noticed fewer porcupines lurking in their backyards. Hikers’ accounts note that porcupines are harder to find than ever before. Some forest ecosystems are already showing the effects of losing an entire species from the food chain: In the Sierra Nevada, an endangered member of the weasel family called the fisher is suffering from lack of the protein porcupines once provided. As a result, the fishers are scrawnier and birth smaller litters in the Sierras than they do elsewhere.   Porcupines are culturally important to the Karuk Tribe, whose members weave quills into cultural and ceremonial items, such as baskets. But these days, the tribe imports quills more often than it harvests them. That’s more than just an inconvenience: Not being able to gather quills locally constitutes a form of lost connection between tribal members and their homelands. “It’s important for (porcupines) to be a part of our landscape. That’s part of why they’re chosen to be part of this ceremonial item,” Tripp said. Erik Beever, an ecologist at the US Geological Survey, worries that the great porcupine vanishing act points to a broader trend. Across the country, biodiversity is declining faster than scientists can track it. The porcupine might just be one example of what Beever calls “this silent erosion of animal abundance.” But no one really knows what’s going on. Beever said, “We’re wondering whether the species is either increasing or declining without anybody even knowing.” Scientists are racing to fill this knowledge gap. Bean and his team combed through a century’s worth of public records to map porcupine distribution patterns in the Pacific Northwest. Roadkill databases, wildlife agency reports and citizen science hits revealed that porcupines are dwindling in conifer forests but popping up in nontraditional habitats, such as deserts and grasslands. Beever is now leading a similar study across the entire Western United States.   Concerned scientists have several theories about why porcupines have not returned to their former stomping grounds. Illegal marijuana farms, which are often tucked away in forests, use rodenticides that kill many animals, including porcupines, while increased protections for apex predators like mountain lions may have inadvertently increased the decline of porcupines. On top of all this, porcupines have low reproduction rates, birthing only a single offspring at a time. “Things don’t seem to be getting better in over the course of my lifetime.” Understanding porcupine distribution isn’t easy. Porcupines are generalists, inhabiting a wide variety of forest types, so it’s challenging for researchers to know where to look. As herbivores, porcupines aren’t that easy to bait, either. Scientists have experimented with using brine-soaked wood blocks, peanut butter and even porcupine urine to coax the cautious critters toward cameras, but with only mixed success. In 34 years of both baited and unbaited camera surveys by the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in the Sierra Nevada, porcupines have only shown up three times. “It’s a mystery,” said John Buckley, the center’s executive director. “We still don’t understand (why) they’re not reproducing and filling back in where there’s very little disturbance of their habitat, like Yosemite National Park.” The Karuk tribe is eager to bring porcupines back. But first, the tribe needs to figure out where healthy populations may already exist. Years of camera trap surveys have turned up scant evidence of the creature’s presence; one area that Tripp considers a “hotspot” had photographed a single porcupine. “That’s how rare they are,” Tripp said. So Karuk biologists are considering other methods, including using trained dogs to conduct scat surveys. Reintroducing the species would require a delicate balancing act. Porcupines are already scarce, and it’s unclear whether already-small source populations could afford to lose a few members to be reintroduced elsewhere. Still, Tripp feels like it’s time to act, since the ecosystem doesn’t appear to be healing on its own. “Things don’t seem to be getting better in over the course of my lifetime,” Tripp said. Yet his actions betray some lingering optimism. Tripp, his wife and daughter still regularly attend basket-weaving events involving quills, doing their part to uphold the Karuk’s age-old traditions that honor the porcupine. It’s a small act of stubborn hope—that, perhaps in a few years, the tribe will be able to welcome the porcupine home.

Humans killed millions of vultures. Now people are paying the price.

The near-extinction of vultures in India has had severe consequences.

Humans killed millions of vultures. Now people are paying the price.As vultures vanished, dogs multiplied, and rabies spread. Humans are living with the consequences.Johnson traveled to Bikaner, Hyderabad and Bangalore to report this story. This reporting was supported by the Pulitzer Center....moreJohnson traveled to Bikaner, Hyderabad and Bangalore to report this story. This reporting was supported by the Pulitzer Center....moreNovember 29, 2025 at 5:00 a.m. EST8 minutes agoBIKANER, India — Dogs roam a field of cattle carcasses at the Jorbeer dump in northern India, passing hollowed-out rib cages and tugging at pink flesh decaying in the sun. Nearby, workers skin hides for leather from the 40 carcasses that arrive daily, fighting heat and a suffocating stench.Competing with the dogs for carrion and circling the hazy skies above are vultures, remnants of a population almost completely wiped out by humans. Between 1992 and 2007, the populations of three species — the long-billed vulture, slender-billed vulture and white-rumped vulture — plummeted more than 100-fold from roughly 4 million to 32,000. The speed of the birds’ decline, scientists say, rivals the passenger pigeon’s plunge from 3 billion or more in the early 1800s to extinction in 1914.Some 800 miles south of the dump, in the city of Hyderabad, a slender boy named Maniteja, 7, lies beneath a pink blanket, unresponsive, breathing through a ventilator. His dark eyes drift. For nine months, no words have come from his lips, only small cries. The family leaves a window open, hoping the sounds of friends playing outside will pierce the fog and restore him to consciousness.A woman with other patients who have been bitten by a dog at Government Fever Hospital in Hyderabad, India. Syringes for treatment of dog bites at the only hospital in India dedicated to treating patients with infectious diseases, communicable diseases and dog bites. Last December, one of India’s estimated 62 million free-ranging dogs ― a population that surged as the vultures declined ― lunged at Maniteja and sank its teeth into his left shoulder. Although his parents got him vaccinated against rabies within an hour, a few weeks later the boy became feverish. On Jan. 18, a doctor asked if he knew the man beside him. “My papa,” Maniteja said, his last words before losing the ability to speak.The decimated vultures competing for dead cattle, the dogs that have become their rivals and the boy fighting for his life all form links in an ecological chain reaction, according to scientists. The sequence, triggered by human action that took a decade to identify, carries a warning as we drive Earth deeper into what many scientists consider to be a sixth mass extinction.When we endanger other species, we endanger ourselves.Dogs fight to claim their stake at carcasses, surrounded by vultures and other birds at the Jorbeer dump in northern India. Dogs, vultures and other birds descend upon carcasses of dead animals left at the Jorbeer dump site. A 2008 paper in the journal Ecological Economics found that between 1992 and 2007 the loss of vultures in India led to an estimated increase of about 5.5 million dogs, 38 million additional dog bites and more than 47,000 extra deaths from rabies.A paper published a year ago in the American Economic Review concluded that in certain districts, “the functional extinction of vultures — efficient scavengers who removed carcasses from the environment — increased human mortality by over 4% because of a large negative shock to sanitation.”That analysis considered not just rabies, but all human deaths related to the loss of vultures — including those from water contaminated by cattle carcasses. Researchers estimated that India suffered, on average, 104,386 additional deaths, and almost $70 billion in extra costs, each year.50 Species that Save UsThis series highlights emerging research on how plants and animals protect human health – and how their disappearance is already sickening thousands of people around the world.India has fought back, banning veterinary use of some chemicals harmful to vultures, establishing programs to protect the birds and launching campaigns to immunize free-ranging dogs against rabies. Conservationists even set up a few “vulture restaurants,” serving cow carcasses known to be safe for consumption.But the damage is hard to reverse.Vultures still face some toxic exposure, though at a lower level, and India’s push to modernize has added new threats: power lines and wind turbines. Captive-breeding programs are slow; vultures breed once a year, usually producing a single egg.“If you take 100 people from any city, it is very unlikely you will get anyone who will say they have seen a vulture,” said Chetan Misher, a wildlife researcher and ecologist who has been working in western India for the past decade.“If it remains like this for a long time, people will think they are imaginary birds.”The loss of vultures is all the more surprising given India’s reverence for animals.It is a country “that believes humans and animals coexist,” explained Kedar Girish Gore, director of the nonprofit Corbett Foundation in Mumbai, which is dedicated to wildlife conservation and environmental awareness.Signs of coexistence are everywhere. In the northwestern state of Rajasthan and in cities like Hyderabad in the south, cars, trucks and motorcycles share crowded roadways with free-ranging dogs and cattle, goats, schoolchildren and other pedestrians.Cows are revered: It is illegal in many states to kill them, even if they’re old or injured. Instead, people bring them to retirement homes called gaushalas where the cattle are fed and cared for by workers who consider it a sacred duty.“The main slogan in India is, ‘A cow is our mother,’” said Shree Gopalacharya, who manages a gaushala in Rajasthan where 70 workers care for about 1,800 bulls.In cities like Delhi, people put out chapati and milk for street dogs. Some even cook and distribute large amounts of chicken biryani, enough to feed up to 200 dogs, said Nishant Kumar, a DBT/Wellcome Trust fellow at the National Center for Biological Sciences in Bangalore.Rahul Malik, 27, administers anti-rabies vaccination to stray dogs in Noida, India. Stray dogs loiter in the neighborhood of Nizamuddin East in Delhi. Even vultures, a bird many in the West consider ugly and use as a metaphor for people who prey on others, enjoy widespread respect in India.Followers of Zoroastrianism, an ancient Persian faith, place their dead atop Towers of Silence for vultures to consume, thus freeing the soul without polluting the sacred elements: earth, fire and water.A vulture is even one of the heroes of Hindu mythology: Jatayu, the vulture demigod, sacrificed his life to save the goddess Sita.“The lesson we learn here is that every species, vultures included, no matter how ugly we think they are, they have sacrificed something that we as humans must decipher,” said Munir Virani, chief executive of the Mohamed Bin Zayed Raptor Conservation Fund in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. “They are giving us a warning.”For centuries, vultures provided a highly efficient sanitation system, cleaning the carcasses of millions of dead cattle.“You could argue that the way of life of Indian livestock farming kind of developed hand-in-hand with vultures,” said John Mallord, who works for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in Britain. “Without the vultures to clean up the environment, people wouldn’t have been able to just leave the cows where they [died] because it would have proved to be a disease threat.”Although other animals scavenge dead cattle, none do so as effectively as vultures. The birds will pick clean a bull carcass in 30 to 40 minutes.Vultures and humans have long collaborated on disposal of dead cattle. Workers removed the hides for leather, leaving the meat more accessible to birds. Vultures then cleaned the carcasses, leaving bones to be harvested by a second group of workers. Collectors sold the bones for use in fertilizer and animal feed.Biologists once counted India’s vultures among the world’s most common birds of prey. The birds often nested in gardens with large trees, including some foreign embassies, said Rhys Green, an honorary professor of conservation science at the University of Cambridge.Large numbers of vultures in India, seen in a 1967 photo. (Paolo Koch/Getty Images)A herd of cattle wait outside a cattle shed in Surdhana, India. Virani remembers being on a cricket tour in the late 1980s and walking along Malabar Hill in what was then Bombay, staring into a vulture-filled sky.“There could have been thousands,” he said.But in the mid-1990s letters began appearing in the Times of India noting the vultures’ disappearance. When people did see the birds, something seemed off.“They wouldn’t be flying around as they normally do. They would just sit there,” Green said. “The head and neck were pointing downwards, which is a thing vultures do when they’re sick.”The scale of the loss was staggering. If vultures were unable to breed in a given year, the overall population would decline about 5 percent, Green said. But road surveys showed that the three vulture species were declining far more rapidly, at rates of between 2o percent and 50 percent each year for many successive years. Between 1992 and 2007, the population of 2.9 million white-rumped vultures in India declined by 99.9 percent.Similar losses were occurring in Pakistan and Nepal.Vibhu Prakash, who worked for the Bombay Natural History Society and had been conducting vulture counts in a national park, sounded the alarm. His papers in biological journals in 1999 and 2003 raised a question no one could answer: What was killing the birds?To solve the mystery, a team of researchers led by American veterinary pathologist J. Lindsay Oaks performed meticulous postmortems on dead white-rumped vultures in Pakistan. They found that 85 percent had visceral gout, which can occur when birds’ kidneys fail.Oaks, who would die in 2011, knew that painkillers called nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories caused kidney failure in certain birds of prey. When members of Oaks’s team surveyed dozens of veterinarians and drug retailers, they learned of a livestock medicine that was toxic to kidneys: diclofenac. The painkiller, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory also given to humans, was widely used to treat sick and dying cattle for pain, fever and inflammation.Laborers skin the carcasses of dead animals even as dogs feed on them at the Jorbeer dump yard in northern India. Scientists tested a subset of the dead vultures, comparing those that had visceral gout with those that did not. Tests revealed diclofenac residue in every bird with kidney failure. Every dead bird that contained no diclofenac showed no signs of kidney failure. When they fed 20 vultures meat from animals treated with various doses of diclofenac, 13 died of renal failure.The timing made sense. The drug’s main international patent had expired in 1993, leading to the approval of cheaper generic versions in India.Vultures diagramAfter the journal Nature published Oaks’s results, other researchers confirmed his findings, and conservationists held conferences on the fate of the vultures. In 2006, Green and the Indian Veterinary Research Institute identified meloxicam as a painkiller safe for vultures.The Indian government enacted a ban on veterinary use of diclofenac that took effect in May 2006, a little more than two years after the drug was found to be lethal to the birds. Pakistan and Nepal issued bans of their own in 2006.“That is actually very quick for how these things work,” Green said. The United States took a decade to ban DDT after the book “Silent Spring” showed the harm pesticides were doing to birds and other wildlife.Even after the diclofenac ban, the number of vultures continued to decline, reaching 19,000 in 2015. Subsequently, three more painkillers given to cows were found to be toxic to vultures and were banned in India.Rabies and the rise of the dogsAs scientists sought an explanation for the vulture decline, the ecosystem changed dramatically.“Dogs have replaced vultures as the main scavenger at carcass dumps monitored,” according to the 2008 paper in Ecological Economics. “It is thus reasonable to assume that the increase in dogs has partially resulted from the decline in vultures.”Estimates of the nation’s dog population vary widely ― anywhere from 15 million in India’s 2019 Livestock Census to as high as 80 million in some news reports. The most common figure is about 62 million.More dogs, researchers found, translated into more dog bites and more deaths from rabies in a country that accounts for 36 percent of worldwide deaths from the disease.Before 1960, rabies killed several hundred people a year in the U.S. Widespread vaccination of pets, however, reduced human deaths to a rarity; in 2024, there were only four deaths in the U.S., none caused by dog bites.A woman waits for her turn to receive treatment for a dog bite in the emergency room at Government Fever Hospital in Hyderabad. The hospital has received 32 cases of rabies this year through mid-November. A man who was bitten by a dog receives treatment at the hospital. In India, someone is bitten by a dog every two seconds, and 18,000 to 20,000 people die each year of rabies, according to the World Health Organization (though the Indian government reported just 54 deaths from rabies in 2024). The government introduced an ambitious rabies plan in 2021 that set a goal of eliminating human deaths from the disease by 2030.Rabies, which has a fatality rate approaching 100 percent, is transmitted through saliva. Once the virus enters the body it creeps along the nerves into the central nervous system, producing fever, nausea, flu-like symptoms and finally coma and death.“By the time the patients come with symptoms you are at the point of no return,” said Lokesh Lingappa, a doctor who has treated the disease at Rainbow Children’s Hospital in Hyderabad’s Banjara Hills.He recalls the case of a 5-year-old boy whose parents brought him to the hospital with only a scratch. They had not even seen a dog bite the boy, Lingappa said, “but maybe there was a lick on some open cut.”A boy who got a dog bite cries as he receives treatment at the hospital. The child, who had not been vaccinated, soon developed aerophobia, an intense fear of puffs of fresh air and a symptom of rabies. The parents “wanted us to say this is not rabies,” Lingappa recalled; he had to tell them that it was. The boy died a week later.In Hyderabad, Maniteja’s relatives watch his bedside in shifts covering every hour of every day. The boy’s mother starts at 6 in the morning and does not finish until 11 at night. She prepares his liquid feedings ― rice water, carrot juice and vegetable soup.Maniteja’s father watches him from 11 at night until 3 in the morning, when an uncle takes over for the last three hours. Before the dog bite, the boy played with friends and rode his bicycle. Today, he receives 30-minute physical therapy sessions.To care for Maniteja at home, his family rents medical equipment at a cost of about $900 a month. The father’s job in technical support pays up to $800 a month, leaving money a constant worry. “What can we do?” the father said.The boy cannot recognize his mother and father at his bedside. Sometimes his father strokes his forehead calling, “Maniteja? Maniteja? Maniteja?” searching for some response. “My heart is breaking watching my child like this,” his father said.A hospital staff member looks at the queue of patients. Free-ranging dogs have long posed a challenge for India.“There is a dog right next to the place where we have our research camp in Delhi, and it has bitten 150 people, probably more in the last three years,” Kumar explained. “And you cannot remove the dog because that dog is protected by the people who love it.”In the summer, India’s Supreme Court ordered authorities in Delhi and its suburbs to round up all street dogs and put them in shelters, then modified the order after criticism. Strays must now be taken to shelters, immunized and sterilized, but then returned to the streets they live on.Kumar said the Indian concept of “community dogs” that live in a neighborhood is complex, and it varies according to economic means, where people live, and many other factors.In a research paper yet to be published, Kumar noted, “We are witnessing two parallel realities: visible acts of kindness masking invisible cycles of suffering.”Stemming vulture extinctionA few hours southwest of Bangalore, 25 to 30 breeding pairs of long-billed vultures, also known as Indian vultures, once nested in the cliffs at the Ramadevarabetta Vulture Sanctuary.“That was over 30 years ago, and now we are down to just one breeding pair,” said Chris Bowden, vulture conservation program manager for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. “We’re hoping those vultures will come back later this evening because they generally roost here.”On a hot day in early October, hours passed, and the pair was never spotted in the country’s only designated vulture sanctuary. It is uncertain whether long-billed vultures in the area will rebuild from the single pair.“We hope they will,” said Bowden, who advises the Saving Asia’s Vultures From Extinction consortium. But protecting them in “this spectacular rocky landscape is not enough to protect them from the main threats.”Green and others have carried out undercover surveys of Indian pharmacies to see how many still sell diclofenac for veterinary use. While more veterinarians are now using vulture-safe meloxicam, Green said, “the amount of toxic diclofenac in cattle didn’t go down to zero.” The problem, he said, has been a lack of awareness and enforcement.Conservationists have also taken steps to discourage deliberate poisonings, a practice in which farmers who have suffered livestock losses from other predators put out poison bait. Vultures die by consuming either the bait or the bodies of poisoned predators.Birds claim their stake to the remains of a dead animal at the Jorbeer dump site. Birds and dogs surround a landscape of carcasses of dead animals at the Jorbeer dump site. For 20 years, the Corbett Foundation has provided immediate compensation to farmers who lose livestock to predators. Gore, the director, estimates the group has paid out for about 20,000 livestock kills.Yet experts say it is unlikely the vulture will ever play the role it once did, a role the Madras High Court once as described as not a scavenger, but a “natural sanitary worker.”Some people now bury cattle carcasses, putting them out of the reach of vultures. When carcasses are left in the open at places like the Jorbeer dump, the competition can be fierce. Misher, the ecologist in western India, has watched dogs harass and chase vultures.Mallord at the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said the vultures’ population crash is over, though “it’s too early to crack open the bottle of champagne.”It once seemed unthinkable that birds as common as India’s vultures could approach extinction. But the same was true of the passenger pigeon, Mallord said.“Nothing’s safe.”About this storyPhotography by Saumya Khandelwal. G.B.S.N.P. Varma contributed to this report. Design, development and illustrations by Hailey Haymond. Editing by Lynh Bui, Maya Valentine, Joe Moore and Juliet Eilperin. Copy editing by Dorine Bethea.

UK MPs push for extra aid and visas as Jamaica reels from Hurricane Melissa

Dawn Butler leads calls for humanitarian visas and fee waivers for vulnerable relatives of UK nationals affected by stormBritish MPs have joined campaigners calling for more aid and humanitarian visas for Jamaicans to enter the UK after Hurricane Melissa demolished parts of the country, plunging hundreds of thousands of people into a humanitarian crisis.The UK has pledged £7.5m emergency funds to Jamaica and other islands affected by the hurricane, but many argue that the country has a moral obligation to do more for former Caribbean colonies. Continue reading...

British MPs have joined campaigners calling for more aid and humanitarian visas for Jamaicans to enter the UK after Hurricane Melissa demolished parts of the country, plunging hundreds of thousands of people into a humanitarian crisis.The UK has pledged £7.5m emergency funds to Jamaica and other islands affected by the hurricane, but many argue that the country has a moral obligation to do more for former Caribbean colonies.Dawn Butler, the Labour MP for Brent East and chair of the UK’s all-party parliamentary group on Jamaica, posted on X a letter she had written to the home secretary requesting temporary humanitarian visas and fee waivers for vulnerable relatives of UK nationals affected by the storm.Butler said that at an emergency meeting in her constituency, which has one of the UK’s largest Jamaican populations, there were calls to ease visa restrictions for children and elderly people affected by the hurricane who could stay with relatives in the UK.“The UK has a long and enduring relationship with Jamaica and I am confident that, with compassion and collaboration, we can play a vital role in supporting those most in need during the difficult period,” the letter says.Diane Abbott, the MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, supported Butler’s calls and said Jamaica needed long-term assistance.Dawn Butler has called for greater support for Jamaicans affected by Hurricane Melissa. Photograph: Jane Barlow/PA“I think when the hurricane first hit, the immediate anxiety over here was to bring back the tourists. And once the tourists had come back, it kind of fell away from the public eye. And there was a sense as well that it was essentially a short-term project.“People need to understand the gravity of the situation. And that it’s going to take a long time and a lot of resources to [rebuild] Black River and [other affected] districts,” she said.The Windrush activist Euen Herbert-Small said the UK should offer humanitarian protection similar to that given to Ukrainians affected by war, which allowed Ukraine nationals and their immediate family members to come to the UK under the Homes for Ukraine sponsorship scheme.“Jamaica is a Commonwealth country. The king is head of state. Ukraine doesn’t have those same historical and present links. And so there is a greater responsibility to support Jamaica, which has strong historical ties with this country and has made this country wealthy over the years. We did it for Ukraine. We can definitely do it for Jamaica,” said Herbert-Small, who has launched a petition calling for humanitarian visas for Jamaicans affected by Melissa.Before-and-after views show Hurricane Melissa damage to Jamaican town – videoRosalea Hamilton, the chief executive of the nonprofit Lasco Chin foundation, which has been assisting hurricane-hit communities in Jamaica, echoed Herbert-Small’s sentiments, as she described the staggering need for support on the ground.“The king is our head of state and there is an expectation on the part of ordinary Jamaicans that … it ought to mean that in a time of crisis, there is at least some kind of a special consideration or something that would flow from the fact that he’s still head of state,” she said.She added that the comparatively small contribution from the UK “further erodes the idea that we need and should still hold on to” King Charles as head of state.According to recent reports, nearly 1 million of Jamaica’s roughly 2.8 million people were affected by the hurricane, and about 150,000 homes were damaged or destroyed. The prime minister, Andrew Holness, has estimated losses at about US$8bn (£6bn).skip past newsletter promotionNesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the worldPrivacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.after newsletter promotionPearnel Charles, Jamaica’s minister of labour and social security, said the government had been trying to get aid to the hundreds of thousands of people in need. It was also assessing the damage to homes as well as longer-term needs, including psychological support.“Our social workers are consistently on the ground, and we continue to open up our hotlines to ensure that if we get that information we attend to it as quickly as possible,” he said.About 150,000 homes in Jamaica were damaged or destroyed by the hurricane. Photograph: Matias Delacroix/APThe country is also battling a deadly outbreak of leptospirosis, with 91 suspected cases and 11 confirmed deaths. Jamaica’s health minister, Dr Christopher Tufton, said: “We had to declare an outbreak because of the spike in the number of cases when compared to usual times.” He added that hospitals were equipped to detect and treat the disease.In Britain, the Green party also called for more support for Jamaica, linking climate justice to the legacy of enslavement. The party’s foreign affairs spokesperson said the UK had a “huge historical responsibility in relation to the legacy of slavery”.Ellie Chowns said: “We, as a country, have got to go further and faster to meet our obligations under our international climate targets, but also recognising that wider moral responsibility for the effects of hundreds of years of burning fossil fuels and the warming that that has led to now.“That, coupled with the legacy of slavery, simply can’t be ignored as part of the context of Hurricane Melissa and similar disasters affecting the Caribbean.”The Global Afro-Descendant Climate Justice Collaborative has argued that Melissa’s devastation in Cuba, Haiti and Jamaica is a stark example of how African-descended people are disproportionately affected by centuries of environmental degradation.It said: “Global warming began with the Industrial Revolutions that were made possible by the resources provided by imperialism, colonialism and enslavement.”

No Results today.

Our news is updated constantly with the latest environmental stories from around the world. Reset or change your filters to find the most active current topics.

Join us to forge
a sustainable future

Our team is always growing.
Become a partner, volunteer, sponsor, or intern today.
Let us know how you would like to get involved!

CONTACT US

sign up for our mailing list to stay informed on the latest films and environmental headlines.

Subscribers receive a free day pass for streaming Cinema Verde.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.